Alberto Loarte 7 th ITPA Divertor Meeting – Toronto 6/9 – 11 – 2006 1 ITER Issue Card PFC-4. Modification of geometry of the divertor PFCs and neutral.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to do wall conditioning in ITER ? # B tor cycles is limited GDC inefficient in B Drawbacks of ECWC, Taylor Ion cyclotron wall conditioning (ICWC) J.
Advertisements

G. Arnoux (1/19) SEWG on transient heat loads Ljubljana, 02/10/2009 Heat load measurements on JET first wall during disruptions G. Arnoux, M. Lehnen, A.
A new look at the specification of ITER plasma wall interaction and tritium retention J. Roth a, J. Davis c, R. Doerner d, A. Haasz c, A. Kallenbach a,
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
ASIPP HT-7 belt limiter Houyang Guo, Sizhen Zhu and Jiangang Li Investigation of EAST Divertor Asymmetry in Plasma Detachment & Target Power Loading Using.
Barbora Gulejová 1 of 12 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas SPS Annual Meeting in Lausanne, 14/2/2006 SOLPS5 modelling of ELMing H-mode on TCV.
1 CENTER for EDGE PLASMA SCIENCES C E PS Status of Divertor Plasma Simulator – II (DiPS-II) 2 nd PMIF Workshop Sep. 19, 2011 Julich, Germany H.-J. Woo.
Spectroscopy of hydrocarbon in low temperature plasmas : Results from JT-60U T. Nakano J apan A tomic E nergy A gency, Ibaraki, Japan. 6-9/11/2006 ITPA.
1 ITPA - DSOL - TorontoS. Brezinsek TEC Hydrocarbon spectroscopy on EU tokamaks S. Brezinsek on behalf of the EU task force for Plasma-Wall Interaction.
Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Update on Thermal Loads during disruptions and VDEs A. Loarte.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER.
The main function of the divertor is minimizing the helium and impurity content in the plasma as well as exhausting part of the plasma thermal power. The.
H. D. Pacher 1, A. S. Kukushkin 2, G. W. Pacher 3, V. Kotov 4, G. Janeschitz 5, D. Reiter 4, D. Coster 6 1 INRS-EMT, Varennes, Canada; 2 ITER Organization,
M.E. Fenstermacher - Summary of Progress and Outlook for Work Plan in PEP ITPA WG on RMP ELM Control 4/23/09 11:15 PM 1 PEP ITPA Working Group on RMP ELM.
Nils P. Basse Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA USA ABB seminar November 7th, 2005 Measurements.
Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Current Plans for ITER Hydrogen Phase Presented by A. Loarte with.
M. Yoda, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, D. L. Sadowski, B. H. Mills, and J. D. Rader G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Updated Thermal Performance of.
1 Greenwald FESAC, Aug. 07 Whyte First Wall Issues: ITER to DEMO D.G. Whyte, B. Lipschultz Plasma Science & Fusion Center, MIT, Cambridge USA Greenwald.
Divertor/SOL contribution IEA/ITPA meeting Naka Nov. 23, 2003 Status and proposals of IEA-LT/ITPA collaboration Multi-machine Experiments Presented by.
Alberto Loarte 9 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Meeting IPP-Garching 7-10/5/ Report on ITER Design Review Sub-group on : Heat and Particle Loads.
H-mode characteristics close to L-H threshold power ITPA T&C and Pedestal meeting, October 09, Princeton Yves Martin 1, M.Greenwald, A.Hubbard, J.Hughes,
1 Modeling of EAST Divertor S. Zhu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Determination of Carbon Release Mechanisms in the DIII-D Divertor from Analysis.
Selection of Plasma Facing Components for ITER and ITER Operational plan V. Chuyanov (Thanks to Y. Shimomura ) ITPA Garching May
9th ITPA Confinement Database and Modelling Topical Physics Group meeting in St. Petersburg 1/5 NF paper on H-mode confinement DB3 Darren McDonald.
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgement s: R. Maingi 2, D. A. Gates 3, J. Menard 3, R. Raman 4, R. E. Bell 3, C. E. Bush 2, R. Kaita 3, H. W. Kugel 3, B.
W coating of CFC tiles for the JET new wall - Task Agreement: JW6-TA-EP2-ILC-05 Manufacturing and testing of W-coated CFC tiles for installation in JET.
1 US PFC Meeting, UCLA, August 3-6, 2010 PFC Activities in Alcator C-Mod G.M. Wright, H. Barnard, B. Lipschultz, D.G. Whyte, S. Wukitch Plasma Science.
Maingi p.1 Supported by Office of Science The Edge Physics Program During Initial Operation in NCSX Rajesh Maingi Oak Ridge National Laboratory For the.
Divertor Design Considerations for CFETR
High  p experiments in JET and access to Type II/grassy ELMs G Saibene and JET TF S1 and TF S2 contributors Special thanks to to Drs Y Kamada and N Oyama.
ITPA DSOL meeting, Toronto W. Fundamenski9/11/2006 TF-E Introduction to ELM power exhaust: Overview of experimental observations W.Fundamenski Euratom/UKAEA.
