Level 1 Ecological Survey Report Requirements ODOT -- Office of Environmental Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Field Survey Methods Eco surveys generally employ a descriptive or qualitative approach towards data collection. Eco surveys generally.
Advertisements

OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. ECOLOGICAL TRAINING INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION SURVEY SURVEY LITERATURE REVIEW LITERATURE REVIEW FIELD SURVEY METHODS.
GEORGETOWN COUNTY STORMWATER DIVISION Breakfast Series #3 How to Prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan January 14, 2009.
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
Ecological Survey Reports The level of ESR Report is determined by the type of project and its probable level of impacts.
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
Culvert Inventory and Assessment Protocol 2015 Field Season.
Culvert Inventory and Assessment Protocol 2012 Field Season.
Training on scientific sampling methods: Stray Dogs of Detroit Sampling Tutorial.
Wetland Critical Areas - Draft Ordinance Overview 18.20: Definitions Many new definitions added for clarity when used in the regulations and several unnecessary.
Project Collaboration In 1999, as a result of several years of monitoring of neotropical migratory birds such as the willow flycatcher, Jim Steele from.
April 14, Indicate every resource type proposed for impact on the Application: Tidal Wetland (short form for some projects) Nontidal Wetland Waterway.
Section 106 Clearance Application Missouri Local Programs How to Complete the Application for Section 106 Clearance.
THE PROPOSED WOUS DETAIL DEFINITION “A PRACTITIONER’S VIEW” Presented by: Richard W. Whiteside, PhD, CWB, CSE Corblu Ecology Group, LLC.
S.R. 256 Road Reconstruction Project From City of Austin to S.R. 203 Thursday, February 6, 2014 Austin Elementary School 6:00 p.m.
USAID Africa Bureau EIA Procedures for Sub-Projects
Developing and Refining the Biological Study Area Have you ever wondered where to start when you are setting up a Biological Study Area (BSA) for a project?
Clean Water Act Section 404: An O&G Perspective Andrew D. Smith SWCA Environmental Consultants.
How Do I Know If There Is a Wetland Where I Want To Build? James Robb, Chief Wetlands & Storm Water Section Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
An overview of Wetland Delineation In preparation for next week’s field trip.
Suzanne Macey.  DEC looks at known occurrences with 1 mile  FWS looks at known occurrences plus the potential for suitable habitat  Contact DEC and/or.
Ch  Know what design frequency means  Know how to delineate a drainage area on a topographic map 2.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research Program Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research.
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES.
The NHD and the Future of Stream Mapping in West Virginia Jackie Strager Natural Resource Analysis Center Evan Fedorko Kevin Kuhn Kurt.
 SOPs are often called the ‘bible’ for your daily operation and as such should bring consistency to the actions of your team.  SOPs tend to fall into.
Lesson Applying Profiling Leveling Techniques. Interest Approach Discuss with the students why producers sometimes put drainage ditches in their fields.
WETLANDS and LOCAL PROGRAMS Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Regional General Permit (RGP) 31 Interagency Meeting June 11, 2015.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
ADWR’S JUNE 2009 SUBFLOW ZONE REPORT ADWR’S JUNE 2009 SUBFLOW ZONE REPORT by Rich Burtell Arizona Department of Water Resources October 2, 2009.
The Golden Rule (of field notebook keeping) A third party should be able to run the fieldtrip solely based on the directions, notes and observations recorded.
“Waters of the U.S.” in New York Farmland Maps by Geosyntec Analysis by American Farm Bureau Federation.
Tables and Figures. The “Big Picture” For other scientists to understand the significance of your data/experiments, they must be able to: understand precisely.
Yakima-Tieton Irrigation District Agency Kickoff Meeting Tieton Canal Replacement Project June 16, 2015.
1 C E T A S Purpose and Need Presentation Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
1 C E T A S Triage Presentation, Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
“Waters of the U.S.” in Pennsylvania Farmland Maps by Geosyntec Analysis by American Farm Bureau Federation.
“Waters of the U.S.” in Oklahoma Farmland Maps by Geosyntec Analysis by American Farm Bureau Federation.
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Wetlands and Waterways Permits Ken Franklin Statewide Permits Program Coordinator Geo-Environmental, ODOT.
1 Identifying Properties at Risk of Flooding Duncan McLuckie Principal Flood Specialist NSW Office of Environment and Heritage Department of Premier and.
2012 ACEA MEETING ORANGE BEACH Brad Lindsey, P.E. Assistant State County Transportation Engineer – Pre Construction Alabama Department of Transportation.
Introduction Left: Old Kenston High School was built in 1950 Right: New Kenston High School was built in 2006.
Comparison of Benthic Invertebrate Communities Upstream and Downstream of Proposed Culvert Installations in Alabama Amy C. Gill USGS, Alabama Water Science.
“Waters of the U.S.” in Montana Farmland Maps by Geosyntec Analysis by American Farm Bureau Federation.
Habitat Mapping of High Level Indicators at Multiple Scales for Fish and Wildlife.
UNIT 13 – Monitoring & Compliance Monitoring and Compliance UNIT 13.
Ecological Wetlands Streams & Rivers Other Surface Waters Terrestrial Habitat Threatened & Endangered Species Agency Coordination Categorical Exclusion.
PRIME WETLAND STUDY OF FITZWILLIAM – INITIAL FINDINGS Dr. Rick Van de Poll Ecosystem Management Consultants Sandwich NH.
Biology 22 Molecular Laboratory Report 1. Bacterial Transformation 2. Plasmid Isolation 3. RFLP Analysis.
Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Adoption of Stream Corridor Management Regulations for the Lake George Park.
Impact Analysis. Impact Analysis (204) ODOT attempts to avoid, and minimize impacts to the natural environment throughout the PDP process Despite these.
Environmental Site Assessments Hazardous Materials/ Regulated Substances Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Let’s Begin! Writing Manure Management Plans!. Manure Management Manual DEP Manure Management Manual can be divided into 3 Parts: Part I Requirements/Guidelines.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Tools for Manure Management Records For: Animal Units For: 300 or more A. U.
Ecological Wetlands Streams and Rivers Other Surface Waters Terrestrial Habitat Threatened and Endangered Species Agency Coordination Categorical Exclusion.
Programmatic Agreements
Ecological Wetlands Streams and Rivers Other Surface Waters
Midwest Training Entering Data on the Website
“Waters of the U.S.” in Pennsylvania Farmland
Take Notes as you view the slides
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Pipeline Planning and Construction: Environmental Considerations
Shaver Creek Permitting
Presentation transcript:

