London Convention Guidelines for Assessment of Dredged Material

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Environmentally sound management of ship recycling- simple or complex? Roy Watkinson Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs UK Promoting Sustainable.
Advertisements

Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan SeaWeb/National Press Club MA Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Ian A. Bowles, Secretary Deerin.
FACILITATING RETURN ON ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTMENT - RESPONSIBLE AND PROFITABLE PORTS BUSINESS, UNINTERRUPTED! Dr Louis Celliers Safe and Sustainable Ports.
Substantive environmental provisions Prof. Gyula Bándi.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Regulatory Program Glen Justis Chief, Policy & Administration Regulatory Division Alaska District 2010 Building.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
Ecological Risk Asssessment Part I – The Basics. Introduction Subject normally taught at end of course, after exposure to background material Subject.
1 Filter Backwash Recycling Rule FBRR Final: June 8, 2001.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 45 Environmental Law Chapter 45 Environmental Law.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
The situation in Norway concerning sediments/dredging Tore Lundestad, Port of Borg, Norway.
Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS. 2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which.
SMS Operation.  Internal safety (SMS) audits are used to ensure that the structure of an SMS is sound.  It is also a formal process to ensure continuous.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
APPLICATION OF EU SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT RULES Axel Luttenberger.
Ramsar COP8. Valencia Nov CBD/Ramsar inland waters rapid assessment workshopSlide 1 The Ramsar Convention and wetland assessment Nick Davidson Deputy.
North American Commission For Environmental Cooperation Chemicals Management in Mexico Chemicals Management in Mexico M AURICIO LIMÓN AGUIRRE Under Secretary.
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
Newmont Mining Corporation Mineral Development Advisory Group Meeting Fisheries and Oceans Canada October 26 th to 28 th, 2010 Cambridge Bay, Nunavut.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2012 Alabama Water Resources Conference Orange Beach, Alabama September 6, 2012 Beneficial Use Opportunities.
1 Influence of Main River Basin District Plans on Environment Czech University of Life Sciences Faculty of Environmental Sciences Miroslav Martis,Vladimir.
International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.4. Pre-disposal waste management Safety Standards.
Environmental Management System Definitions
Case study: SEA for land-use plan amendments of Krasna Hora municipality.
Draft Policy for Assessing & Managing Contaminants in soil: a progress report WMINZ Conference, 15 October 2009 James Court and Howard Ellis Ministry for.
Module 3 Risk Analysis and its Components. Risk Analysis ● WTO SPS agreement puts emphasis on sound science ● Risk analysis = integrated mechanism to.
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
CALIFORNIA proposed SAFER CONSUMER PRODUCT REGULATIONS Marjorie MartzEmerson October 24, 2012.
Nicolas Solente Workshop on Regulatory Requirements to Ensure Safe Disposal of Disused Sealed Sources for Operators and Regulators Amman, JORDAN 7-11 April.
A PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE OF PUBLIC SERVICES 13 FEBRUARY 2008 BY NOSIPO SOBEKWA CHIEF DIRECTOR: MARITIME TRANSPORT REGULATION DEPARTMENT OF.
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 24 Environmental Law.
Management of threats to fish and wildlife from PBTs Scott Redman, Puget Sound Action Team Puget Sound Plankton - The Ultimate Seafood Experience, Jan.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
1 Integrating (Mainstreaming) Sound Management of Chemicals into National Development Planning United Nations Development Programme Energy and Environment.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Implementation of critical studies necessary to promote better planning and efficient management of hydropower projects in an Int’l River Basin context.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
ICZM PROTOCOL INDICATORS THE MEDITERRANEAN PROTOCOL ON INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT: What indicators are needed? Marko PREM Director a.i.
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
1 Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting April 13, 2005 Project Manager.
Water.europa.eu Water Framework Directive - a framework for Community action in the field of water policy Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European.
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
Soil contamination Proposed EEA/ETC contribution to the working group on Soil Contamination European Topic Centre on Terrestrial Environment SESSION 2.
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
Proposed Topics for Application of Sediment Quality Objectives.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Requirements for.
COCONET SUMMER COURSE “GES & MPAs” Good Environmental Status and Marine Protected Areas in the Mediterranean and Black Sea Rabat, 8-13 september
1 Calcasieu River & Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting February 2, 2005 Project Manager Mireya Laigast, Civil Engineer,
Alternative Evaluation Framework for Managing Dioxins/Furans in Dredged Material Proposed for Open-Water Disposal Tad Deshler Windward Environmental LLC.
TRAP 5 th interregional meeting & Site Visits Limerick & Lough Derg, Ireland 9 th October 2013 CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, Associate Professor.
Principles in international environmental law April 30, 2014 Edmunds Broks.
Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.
Continuing Authorities Program
CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional Authority
Relationship between World Bank and Romanian EA requirements
Meeting of the Maritime Security, Environmental Protection and Operations (MSEPO) Freetown, Sierra Leone October 2017 “Environmental Management.
Working Group on estuaries and coastal zones
Water Framework Directive, Habitats Directive and Inland Waterway Transport Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
PIANC, Chair of WFD Navigation Task Group
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
BOSTON HARBOR DEEP DRAFT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Presentation transcript:

