Diffractive Multifocal IOL Prof. Dr. Daniel H. Scorsetti

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DR. FAİK ORUCOV İSTANBUL SURGERY HOSPİTAL DEPARTMANT OF CATARACT AND REFRACTİVE SURGERY Accomodative and Multifocal IOL implantations i s t a n b u l c.
Advertisements

Dr H. Razmjoo Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Multifocal IOLs
Comparison of Visual Outcomes With Toric IOL and With Limbal Relaxing Incisions in Cataract Surgery Eriko Fukuyama, MD Fukuyama Eye Clinic Fukuoka, Japan.
Goals of Cataract Surgery Provide a Full Range of Vision Minimize Dependence on Glasses Including Reading Glasses and Bifocals Improve Lifestyle Activities.
R. Lehmann, MD ASCRS 2008 Clinically Relevant Advantages in the Functional Performance of the AcrySof ® IQ IOL Robert P. Lehmann, MD, FACS Lehmann Eye.
Multifocal Intraocular Lenses & Contrast Sensitivity
NEW TRULIGN™ TORIC IOL Surgeon Training
A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Evaluation of Patients with Contralateral Implantation of Two Aspheric Acrylic Intraocular Lenses R. Cionni, MD.
Eltutar, Kadir; Akcetin, Tulay A.; Ozcelik, N. Demet Istanbul Education and Research Hospital Department of Ophthalmology The authors state that they have.
Ruth Lapid-Gortzak MD PhD 1,2, Jan Willem van der Linden BOpt 2, and Ivanka J. van der Meulen MD 1,2 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Medical Center,
Disclosure of finanacial interest * Author has no financial interest in this paper. ** Author's research is partially funded by Imperial Medical Technologies.
Multifocal and Toric IOLs: An Update on the Resident Experience M. Allison Roensch, MD, Preston H. Blomquist, MD, Nalini K Aggarwal, MD, Justin W. Charton,
Progressive Multifocal Intraocular Lens G. Rubiolini M.D. Italy Disclosure of finanacial interest Author's research is partially funded.
1 Clinical Performance of the Crystalens® AO Guy M. Kezirian, MD, FACS.
Retrospective Comparison of 3177 Eyes Implanted with Presbyopic IOLs Carlos Buznego MD Elizabeth A. Davis MD, FACS Guy M. Kezirian MD, FACS William B.
REFRACTIVE ASPECTS OF CATARACT SURGERY. OPTICAL CORRECTIONS AFTER CATARACT EXTRACTION.
M. Allison Roensch, MD, Preston H. Blomquist, MD, Nalini K Aggarwal, MD, James P. McCulley, MD Department of Ophthalmology University of Texas Southwestern.
Justin Charton, MD, Preston H. Blomquist, MD, Nalini K. Aggarwal, MD, James P. McCulley, MD University of Texas Southwestern Department of Ophthalmology.
Functional Vision With Apodized Diffractive Aspheric Multifocal IOL With +3.0 D Add Jonathan M. Davidorf, MD Los Angeles, CA ASCRS Annual Symposium March,
Managing the Refractive “Surprise” After Toric IOL Placement Managing the Refractive “Surprise” After Toric IOL Placement Brad H Feldman, MD Derek DelMonte,
Hyun Seung Kim, M.D. Department of Ophthalmology, St. Mary’s hospital, The Catholic University of Korea Changes in Astigmatism After Clear Corneal Temporal.
Nizar S Abdelfattah, M.D.1, Marina Israel2, Nermin Osman, M.D.3,
Bret Fisher, MD The Eye Center of North Florida Panama City, FL
PIGGYBACK IMPLANTATION OF FOR HIGH HYPEROPIA 24 MONTHS FOLLOW UP JL. FEBBRARO I.VIELPEAU, F. KRIFA, S.BERBACHE, S. GANEM Department of Ophthalmology S.
Recent Advances in Intraocular Lenses Jim Schwiegerling, PhD Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences Optical Sciences.
Blended vision after bilateral monofocal cataract surgery: an evaluation of spectacle independence and vision related quality of life Allison Landes, MD.
USAMA MOURIS BEBAWY, MB MBCh CLINICAL FELLOW, MCMASTER UNIV No Financial Disclosure GEORGE H.H. BEIKO, B.M.,B.Ch.,FRCSC ST. CATHARINES, CANADA ASSIST PROF,
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon.
Unilateral multifocal lens implantation in patients with a contralateral monofocal or phakic eye is a viable presbyopic correction option Robert J. Cionni,
Neeti Parikh, MD Fuxiang Zhang, MD Department of Ophthalmology Henry Ford Hospital A Comparison Of Patient Satisfaction With Modified Monovision Versus.
Outcomes after WIOL – CF accommodative intraocular lens implantation Institute of Vision and Optics University of Crete School of Medicine Heraklion, Crete.
A Fellow Eye Comparison of Aberrations, Modulation Transfer Function and Contrast Sensitivity After AcrySof IQ and AcrySof Natural IOL Implantation. Mayank.
Astigmatism management with toric intraocular lenses in cataract patients Adriano Guarnieri 1-2, Luis W. Lu 3-4, Alfonso Arias- Puente INCIVI, Madrid,
