This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science under Cooperative Agreement DE-SC Michigan State University designs and establishes FRIB as a DOE Office of Science National User Facility in support of the mission of the Office of Nuclear Physics. Sheng Peng Controls & Computing Department Manager Welcome

FRIB Project at MSU Project of $614.5M ($520M DOE, $94.5M MSU)  Dec. 2008: DOE selects MSU to establish FRIB  June 2009: DOE and MSU sign corresponding cooperative agreement  Sept. 2010: CD-1 granted; conceptual design complete & preferred alternatives decided  June 2012: CD2/3A pursued; performance baseline & start of conventional facility construction Growth from more than 400 employees today at NSCL, MSU More than 700 registered user at NSCL user group and at FRIB user organization, Slide 2

Facility Layout, Slide 3S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16

FRIB Driver Accelerator Layout  Delivers FRIB accelerator as part of a DOE-SC national user facility with high reliability & availability  Accelerate ion species up to 238 U with energies of no less than 200 MeV/u  Provide beam power up to 400kW  Satisfy beam-on-target requirements  Energy upgrade by filling vacant slots with 12 SRF cryomodules  Maintain ISOL option  Upgradable to multiuser simultaneous operation of light/heavy ions with addition of a light-ion injector, Slide 4

Installed or close to final installation (EBIT) module FY modules RT RFQ MHB Q/A Pilot source  ReA3 is a MSU contribution to FRIB  ReA3 shares similar technologies as the FRIB driver LINAC  ReA3 provides data for the FRIB engineering, commissioning and installation planning, beam physics, and development of the control system ReA3 as FRIB Technology “Prototype”, Slide 5

 FRIB key facts to controls CW machine with MHz main RF clock »Single-shot/pulse mode for commissioning Beam power up to 400kW CW »Machine protection is critical for damage prevention and efficient commissioning Multi-types of particles with different charge states »Physics model Most of the low level devices are network-attached devices or PLC with Ethernet »Large scale of network Fix TPC $614.5M »Controls budget is tight as well. Has to deliver on time/within budget  Pre-commissioning Most of the control system has to be ready to support installation and commissioning started mid-2015  CD-4 milestone Whole control system has to be ready to support FRIB operation by 2018 Key Requirements, Slide 6S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16

 Global systems Global timing system Machine protection system Network and computers  High level applications Standards Control room applications Physics applications  Low level controls  Personnel protection system  Diagnostics  Conventional facility integration Technical Scope, Slide 7S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16

Scale  It is a large scale distributed control system ~200m * 200m physical distribution ~150 Computers/EPICS Input/Output Controllers (IOC) ~100 Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) Thousands of network attached intelligent devices »RF controller »Power supply controller »Vacuum gauge/pump controller »Programmable logic controller ~ 3000 network ports >500 timing drop points ~2000 MPS fast protection inputs ~646 racks and more than 100 with controls devices, Slide 8S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16

 Naming convention is establish FRIB, NSCL beamline and ReA3 all follow the same naming convention RDB will force the name convention  MySQL is selected as FRIB standard RDBMS  XAL is selected as FRIB physics online modeling platform  CSS is selected as FRIB standard framework of control room applications  GUI standard is established  SOA –Service Oriented Architecture is preferred  SCM standard is established RT, Mercurial, Jenkins, Mantis Technical Status for Software Standard, Slide 9S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16

 High Level Applications deliverables are identified and reviewed  Database schema (IRMIS-like) is under development  CSS development and collaboration E-log plugin Scan user interface  E-log is online and has been using in ReA3  E-traveler prototype will soon be given to user Technical Status for High Level Applications, Slide 10S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16

 Physics applications deliverables are identified and reviewed  XAL is adopted and built  The hardware representation and online model for electrostatic quads are added  XAL configuration files for FRIB Linac and ReA3 are generated  Benchmarking is going on against off line modeling tool Technical Status for Physics Applications, Slide 11S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16 FRIB Segment1 to Stripper Energy Gain LB Source to Diagnostics Box2

 Present the current status of database related design and development (architecture, schema, lattice/model, service and applications) from both FRIB and BNL  Evaluate if the architecture meets both labs’ requirements  Review the current schema (IRMIS-like) design for FRIB to establish a good starting point for whole HLA/Physics Apps  Identify the common interest between FRIB and NSLS II  Try to establish a plan for further collaboration Goal of this workshop, Slide 12S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16