London Convention Guidelines for Assessment of Dredged Material PIANC-Dredged Material Management Guidance Documents Robert.m.engler@erdc.usace.army.mil

Specific Guidelines for Assessment of Dredged Material Introduction Dredging is essential to maintain navigation in ports, harbours, marinas and inland waterways; for the development of port facilities; for flooding mitigation; and for removal of sediments from structures, basins and water intakes. Dredged material worldwide is, by nature, similar to undisturbed sediments in inland and coastal waters. A smaller proportion of dredged material, however, is contaminated by human activity.

Evaluation of Need for Dredging and Disposal CAPITAL DREDGING - for navigation, to enlarge or deepen existing channel and port areas or to create new ones MAINTENANCE DREDGING - to ensure that channels, berths or construction works, etc., are maintained at their designed dimensions; and CLEAN UP DREDGING - deliberate removal of contaminated material for human health and environmental protection purposes.

The schematic provides a clear indication of the stages in the application of this guidance where important decisions should be made. Components are: 1. Dredged material characterization 2. Waste prevention audit and evaluation of disposal options 3. Is material acceptable 4. Identify and characterize dump-site 5. Determine potential impacts and prepare impact hypothesis(es) 6. Issue permit 7. Implement project and monitor compliance 8. Field monitoring and assessment (monitoring)

Dredged Material Assessment Framework SOURCE CONTROL OTHER NO YES CAN MATERIAL ACCEPTABLE? BE MADE NO NO Representation of the Jurisdictional Boundary of the Convention Dredged Material Assessment Framework NO YES YES IMPLEMENT PROJECT & MONITOR COMPLIANCE NEED FOR DREDGING DREDGED MATERIAL CHARACTERIZATION IDENTIFY AND CHARACTERIZE DISPOSAL SITE IS MATERIAL ACCEPTABLE? DETERMINE POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND PREPARE IMPACT HYPOTHES(I/E)S BENEFICIAL USE POSSIBLE? ISSUE PERMIT? FIELD MONITORING & ASSESSMENT YES BENEFICIAL USE

NEED FOR DREDGING DREDGED MATERIAL CHARACTERIZATION SOURCE CONTROL

CAN MATERIAL IS MATERIAL OTHER BENEFICIAL USE BE MADE ACCEPTABLE? NO NO OTHER YES YES YES BENEFICIAL USE POSSIBLE? BENEFICIAL USE NO

IDENTIFY AND CHARACTERIZE DISPOSAL SITE NO IDENTIFY AND CHARACTERIZE DISPOSAL SITE DETERMINE POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND PREPARE IMPACT HYPOTHES(UE)S

ISSUE PERMIT? NO YES

IMPLEMENT PROJECT & MONITOR COMPLIANCE YES IMPLEMENT PROJECT & MONITOR COMPLIANCE FIELD MONITORING & ASSESSMENT

Waste Prevention Audit For dredged material, the goal of waste management should be to identify and control the sources of contamination. SOURCE CONTROL STRATEGY 1. The continuing need for dredging; 2. The hazards posed by contaminants and the relative contributions of the individual sources to these hazards; 3. Existing source control programmes and other regulations or legal requirements; 4. Technical and economic feasibility; 5. The evaluation of the effectiveness of measures taken; and 6. Consequences of not implementing contaminant reduction.

Management Options Reduce or control impacts to a level that will not constitute unacceptable risks Treatment Disposal management techniques Methods of containing dredged material in a stable manner The practical availability of other means of disposal should be considered in the light of a comparative risk assessment involving both dumping and the alternatives

Dredged Material Characterization Physical characterization The basic physical characteristics required are the amount of material Exemptions from detailed characterization Dredged material is excavated from a site away from existing and historical sources of appreciable pollution, so as to provide reasonable assurance that the dredged material has not been contaminated, or dredged material is composed predominantly of sand, gravel and/or rock, or dredged material is composed of previously undisturbed geological materials.

