Moving NGSS to KCAS and Beyond

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 4.
Advertisements

 Meetings  Learning  Expectations.
WELCOME to WELCOME to Implementation Training for: The Revised Ontario Curriculum for Canadian and World Studies Grades 9 and 10.
What Happened? In your group, discuss what happened in your district regarding SB 1 after our last meeting. Each group will share (1)one positive outcome.
Moving NGSS to KCAS and Beyond Terry Rhodes
Science Breakout New Teacher Meeting 6, Year 2 March 31, 2011.
Planning for Inquiry The Learning Cycle. What do I want the students to know and understand? Take a few minutes to observe the system to be studied. What.
Common Core Planning for Content & Practice Preparing Los Angeles Students for College and Career.
Science Content Leadership Network July 17, 2014.
NGSS Performance Expectations Please sit in mixed grade level groups K-12 Alliance.
1 Welcome back!. Vision for Science Teaching and Learning 2 View free PDF from The National Academies Press at *Will also be posted.
3 Dimensions of the Next Generation Science Standards Spokane County Water Resource Center Wendy Whitmer- Regional Science Coordinator 1.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Discourse. Student Discourse How would you define student discourse? “IS considered student discourse” “IS NOT considered student discourse”
Five Dimensions of Quality Math Instruction Insert appropriate name/title/location.
Elementary Science Leadership Network June 17, 2014 While you are getting settled, think about the NGSS probe and record your answers..
Engaging in Next Generation Science Standards. Amber Farthing Professional Learning and Program Assistance Coordinator, LASER Ellen Ebert Science Director,
Goals for Learning: I can describe what rigor looks like in my classroom. I can examine student work products for rigor. I can incorporate rigor into my.
Institute for Collaborative Research in Education, Assessment, and Teaching Environments for STEM NGSS Resources by CREATE for STEM Institute MSU licensed.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
What is STEM? What is STEM?
Math and Science Institute Exploring Physical Science Today’s Agenda Review of homework and participant sharing of their ENGAGE components of 5E. Engage.
Revisiting LDC, Day 2 Elementary Bowling Green, Kentucky – Reach Associates November 15,
Science Leadership Network Winter Welcome! Please silence your electronic devices Sign-in Plug-in if needed.
Moving NGSS to KCAS and Beyond Terry Rhodes
Appalachian Teacher Partners Appalachian Math Science Partnership September 23, 2009 We will begin at 9:01.
Making Algebraic Connections Math Science Partnership Grant Funded by the United States Department of Education through the Kentucky Department of Education.
Using Picture Books for Professional Development on NGSS Kirk Robbins October 26, 2013.
ACADEMIC CONVERSATIONS
Math-It’s Elementary February 2013 Investigating strategies that promote highly effective teaching and learning for meeting the Kentucky Core Academic.
A Collaboration between: Los Angeles Unified School District University of California, San Diego San Diego State University University of California, Irvine.
Moving NGSS to KCAS and Beyond Terry Rhodes
Moving NGSS to KCAS and Beyond Terry Rhodes
CKEC -Kentucky Science Leadership Network April 28, 2014 Today’s materials can be accessed at:
Institute for Collaborative Research in Education, Assessment, and Teaching Environments for STEM Workshop 8: Planning Instruction to Meet the Intent of.
Supporting Rigorous Curriculum (Overcoming Isolationism) Participants are expected to purchase the book Results Now Instructional Leadership.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
Update for TN State Board of Education July 24, 2013 Next Generation Science Standards for Today’s Students and Tomorrow’s Workforce.
Inquiry Based Learning District Learning Day 1:45-2:45 August 5, 2015.
+ Operations and Algebraic Thinking Success Implementing CCSS for K-2 Math Day 2.
Moving NGSS to KCAS and Beyond Terry Rhodes
By Yvonne Hasenei. Students collaborate while participating in Student Council’s Beautify our School contest. They choose the location for a garden and.
Our Community: THINGS ARE JUST NOT THE SAME!. UNIT SUMMARY: Children are often under the impression that the way things are in their world is the way.
LeaPS Learning in Physical Science November 13, 2009 Supported by University of Kentucky PIMSER Math and Science Outreach Welcome!
Math Leadership Support Network ’09-’10 Mathematics Leadership Support Network Presentation Provided Jointly by the P-12 Math and Science Outreach Division.
CKEC -Kentucky Science Leadership Network NOVEMBER 25 th, 2013 Today’s materials can be accessed at:
Welcome to: Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) – Creativity: Applications and Assessment Before we start, if you have a smart phone please download.
Middle School Model Selection Kirk Brown and Lissa Gilmore Science and STEM Integration/Innovation San Joaquin County Office of Education.
Science Breakout Session February 2010 New Science/Math Teacher Network.
Mt. Sterling Elementary MAY 20, 2015 Terry Rhodes
1 Math CAMPPP 2011 Perspectives ??? Proportional Reasoning Breakout # 2.
College and Career Ready Conferences Summer 2015 Financial Literacy.
Institute for Collaborative Research in Education, Assessment, and Teaching Environments for STEM Workshop 5: How to Read the Standards.
Master Teacher Project Appalachian Math Science Partnership August 28, 2009 We will begin at 9:01.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices. Five Guidelines For Developmentally Appropriate Practices.
Collaborative Grouping 6-12 Math Teachers. Workshop Outcomes Participants will gain effective strategies for forming and facilitating a classroom culture.
Claims, Evidence, and Reasoning
Formative Assessment February Fraction Action.
NGSS Tools and Process Five Tools & Processes for NGSS Tool 2: Using Performance Expectations to Plan Classroom Assessments.
Mapleton Elementary APRIL 30, Terry Rhodes
Smarter Balanced Scores & Reports. The new assessment, Smarter Balanced, replaces our previous statewide assessment, the New England Common Assessment.
A Great Collaboration for Learning Elementary Connections
Introduction to the Five Tools and Processes for Translating the NGSS into Instruction and Classroom Assessment.
Effective Planning – with the End in Mind - Teaching to the Standards
Next Generation Science Standards
We believe in books. Somehow we want to make childhood better, and we believe that a book given at the right moment can work magic in a child's life. -Ann.
Advancing Tools and Processes for Next Generation Science
Weather, Climate and Communication
. NGSS Tool and Process 1 . Advancing Tools and Processes for Next Generation Science Planning for Instruction Introduction to the Five Tools and Processes.
Presentation transcript:

Moving NGSS to KCAS and Beyond Terry Rhodes terry.rhodes@education.ky.gov 859-585-7762 www.terryrhodes1science.com

Norms Be an ambassador of “lifelong learning.” Show your enthusiasm for the work, support the learning of others, be willing to take risks, participate fully. Come to meetings prepared. Be on time, any preparations/ readings completed, with necessary materials. Be focused during meetings. Stick to goals/ targets, use technology to enhance work at hand, limit sidebar conversations. Work collaboratively. All members’ contributions are valued and honored, seek first to understand, then be understood. Expectations; any more to add?

“The Kentucky Board of Education approved a motion to support Commissioner Holliday’s plan for moving ahead with teaching the Next-Generation Science Standards this fall in every grade, K-12, with development of a new test for elementary and middle school occurring after the 2014-15 school year. While there will be no K-PREP science test in 4th- and 7th-grades in the coming school year, students will still take science assessments as part of the EXPLORE (8th grade), PLAN (10th grade), ACT (11th grade) and End-of-Course (high school) tests.”

Types of Learning Targets Unp Types of Learning Targets

Knowledge The underlying facts and concepts of the discipline that students need to know (describe, explain, recall, identify) This information is found in the Disciplinary Core Ideas section of the standard. After looking at the components of the standards, teachers need to determine what students need to know in order to achieve the standard. Trainer: Hand out the two pages about Bloom’s Taxonomy revised for reference for the next section of the training.

Reasoning Students use and apply what they know to reason and solve problems (use, formulate, Analyze, infer) This is embedded in the Scientific and Engineering Practices section of the standards. Trainer: Again refer participants to the two pages of Bloom’s Taxonomy revised handouts. In particular, participants should look at verbs that relate to what students should be able to do.

Skill Students perform an action or task that must be observed to be assessed (measure, observe, use equipment) This is embedded in the Science and Engineering Practices section of the Standards. This refers to what students should be able to do to demonstrate their understanding of the standard.

(constructs, creates, develops) Product The product itself is the focus of the standard and there must be a product to determine if the student can create it (constructs, creates, develops) The ability to create a product serves as formative assessment of the student’s level of mastery of the standard. If the product does not meet expectations, it provides guidance for reteaching of the standard.

Your Grade? Your School? Your District?

Thinking About Bundling How Do They Go Together? Thinking About Bundling Close Ipads, laptops, phones and Standards books! NO CHEATING! In pairs, choose an envelope with a grade level (ES/MS) or content (HS) you will teach Lay out the strips and begin reading the Performance Expectations Start thinking about how they fit together; where do they overlap? What PE’s will be bridges to other concepts?

Once partners have come to consensus, tape the strips to chart paper and use markers to write in additional information such as unit names or cross-discipline ideas Remember…some may go in more than one place! Hang the posters by grade/by school, starting with K

Gallery Walk Look for the flow Find the connections What’s Your Story??

What content needs to be addressed?? Performance Expectation, Clarification Statement, Assessment Boundary Appendix E Framework What content needs to be addressed?? Appendix F Framework What Practices need to be addressed?? Appendix G Framework What XCC’s need to be addressed? Connections Boxes, other resources What else?? Math? Literacy? Misconceptions?

Long Term Unit Planning Have grade level discussions about long term planning; Word copy on website with today’s materials

Flowchart for Deconstructing Performance Expectations (PEs) Trainer: Briefly go through the flow chart just to introduce it to participants. They will work with it in more detail later.

