[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO] [ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT] [Presenter Name,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Advertisements

Agency reviews: purpose and stages of the review process Achim Hopbach.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Health and Safety Committees RENZO BERTOLINI Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety.
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs
FRCC Fall Compliance Workshop October , 2013
1 PER-005 Update Impact on Operators System Operator Conference April and May 1-3, 2012 Columbia, SC Margaret Stambach Manager, Training Services.
MODULE B - PROCESS B1. ASME Organizational Structure B2. Standards Development: Staff and Volunteer Roles and Responsibilities B3. Conformity Assessment:
[ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification for [RELATED ENTITIES] [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT] [ Presenter Name, Title] Closing Presentation.
CIP Spot Check Process Gary Campbell Manager of Compliance Audits ReliabilityFirst Corporation August, 2009.
Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B5Consensus Process for Standards Development ASME S&C Training Module B5 Consensus Process for.
School Safety Training
[ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification Review for [RELATED ENTITIES] [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT] [Presenter Name, Title] Closing Presentation.
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop January 16, 2009 – Orlando FL Roles & Responsibilities Pre- and Post- Assessment.
U.S. Small Business Administration
ERCOT Compliance Audits Robert Potts Sr. Reliability Analyst March 23, 2005.
Lisa Wood, CISA, CBRM, CBRA Compliance Auditor, Cyber Security
1 Texas Regional Entity Report December Performance Highlights ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for October – Initial.
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO] [ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification Review for [RELATED ENTITIES] [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE.
Where to find Information About Facilities. Overview of Title V Permits.
Update On The ERO Transition Activities To Comply With The 2005 EPAC ERCOT TAC Meeting March 9, 2006 Sam Jones, COO.
Procedures and Forms 2008 FRCC Compliance Workshop April 8-9, 2008.
SPP.org 1. EMS Users Group – CIP Standards The Compliance Audits Are Coming… Are You Ready?
How to prepare for an Authorized Agent Compliance Review Ronald Hebert Water Section Manager Region 10/ Beaumont (409)
Monitoring Schedule David Chappell, or
Texas Regional Entity Update Sam Jones Interim CEO and President Board of Directors July 18, 2006.
NERC Data Collection & Coordination. Rules of Procedure: Section 1600 Overview  NERC’s authority to issue a mandatory data request in the U.S. is contained.
SUMMARY OF INFORMAL COMMENTS Temporary Waiver of Terms Regulations May 2006.
QUALITY OF EVIDENCE FRCC Compliance Workshop September/October 2008.
1 Texas Regional Entity 2008 Budget Update May 16, 2007.
Overview of WECC and Regulatory Structure
Title V Operating Permit Program 1 Section 1: Intro to Title V Laura McKelvey U.S. EPA.
Item 5d Texas RE 2011 Budget Assumptions April 19, Texas RE Preliminary Budget Assumptions Board of Directors and Advisory Committee April 19,
Date Meeting Title (optional) Enforcement and Sanctions Presenter Name Presenter Title (Optional)
Bill Lewis, Compliance Team Lead NERC Reliability Working Group May 16, 2013 Texas RE Update Talk with Texas RE April 25, 2013.
Paragraph 81 Project. 2RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY Background FERC March 15, 2012 Order regarding the Find, Fix, Track and Report (FFT) process  Paragraph.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) AS9104/2A Presentation San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company 1 Other Party.
Problem Areas Updates Penalties FRCC Compliance Workshop September / October
Rhonda Anderson, RHIA, President  …is a PROCESS, not a PROJECT 2.
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
 Definition of a quality Audit  Types of audit  Qualifications of quality auditors  The audit process.
Introduction This presentation is intended as an introduction to the audit process for employees of entities being audited by MACD. Please refer to the.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program - The Audit Process.
Establishing and Maintaining Effective Safety Committees.
2011 ReliabilityFirst 693 Compliance Audit Process for 6 Year Audit Cycle Entities Glenn Kaht Senior Consultant - Compliance ReliabilityFirst Corporation.
Electric Reliability Organization and Issues in Texas Technical Advisory Committee January 4, 2006 Jess Totten Director, Electric Industry Oversight Division.
HunterDouglas VPP TRAINING.
SAR 001 DT Presentation Texas RE Presentation to SAR-001 Drafting Team Farzaneh Tafreshi Manager, Reliability Standards Texas Regional Entity.
1 Power System Restoration. 2 Not Active 3 4 Compliance Audit Process APPA E&O Technical Conference – Atlanta April 16, 2007.
Compliance Update Larry Grimm ERCOT Compliance To The ERCOT Board of Directors September 20, 2005.
Document Categorization Policy Chris Albrecht, Legal Counsel W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
Compliance Program Update Lisa Milanes Manager of Compliance Administration.
Updated ERO Enterprise Guide for Internal Controls
NERC Entity Registration and Certification in the ERCOT Region
Rachel Coyne Manager, Reliability Standards Program
Audit of <insert title and audit #>
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Standards and Certification Training
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]
[ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification
Audit of <insert title and audit #>
[ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification Review
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]
Coordinate Operations Standard
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
Accessibility Supports Training
Document Categorization Policy
Presentation transcript:

[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO] [ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT] [Presenter Name, Title] Opening Presentation [Month Day, Year]

RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY2 Topics to Discuss Team Members Team Member Requirements Certification Aspects Bucket Items Certification Process Certification Appeals Evidence Policy Questions and Answers [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY3 Team Members [Team Leader 1 (CTL)][Company affiliation] [Team Member 2][Company affiliation] [Team Member 3][Company affiliation] [Team Member 4][Company affiliation] [Team Member 5][Company affiliation] [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY4 Team Member Requirements CT members have completed the required NERC training prior to participation. No reasonable objections to CT Members submitted by [ENTITY]. CT members must adhere to NERC’s Confidentiality Agreement for any data or information received. [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY5 Certification Aspects Performed Per the NERC Rules of Procedure  Section 500 and Appendix 5A require an on-site visit  Expected Outcomes - Findings o Positives o Bucket Items Roles  CTL  Members  [Entity] Participants Caucus [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY6 Bucket Items Bucket 1 Items  Items found that prevent Certification Team from recommending Certification Bucket 2 Items  Items found that must be closed: o Prior to going operational, and o Within 180 days of on-site visit completion Bucket 3 Items  Suggestions for enhancement o These items will not be included in the final report. [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY7 Certification Process Entity completes Certification application or RE completes the application on their behalf Regional Entity assigns Certification Team Leader who assembles a Certification team Regional Entity sends questionnaire and statement of expectations to Entity. RE also sends neighboring questionnaire to BAs, TOPs, and RCs with which Entity intends to interconnect [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY8 Certification Process Continued CT conducts at least one on-site visit to entity’s facility(ies) Entity may have up to 180 days to resolve open Certification issues Entity and CT try to resolve any issues prior to issuance of draft report to entity for their review CTL issues recommendation and report to RE RE issues recommendation to Entity and NERC to certify NERC approves or disapproves final Certification recommendation [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY9 On-Site Certification Process Certification process includes: Reviewing data collected and data available on-site. Interviewing the operations and management personnel. Inspecting the facilities and equipment associated with the applicable reliability standards. Requesting demonstration of tools identified in the certification process. Reviewing documents and data including agreements, processes, and procedures. Verifying operating personnel, NERC certification documents, and proposed work schedules. [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY10 On-Site Certification Process (Cont.) [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] Any deficiencies discovered in the certification documents that also impact other existing registered functions will be considered a possible violation of the NERC Reliability Standard. CT must report this to the RE, however the Entity will be given the opportunity to self-report this possible violation.

RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY11 On-Site Certification Process (Cont.) CT will have a daily debriefing with applicant. Establish a schedule to resolve any deficiencies prior to issuance of the draft Final Report. Draft Final Report provided to [ENTITY] for a 14 day review period. Resulting [ENTITY] comments will be assessed by the CT for possible inclusion in the report. A time extension, not to exceed 180 days, may be granted to resolve any open Bucket 2 items. [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY12 Entity appeals to NERC within 21 days of Certification Report Findings Compliance and Certification Committee conducts hearing within 28 days of notice of appeal If CCC Hearing verdict is appealed case directed to BOTCC In event BOTCC verdict is challenged, entity may appeal to applicable Governmental Authorities within 21 days of issuance of decision Certification Appeals Process [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY13 Evidence Policy [ENTITY NAME] has provided the CT all evidence to support the CT’s recommendations via [RE]’s Secure Portal. Copies of notes, draft reports, and other interim documents developed or used during an entity Certification evaluation shall be destroyed after the public posting of the final, uncontested report. Confidential information will be handled per Section 1500 of the ROP. Documentation used to substantiate the conclusions of the Regional Entity/ NERC related to Certification must be retained by Regional Entity for (6) six years. [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY14