Antibiotic Resistance in Non-coliform Bacteria Isolated from a Cattle Farm KIMBERLEIGH FOSTER, J. RENGEL, M. MILLER, J. ARNOLD, J. WOLOZYNEK, and J. CHAMPINE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DNA Technology & Gene Mapping Biotechnology has led to many advances in science and medicine including the creation of DNA clones via recombinant clones,
Advertisements

Genetic Engineering define the term recombinant DNA;
Function-Driven Metagenomics Jo Handelsman. What is Function-Driven Metagenomics? Clone DNA directly from environmental sample Screen clones for expressed.
Dolly the sheep ( ) 1. Animal and human cloning 2. Gene cloning.
RESULTS With increasing amounts of Novobiocin there was an obvious decrease in survival of colony forming units of bacteria (Fig. 8). Triclosan was more.
GENETICS (CE421/521) - Genetics is one of the most fascinating areas of biology. It has effects at all scales from the molecule to population. Its study.
Genetic Engineering. Vocabulary Gene – sequence of DNA that codes for a trait (protein). Genome – an organism’s complete genetic information. Transgenic.
Growth, Pigmentation, and Antibiotic Resistance Phenotypes of Bacteria Grown in the Presence of Lead JOE TONEY, S. KHAN, A. CORCORAN, J. SEABAUGH, M. HOBBS,
Abstract Microorganisms were isolated from a chat pile and soil in the vicinity. Chat is a byproduct of lead mining that is high in Pb content, >16,000.
Results (cont.) Figure 3: Gel results checking for digested DNA fragments using the EcoR1 restriction enzyme. (A) Lane 1 shows blue colony obtained from.
Investigating Mechanisms Of Antimicrobial Resistance Using Molecular Techniques Name: Semina Ploumakis; Life Sciences Department. Supervisors: Professor.
Abstract Background: In order to assess the possibility that antibiotic resistance genes are being transferred from animals to environmental bacteria,
Abstract Background: Bacteria able to grow in the presence of Pb are of interest for bioremediation and insight into mechanisms of defense against the.
Life Sciences-HHMI Outreach. Copyright 2008 President and Fellows of Harvard College. Summer 2008 Workshop in Biology and Multimedia for High School Teachers.
Transformation of Escherichia coli
MCB 720: Molecular Biology Eukaryotic gene organization Restriction enzymes Cloning vectors.
16.2 In vivo gene cloning – the use of vectors. The importance of ‘sticky ends’. Last lesson, we discussed sticky ends that are left after the action.
Gene Cloning Techniques for gene cloning enable scientists to prepare multiple identical copies of gene-sized pieces of DNA. Most methods for cloning pieces.
CHAPTER 4 DNA CLONING (cont.) MISS NUR SHALENA SOFIAN.
Bacterial Transformation RET Summer Overall Picture Bio-Rad pGLO Transformation Insertion of GFP gene into HB101 E. coli.
TITLE Mannitol Salt Agar-Cefoxitin Combination as a screening Medium for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylocuccus aureus.
AP Bio Lab 8: Transformation We will start on TUESDAY!
© SSER Ltd..
GFP Transformation Lab Images taken without permission from
GENETIC ENGINEERING (RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY)
Attack of the Superbugs Lab Introduction
Kristin Rosche, Emily Thornsen & Lloyd Turtinen  Department of Biology  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Knockout of the US29 gene of Human Cytomegalovirus.
Chapter 9 – DNA-Based Information Technologies
DNA Technology & Genomics
Restriction enzymes (endonucleases)
Bacterial Transformation Lab “pGLO”
How do you identify and clone a gene of interest? Shotgun approach? Is there a better way?
Bacterial Transformation
GFP Transformation Lab Images taken without permission from
 Isolate a specific gene of interest  Insert into a plasmid  Transfer to bacteria  Grow bacteria to get many copies  Express the protein product 
Bacteria Bacteria – single-celled organisms that are prokaryotic (no true nucleus)
Is taking in a plasmid good or bad for the bacteria? Explain.
Expression of Deer Adenovirus Spike Protein By: Dang Duong.
Attack of the Superbugs Lab Introduction Mrs. Stewart Medical Interventions.
1 Objectives describe the steps in gene cloning by using plasmid as the vector.
Chapter 20: DNA Technology and Genomics - Lots of different techniques - Many used in combination with each other - Uses information from every chapter.
Treatments that stimulate the E.coli. to take up foreign plasmids include: 1.CaCL2 treatment 2.Heat shock 3.Incubation with ECORI 4.1 and and 3 6.All.
+ genetic engineering module 2 – biotechnology & gene technologies.
Figure 1. Transposon-tagged mutant chromosome (cmsm). WT S. typhimurium cells (WT cmsm on left) were mutagenized by introducing a transposon (Tn) that.
In the pGLO lab, we will: Use recombinant DNA Genetically engineer E. coli bacteria by inserting a plasmid Plate and grow bacteria Determine if the proteins.
Bacterial Transformation Lab
Cell Transformation Recombinant DNA Host Cell DNA Target gene Modified Host Cell DNA.
BIO 208 NUCLEIC ACID METHODS Stephanie Schumaker.
In the pGLO lab, we will: Use recombinant DNA Genetically engineer E. coli bacteria by inserting a plasmid Plate and grow bacteria Determine if the proteins.
Bacterial Transformation
Transformation MISS : SALSABEEL H. AL- JOUJOU.
Bacterial Transformation
Transformation of Escherichia coli
Gene Cloning Techniques for gene cloning enable scientists to prepare multiple identical copies of gene-sized pieces of DNA. Most methods for cloning pieces.
Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus spp
© SSER Ltd..
Chapter 20: DNA Technology and Genomics
Bacterial Transformation
Attack of the Superbugs Lab Introduction
Lab 8 Warm-Up What are plasmids?
PGLO Lab Purpose: To transform E. coli bacteria by adding plasmids that allow the bacteria to glow green under UV light in the presence of arabinose sugar.
Lab 8 Warm-Up What are plasmids?
Transformation Change caused by genes and involves the insertion of one or more genes into an organism in order to change the organism’s traits.
Transformation of Escherichia coli
Laboratory: Bacterial Transformation
Chapter 20: DNA Technology and Genomics
Transformation of Escherichia coli
Transformation of Escherichia coli
Transformation of Escherichia coli
Addressing Antibiotic Resistance by Isolation and Characterization of Genus Lysobacter and Genus Unknown Antibiotic-producers in Pittsburgh Soil Miriam.
Presentation transcript:

Antibiotic Resistance in Non-coliform Bacteria Isolated from a Cattle Farm KIMBERLEIGH FOSTER, J. RENGEL, M. MILLER, J. ARNOLD, J. WOLOZYNEK, and J. CHAMPINE Southeast Missouri State University, Cape Girardeau, MO Background: In order to assess the possibility that antibiotic resistance genes are being transferred from animals to environmental bacteria, non-enteric Ampicillin resistant (AmpR) bacteria were isolated from a cattle farm, a meat packing plant sewage lagoon, and the Mississippi river. Methods: Organisms were isolated on APT media containing 50 mg/L Amp, screened for cefinase activity, and the inability to ferment lactose to acid and gas in broth. MIC for Amp was determined using Etest  strips, and a profile of resistance to 17 antibiotics was determined using the Kirby-Bauer agar diffusion test. Chromosomal DNA was extracted by phenol:chloroform separation in the presence of CTAB detergent and by DNeasy . Plasmid extractions were performed with the Qiagen mini-prep kit  and the Wizard mini-prep kit . These DNAs were used in Southern hybridization experiments with probes for class A (TEM1-type) and class B (metallo-)  -lactamases. Six of the isolates were identified by sequencing of PCR amplified 16S rDNA (GenBank accession numbers). Results: A total of 17 non-enteric strains were studied, and 14 had MIC values greater than 256 mg/L. Pseudomonas sp. FDM13 (AY464123), from the sewage lagoon, contained plasmid DNA, but was not capable of transforming E. coli strains INV  F’ or XL10 Gold . No plasmid DNA was detected in the 16 isolates from the cattle farm and the Mississippi river. None of the chromosomal DNAs, or FDM13 plasmid DNA hybridized with the TEM1 probe. Pseudomonas sp. CPE30 (AY484469), Aeromonas sp. WC56 (AY484470), Morganella sp. CPD30 (AY464464), Pseudomonas sp. ACP14 (AY464463), and Chryseobacterium ACP12 (AY464462) showed the strongest hybridization with the metallo-β-lactamase probe. Conclusion: The lack of R-plasmids and the failure of hybridization with the TEM1 probe suggest that lateral gene transmission from enteric bacteria associated with animals to environmental bacteria is not taking place. On the other hand, environmental bacteria that show a high degree of resistance to Amp were widespread, and resistance in these bacteria may be due to zinc-hydrolases, or other yet unidentified resistance mechanisms. Abstract Q-184 Hypothesis 1 - Resistance due to gene transfer Resistance highly specific to antibiotics used Resistance genes may be carried on plasmids  -Lactamase gene may resemble class A TEM bla found in enterics Hypothesis 2 - Resistance evolved in soil organisms Broader resistance to variety of antibiotics encountered in soil over time Resistance may be plasmid or chromosomally encoded Class B Metallo-  -Lactamase observed in Caulobacter may be present IsolateSourceIdentificationGenBank # ACP12Cattle Pond 1ChryseobacteriumAY ACP14Cattle Pond 1PseudomonasAY CPA30Cattle Pond 3PseudomonasNot yet prepared CPC20Cattle Pond 2PseudomonasNot yet prepared CPD30Cattle Pond 3MorganellaAY CPD32Cattle Pond 3EscherichiaNot yet prepared CPE30Cattle Pond 3PseudomonasAY WC56Wolf CreekAeromonasAY FDM13Meat-packing plantPseudomonasAY Nine Organisms Identified by 16S Sequence Ampicillin resistance Plated on APT agar w/ 50  g/ml ampicillin Single colony taken from each plate with growth, unless additional morphotypes present Screened for cefinase activity Non-coliform status (accepted if one of the following are true) Gram positive No lactose fermentation on EMB No gas from lactose broth MIC of Ampicillin for isolates was determined with Etest  strips (upper left) 14 of the isolates had a MIC of greater than 256 µg/ml. CPB30 (96µg/ml) and CPC32 (128 µg/ml) Kirby-Bauer Agar diffusion tests:  -lactam (Ox, Cec, Cz, Ctx, Ipm, Cb) and non-  -lactam (Lvx, Te, PB, E, K, S, RA, NB). All of the isolates were resistant to at least 1 non-  -lactam antibiotic, and 14 were resistant to >1. None of the isolates showed resistance to imipenem, suggesting no metallo-  -lactamase activity.

Organisms used Cattle farm ampicillin resistant isolates (focus of this study): 16 organisms including Chryseobacterium, Pseudomonas, Aeromonas, Morganella, and Escherichia Reference organisms associated with soil (Lab teaching strains): B. cereus, B. megaterium, B. subtilis, B. brevis, B. pumilis, P. aeruginosa, P. putida, P. fluorescens, P. paucimobilis, P. stutzeri Chat Pile Lead-mine tailings isolates (see Q-201): 10 organisms including Rhodococcus, Pseudomonas, Streptomyces, Ochrobactrum, and Arthrobacter Antibiotics used  -lactam: Ampicillin, Carbenecillin, Cefazolin, Cephatoxime, Cefaclor Non-  -lactam: Erythromycin, Kanamycin, Polymyxin B, Streptomycin, Tetracycline a significantly more resistant than expected, α=0.005, df=2, Fcrit= 10.6 less resistant b significantly less resistant than expected, α=0.005, df=2, Fcrit= 10.6 C significant variation among groups; α=0.005, df=10, Fcrit= 25.2 Organism/AbSusceptibleIntermediateResistantTotal Known/ β-lactam a Known/ Non-β-lactam b Cattle Farm/β-lactam Cattle Farm/ Non-β-lactam Chat Pile/ β-lactam Chat Pile/Non-β-lactam Total c EcoRI-digested Chromosomal DNA probed with a 1064 bp BstXI fragment of a putative metallo-β-lactamase from G. metallireducens (positive control) ACP12 - 9kbp, WC56 - 3kbp, ACP14 - 9kbp and 8kbp, CPD30 - 8kbp and 6kbp, and CPE30 - 8kbp and 6kbp E. coli (negative control), WC24, CPA30, MR55, CPA20, and CPD32 showed non specific hybridization. CPB30, WC42, CPC20, CPC32, WC20, and CPC30, and reference strains showed no hybridization to this probe. λHindIII G. metallireducens ACP12 WC56 CPD30 CPE30 E.coli * * * * * ACP14 No plasmids detected EcoRI Chromosomal DNA was probed with a 540 DdeI internal fragment of the bla gene from pBR322. No class A TEM type  -lactamase detected. Discussion Bacteria showed a wide range of antibiotic resistances, but specific (and extreme) resistance to  -lactams Lack of imipenem resistance suggests no metallo-  -lactamase activity No plasmid DNA or TEM type bla detected Poor hybridization to metall-  -lactamase probe suggests there may be a greater diversity of  -lactamase genes or defenses than currently understood (Class C and D genes not tested)