What’s New in the Fifth Edition Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting May 23, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review & Update of the Stormwater C.3 Guidebook Dan Cloak, P.E. Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Advertisements

Urban Low Impact Development English + Associates Owner Architect Construction EcoServices Storm-water Tank Contractor General Contractor T&T Construction.
Construction of Facilities Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting Construction Workshop, May 2, 2012.
Discussion Topics Brief history of structural stormwater management The Low Impact Development (LID) alternative to ponds, ponds, ponds… LID for Hydromodification.
Soils Well-designed systems capture sediment near the entrances Sediment loads vary by facility Regular visual checks are the key City of Portland Environmental.
Operation & Maintenance Requirements: Tips for Keeping Your Agency in Compliance Kristin Kerr, P.E., QSD EOA, Inc. New Development Workshop May 22, 2013.
Infiltration Trenches Dave Briglio, P.E. MACTEC Mike Novotney Center for Watershed Protection.
Preparing a Stormwater Control Plan Stormwater C.3 Guidebook 6 th Edition.
LID and Stormwater Technical Resource Center Update County Road Administration Board November 3,
LID Site Design and Drainage Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting May 23, 2011.
& Community Design LSU Green Laws Research Project Green Laws Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry EBR Parish Tree And Landscape Commission Louisiana.
Introduction To The Highway Runoff Manual This introduction focus on: An overview of the Highway Runoff Manual. The definition of Minimum Requirements.
INLAND EMPIRE ASCE & APWA LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) SEMINAR INLAND EMPIRE ASCE & APWA LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) SEMINAR LID FACILITY DESIGN Prepared.
Where are the regulations going? Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting May 23, 2011.
Low Impact Development Overview  Alternative to end of pipe approach to SWM  Maintain hydrologic function of local ecosystem  Treat stormwater close.
Low Impact Development for Stormwater Treatment and Hydrograph Modification Management in California Dan Cloak, Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Stormwater Management
Bioretention Design Getting the Details Right. Coordination of Plans Curb elevations, grade breaks, architectural plans consistent with delineation of.
Why and How; What’s Working and What Isn’t.  How Low Impact Development can mitigate effects of urban drainage  Applying design criteria for bioretention.
UVM-AWRA CHARRETTE: designing an alternative stormwater treatment technique W h a t I s a C h a r r e t t e? A Charrette is a cross-disciplinary workshop.
C.3 in MRP 2.0 What to Expect (as of March 17, 2015) Dan Cloak.
Stormwater Infrastructure for Water Quality Management Dr. Larry A. Roesner, P.E. CE 394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology University of Texas, Austin April 8,
For Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting December 14, 2010 Contra Costa Clean Water Program.
Implementing MRP Provision C.3 Stormwater NPDES Compliance For New Developments.
6 th Edition CCCWP Management Committee February 15, 2012.
Inspecting Construction of Bioretention Facilities Carlton Thompson and Jeff Cowling.
Horsley Witten Group, Inc. Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual Public Workshop Design Elements for BMPs January 19, 2011.
To Meet NPDES Retention and Hydromodification Management Requirements Tom Dalziel Program Manager, Contra Costa Clean Water Program Dan Cloak Dan Cloak.
Bioretention Dave Briglio, P.E. MACTEC Mike Novotney Center for Watershed Protection.
STEP 3: SITING AND SIZING STORM WATER CONTROLS Section 6.
Steve Harrison, Environmental Manager Bureau of Entomology and Pest Control -Mosquito Control Section.
Background and Overview Stormwater NPDES Compliance For New Developments.
