May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop New Ionosphere Products Proposed for SWPC Tim Fuller-Rowell, Mihail Codrescu, Rashid Akmaev, Eduardo Araujo-Pradere,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modelling complexity in the upper atmosphere using GPS data Chris Budd, Cathryn Mitchell, Paul Spencer Bath Institute for Complex Systems, University of.
Advertisements

NOAA Non-standard and Test Products for Space Weather AGU – 12/2012 Paper: IN31D-03 William Denig 1 Rodney Viereck 2 1 National Geophysical Data Center.
M. Gende 1,2, C. Brunini 1,2, F. Azpilicueta 1,2 Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina 1 CONICET, Argentina 2 La Plata Ionospheric Model as a tool.
Algorithm Working Group Space Weather Team Activities and Plans S. Hill, H. Singer, T. Onsager, R. Viereck, D. Biesecker, C. Balch – NOAA/NWS/NCEP/SEC.
4/18 6:08 UT 4/17 6:09 UT Average polar cap flux North cap South cap… South cap South enter (need to modify search so we are here) South exit SAA Kress,
29 April 2011Viereck: Space Weather Workshop 2011 The Recent Solar Minimum: How Low Was It? What Were The Consequences? Rodney Viereck NOAA Space Weather.
ALTITUDE PROFILES OF ELECTRON DENSITY DURING LEP EVENTS FROM VLF MONITORING OF THE LOWER IONOSPHERE Desanka Šulić 1 and Vladimir Srećković 2 1 Institute.
Space Weather Effects on GPS Thomas J. Bogdan, Director Space Weather Prediction Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA 325 Broadway, DSRC Room 2C109 Boulder, CO 80305,
Abstract Since the ionosphere is the interface between the Earth and space environments and impacts radio, television and satellite communication, it is.
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
GEM Workshop June 24, 2003 Data Assimilation Workshop Notes Why and What is Data Assimilation? What Data Assimilation is not Key Challenges in Data Assimilation.
Mesoscale ionospheric tomography over Finland Juha-Pekka Luntama Finnish Meteorological Institute Cathryn Mitchell, Paul Spencer University of Bath 4th.
CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March Ionosphere-Thermosphere Modeling Tim Killeen, Stan Solomon, and the CISM Ionosphere-Thermosphere Team.
TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.
Use of GPS Radio Occultation in Space Weather Applications and Ionospheric Research Tim Fuller-Rowell and Ernie Hildner NOAA Space Environment Center and.
NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center Products and Services T. Onsager, J. Kunches, W. Murtagh, and C. Balch NOAA GPS/GNSS Workshop Boulder, CO October.
New Operational Algorithms for Charged Particle Data from Low-Altitude Polar-Orbiting Satellites J. L. Machol 1,2 *, J.C. Green 1, J.V. Rodriguez 3,4,
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Space Weather Aviation Operational Needs
Space Weather in Ionosphere and Thermosphere Yihua Zheng For SW REDI 2013.
Effects of ionospheric small- scale structures on GNSS G. WAUTELET Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Ionospheric Radio Systems & Techniques (IRST)
GPS derived TEC Measurements for Plasmaspheric Studies: A Tutorial and Recent Results Mark Moldwin LD Zhang, G. Hajj, I. Harris, T. Mannucci, X. PI.
EGU General Assembly 2013, 7 – 12 April 2013, Vienna, Austria This study: is pioneer in modeling the upper atmosphere, using space geodetic techniques,
Part Va Centimeter-Level Instantaneous Long-Range RTK: Methodology, Algorithms and Application GS894G.
IRI Workshop 2005 TEC Measurements with Dual-Frequency Space Techniques and Comparisons with IRI T. Hobiger, H. Schuh Advanced Geodesy, Institute of Geodesy.
June, 2003EUMETSAT GRAS SAF 2nd User Workshop. 2 The EPS/METOP Satellite.
ARL Applied Research Laboratories The University of Texas at Austin ARL Applied Research Laboratories The University of Texas at Austin Ionospheric Tomography.
1 Agenda Topic: Space Weather Modeling and the Whole Atmosphere Model (WAM) Presented By: Rodney Viereck(NWS/NCEP/SWPC) Contributors: Rashid Akmaev (SWPC)
Sub-ionospheric Point hmhm Ionosphere Earth Surface Ionospheric Piercing Point High Resolution GPS-TEC Gradients in the Northern Hemisphere Ionospheric.
K9LA Vancouver 2003 Disturbances to Propagation Carl Luetzelschwab K9LA CQ DX?Where’d everybody go?
Simulations of the effects of extreme solar flares on technological systems at Mars Paul Withers, Boston University Sunday
Annual Interagency Weather Research Review and Coordination Meeting Aviation related Space Weather product verification December, 2010 Rodney Viereck Research.