Kaori Morii, M.D. Shinji Miura, M.D, Ph.D. Dept. of Ophthalmology, Asagiri Hospital, Hyogo, JPN We have no financial interest. This retrospective study.
Multifocal Intraocular Lenses Abdullah Al-assiri Mansour Farooqui Abdulrahman Al-Muammar Saudi Ophthalmology Meeting 2009.
AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Aspheric IOL. Aspheric IOL AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® 2 AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Aspheric IOL SN6AD3 Add Power: +4 D Spectacle Plane: 3.2 D Range:
Controversies about binocular function and patient satisfaction after induced conventional monovision in case of bilateral intraocular lens implantation.
DR. TEJAS D. SHAH AMDAVAD EYE LASER HOSPITALS PVT LTD GOOD BYE GLASSES LASER CENTRE AHMEDABAD, INDIA NO FINANCIAL INTEREST
S. Lee/M.Kim 2010 M. Kim 1, H. Lee 1, S. Lee 1,, S.D. Lee 1 1 ASA-Vision Clinics Seoul Comparative Analysis Preliminary Results of.
LogMAR-Analysis of multifocal intraocular lenses: Clinical performance A. Mannsfeld, I.-J. Limberger, A. Ehmer, M.P. Holzer, G. U.Auffarth International.
AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Apodized Diffractive IOL. What is the AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® IOL? The AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® IOL incorporates an apodized diffractive optic.
Comparative Study of the Aspheric Akreos Adapt AO IOL Versus the Spherical Akreos Adapt IOL Maghizh Anandan Martin Leyland.
Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.
Comparison of 2 Models of Aspheric Diffractive Multifocal IOL
O.I.I. EC-3 Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens: The European Experience Thierry Amzallag, M.D. Institut Ophtalmique Somain, France.
Investigation of Multifocal Toric IOLs to Compensate for Corneal Astigmatism and to Provide Near, Intermediate, and Distance Vision José L. Rincón, MD.
Preliminary Results after Cataract Surgery with the Aspheric Acrysof ReSTOR IOL to Correct Presbyopia Meeting of the ASCRS Chicago 8-10 February 2007 R.M.M.A.
Inadvertent Insertion of an Opposite- Side Tecnis ZM900 Multifocal IOL Wilson Takashi Hida, M.D. Celso Takashi Nakano; Jonathan Lake;
Toric IOLs: wavefront aberrometry and quality of life Mencucci Rita Giordano Cristina, Stiko Ermelinda, Miranda Paolo, Eleonora Favuzza, Ugo Menchini Authors.
9-Month Results after Implantation of a new accommodative IOL that works with one focus Mark Tomalla M.D.* Clinic for Refractive and Ophthalmic Surgery,
F.I. Camesasca, MD Zeiss Invent ZO Aspheric IOL: Long-Term Results of Refractive and Aberrometric Analysis F. I. Camesasca* P. Vinciguerra.
INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) BASIC MONOFOCAL LENS ASTIGMATISM CORRECTING LENS CRYSTALENS AO TRULIGN TORIC TECNIS MULTIFOCALRESTOR METHOD OF CATARACT SURGERY.
Dissatisfication After Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation in Taiwan Yu Wei Lin, MD (Presenting Author); Ching-Ju Hsieh; Lin-Chung Woung The authors.
Multifocal lenses analysis with OQAS system Dr Alfredo Castillo Hospital Quirón Madrid ASCRS Chicago.
"Mix and Match" approach implantation
OUR EXPERIENCE WITH PRELOADED IOL CT LUCIA 601P(Y)
Postoperative Refraction and Patient Satisfaction after Bilateral Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Robert Cionni, MD Financial.
Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
Eye clinic of the 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
Evaluation of Akreos AO micro-incision IOL, implantation in 350 eyes :
MI60 INTRAOCULAR LENSES – OUR EXPERIENCE
Long Term Clinical Outcomes of Refractive Lens Exchange in Moderate     to High Hyperopia Frank Goes, BELGIUM Ascrs 2008.
Thomas Kohnen, MD Department of Ophthalmology
Comparison of vision with an accommodating IOL versus a multifocal IOL
None of the authors has a financial interest on the presented data.
성모병원 안센터 CHANGES IN ASTIGMATISM RELATIVE TO IOL HAPTIC INSERTION AXIS IN WITH-THE-RULE AND AGAINST-THE-RULE ASTIGMATISM PATIENTS Hyun Seung Kim, M.D.
David T. Vroman, MD Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology
Visual Outcomes and Satisfaction with Toric IOL Versus Monofocal IOL
Comparative Global Literature Review of Visual and Optical Quality of Refractive, Diffractive, and Hybrid IOL Designs James P. McCulley, MD Department.
Consultant Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth
Presentation transcript:

