Log on to the survey now at www.cmeabaysection.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. TOTAL ARMY PERSONNEL COMMAND
Advertisements

Qualifications Update: National 5 Music Qualifications Update: National 5 Music.
You can use this presentation to: Gain an overall understanding of the purpose of the revised tool Learn about the changes that have been made Find advice.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Grantee Program Plan. Components of the Program Plan Goals  Objectives  Activities  Techniques & Tools  Outcomes/Change.
Quick and Easy Ways to Assess while Supporting, Not Interrupting, Your Performance and Rehearsal Agenda.
Discover potential. Expand global opportunity. Copyright © 2011 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo, LISTENING. LEARNING.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Introduction to Measurement and Evaluation
This Presentation: 1.Brief background on teacher evaluation 2.Look at the SLO Process Template 3.Critique Goal Statements and aligned Performance Measures.
Chapter 13 Survey Designs
Business research methods: data sources
Reporting and Presenting Research Findings. Effective Writing Clear, concise, direct Thoughts are complete Attention given to details such as grammar,
Survey Designs EDUC 640- Dr. William M. Bauer
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
1.2 Cultural understanding Exploring how ideas, experiences and emotions are conveyed in a range of music from different times and cultures. 1.3 Critical.
Skill Based Assessments Skills Singing Playing instruments Moving Listening Composing, Improvising, Arranging Notating (perform, read, write -PRW) Examples.
1 New York State Education Department Using Growth Measures for Educator Evaluation August 2012.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
Understanding the North Carolina End-of-Grade Reading and Math Test
BACK TO SCHOOL NIGHT - Parent Information About Band Classes.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Large Group Performance Evaluation Preparation Guidelines for Making a Superior Performance Presented by Banddaddy.com.
Assessing Student Learning Lynn Merklin Assistant Provost Office of Institutional Effectiveness August, 2014.
Customizing Rubrics A GENERAL HOW-TO OVERVIEW By Dr. Paula Roberson, Outcomes Assessment Coordinator.
Digital Teaching Portfolio Induction Daniel Friel.
Why Music Education?  Self Discipline  Group cooperation/Teamwork  Problem-solving  Goal-setting  Self Expression  Memory skills/Concentration 
1: Overview and Field Research in Classrooms ETL329: ENTREPRENEURIAL PROFESSIONAL.
Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches
TrIn 3102: Consecutive Interpreting Week 8: Midterm.
Teacher Evaluation Wednesday, July 24, :30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Value-Added Teacher Evaluation: Explanations and Implications for Michigan Music Educators Colleen Conway, University of Michigan (Session Presider) Abby.
USING SCIENCE JOURNALS TO GUIDE STUDENT LEARNING Part 1: How to create a student science journal Part 2: How to assess student journals for learning.
Record Keeping and Using Data to Determine Report Card Markings.
General Information Initiate and complete the first five SLO sections Use of PPT to guide the process Mostly work session Stay within what we can control.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Target -Method Match Selecting The Right Assessment.
PRESENTED AT: THE ISU SUMMER DIRECTOR WORKSHOPS, JULY 10, 2012 DAVID W. SNYDER MAKING THE GRADE: QUALITY ASSESSMENT FOR INSTRUMENTAL GROUPS.
WARM-UP  On the blank side of your card please write 1-3 things you have learned about the rubric since our last professional development.
The ACE Strategy Week 2: Administer and Evaluate Pre-test Cluster Cycle 2 Goal: By the end of the cycle, 78% of students in grades 3-5 will increase their.
Music Teacher Evaluation Colleen Conway, University of Michigan Phillip Hash, Calvin College Wendee Wolf-Schlarf, Traverse City Public Schools.
Assessment of Hands-on Science Including the Use of Portfolios By: Lori McEllin and Matt Shannon.
Rationale for new system Explanation of point system New Procedures and Score Sheets Comparison of the old and new procedures.
Type One: Capture Ideas Type Two: Respond Correctly Type Three: Edit for Focus Correction Areas Type Four: Peer Edit for Focus Correction Areas Type Five:
Kent School District Middle School Math Curriculum Review TAMI OHOYO COORDINATOR OF SECONDARY MATH TEACHING & LEARNING.
Grading Rubric – Research Papers Dennis Duncan University of Georgia.
After School Workshops 17 Feb, 3, 17, 31 Mar, 26 May, 14, 9, 23 June, 28July, 11, 25 Aug. Presenter Sandra Pizaro Learning More about Teaching Students.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
ADJUDICATION AND SCORING. Primarily local competitions with a culminating championship competition Mostly guards from North Texas Series of regional championships.
Rubric Word Cloud Activity. Step 1: Read through the description words on the rubric for the top scores of each category (adjectives/adverbs/verbs) and.
Miss Amorin Language Arts SAT
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
C H A P T E R 3 Rubrics Chapter 3 Rubrics.
KS2 SATS Guidance for Parents
Rubric Development and Design
Writing Rubrics Module 5 Activity 4.
Chapter 6: Checklists, Rating Scales & Rubrics
U.S. TOTAL ARMY PERSONNEL COMMAND
Step 1: Take out your essay and open to Poetry Section 4 in Notebook:
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California
New York State Education Department Using Growth Measures for Educator Evaluation August 2012.
Welcome to CMEA Region 2018 Auditions
NFHS Music Conference - Chicago
Marching Band Festival Terminology and scoring
U.S. TOTAL ARMY PERSONNEL COMMAND
U.S. TOTAL ARMY PERSONNEL COMMAND
jot down your thoughts re:
jot down your thoughts re:
Presentation transcript:

Log on to the survey now at

Broad Descriptors— not genre specific No reference to established rubrics Ratings tend to be highly subjective Ratings ranges are too narrow Same qualitative and quantitative scale is applied to all groups

The Current Evaluation Form All Purpose Form Generic Language that encompasses all Genres (Band, Orchestra, Choir) Four Captions: Quality of Sound (30 pts) Technique (30 pts) Musicality (30 pts) Other Factors (10 pts) Five Ratings: Superior Excellent Good Fair Needs Improvement

Incorporates rubrics to substantiate the rating Uses language in rubrics that is specific to each genre: Instrumental, Choral, Jazz Uses an Adjusted Point Scale for different levels of groups Uses Broader Ratings Ranges for greater flexibility in assigning ratings Evaluation Rubrics and Score/Comment Sheet are All-in-One

Three Classifications Directors Select Classification when Registering Groups

Adjustable Point Scale

Captions feature genre-specific descriptors

Applying the Point Scale with the Rubric

Other Factors 5 points is the Baseline score Award points for excellence Subtract points for deficiencies Other Factors becomes a more important category in which points are earned by the group as opposed to being an automatic award

Expanded Ratings Ranges Superior: Excellent: Good: Fair: 6-33

Revised Comment/Score Sheet Revised to reflect individual genres Evaluation Form will be on the reverse of the Evaluation Scale/Rubric Easy access by Adjudicators and Directors

JAZZ COMMENT/SCORE SHEET

Adjudicators will have to adjust- easy with practice Overall numeric scores will trend lower Numbers will more honestly reflect level of performance Directors and Students can see room for growth Adjudicators will have specific vocabulary and phrases at their fingertips during the performance. Can circle phrases on the sheet Adjudicators will have more flexibility with the new scoring system Directors and Students will be able to reference the rubrics as they listen to recorded comments and read written comments

All groups would be required to sight read at Bay Section Music Festivals – Emphasizes importance of developing fluency in the language of Music – Aligned with the CA State Standards – Makes scheduling and Adjudicator routing easier

SIGHT READING PROPOSAL Procedural Changes (Instrumental & Jazz) that places responsibility to interpret notes and rhythms with students Director has 2 minutes to study the score Director has 5 minutes to discuss selection with group – Director may not sing lines, clap rhythms or demonstrate the music in any way – Students may sing, clap, finger but may not make any sound on instruments – At end of 5 minutes, Adjudicator reads statement to group reminding them of importance of going without stopping.

New SR Form 70 point scale Descriptors are specific to genres (Instrumental, Choral, Jazz) Expanded ratings ranges Option to SR for Comments Only Adjudicator uses 5 points as Baseline for each Caption

Pilot Programs involving “Shadow” Adjudicators at the following festivals: Jazz West— Aragon HS Jan. 31 Band/Orchestra North— Terra Linda HS Mar. 20 Choral East— Acalanes HS Apr. 25