Claudinei Rodrigues de Aguiar Federal University of Technology - Parana Paulo de Oliveira Camargo São Paulo State University.
1 J July, Ionospheric Calibration for the GFO AltimeterXiaoqing JPL Review Ionospheric Calibration for the GFO Altimeter Xiaoqing Pi Byron.
P. Wielgosz and A. Krankowski IGS AC Workshop Miami Beach, June 2-6, 2008 University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Joint International GRACE Science Team Meeting and DFG SPP 1257 Symposium, Oct. 2007, GFZ Potsdam Folie 1 Retrieval of electron density profiles.
1 Space Environment Corporation Investigation and Development of Data-Driven D-Region Model for HF Systems Impacts D. Rice Space Environment Corp., Providence,
VARIABILITY OF TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT AT EUROPEAN LATITUDES A. Krankowski(1), L. W. Baran(1), W. Kosek (2), I. I. Shagimuratov(3), M. Kalarus (2) (1) Institute.
Retrieval of Moisture from GPS Slant-path Water Vapor Observations using 3DVAR and its Impact on the Prediction of Convective Initiation and Precipitation.
M. Gende, C. Brunini Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. Improving Single Frequency Positioning Using SIRGAS Ionospheric Products.
The Mesoscale Ionospheric Simulation Testbed (MIST) Regional Data Assimilation Model Joseph Comberiate Michael Kelly Ethan Miller June 24, 2013.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Preliminary results from assimilation of GPS radio occultation data in WRF using an ensemble filter H. Liu, J. Anderson, B. Kuo, C. Snyder, A. Caya IMAGe.
HF Communication Disruptions from Disturbed Ionosphere Conditions
Assimilating Data Into Ionospheric Models: The Real-Time Revolution Anthony Mannucci, JPL Brian Wilson, JPL George Hajj, JPL, USC Lukas Mandrake, JPL Xiaoqing.
Transient response of the ionosphere to X-ray solar flares Jaroslav Chum (1), Jaroslav Urbář (1), Jann-Yenq Liu (2) (1) Institute of Atmospheric Physics,
Ionospheric Assimilation Model for Space Weather Monitoring and Forecasting I. T. Lee 1 W. H. Chen 2, T. Matsuo 3,4, C. H. Chang 2,
Formosat3/COSMIC Workshop, Taipei, Oct. 1-3, 2008 The Ionosphere as Signal and Noise in Radio Occultation Christian Rocken, Sergey Sokolovskiy, Bill Schreiner,
Electron density profile retrieval from RO data Xin’an Yue, Bill Schreiner  Abel inversion error of Ne  Data Assimilation test.
Data Assimilation Retrieval of Electron Density Profiles from Radio Occultation Measurements Xin’an Yue, W. S. Schreiner, Jason Lin, C. Rocken, Y-H. Kuo.
0 7th ESWW, Bruges, Ionospheric Scintillations Propagation Model Y. Béniguel, J-P Adam IEEA, Courbevoie, France.
What is a geomagnetic storm? A very efficient exchange of energy from the solar wind into the space environment surrounding Earth; These storms result.
IGARSS 2011, Vancuver, Canada July 28, of 14 Chalmers University of Technology Monitoring Long Term Variability in the Atmospheric Water Vapor Content.
Simulations of the effects of extreme solar flares on technological systems at Mars Paul Withers, Boston University Monday
1 AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY Dr. Keith Groves Space Weather Center of Excellence AFRL/VSBXI 29 Randolph Rd Hanscom AFB, MA voice
Space Weather Services to Build Global Resilience Expert Meeting on Space Weather Services February 3, 2015 – UNCOPUOS STSC Assembly Goal: Foster greater.
Bringing 93,000,000 Miles to 40,000 Feet: Space Weather & Aviation An introduction to Space Weather What is it? Where does it come from? What does it do?
AXK/JPL SBAS Training at Stanford University, October 27-30, 2003 Satellite Based Augmentation Systems Brazilian Ionosphere Group Training at Stanford.
GOES Data Status Mutual Benefits of NASA THEMIS and NOAA GOES
Space weather phenomena in the ionosphere and their effect on GNSS
S. Datta-Barua, Illinois Institute of Technology G. S. Bust, JHUAPL
Utilizing Scientific Advances in Operational Systems
Early Alert of Solar Radiation Hazard
Center for Atmospheric & Space Sciences
Prospects for real-time physics-based thermosphere ionosphere models for neutral density specification and forecast Tim Fuller-Rowell, Mariangel Fedrizzi,
Formosat3 / COSMIC The Ionosphere as Signal and Noise
Formosat3 / COSMIC The Ionosphere as Signal and Noise
Effects and magnitudes of some specific errors
GPS Ionospheric Mapping at Natural Resources Canada
Data Assimilation and the GAIM Model at the Air Force Weather Agency
Presentation transcript:

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop New Ionosphere Products Proposed for SWPC Tim Fuller-Rowell, Mihail Codrescu, Rashid Akmaev, Eduardo Araujo-Pradere, Mike Husler, and Herb Sauer 1 NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center and/or CIRES University of Colorado 1 National Geophysical Data Center

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop New SWPC “Ionosphere” Products: in transition or proposed D-Region absorption upgrade - FY08 GPS Ionosphere Positioning Correction (GIPC) - FY08 US-TEC short-term forecast - FY09

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop New SWPC “Ionosphere” Products: in transition or proposed D-Region absorption upgrade - FY08 GPS Ionosphere Positioning Correction (GIPC) - FY08 US-TEC short-term forecast - FY09

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop D-Region absorption in response to solar X-ray flare Driver: GOES X-rays Dayside response to flare Zenith angle dependence Frequency dependence Estimated recovery time based on current X-ray flux

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop Combined flare and Polar Cap Absorption (PCA) ( Provided by Michael P. Husler, NOAA SEC) June 21, :00 UT Kp= 3 Color scale denotes frequency at which the ionospheric absorption equals 1 dB

Day/Night Absorption Algorithms developed by Sellers et al* Provides 30 MHz absorption estimates Driven by proton fluxes obtained in real-time by NOAA GOES Day/night differences due to electron attachment to O 2 in absence of UV radiation Day-time Abs A d = [ J(E>5.2 MeV)] 1/2 dB Night-time Abs A n = [J(E>2.2 MeV)] 1/2 dB *Sellers, B., F.A.Hanser, M.A. Stroscio, and G.K.Yates, The night and day relationships between polar cap riometer absorption and solar protons, Radio Sci., v12, pp , Twilight absorption bi-linear fit to values at  10  solar elevation angle A = A d [ El + 10] / 20 – A n [ El – 10 ] / 20 Recovery time-scale based on current GOES flux levels

Geomagnetic Latitude Dependence - Determine Cutoff Energy Effects The absorption at lower than polar cap latitudes are obtained from application of geomagnetic cutoff energies which include their dependence on geomagnetic activity (K p ) as derived from the results of Smart et al* and illustrated below. *Smart, D.F., M.A.Shea, E.O.Fluckiger, A.J.Tylka, and P.R.Boberg., Changes of calculated vertical cutoff rigidities at the altitude of the International Space Station as a function of geomagnetic activity, Proc. Int’l Cosmic Ray Conf., v7, pp , 2001

Frequency Dependence The absorption at a frequency, f, other than 30 MHz (A f ) is obtained from the approximate dependence of ionospheric absorption on the inverse power law of the frequency (e.g.: Patterson et al*) A f = (30/f) 1.5 A 30 *Patterson, J.D., T.P.Armstrong, and C.M.Laird, Correlation of solar energetic protons and polar cap absorption, J.Geophys. Res., 106, A1, pp ,2001.

Specimen Comparison with Observation: Thule 30 MHz Riometer Panel a): GOES particle fluxes. Panel b): Observed absorption with calculated day and night absorption Panel c): Observed and fully estimated absorption Panel d): Calculated solar elevation angles a) b) c) d)

Comparison of Calculation with observations provided by AFGL’s Thule Riometers for 11 largest events Top panels: GOES particle fluxes. 2 nd panels: Observed absorption with calculated day and night absorption 3 rd panels: Observed and fully estimated absorption 4 th panels: Calculated solar elevation angles

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop Combined X-ray and PCA

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop Polar Region Display - 10dB PCA depends on solar illumination O 2 - e - attachment process in the D-region