Diffractive Multifocal IOL Prof. Dr. Daniel H. Scorsetti EYEDIFF PLUS +3.50D Diffractive Multifocal IOL “A New Alternative” Prof. Dr. Daniel H. Scorsetti University of the Salvador - Catholic Pontificia University of Argentina Faculty of Medicine - Faculty of Medical Sciences Chair of Ophthalmology Buenos Aires, Argentina

Eyediff Plus +3.50D: Technical Specifications

EYEDIFF Plus Presbyopic IOL Diffractive Technology Perfect Light Distribution for Distance &Near( 60/40)‏ Addresses Cataract Patients with or without Presbyopia Allowed Patients a High Level of Freedom From Glasses in clinical trial

Full Optic Regular Diffractive IOL Advantages Provides multifocal vision Reduced pupil dependency Balanced distribution of light Able to tolerate some decentration

Full Optic Diffractive IOL Disadvantages Potential for Scattering of light and glare and halos at night but Advantages Provides multifocal vision Reduced pupil dependency Balanced distribution of light Able to tolerate some decentration * Creates Halos and scattering Light

Zones

EYEDIFF Plus - Predictable refractive outcome +3.00D Addition

EYEDIFF Plus - Predictable refractive outcome +3.50D Addition

EYEDIFF Plus - Predictable refractive outcome +4.00D Addition

Show Optic Far Intermediate Near

EYEDIFF PLUS – Predictable Customized LIO

EYEDIFF PLUS - Predictable refractive outcome Analysis of the mistake : Square root of the sum of the squares Warren E. Hill, MD, FACS

EYEDIFF PLUS - Predictable refractive outcome Analysis of the mistake : Square root of the sum of the squares Warren E. Hill, MD, FACS

Aspheric Optic (Aberration Neutral)