Level 1 Ecological Survey Report Requirements ODOT -- Office of Environmental Services

Level 1 Ecological Survey Report   The Level 1 Report is used to coordinate projects that fall under the MOA between FHWA/ODOT, USFWS, and ODNR.   Project qualifications to meet the MOA: Projects that meet the NWP program, and/or need only a Level 1 or 2 PAN, and Projects that do not require an Individual 401 or a Level 3 PAN, and Projects that will not impact a National Scenic River below OHWM   Project types that generally fall under the MOA: Bridge rehabilitation/replacement Culvert replacement/minor lengthening Bike trails Minor road rehabilitation or widening Some minor road realignments   New Level 1 ESR form will be used to coordinate these projects with the appropriate agencies.

Level 1 Ecological Survey Report   Title page of the report contains general project information.   Please fill out author and contact information so that ODOT-OES can contact the author with any questions.   Date of submission is the date that the consultant completes the report.   Cover photo is selected by the author. Permits/Ecology/Pages/Forms.aspx

Level 1 Ecological Survey Report   This section contains general project location information and the description of the project.   Project description should include the following: An explanation of the work that will occur for the project. General study area land-use. Length of the study area (for linear projects) A brief synopsis of the impacts for the project Descriptions will be more in-depth for projects that go off existing alignment.

ort Level 1 Ecological Survey Report   Vegetative Communities within construction limits   Level of Disturbance   High Quality Habitats   Acres Impacted Vegetative Communities and Land Cover

ort Level 1 Ecological Survey Report   Stream ID is the USGS name of the stream, or the identification number or name given to the stream by the consultant (eg. Stream 1)   Receiving waters is the stream that the impacted stream flows to. Can be a named stream, or an unnamed tributary.   Three stream types: TNW, RPW, or Non-RPW   Flow Characteristics: Perennial, Seasonal (Intermittent), or Ephemeral   For the OEPA use designation, include the QHEI/HHEI score for streams with no ALU   Scenic River is answered as yes or no. Answer “yes” if it is within 1,000 feet. Streams Fill in Presence and Impacts boxes Delete any rows that are unneeded Additional information

Level 1 Ecological Survey Report   Include the flow-path of each stream to the nearest TNW (ex. Stream 1  Big Darby Creek  Scioto River).   Include details on impacts to each stream (see Impacts Analysis Section for more information).   Include any other details such as observed pollution issues, field sampling issues, and other pertinent information. Streams: Additional Information Box