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop New SWPC “Ionosphere” Products: in transition or proposed D-Region absorption upgrade - FY08 GPS Ionosphere Positioning Correction (GIPC) - FY08 US-TEC short-term forecast - FY09

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop US-TEC Target Users: Positioning and Navigation community Collaboration between SWPC, NGS, FSL, and NGDC Kalman filter over CONUS + ground-based GPS data, IRI background model, solve for receiver biases 15-minute cadence 15 to 30 minute latency TEC unit accuracy (~ cm delay at L1 frequencies)

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop Slant-Path TEC Maps 2-D maps of of slant path TEC over the CONUS for each GPS satellite in view updated every 15 minutes Applications: 1. Ionospheric correction for single frequency GPS 2. Support dual-frequency integer ambiguity resolution for more rapid decimeter and centimeter accuracy positioning Sat. 1 Sat. 5 Sat. 14 Sat. 29 …. etc A A A AB B B B C C C C C

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop Ionosphere phase delay/advance for NGS in new RINEX format US-TEC slant TEC provides ionospheric correctors for RINEX files Sat. 29 AB C

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop New SWPC “Ionosphere” Products: in transition or proposed D-Region absorption upgrade - FY08 GPS Ionosphere Positioning Correction (GIPC) - FY08 US-TEC short-term forecast - FY09

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop Mid-latitude day-to-day variability in ionospheric total electron content

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop The challenge in forecasting the ionosphere and total electron content 15 minute units 12hrs24hrs 15 min intervals 1hr forecast hr forecast 0.8

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop VTEC Short-term Forecast Using USTEC 10-day average to predict the ionospheric behavior in to the next 1 to 2 hours., USTEC 10-day average USTEC 15-min data time  Now   – Departure of “now value” from the 10-day average. Now-24 h Now-24+  t    –  TEC in the 10-average between the value at now-24 h and now-24+  t  t < 6hrs Now+  t    

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop New SWPC “Ionosphere” Products: in transition or proposed D-Region absorption upgrade - FY08 GPS Ionosphere Positioning Correction (GIPC) - FY08 US-TEC short-term forecast - FY09

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop Latitude dependence

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop US-TEC Validation Summary Differential TEC: Slant = 2.4 TEC units Vertical = 1.7 TEC units “Absolute” FORTE ray tracing: Slant = 2.7 TEC units Vertical = 1.9 TEC units Estimated US-TEC slant path total electron content uncertainty < 3 TEC units (equivalent to about 45 cm of signal delay at L1 frequencies) Estimate US-TEC vertical total electron content uncertainty < 2 TEC units (equivalent to about 30 cm of signal delay at L1 frequencies)

***************************************************************************************************

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop “Differential” Validation Integrate through US- TEC model at two different times. Compare directly to the phase difference in the original RINEX data file. As time separation increases, errors in US-TEC map become uncorrelated and approach true uncertainty. Araujo-Pradere et al. 2006

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop US-TEC “Differential” Validation Validation stations not included in assimilation process Build up statistics every 5th day over 6 months Daily average RMSE for each site Slant path RMSE US-TEC IRI

Validation Statistics: “differential” TEC 2.4 TEC units

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop Absolute validation: FORTE Fast Onboard Recording of Transient Events satellite (Los Alamos, Abe Jacobson) Phase or arrival time as function of frequency Separate O and X traces Fit to k/f 2 dependence provides TEC estimate Time of arrival Frequency Broad-band RF receiver MHz at 800 km altitude Designed to monitor lightning Pulse transmitted from Los Alamos (simulated lightning) Possible to estimate line-of-sight TEC between transmitter and FORTE satellite Broad-band signal/receiver eliminates phase ambiguity so produces an “absolute” TEC estimate (uncertainty estimate is about 1 to 2 TEC units) Issues are –bending of the rays, –plasmaspheric content, and having to sub-sample US-TEC vertical domain

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop US-TEC/FORTE Statistics “Absolute”: using 178 FORTE observations between June 30, 2000, and November 27, 2001 All values in TECU Minter et al. 2006

May 1st 2008SWPC/NOAA SWW Workshop OPUS – GIPC (GPS Ionospheric Positioning Correction) SWPC (USTEC output is used to derive the ionospheric delay) RINEX Processed (a new I1 observable added to the RINEX file) RINEX No Processed (comment added to the file) NGS (quality control) Customer RINEX NGS Special Projects Users (NGS, surveyors, etc.) RINEX TRANSITION: 4 th quarter ‘08