360° Square Edge

EYEDIFF Plus 360⁰Square Edge Edge thickness correspond to standard designed IOLs Square edge design Perfect centration in the capsular bag Perfect optical performance Extremely low incidence of PCO Anti Z effect Haptic design

IOL Power calculation Careful Keratometry 1.0D corneal power error affects 1.3 to 1.6D IOL power calculation Careful Axial Length 1.0mmAL error affects the post-operative refraction by 1.2 to 2.5D aprox. IOL Master: SRK II--------- 118.6  SRK T--------  118.4   Holladay 1 - sf--- 1.37   Haigis ----- a0=0.95, a1=0.4, a2=0.10   Hofer - pACD-- 5.17 Aim Emmetropia & Astigmatism <1.0D A-Const. & ACD ( Surgeon Factors)‏

Clinical Trial Objective: to compare the visual quality preop and postop., between 2 multifocal IOLs and 1 monofocal Material and methods : 60 eyes of 30 pts. divided into 3 groups, informed and signed assent, cataract degrees II and III, older than 55 years (average 60 years), without ocular disease or astigmatism > 1.0D. Bilateral implants, the same IOL in every patient (not mix and match) Equipment: Alcon Infinity Technique : Facotorsional with Ozil IP, 2.2mm (intrepid) Incision in the steepest axis and the same protocol in all cases Group 1: 10 pts. Acrysoft IQ Group 2: 10 pts. Acrysoft Restor Group 3: 10 pts. EYEDIFF PLUS +3.5D

Clinical Trial Preop Complete ocular exam: UCVA & BCVA: far, intermediate (70 cm) and near (40 cm) Pentacam HR IOL Master Contrast Sensibility : photopic and mesopic NEI VFQ-25 Questionnaire with Apéndix NEI VFQ-39 (in Spanish) 6 questions to evaluate visual general health 20 questions to evaluate difficulties in visual activities 13 questions to evaluate level of acceptance of visual loss NEI VFQ: National Eye Institute, Visual Function Questionnaire

Clinical Trial Postop complete examination : days 1 - 7- 30 - 90 UCVA & BCVA: far, intermediate (70 cm) and near (40 cm) Pentacam HR Contrast Sensibility : photopic and mesopic NEI VFQ-25 Questionnaire with Apéndix NEI VFQ-39 (in Spanish) 6 questions to evaluate visual general health 20 questions to evaluate difficulties in visual activities 13 questions to evaluate level of acceptance of visual loss Follow-up 3 months

Results Questionnaire Group 2 and 3: better in postop. to read newspaper and close vision activities. Group 3: less difficulty in night driving, But without statistically significant difference with 2. Group1: statistical significant difference to favor to drive by night Without intraop complications Without PCO Descentrations 2 minor in group 2 1 minor in group 3 Halos/Glare 3 tolerable in group 2 2 tolerable in group 3

Results FAR – GROUP 1: Acrysoft IQ UCVA BCVA

Results FAR – GROUP 2: Acrysoft Restor UCVA BCVA

Results FAR – GROUP 3: EYEDIFF PLUS UCVA BCVA

Results NEAR – GROUP 2: Acrysoft Restor UCVA BCVA

Results NEAR – GROUP 3: EYEDIFF PLUS AV S/C AV C/C

Intermediate Vision (70 cm) GROUP 2 Acrysof Restor DECIMAL DISTANCE INTERMEDIATE WITHOUT CORRECTION 0.4 70 cm INTERMEDIATE WITH CORRECTION 1.0 GROUP 3 – EYEDIFF PLUS DECIMAL DISTANCE INTERMEDIATE WITHOUT CORRECTION 0.5 70 cm INTERMEDIATE WITH CORRECTION 1.0

EYEDIFF Plus

EYEDIFF Plus

Conclusions Less adverse effects Good results post-surgery Individual map with MTF and topography of IOL power Variety of powers for near First Customized IOL Cost

Thank you very much!!! danielhs@arnet.com.ar