Maine Board of Tax Appeals 1. What we are: An independent Board of three individuals appointed by the Governor to resolve controversies between Taxpayers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Independent External Review of Health Care Decisions in Vermont Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration.
Advertisements

August 28, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Arbitration Process.
County Election Protests, and Candidate Challenges Hearings and Their Appeal Don Wright SBE Statewide Training March 31, 2010.
The A to Z s of A & D A guide to conducting disciplinary hearings.
The Allegation An allegation may be submitted by : Any Person. An allegation may be filed with the PLSB through: The Department of Education A Public.
How does the FAT Procedure work? A Guide to Arbitration Procedures before the FIBA Arbitration Tribunal (FAT)
Regional Center Fair Hearing Process
WINNING YOUR UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE HEARING Presented By D DeGROOT M MANAGEMENT S SERVICES, INC
Faculty Grievance Committee Training October 26, 2012.
Staff Development Emergency Operations 1. Identify 5 purposes of the offender/student grievance process Identify 5 grievable issues Identify 12 non-grievable.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Faculty Forum: March 5, 2008 Shall the Collected Rules and Regulations be revised to adopt the revised Pilot Faculty Grievance Procedure recommended by.
Student Integrity and Misconduct Training and support for decision makers and Academic Integrity Officers.
Medicaid1 SANDHILLS CENTER PARTICIPATING PROVIDER VIOLATIONS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS (Medicaid & State Funded)
The Appeals Process by Gina chandler
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2013 by the American Academy of Actuaries.
The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.
Litigation and Alternatives for Settling Civil Disputes CHAPTER FIVE.
Appeal Practice Before Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
SUBPOENAS IN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CASES IN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CASES.
The Division of Student Affairs University of North Carolina Wilmington.
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
Legislative Rule-Making Process. Three Different Processes Higher Education 29A-3A-1 et seq State Board of Education 29A-3B-1 et seq All other state agencies.
1 Chapter 4 Copyright ©2006 Thomson South-Western, Mason, Ohio William A. Raabe, Gerald E. Whittenburg, & Debra L. Sanders Administrative Regulations &
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
How does the BAT Procedure work? A Guide to Arbitration Procedures before the Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (BAT)
1 Pre-Hearing Conference November 6-10, 2011 Submissions of BIM on Process Issues.
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES EXPEDITED CASE PROCESSING PURSUANT TO PUBLIC ACT
EPA’s ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION SYSTEM Environmental Appeals Board U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Kathie A. Stein, Judge.
2008 Commissioners Indaba 19 – 21 st November 2008 Sun City, North West Province HOW to CONDUCT ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS RANDALL van VOORE.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
MODES OF DISCOVERY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Legal Forms Group 3 Summary.
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
Ethical Considerations for Self Help Center Staff Assisting Self Represented Litigants While Maintaining Neutrality June 10, 2011.
August 28, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Arbitration Process.
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
EDSE 539 Special Education Leadership in Schools Parent Rights and Relationships Dispute Resolution Remedies.
Doc.: IEEE /1129r1 Submission July 2006 Harry Worstell, AT&TSlide 1 Appeal Tutorial Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Summary of Rulemaking in California for the Forensic Alcohol Laboratories Regulation Review Committee Cathy L. Ruebusch, RN, MSN Office of Regulations.
The Adversary System.  To provide a procedure for disputing parties to present and resolve their cases in as fair a manner as possible  Controlled by.
IFTA DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS AMENDMENT PROPOSALS Present by Rick LaRose, Chair Dispute Resolution Committee Annual IFTA Business Meeting July 18-19,
Mental Capacity Act Practitioners Forum Amendments to The Court of Protection made in 2010.
Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication LA 310.
Proposed By-Law Revisions: General Additions & Changes August 2015.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 3 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
Administrative Law The Enactment of Rules and Regulations.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
CHAPTER 12: NEGOTIATIONS, MEDIATION, AND HEARINGS Emond Montgomery Publications 1.
The Hearing Process 1. 2 Notice of Claim Status Issued by Carrier Legally Binding Triggers Protest Period (usually 90 days)
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
Value Adjustment Board
Presented by: Antony N. Gichia Regional Audit Center Mombasa
Objections, Appeals and Reviews
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Education Employment Procedures Law of 2001
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
STUDENT COURT HOW TO GUIDE
Appeals in Public Retirement Cases
Appeal Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
Wyoming Administrative Procedure Act
Panel Discussion on Hearings Case Management Projects
Appeal Code Changes Delynn Coldiron, City Clerk; Brad Yatabe, Legal
Hearing Officer Guidelines
Presentation transcript:

Maine Board of Tax Appeals 1

What we are: An independent Board of three individuals appointed by the Governor to resolve controversies between Taxpayers and Maine Revenue Services (“MRS”) Supported by an Appeals Office which holds hearings, evaluates evidence and prepares recommended decisions for the Board Set within the Department of Administrative and Financial Services 2

Who we are: Board Members William J. Kelleher- Chair Edwin A Heisler Richard A. Nass 3

Appeals Office Chief Appeals Officer -Robert Creamer Appeals Officers – Paul Bourget Gerard Poissonnier Administrative Assistant –Lisa Stevens 4

Where we are: Office located at 108 Sewall Street in Augusta (opposite the Cross office building) Mailing Address:Maine Board of Tax Appeals 134 State House Station Augusta, ME Telephone:

Goals To provide a fair and independent method for resolving disputes concerning assessments and determinations issued by MRS To administer an appeals process that is accessible to unrepresented taxpayers To be open and transparent to both taxpayers and MRS To provide a cost and time efficient alternative to filing an appeal in Superior Court 6

Filing an Appeal May file after completion of the reconsideration process at MRS Optional – May file an appeal in Superior Court or with the Board But, to file with the Board, there must be at least $5,000 in controversy at the time reconsideration was sought Filing requires only a simple statement of appeal 7

Filing an Appeal If Taxpayer wishes to have a conference, the request must be made in the statement of appeal (statutory requirement) If a conference is requested, there is a processing fee If no conference is requested, there is no fee 8

Appeals Process Board considers appeals de novo Process governed by proposed Rule 100, Maine Board of Tax Appeals Practice and Procedure Still in rulemaking process, but Board is open for business 9

Appeals Process Taxpayer has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that MRS has erred in applying or interpreting the relevant statute or facts Both parties must make their case to the Board, – The Taxpayer will see the evidence that MRS is relying on to support the assessment – MRS will see the evidence that the Taxpayer is relying on to support the claim that MRS has made a mistake 10

Appeals Process After the statement of appeal is filed, the Appeals Officer assigned to the case will request that both Taxpayer and MRS submit information and evidence supporting their claims within 21 days Copies must be sent to the opposing party Once the Appeals Officer receives this information, he or she will request that the parties submit responses to each other’s submissions within 14 days 11

Appeals Process If a conference was requested, the Appeals Officer may hold a preliminary procedural conference, which may be conducted via phone. The preliminary conference is intended to: – Identify and clarify issues for the conference – Develop stipulations of fact – Identify witnesses and evidence that will be presented, so as to eliminate as mush as possible the element of surprise – Resolve disputes over the admissibility of evidence 12

Appeals Process At the conference, both the Taxpayer and MRS may: – Present any arguments concerning the appeal; – Have witnesses and experts testify on their behalf – Further explain the evidence they have submitted Whether or not a conference was requested, both the Taxpayer and MRS may submit written testimony in the form of affidavits If no conference was requested, Appeals Officer will decide case based upon the submitted written materials 13

Appeals Process Evidence – Not bound by the Rules of Evidence used by the Maine Courts – Standard adopted is whether evidence is of the kind upon which reasonable persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of serious affairs – Privileges recognized by the Maine Courts (attorney – client, etc.) are observed 14

Appeals Process After the conference, or, if one was not requested, after reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Appeals Officer will issue a Recommended Decision that will contain: – A clear statement of the matter that is the subject of the appeal – The date of the conference (if any) and the participants – A listing of all evidence upon which the decision is based – Findings of fact – A clear statement of result resolving all issues under consideration – An explanation of the reasoning behind the decision 15

Appeals Process The Recommended Decision is what the Board will consider in reaching a final decision on the appeal The Recommended Decision will be shared with the parties prior to its delivery to the Board The parties will have a chance to submit written comments on the Recommended Decision to the Appeals Officer The Appeals Officer may modify his or her decision based on the parties’ comments The parties will receive copies of the final version of the Recommended Decision when it is presented to the Board 16

Appeals Process The Appeals Officer will also forward to the Board the parties’ comments on the recommended decision The parties may submit written statements of position to the Board Either party may also request the opportunity to address the Board 17

Appeals Process The Board will meet to consider the Recommended Decision and decide whether to: – Uphold the Recommended Decision; – Modify the Recommended Decision; – Send the case back to the Appeals Officer for the taking of additional evidence or further consideration of the issues; or – Reject the Recommended Decision and decide the case for itself based on the record Once the Board issues its decision, either party may request reconsideration 18

Important Considerations No ex parte communications – Neither Board members nor Appeals Officers may have any conversations with one party without the other one present – All communications and documents sent to Board or Appeals Office must also be sent to the opposing party Preserves the intent behind the creation of the Board to have a transparent process for deciding tax appeals at the administrative level Does not prevent communication about administrative matters 19

Important Considerations Board decisions can be appealed to Superior Court – Appeals must be filed within 60 days of receipt of the Board’s final decision – Either party may appeal – Case will be heard de novo by the Court – Although there is a “record” developed by the Appeals Office for the consideration by the Board, this record in no way limits the Court’s review of the case 20

Important Considerations Proceedings are not open to the public Taxpayers do not need to be represented by an attorney See website for a guide to bringing appeals before the Board 21