Deconstructing Standards Activity This series of slides illustrates how to deconstruct the standards into knowledge, reasoning, skills, and products. We will be using this standard to model the steps in deconstructing standards. The deconstructing standards activity is completed in a step-by-step manner, with participants checking their work against the flowchart each step of the way. Activity Instructions, step one: Using this standard as a model, look at the highlighted performance expectation. Discuss with participants what is the intent of the learning and what are the key concepts in the learning. Now, participants will do step one of the activity with their standard. Divide participants into groups of similar grade levels, as much as possible. Each group selects a recorder. Distribute copies of the appropriate grade level of standard ESS3 to each group. In their groups, participants select a weather-related performance expectation. Groups discuss the intent of the learning and key concepts in the learning for their selected performance expectation.

Flowchart for Deconstructing Performance Expectations (PEs) Read the highlighted section of the flowchart. Determine if there is agreement on the meaning and intent of the performance expectation for the model standard, 07-PS4-2. If yes, we move on to the next step in deconstructing standards. If no, additional discussion is needed. Participants determine if there is agreement on the meaning and intent of the performance expectation for standard ESS3.

Deconstructing Standards Activity Performance Expectations/Knowledge Brainstorm KNOWLEDGE Student learning targets from the teacher’s perspective Student “I Can” statements for KNOWLEDGE Performance Expectations/Skills Brainstorm SKILLS Student learning targets from the teacher’s perspective Student “I Can” statements for SKILLS 1.,. ` Activity Instructions, step two: Distribute the three handouts pictured above. Intro: These three handouts and the following slides guide participants through the next steps in the process of deconstructing a standard. The activity starts with the trainer using standard 07-PS4-2 as a model and then participants using standard ESS3 for their grade level. Performance Expectations/Products Brainstorm PRODUCTS Student learning targets from the teacher’s perspective Student “I Can” statements for PRODUCTS

Brainstorming Knowledge Brainstorm KNOWLEDGE Student learning targets from the teacher’s perspective Student “I Can” statements for KNOWLEDGE Light waves interact with matter by reflecting, refracting, absorption, and transmission. Looking at the Performance Expectations listed on the model standard (07-PS4-2), we brainstormed what students need to know to reach the performance expectation. Listed in the chart above is one example. We would do the same brainstorming activity to brainstorm what students need to be able to do (skills) and what students need to be able to create/produce (products). Activity Instructions, step two continued: Participants brainstorm the knowledge, skills and products needed to reach the performance expectation their group chose for standard ESS3. Groups then select one or two brainstormed items from each chart to use in the remaining steps of the activity.

Flowchart for Deconstructing Performance Expectations (PEs) Trainer: Use the flow chart to evaluate your brainstorming. Walk participants through the flow chart using the brainstormed list for our model standard, “Light waves interact with matter by reflecting, refracting, absorption, and transmission.” Participants do the same with their brainstormed lists.

Writing Learning Targets Brainstorm KNOWLEDGE Student learning targets from the teacher’s perspective Student “I Can” statements for KNOWLEDGE Light waves interact with matter by reflecting, refracting, absorption, and transmission. My students can compare and contrast reflection and refraction. Activity Instructions, step three: Look at the brainstormed list of knowledge students need to reach the performance expectation and determine what I want my students to know. These statements are written from the teachers perspective. The example above is from our model standard 07-PS4-2. Now participants do the same thing with their standard ESS3 and the brainstormed lists of knowledge (what students need to know), skills (what students need to be able to do) and products (what students need to be able to produce). Write these student learning targets in the middle section of each of the three charts. Refer participants to the Quality Learning Targets opening activity for assistance with this part. In addition, refer participants to the two handouts on Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised for assistance in writing learning targets.

Flowchart for Deconstructing Performance Expectations (PEs) Look at the example chart of learning targets from the teacher’s perspective: “My students can compare and contrast reflection and refraction.” Check the learning target against the highlighted section of the flow chart to see if the answer to both questions is “yes”. If the answer to either question is “no”, more work needs to be done on the learning target. Participants follow the same process with the learning targets their group wrote.

Writing “I can…” Statements Brainstorm KNOWLEDGE Student learning targets from the teacher’s perspective Student “I Can” statements for KNOWLEDGE Light waves interact with matter by reflecting, refracting, absorption, and transmission. My students can compare and contrast reflection and refraction. I can correctly use the terms reflecting and refracting. Activity Instructions, step four: Look at the student learning target from the teacher’s perspective., “My students can compare and contrast reflection and refraction.” The last step in deconstructing standards is to write “I can…” statements that are student-centered for that learning target. Share the example “I can…” statement with participants. Participants look at the learning targets on their charts and write “I can…” statements for standard ESS3.

Flowchart for Deconstructing Performance Expectations (PEs) Look at the example chart of “I can…” statements, “I can correctly use the terms reflecting and refracting.” Look at the flow chart to see that this is the last step in deconstructing standards. Participants look at their “I can…” statements to see where they fit in the flow chart. Congratulations! You have successfully deconstructed a performance expectation in a standard.

Moving NGSS to KCAS and Beyond Terry Rhodes terry.rhodes@education.ky.gov 859-585-7762 www.terryrhodes1science.com