Pavement Design.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Soil The product of weathering of rocks
Advertisements

CC-5: Post-Traffic Testing FAA Working Group Meeting DATE : April 24, 2012 By: Harkanwal Brar.
Material Strength Local subgrade settlement failure (from NHI Highway Materials Engineering course)
LOW VOLUME ROAD DESIGN EMPIRICAL APPROACH.
Dr. Wa'el M. Albawwab ECGD4228 Transportation Engineering II Summer 2008 Sat. 15:30-18:30 PM K115.
Objectives Be able to use basic volume weight equations
Pavement Structure and Base
ENGINEERING MATERIAL PROPERTIES (CE1303)
Chemical Stabilization of Subgrades Section Engineers ’ Meeting Lake Cumberland State Resort Park March 5-7, 2013.
Pavement Design CE 453 Lecture 28.
Project Title: Chemical Stabilization of Clay Design Department Presenter: Stephan Cheong Date: February 5,2015.
1 Characterization of Granular Base Materials for Design of Flexible Pavements Lulu Edwards, Walter Barker, Don Alexander US Army Engineer Research and.
Know the factors considered in the AASHTO design method
 The material properties of each layer are homogeneous  Each layer has a finite thickness except for the lower  layer, and all are infinite in.
Transportation Engineering II
In Tai Kim & Erol Tutumluer University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Chapter 3 Compaction. To improve the density and other properties of soil Increases the solid density improves strength Lowers its permeability Reduces.
A Presentation On Geo Textiles : Perspective from the Construction Sector By D C DE CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED FEDERATION.
Civil Engineering The best kind!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
SESSION 3 Subgrade This module presents the concepts and methods of characterizing the subgrade for the purpose of concrete pavement design. It also highlights.
Consolidation Theory Examples.
An – Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department.
Pavement Design CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
Soil Stabilization By: Monica Acosta.
Subgrade Characterization For Concrete Pavement Design
Lec 28, Ch.20, pp : Flexible pavement design, ESAL (Objectives)
Transportation Engineering II
COMPACTION Topic COMPACTION Presented to Dr. Ayub Elahi Presented by Group leader. M.Zeeshan haider yousaf Zia. # 14 Haider ayub # 13 Bilal ansari #35.
Soil Compaction and Pavement Design
7. Soil Compaction (Das, chapter 6)
Module 2-5 Field Sampling and Testing.  Identify reasons for conducting field sampling and lab testing  Describe typical field sampling and testing.
Construction Methods Lecture 9 Compacting Lecture 9.
CHAPTER TWO SOIL COMPRESSION.
Pavement Base & Subbase CEE 320 Steve Muench 8/13/ The subbase course is between the base course and the subgrade. It functions primarily as structural.
1 Pertemuan 06 > Matakuliah: S0182/Studi Kasus Dalam Teknik Sipil Tahun: Juli 2005 Versi: 01/01.
1 Kh Training April Gudiance on the selection of Kh Soil Soil to Rock Rock Soil Soil to Rock Rock.
Highway Subgrade (1) Introduction
THE DESIGN OF POROUS PAVEMENT SHOULDERS AT RICHMOND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 33 rd Annual Airports Conference March 3, 2010 – Hershey, PA Presented by: H.
Bases, Subbases, & Low Cost Surfaces Dr. TALEB M. AL-ROUSAN.
DESIGN FLEXIBLE AND RIGID PAVEMENTS Ms Ikmalzatul Abdullah.
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (CBR) METHOD
Traffic engineering Építés- és környezetföldtan 4. Engineering and Environmental Geology.
AAR-410 February 2, Alpha Factor Determination for 6-Wheel Gears u Gordon Hayhoe, AAR-410, FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center, Atlantic City,
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-II
DARWIN AC/AC Overlay Design. Course Materials Tables and Design Procedures for this manual.
Soil cement   1 1.
GEOTEXTILES IN TRANSPORTATION APPLICATIONS
USE OF GEOGRIDS IN FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT
COMPACTION BY EQUIPMENTS
California Bearing Ratio
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING
Pavement Design Al-Balqa’ Applied University
Transportation Engineering-II
California Bearing Ratio Test
Structural Design of Highway
Chapter(16) AASHTO flexible pavement design method
Structural Design of Highway
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-II
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (CBR) METHOD
Pavement Design  A pavement consists of a number of layers of different materials 4 Pavement Design Methods –AASHTO Method –The Asphalt Institute Method.
PAVEMENTS CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Introduction to Pavement Design
SUBGRADE HOW TO DEAL WITH SOFT SPOTS
Calculating Dimensions for a Typical Pavement Section using 1993 AASHTO Flexible Pavement Design Guide.
Flexible Pavement Design (JKR Method)
Flexible pavement design
Structural Design of Highway
Pavement materials: Soil
Pavement Structural Analysis
Light Compaction Equipment
Presentation transcript:

Pavement Design

I. Pavement Design A. Overview Degree of curvature “Principal cause of pavement failure shown above—not the blacktop”

B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) I. Pavement Design B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) “How to build a road!”

B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) I. Pavement Design B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) 1. The California bearing ratio (CBR) is a penetration test for evaluation of the mechanical strength of road subgrades and basecourses. It was developed by the California Department of Transportation. 4

I. Pavement Design B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) The California bearing ratio (CBR) is a penetration test for evaluation of the mechanical strength of road subgrades and basecourses. It was developed by the California Department of Transportation. 2. The test is performed by measuring the pressure required to penetrate a soil sample with a plunger of standard area. The measured pressure is then divided by the pressure required to achieve an equal penetration on a standard crushed rock material.

3. “The Test” I. Pavement Design B. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Take load readings at penetrations of: “the result” 0.025” ……………70 psi 0.05”……………...115 psi 0.1”……………….220 psi 0.2”……………….300 psi 0.4”……………….320 psi 6” mold “Achieve OM &MD” Penetrations of 0.05” per minute

4. Plot the Data

5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0 5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0.1 and 0.2 penetration. “The Gold Standard” for CBR for 0.1” of penetration, 1000 psi for 0.2” of penetration, 1500 psi Example above: for 0.1” of penetration, 220 psi for 0.2” of penetration, 300 psi The standard material for this test is crushed California limestone

5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0 5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0.1 and 0.2 penetration. Example psi = CBR Standard psi 220 psi = .22, or 22% 1000 psi 300 psi = .20, or 20% 1500 psi CBR of material = 22% “The Gold Standard” for CBR for 0.1” of penetration, 1000 psi for 0.2’ of penetration, 1500 psi Example above: for 0.1” of penetration, 220 psi for 0.2” of penetration, 300 psi

5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0 5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0.1 and 0.2 penetration. Example psi = CBR Standard psi 220 psi = .22, or 22% 1000 psi 300 psi = .20, or 20% 1500 psi CBR of material = 22% “The Gold Standard” for CBR for 0.1” of penetration, 1000 psi for 0.2’ of penetration, 1500 psi Example above: for 0.1” of penetration, 220 psi for 0.2” of penetration, 300 psi Use 0.1” of penetration, unless 0.2” is the greater value. If so, then rerun the test, taking the higher of the two values from this second trial

5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0 5. Determine the percent of compacted crushed stone values for the 0.1 and 0.2 penetration. In General: The harder the surface, the higher the CBR rating. A CBR of 3 equates to tilled farmland, A CBR of 4.75 equates to turf or moist clay, Moist sand may have a CBR of 10. High quality crushed rock has a CBR over 80. The standard material for this test is crushed California limestone which has a value of 100. Example psi = CBR Standard psi 220 psi = .22, or 22% 1000 psi 300 psi = .20, or 20% 1500 psi CBR of material = 22%, or “22” “The Gold Standard” for CBR for 0.1” of penetration, 1000 psi for 0.2’ of penetration, 1500 psi Example above: for 0.1” of penetration, 220 psi for 0.2” of penetration, 300 psi

Potential Corrections to the Stress-Penetration Curves

I. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design

C. The Mechanics of the Design Determine I. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design Determine The CBR values of the subgrade The type of use expected (runways vs. taxiways) 14

C. The Mechanics of the Design Determine I. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design Determine The CBR values of the subgrade The type of use expected (runways vs. taxiways) The expected wheel load during service Types of CBR materials available for the construction 15

C. The Mechanics of the Design 2. Primary Goals I. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design 2. Primary Goals Total strength of each layer only as good as what is beneath it Therefore, must meet minimum thickness requirements “Don’t break the bank” Use less inexpensive CBR materials when allowed while not shortchanging the project’s integrity

C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example I. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load)?

“ a point on the curve for a given CBR material represents the minimum thickness of pavement courses that will reside above it, in order to maintain stability

CBR subbase of 8, Taxiway, and wheel load of 40,000 lb 23 inches “23 inches of total earth material and pavement”

C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example I. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load) What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)? What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches? 23 inches

C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example I. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load) What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)? What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches? Wearing Surface 0-15k…….....2” >15k-40k…..3” >40k-55k…..4” >55k-70k…..5” >70k……..…6” Wheel Pound Loads CBR Value 15,000 or less 50 15k-40k 65 40k-70k 80 70k-150k 80+

C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example I. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load) What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)? What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches? 23 inches 3 inches 6 inches of CBR 65/80 Wearing Surface 0-15k…….....2” >15k-40k…..3” >40k-55k…..4” >55k-70k…..5” >70k……..…6” Wheel Pound Loads CBR Value 15,000 or less 50 >15k-40k 65 >40k-70k 80 >70k-150k 80+

C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example 3” 6” V. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load) What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)? What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches? CBR = 80 23 inches 3 inches 6 inches of CBR 65/80 Wearing Surface 0-15k…….....2” >15k-40k…..3” >40k-55k…..4” >55k-70k…..5” >70k……..…6” Wheel Pound Loads CBR Value 15,000 or less 50 >15k-40k 65 >40k-70k 80 >70k-150k 80+

C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example 3” 6” V. Pavement Design C. The Mechanics of the Design 3. An example A compacted subgrade has a CBR value of 8. What is the minimum pavement thickness if it is to support a taxiway pavement designed to support a 80,000 lb airplane (40,000 wheel load) What is the optimal pavement thickness (wearing surface)? What is the optimal CBR value of upper 6 inches? What can we use for the remainder of thickness? CBR = 80 23 inches 3 inches 6 inches of CBR 65/80 Wearing Surface 0-15k…….....2” >15k-40k…..3” >40k-55k…..4” >55k-70k…..5” >70k……..…6” Wheel Pound Loads CBR Value 15,000 or less 50 >15k-40k 65 >40k-70k 80 >70k-150k 80+

Need = 9” minimum thickness 25

CBR = 27 for remainder of base (14”) 26

Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs

Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs CBR of 30 needs minimum of 9” of pavement courses above it.

Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs CBR of 30 needs minimum of 9” of pavement courses above it. 3” of wearing surface 6” of CBR 80 in upper 6”

Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs CBR of 30 needs minimum of 9” of pavement courses above it. 3” of wearing surface 6” of CBR 80 in upper 6” 14” of CBR 30 30

Another Example: Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=15, 30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs

Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: Another Example: Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=15, 30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs 3” of wearing surface 6” of CBR 80 in upper 6” 32

Another Example: Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=15, 30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs 3” of wearing surface 6” of CBR 80 in upper 6” A CBR of 15 requires X” above it

Another Example: Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=15, 30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs 3” of wearing surface 6” of CBR 80 in upper 6” A CBR of 15 requires 15” above it

Another Example: Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=15, 30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs 3” of wearing surface 6” of CBR 80 in upper 6” A CBR of 15 requires 15” above it A CBR of 30 requires X” above it

Another Example: Given: Same CBR subgrade as before Materials available of: CBR=15, 30, 80 Determine: Optimal thickness of each layer while minimizing costs 3” of wearing surface 6” of CBR 80 in upper 6” A CBR of 15 requires 15” above it A CBR of 30 requires 9” above it

CBR materials available: 80, 30, 15 Your turn…. Subbase of CBR=7, 50,000 lb loads for a taxiway CBR materials available: 80, 30, 15 Design the pavement with attention paid to optimizing costs and stability 37

CBR materials available: 80, 30, 15 Your turn…. Sub base of CBR=7, 50,000 lb loads for a taxiway CBR materials available: 80, 30, 15 Design the pavement with attention paid to optimizing costs and stability Solution: Total Thickness: 28” Wearing Surface Thickness: 4” Upper 6” of CBR=80 CBR 30 of 7” CBR 15 of 11” 38

Homework: Subbase of CBR=15, 70,000 lb loads for a runway CBR materials available: 80, 40, 20 Design the pavement with attention paid to optimizing costs and stability