HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop Exercise IV – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross – Group Exercise - Session #8 8-1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Worked Example: Highway Safety Modeling. Outline –Safety Modeling »Safety Modeling Process –Set-up for Worked Example –Develop / Build Safety Model »Project.
Advertisements

Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM)
Statewide Traffic Engineers Meeting Rumble Strip(e) June 16, 2011 Simone Ardoin Assistant Road Design Engineer Administrator.
Lec 33, Ch.5, pp : Accident reduction capabilities and effectiveness of safety design features (Objectives) Learn what’s involved in safety engineering.
HSM Practitioner’s Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Investigation of the Safety Effects of Edge and Centerline Markings on Narrow, Low-Volume Roads Lance Dougald Ben Cottrell Young-Jun Kweon In-Kyu Lim.
Project Development – High Priority Segments 1/24/2011 Rumble StripE Lane Width? Rumble Strip 2 ft. shoulder paving* (up to 6 miles/year**) + rumble stripE.
DISTRICT PILOT PROJECT PRESENTATION MAY 2, Highway Safety Manual Implementation.
Overview  Improving highway safety is a priority for all state transportation departments.  Key roadway characteristics can be used to identify sections.
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
Enhanced Safety Prediction Methodology and Analysis Tool for Freeways and Interchanges James A. Bonneson August 2012 NCHRP Project
ALDOT HSIP FUNDING OPPORTUNTIES ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF SAFETY OPERATIONS SONYA BAKER TIMOTHY BARNETT MAY 13, 2015.
Incorporating Safety into the Highway Design Process.
Local Government Section
Role of SPFs in the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Mike Dimaiuta LENDIS Corporation.
The Empirical Bayes Method for Safety Estimation Doug Harwood MRIGlobal Kansas City, MO.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Project Development – High Priority Segments -- ATP 2 10/29/2012 Road Surface? Paved Gravel Segment received Stars for Lane Departure Crash Density & Critical.
1 CEE 763 Fall 2011 Topic 1 – Fundamentals CEE 763.
Creating a Critical Crash Rate Report Using Existing Tools and Available Information Heath Hoftiezer, P.E., P.T.O.E Civil Engineer/ P.E. (Traffic) City.
Jason J. Siwula, PE – Safety Engineer DOES 24+0=22+2? AN INTRO TO HSM METHODS.
HSM: Another Tool for Safety Management in Wyoming 1 Excellence in Transportation.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
The Highway Safety Manual: A New Tool for Safety Analysis John Zegeer, PE Kittelson & Associates, Inc. HSM Production Team Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Problem 1: Determination of Facility Types for Analysis.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Funds Study Safety of Lane/Shoulder Width Combinations on Two-Lane Rural Roads Dr. Frank Gross, Vanasse Hangen Brustlin.
July 29 and 30, 2009 SPF Development in Illinois Yanfeng Ouyang Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Calibrating Highway Safety Manual Equations for Application in Florida Dr. Siva Srinivasan, Phillip Haas, Nagendra Dhakar, and Ryan Hormel (UF) Doug Harwood.
Conference or Meeting Name 1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith June 12, 2003.
Fall  Crashes are “independent” and “random” events (probabilistic events)  Estimate a relationship between crashes and covariates (or explanatory.
MAINE Highway Safety Information System Liaison Meeting Chapel Hill, North Carolina September , 2015 Darryl Belz, P.E. Maine Department of Transportation.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
Driver Education Rural Driving 82% of all miles in the U.S. are Rural Roads. Collisions in rural areas are equal to 2 x as many highway deaths as in.
Role of Safety Performance Functions in the Highway Safety Manual July 29, 2009.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
6-1 Module 6: Group Activity Wright County Safety Review Identifying Opportunities for Making Roads Safer 6-1.
Curve Crash Analysis March / Information Gathering PE Services Name Segment Description Radius Length Shapefiles Chevrons (based on county.
FHWA: Revision of Thirteen Controlling Criteria for Design; Notice for Request and Comment. Comments Due: December 7, 2015 Jeremy Fletcher, P.E., P.S.M.
HSM Applications to Suburban/Urban Multilane Intersections Prediction of Crash Frequency for Suburban/Urban Multilane Intersections - Session #9.
1 The Highway Safety Manual Predictive Methods. 2 New Highway Safety Manual of 2010 ►Methodology is like that for assessing and assuring the adequacy.
6-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise IX – Session #6.
Exercise I – Prediction of Safety Performance for Rural Multilane Highway and Comparison to Substantive Safety Performance - Session #4 HSM Applications.
Highway Safety Manual (HSM) into Safety Processing
Segment Crash Analysis
HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL APPLICATIONS
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
HSM Practicitioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Highway Safety Manual DAY 2 - HSM Practitioners Guide for Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Cover Slide for the one-day NHI format 2010.
HSM Practitioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Prediction of Crash Frequency and CMF’s for Undivided Rural Multilane Highways.
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
HSM Practioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
HSM Practicitioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Worked Example: Highway Safety Modeling
HW 7b: HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
HSM Practioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
February 6, ADOT&PF Design Quarterly Meeting Randy Kinney, P.E., PTOE,
Presentation transcript:

HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop Exercise IV – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross – Group Exercise - Session #8 8-1

Exercise IV: US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross Learning Outcomes: ► Compute combined predicted safety performance of x-section, grade, curvature, and intersections ►Compare predicted safety performance to actual safety performance ► Identify greatest safety shortfall ► Identify priorities for improvement 8-2

8-3

Exercise IV: US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross – Segments/Grade/Curves LOCATIONNUMBER On Roadway Segments 63 Within Intersection16 Intersection Related1 On-Grades3 On Curves39 Total122 Crashes by location 8-5

Exercise I – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross  Length: 13.0 miles  AADT: 2,500  Lane Width: 11 feet  Shoulders: Paved 0 feet Gravel 4 feet  Hazard Rating: 5  Driveways: 91 on level tangent segments  Total Length of Curves = 4,826 ft or mi  Total Length of Grades = 13,400 ft or 2.54 mi Geometric Information: 8-6

Exercise I – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross Geometric Information Grades: Grade Section #% GradeLength in ft 15.6% Total Length = 13,400 feet or 2.54 miles 3%< All Grades <6% 8-7

Exercise II: US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross Geometric Information Curves: Curve #DeltaDegreeRadiusLength deg8 deg 50’ ft1,225.5 ft 2- “A” 104 deg 33’9 deg836.6 ft1162 ft 3- “B” 63 deg 56’12 deg477.5 ft532.8 ft 4- “C” 67 deg 04’12 deg477.5 ft558.9 ft 5- “D” 42 deg 15’12 deg477.5 ft352 ft 6- “E” 62 deg 58’12 deg477.5 ft524.8 ft 7- “F” 28 deg 10’6 deg955 ft469.4 ft Total Length = 4,826 feet 8-8

Exercise III – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross Intersections on US 52: (AADT maj = 2500) StationLocationTypeSide Road ADT Predicted Crashes SkewCrashes x CMF 107East of DT45015 deg 126West of DT2505 deg 262East of FT45070 deg 559F+3000 deg TOTAL ? 8-9

Exercise IV: US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross 1.Compute the combined predicted safety performance (x-section + curves + intersections) and compare to actual safety record 2.Identify priorities areas for improvements Discussion  Use Worksheet Exercise IV 8-10

Exercise IV – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross From the US 52 corridor crash information, perform the following tasks: 2.Compute the combined predicted crash frequency performance (x-section + curves + intersections) and compare to actual crash record - Where is the greatest safety shortfall? a. Lane and Shoulder Width b. Driveway Density c. Roadside Design d. Curves e. Intersections 8-11

From the US 52 corridor crash information, perform the following tasks: 2.Identify priorities as to improvements - where is the greatest shortfall (at 2,500 AADT)? a. Lane and Shoulder Width (yes/no) (___%) c. Roadside Design (yes/no) (____%) d. Curves (yes/no) (___%) e. Intersections (yes/no) (___%) b. Driveway Density (yes/no) (___%) Exercise IV – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross 8-12

Learning Outcomes: ► Computed combined predicted safety performance of x-section, grade, curvature, and intersections ►Compared predicted safety performance to actual safety performance ► Identified greatest safety shortfall ► Identified priorities for improvement Exercise IV – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross 8-13

Safety Effects Calculations Rural Two-Lane Roads CONCERNS: GOOD NEWS: Too Time Consuming for Calculations and Organizing Results? Excel spreadsheet facilitates calculations and delivers results in an organized format! 8-14

Questions and Discussion HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop 8-15