Dan Cloak, P.E. 18 September 2007 to achieve water quality benefits in Contra Costa County Implementing Low Impact Development.
Putting the “LID” on Water Pollution New Water Quality Requirements for Land Use County of Orange Mary Anne Skorpanich Richard Boon.
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods by Marty Wanielista, Josh Spence, and Ewoud Hulstein Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
Department of Public Works NPDES Low Impact Development and Green Streets Resolutions City Council August 17, 2015.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Dan Cloak, P.E. Presentation to the San Diego Region Co-permittees Hydromodification Workgroup December 6, 2006 Contra.
What’s New in Stormwater Requirements for Development Projects? Jill Bicknell, P.E. EOA, Inc. New Development Workshop May 22, 2013.
Why are we here today? To discuss the challenges we face in meeting NPDES Phase II minimum requirements for stormwater control. The NPDES program requires.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Dan Cloak Presentation to the Citizens Advisory Committee November 13, 2006 Options for implementing new Phase II.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow-Control Requirements in Phase I and Phase II Municipal NPDES Permits Dan Cloak, Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
Stormwater Water Quality Treatment Options Alvin Shoblom, P.E. Hydraulics Engineer.
Hydrograph Modification Management in Contra Costa County Dan Cloak, P.E. Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Regulatory Refresher What Construction Site Inspectors Need to Know about the MRP Kristin Kerr, P.E., QSD EOA, Inc. Construction Inspection Workshop April.
Low impact development strategies and techniques jennifer j. bitting, pe the low impact development center, inc. june 2008.
Stormwater and C.3 Overview Tom Dalziel, Assistant Manager Contra Costa Clean Water Program.
Low Impact Development for Compliance with NPDES Treatment and Hydrograph Modification Management Requirements in Contra Costa County Tom Dalziel, Assistant.
For Bioretention Facilities Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting May 23, 2011.
Countywide Model SUSMP July 17, Topics SUSMP Timeline Goals Approach to Compliance NPDES Permit Requirements NPDES Permit Requirements Model SUSMP.
Low Impact Development (LID)
Low Impact Development [presenters name] [presentation date] Integrated Management Practices Controlling Stormwater Quality and Quantity using.
LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT APPROACHES
Effective Post-Construction Stormwater Management Mike Novotney, P.E. (MD) Center for Watershed Protection Ronald Feldner, P.E. Ecological Solutions, Inc.
Post-Construction Requirements Design Challenges Dan Cloak, P.E.
Local Plans, Regulations, or Policies Supporting Green Infrastructure City and County of Honolulu Department of Facility Maintenance – Storm Water Quality.
Operation & Maintenance of Permanent Stormwater Controls Overview of Inspection Requirements Laura Prickett, AICP, CPESC EOA, Inc. Construction Inspection.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Analyzing a Development Site for Low Impact Development design.
SWPPP: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Creating/Implementing a Plan for Compliance.
Low Impact Development Practices. What is Low Impact Development (LID)? LID is an approach to land development (or re- development) that works with nature.
1. Wolfeboro’s Tool Kit Implemented tools for water quality protection Municipal Watershed District Ground Water Protection Overlay District Steep Slope.
City of Clarksville Storm Water Management Manual Revisions 2014.
Construction of On-Site Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Facilities Dan Cloak, P.E. Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Green Infrastructure Planning Update
Green Infrastructure Planning Update
Alternative Compliance for New Developments
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Presentation transcript:

What’s New in the Fifth Edition Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting May 23, 2011

 Guidebook Objectives and Methods  Brief History of Contra Costa’s Approach  Review of New Features  New Integrated Management Practices  New Specifications and Details for IMPs  New Chapter on Construction of IMPs

 Objectives  Permit compliance for all projects  Applicants know what they need to submit  Reviewers can determine quickly and with confidence whether a project complies  Projects that work!  Methods  Continuous Improvement  Engage the experience and perspectives of developers, designers, builders, and operators

 First Edition—January 2005  Based on a manual developed for City of Milpitas  C.3 requirements implemented 2/15/2005  Second Edition—March 2005  Basic format and features of the current edition  Emphasis on Drainage Management Areas  4% sizing factor  Fact sheets from infiltration feasibility study  Third Edition—October 2006  Met obligation to implement the Hydrograph Modification Management Plan (HMP) approved by the Water Board in June 2006  More emphasis on Low Impact Development  Policies for Phased Projects and Subdivisions  New IMP sizing factors for HMP compliance  IMP Sizing Calculator  Fourth Edition—October 2008  March 2007 design charrette to improve IMP designs  Expanded design sheets include many new drawings  LID Design Guide (Chapter 4)  Consolidated and shortened

Impervious Area Threshold Effective Date Requirement All projects requiring municipal approvals or permits May 1, 2010 Consider site design features. Incorporate Source Controls Projects between 2,500 and 10,000 square feet requiring approvals or permits December 1, 2012 Incorporate one LID feature from the stated menu. Auto service facilities, gas stations, restaurants, and uncovered parking lots over 5,000 square feet December 1, 2011 Prepare and submit a Stormwater Control Plan. Use the LID Design Guide in Chapter 4, including sizing factors and criteria for “treatment only.” All projects between 10,000 square feet and one acre † August 15, 2006 Projects an acre and largerOctober 14, 2006 Prepare a Stormwater Control Plan. Use the LID Design Guide. Incorporate flow control into the LID design if required. Page 4

 Alternative Compliance Options  No requirement to demonstrate infeasibility of on-site treatment  1:1 substitution of impervious area  Must be LID treatment  Should be at least as much pollutant loading  Can combine on-site and off-site treatment  Can also share proportionally in a larger project  Consideration or acceptance of alternative compliance is at the discretion of the municipality Page 10

 Flow control for projects on sites that are already partially developed * see footnote  Selection of Stormwater Treatment Facilities  First, use LID features that minimize runoff  Assess feasibility of harvesting and (re)use  Two options for (re)use  Storage for two days or less (same volume as a detention basin)  Seasonal storage (60% of mean annual precipitation) Page 15 Page 16

Page Assemble Info 2. Identify Constraints and Opportunities 3. Prepare and Document Your LID Design 4. Specify Source Control BMPs 5. Describe Stormwater Facility Maintenance 6. Complete Exhibit and Report

 Overall LID Design Approach is retained  Addition of a fifth LID Strategy: 1. Optimize the site layout 2. Use pervious surfaces or surfaces that retain runoff 3. Disperse runoff on to adjacent pervious surfaces 4. Store runoff and use it later 5. Direct drainage from impervious surfaces to IMPs Page 35

 Two New IMPs (from 2009 supplement)  Bioretention facilities  Flow-through planters  Cistern + bioretention facilities  Bioretention + vault facilities  Dry wells and other infiltration facilities Page 49

 Incorporated into the IMP Sizng Calculator  New Design Sheets Pages 87, 91

Native soil, no compaction. Rip to loosen. Class 2 perm (Assume 40% porosity for calculation of V 2 ) Min. 12“ or as needed to achieve V 2 Min. 18“ Specified soil mix 3" max. mulch if specified in landscape plans Min. 6" or as needed to achieve V 1 Curb cut (or curb inlet if needed to ensure runoff capture) 4" min. dia. SDR 35 or equiv. sweep bend and cleanout min. 2" above overflow level 4 " min. dia. SDR 35 or equiv., perforations facing down Top of Gravel Layer TGL Bottom of Gravel Layer BGL Top of Soil Layer TSL Overflow structure 24" min x 36" min. concrete drop inlet or manhole with frame and atrium or beehive grate, ¼ “ openings Schedule 80 (no perforations) seal penetration with grout Male threaded pipe end with cap center-drilled to specified orifice dia. (Omit cap for treatment-only facilities.) 24" 6" To storm drain or approved discharge point Notes: No liner, no filter fabric, no landscape cloth. Maintain BGL. TGL, TSL throughout facility area at elevations to be specified in plan. Class 2 perm layer may extend below and underneath drop inlet. Preferred elevation of perforated pipe underdrain is near top of gravel layer. See Appendix B for soil mix specification, planting and irrigation guidance. See Chapter 4 for factors and equations used to calculate V 1, V 2, and orifice diameter. Install all plantings to maintain TSL at or below specified elevation Cobbles or splash block Adjacent pavemen t Moisture barrier if needed to protect pavement or structures Bioretention Facility Cross-section Not to Scale Large diameter closed perforated pipes or arches may augment storage to achieve V 2 Walls as needed to establish constant rim elevation around perimeter of facility Page 76

 Based on growing experience with design and construction of bioretention facilities  Construction of Integrated Management Practices  What to show on construction plans  Where to call out elevations  Use cross-sections  Show how runoff moves  Construction checklist Page 93

 Soils, Plantings, and Irrigation for Bioretention Facilities  Originally published as a separate addendum in January 2009  Soil specification to be implemented throughout the Bay Area  Mix of “concrete sand” (ASTM C33) and compost  Useful guidance on soil and plant installation and plant maintenance  Plant list