ITPA - Meeting, Toronto; Session 3 - High Z studies 3 - High-Z studies (Chair - A. Herrmann) 16:25 (0:10) A. Herrmann - Introduction 16:35.
Transport of deuterium - tritium neutrals in ITER divertor M. Z. Tokar and V.Kotov Plasma and neutral gas in ITER divertor will be mixed of deuterium and.
1ITPA meeting IOS, Oct 2011Arne Kallenbach IOS-1.2 Study seeding effects on ITER demo discharges (Oct 2011) - closely related to IOS-1.1, development of.
NSTX-U cryo/particle control discussion #8 December 19, 2012 What have we done, or plan to do to be responsive to PAC questions, and in prep for 5 year.
Planned Theory Contributions to the FY’2011 Joint Research Target on Pedestal Research R. J. Hawryluk Thanks to the Pedestal Working Group: C-S Chang,
PPPL International Collaboration Activities J. R. Wilson Head Off-site Research Department Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 4th US-PRC Magnetic Fusion.
Introduction of 9th ITPA Meeting, Divertor & SOL and PEDESTAL Jiansheng Hu
Background Long term tritium retention is one of the most critical issues for ITER during the tritium phase. It is mandatory to evaluate the long term.
R. A. Pitts et al. 1 (12) IAEA, Chengdu Oct ELM transport in the JET scrape-off layer R. A. Pitts, P. Andrew, G. Arnoux, T.Eich, W. Fundamenski,
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Task Force S1 J.Ongena 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon Towards the realization on JET of an.
O-36, p 1(10) G. Arnoux 18 th PSI, Toledo, 26-30/05/2008 Divertor heat load in ITER-like advanced tokamak scenarios on JET G.Arnoux 1,(3), P.Andrew 1,
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
TRANSP for core particle transport studies M. Maslov.
1 EAST Recent Progress on Long Pulse Divertor Operation in EAST H.Y. Guo, J. Li, G.-N. Luo Z.W. Wu, X. Gao, S. Zhu and the EAST Team 19 th PSI Conference.
ERO code development A. Kirschner M. Airila, D. Borodin, S. Droste, C. Niehoff  The ERO code  ERO code management  Modelling of CH 4 puffing in ASDEX.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION FDF: PWI issues and research opportunities Peter Stangeby University of Toronto.
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
ELM propagation and fluctuations characteristics in H- and L-mode SOL plasmas on JT-60U Nobuyuki Asakura 1) N.Ohno 2), H.Kawashima 1), H.Miyoshi 3), G.Matsunaga.
Fast response of the divertor plasma and PWI at ELMs in JT-60U 1. Temporal evolutions of electron temperature, density and carbon flux at ELMs (outer divertor)
Page 1 Alberto Loarte- NSTX Research Forum st - 3 rd December 2009  ELM control by RMP is foreseen in ITER to suppress or reduce size of ELM energy.
Radiation divertor experiments in the HL-2A tokamak L.W. Yan, W.Y. Hong, M.X. Wang, J. Cheng, J. Qian, Y.D. Pan, Y. Zhou, W. Li, K.J. Zhao, Z. Cao, Q.W.
J. Roth: ITPA SOL/DIV, Avila, Jan Prediction of ITER T retention levels with W PFCs J. Roth, and the SEWG Fuel retention of the EU Task Force on.
1 Estimating the upper wall loading in ITER Peter Stangeby with help from J Boedo 1, D Rudikov 1, A Leonard 1 and W Fundamenski 2 DIII-D 1 JET 2 10 th.
Alberto Loarte 7 th ITPA Divertor Meeting – Toronto 6/9 – 11 – ITER Issue Card FW-3. Modification of Upper Be-blanket modules, material and/or PFC.
1 V.A. Soukhanovskii/IAEA-FEC/Oct Developing Physics Basis for the Radiative Snowflake Divertor at DIII-D by V.A. Soukhanovskii 1, with S.L. Allen.
Evaluation of a Field Aligned ICRF Antenna in Alcator C-Mod 24th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference San Diego, USA October S.J. Wukitch, D. Brunner,
Deposition in the MKII - Gas Box Divertor Deposition in Septum
Major aims of IPP-NIFS collaboration on divertor physics
Improving confidence in the materials choices for ITER
Presented by T. Sugie (ITER-IT) N. Yoshida (Kyushu University, Japan)
L-H power threshold and ELM control techniques: experiments on MAST and JET Carlos Hidalgo EURATOM-CIEMAT Acknowledgments to: A. Kirk (MAST) European.
Progress on the application of ELM control schemes to ITER scenarios from the non-active phase to DT operation Alberto Loarte G. Huijsmans, S. Futatani,
Dynamics of transient divertor re-attachment
ITER consequences of JET 13C migration experiments Jim Strachan, PPPL Jan. 7, 2008 Modeled JET 13C migration for last 2 years- EPS 07 and NF paper in prep.
Status of the ARIES Program
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
The operational window for divertor detachment in a fusion reactor – A physics-technology integrated approach FIP/P7-12 Background: The reactor throughput.
Presentation transcript:

Alberto Loarte 7 th ITPA Divertor Meeting – Toronto 6/9 – 11 – ITER Issue Card PFC-4. Modification of geometry of the divertor PFCs and neutral by-pass leaks A. Loarte, T. Tanabe, H.D. Pacher, A. Kukushkin, G. Pacher

Alberto Loarte 7 th ITPA Divertor Meeting – Toronto 6/9 – 11 – Outline of the ITER Design/Assumptions Divertor design in ITER optimised to meet various requirements and based on B2-Eirene modelling  W baffle for  R sep > 6 cm  Dome  eq  R sep = 1 cm  Separation between cassettes ~ 5 mm Aims of divertor design  Allow access to q div peak < 10 MWm -2 for conditions compatible with Q DT = 10  n He / < 6%  P main chamber /P div ~  P PFR above-dome / P PFR under-dome ~ 10 Key ingredients of the design : Dome & V-shape near strike point

Alberto Loarte 7 th ITPA Divertor Meeting – Toronto 6/9 – 11 – Issue We know now that :  Under a given divertor leak rate main chamber pressure/plasma flux is determined by anomalous transport  Effect of septum in JET experiments is weak and only seen in one configuration  “Corner” or V-shape effect on detachment seen in JET and ASDEX-Upgrade but quantitative comparison with modelling remains outstanding  Modelling of plasma conditions in ITER requires inclusion of non-linear effects as proven by Alcator C-mod modelling  Geometry influence with non-linear effects weaker Issues  Requirements on divertor neutral leakage, helium pumping, detachment access, etc., and B2-Eirene modelling without non-linear effects have lead to a divertor design which has a restricted plasma configuration flexibility  Presence of dome may lead to hydrocarbon deposition in zones of difficult access  How long should be the CFC part of the target ?

Alberto Loarte 7 th ITPA Divertor Meeting – Toronto 6/9 – 11 – Actions  Review critical effects that influence ITER divertor modelling results  Perform experimental/modelling quantitative assessment of above effects  Evaluate divertor performance with simplified geometry (i.e. without dome) with validated physics models  Evaluate trade-off between increased plasma configuration flexibility and other possible restrictions (reduction of detachment operation window, required pumping for He removal, …)  Evaluate pro’s and con’s of presence of dome with respect to hydrocarbon deposition/removal  Evaluate effect of increased cassette gap on divertor performance and perform optimisation (leak rate vs. feasibility of installation) Benefits to ITER : Larger device flexibility to explore magnetic configurations Implications in Cost and Schedule : Depending on outcome a simpler divertor would result on a cost saving and no impact on schedule Risks : Loss of diagnostics. Changes to detachment access and its compatibility with H-mode operation ?