Level 1 Ecological Survey Report   Wetland ID is the name that the consultant assigns the wetland (eg. Wetland A)   List if each wetland is isolated, adjacent or abutting.   Only wetlands that are adjacent or abutting will have receiving waters   List ORAM category and score   Wetland type should fit the Cowardin classification   Total size of wetland include the size of the entire wetland (even if it extends outside of the project area.   Include size in study area in acres. Often this will be the same as the impact acreage.   Include impacts in acres. Wetlands Fill in Presence and Impacts boxes Additional information Delete any rows that are unneeded

Level 1 Ecological Survey Report   Include the flow-path of each abutting or adjacent wetland to the nearest TNW (ex. Wetland A  Trib to BDC  Big Darby Creek  Scioto River).   Include details on impacts to each wetland (see Impacts Analysis Section for more information).   Include any other details such as observed pollution issues, field sampling issues, illegal fills, and other pertinent information. Wetlands: Additional Information Box

Level 1 Ecological Survey Report   Only discuss potentially jurisdictional ditches.   Ditch ID is the name that the consultant assigns the wetland (eg. Wetland A)   RPW, OWHM Present, Constructed in or drains a wetland, and Constructed through hydric soils boxes should be marked yes or no.   Wetted width is the width of the area below OHWM, use this times the length to figure impacts (convert to acreage   Include length within the study area. Total length is not necessary.   Include impacts in acres. Potentially Jurisdictional Ditches Fill in Presence and Impacts boxes Additional information Delete any rows that are unneeded

Level 1 Ecological Survey Report   Include the flow-path of each potentially jurisdictional ditch to the nearest TNW (ex. Ditch 1  Big Darby Creek  Scioto River).   Include the location of the origin of the ditch   Include details on impacts to each ditch (see Impacts Analysis Section for more information). .  Include any other details such as observed pollution issues, field sampling issues, and other pertinent information. Ditches: Additional Information Box

Level 1 Ecological Survey Report   Pond ID is the name that the consultant assigns the wetland (eg. Pond A)   Mark whether the resource is isolated or non-isolated.   Receiving waters is the nearest stream that a non-isolated pond flows to (left blank for isolated ponds)   Design function is the type of pond/lake/reservoir and its function (retention, farm pond, water supply, natural lake, etc).   Answer “functions as intended” with yes or know   Include total size of the resource, even portions of the resource outside the project area.   Include impacts in acres. Ponds/Lakes/Reservoirs Fill in Presence and Impacts boxes Additional information Delete any rows that are unneeded

Level 1 Ecological Survey Report   Include the flow-path of each non-isolated resource to the nearest TNW (ex. Pond A  Big Darby Creek  Scioto River).   Include details on impacts to each pond/lake/reservoir (see Impacts Analysis Section for more information). .  Include any other details such as observed pollution issues, field sampling issues, fills, and other pertinent information. Ponds/Lakes/Reservoirs: Additional Information Box

Level 1 Ecological Survey Report Unionid Mussels Species Name (common and scientific) Listing Status (State and/or Federal) Impacts write-up Additional Information box If a listed species of mussel (shell material or live mussel) is found within or adjacent to the project area, it will also have to be discussed in the Listed Species section. The preparer can reference between the sections to minimize repetition. USFWS has announced a list of streams that may have populations of federally listed mussels. No collecting of live mussels is permitted in these streams without a federal permit. Unionid mussels should be surveyed for in any perennial stream large enough to support mussels (generally over 5 square mile drainage)

Level 1 Ecological Survey Report   Additional Information Box should include the following: General discussion on population composition, age classes, in-stream location, and habitats used by live mussels. The condition of dead shells: Fresh dead – periostracum intact, nacre still shiny, portions of the hinge may still be present Dead – periostractum mostly intact, nacre dull, no protein or soft parts present Weathered dead – very worn, periostracum nearly gone, nacre gone or very dull, shell may be fractured. Discuss any listed mussels in the appropriate Listed Species table. Unionid Mussels

Level 1 Ecological Survey Report   For each species with known ranges that includes the project county(ies), include the following: A brief life history synopsis, focusing on habitat requirements Records within a mile (or within 5 miles for IB captures, and 10 miles for hibernacula) Distance to nearest Bald Eagle nesting activity If the species was found within the project area (IF YES, CALL OES FIRST!!!) If critical habitat was found within the project area (IF YES, CALL OES FIRST!!!) If suitable habitat was found within the project area Impacts to the suitable habitat   For Indiana bat, also summarize the information from the Bat Habitat Worksheet.   Include any other pertinent information in the Additional Information box (including date of surveys for listed species). Federally Listed Species

Level 1 Ecological Survey Report   For each species with records within a mile of the project (or that were found within or directly adjacent to the project area) A brief life history synopsis, focusing on habitat requirements Distance of record from project area If the species was found within the project area If suitable habitat was found within the project area Impacts to the suitable habitat   If a federal species record is located within a mile, reference between the Federal and State species tables to minimize repetition.   Include the dates of any species specific surveys in the Additional Information box, and any other pertinent information. State Listed Species

Level 1 Ecological Survey Report   Put an “x” next to what is included in the appendices. The maps/photos/plans/forms that have a red “x” beside them are required. The maps/photos/plans/forms that have a blue “x” are required if the resource exists in the study area, or if available. Appendices

Mapping   USGS 7.5” Topographic Map Must be clearly labeled with the correct USGS Quad map name and project name Map must use standard quad scale. A close-up map of the project area can also be included if detail is needed. Clearly mark entire project area on map   County maps or other types of mapping can make finding a project area easier when there are not many identifying characteristics on the topographic map.   Resources map shows location of ecological resources within the project area Show locations of streams and wetlands Show locations of suitable roosting habitat for IB.

Topographic Mapping Example

Aerial Photo and Resource Map Examples

MOA Photos and Photo Log   Photo log for bridge replacement projects should consist of the following. Photos from roadway taken through the bridge from both directions on the roadway. Photos of the upstream segment and downstream segment of the stream from the bridge. Photos of the bridge from the stream from upstream and downstream. A photo of each quadrant of the project area. A photo/photos of potentially impacted wetlands Representative photos of Indiana bat roosting habitat within the project area. Photographs of all potential maternity roost trees. Photo of any rare species or freshwater mussel shells found within or adjacent to the project area.   Photo logs of long projects should contain representative photos of impacted habitats, including culvert replacement areas, Indiana bat habitat trees, impacted terrestrial habitats, and wetlands that may be impacted by the project. EA TAKE AS MANY PHOTOS AS NECESSARY TO DOCUMENT THE PROJECT AREA

MOA Photos and Photo Log Continued.   Photos must be in color.   Photos, especially digital photos and photos that are copied must be clear.   Photos should be 3” x 5” or 4” x 6”. Panoramic photos can be used to show a larger area if needed.   Each photo should have a caption explaining the photo (eg. Walnut Creek upstream of the bridge). NO SNOW PICTURES!!!!

Photo Log Map Example

Plan Sheets   Although not required to process the MOA, they offer good information and are sometimes needed for field reviews.   Can also be used for the photo log.   Plan and profile sheets are the most informative.   Cross Sections are useful to determine wetland impacts.   Culvert details are used to quantify stream impacts.   It is helpful to have the trees that will be removed marked on the plans.

Plan Sheet Example  Shows trees to be removed. .  Shows possible parking areas and work pads.

Forms   If project will impact a stream, a QHEI or HHEI form is required   If a project will impact a wetland, a routine wetland delineation form and the ORAM form are required   For projects that will impact suitable IB habitat, the Indiana Bat Habitat Characterization Worksheet is required.   A NHDB check is required for ALL PROJECTS

General MOA Coordination Timeframes   Review by OES in 15 working days, if supplemental field work is not required.   Agencies have 30 days to review the submissions. They can request more time if needed.   Generally, OES returns comments within a few days of receipt, unless there is an issue with the comments. .  Additional information will be requested for incomplete packages. A 15 working day review time will begin again after the new information is received. ODOT-OES coordinates ALL projects with the Agencies.

Field Work   If project is an LPA project that is not let by ODOT, any further field work is usually done by a pre-qualified consultant   If a project is an LPA project or an ODOT project let by ODOT, any further field work may be done by OES or pre- qualified consultant, as determined on a case-by- case basis.

Level 1 Report Submission   Consultant submits reports to the appropriate ODOT district.   ODOT is now coordinating MOA projects electronically, so OES will need one hard copy, and the district will post an electronic copy for submission to the agencies   No additional copies will be needed for State Scenic Rivers   One additional hard copy will be needed for projects within 1,000 feet of a National Scenic River.

QUESTIONS?