Chemical Characterization Available information Geochemical characteristic Contaminant routes /sources

Biological Characterization Biological tests should incorporate: Acute toxicity Chronic toxicity and sub-lethal effects The potential for bioaccumulation The potential for tainting at and in the vicinity of the disposal site.

Action List Chemical and/or biological screening resulting in: - Wastes containing specified substances, or causing biological responses, exceeding the relevant upper level shall not be dumped, unless made acceptable. - Wastes which contain specified substances, or which cause biological responses, below the relevant lower levels should be considered to be of little environmental concern. - Wastes, which contain specified substances, or which cause biological responses, below the upper level but above the lower level require more detailed assessment before their suitability for dumping can be determined.

Dump-Site Selection Site Selection Considerations: Physical, chemical and biological characteristics of the water-column and the seabed Location of amenities, values and other uses of the sea in the area under consideration Assessment of the constituent fluxes associated with dumping in relation to existing fluxes of substances in the marine environment Economic and operational feasibility

Important Amenities, Biological Features and Uses of the Sea The shoreline and bathing beaches Areas of beauty or significant cultural or historical importance Areas of special scientific or biological importance, such as sanctuaries Fishing areas Spawning, nursery and recruitment areas Migration routes Seasonal and critical habitats Shipping lanes Military exclusion zones Engineering uses of the seafloor

Site Selection Consideration Size of the dump-site Site capacity Evaluation of potential impacts Contaminant mobility

Assessment of Potential Effects Impact hypothesis Integrate waste characteristics / site information Comprehensive assessment Emphasis on biological effects / habitat modification Cumulative impacts

Monitoring Compliance monitoring, Field monitoring Modify or terminate the field-monitoring programme Modify or revoke the permit Redefine or close the dump-site Modify the assessment basis

Permit and Permit Conditions The types, amounts and sources of materials to be dumped The location of the dump-site(s) The method of dumping Monitoring and reporting requirements

International Navigation Association PIANC Dredged Material Management Guide (Supplement to Bulletin no. 96, 1987 Assessment framework (LC) Material characterization Sustainable relocation

Contamination source control Management strategy Management options Contamination source control Management strategy Relevant background literature

Disposal Land-based confined disposal - Contaminant release mechanisms Aquatic (LC guides) Land-based confined disposal - Contaminant release mechanisms - Processes - Pathways - Isolation - Surplus water treatment

Confined Disposal Site Management Implementation guidelines Monitoring (physical and environmental) Evaluation Optimization

Treatment Pretreatment Biological Chemical Thermal Immobilization

Impact Assessment Long- or short-term Direct or indirect Beneficial or adverse Long- or short-term Direct or indirect Reversible or irreversible Local or strategic Independent or cumulative

Monitoring Port operational monitoring Specification of baseline conditions Port operational monitoring

International Navigation Disposal of Dredged Material Association PIANC Management of Aquatic Disposal of Dredged Material (Working Group 1 - 1998)

Outline 2. Management framework 1. Introduction 2. Management framework 3. Dredged material and site characterization Survey and sampling methods Dredged material characterization - Physical - Chemical - Ecotoxicological - Biological

Outline (cont.) Characterization of disposal site - Physical - Chemical - Biological - Functional uses of receiving area

Outline (cont.) Effects of disposal - Physical processes - Physical effects on ecology - Chemical and ecotoxicological - Functional uses / amenities

Outline (cont.) International, regional and National environmental controls - General approaches - Marine and estuarine disposal - Inland waterways disposal

Planning and engineering for aquatic disposal - Regulatory decision framework - Technical decision framework - Project decision framework

Operational aspects of aquatic disposal - Operations plan - Monitoring requirements

- Description of physical properties of dredged material References Annexes - Description of physical properties of dredged material - Metals in sediments - List of international agreements, protocols and guidelines - Beneficial uses of dredged material in the aquatic environment - Mitigation measures - Consideration in design of monitoring plans

Managing Contaminated Dredged Material Defining CDM Risks Chemical characteristics and sources

Identifying, Assessing, and Selecting Options Planning CDM projects State-of-the-art technologies PIANC technical position Documenting results with case studies

The Environmental Facts Where to Find What You Need to Know Dredging: The Environmental Facts Where to Find What You Need to Know Dredging a vital process Dredging for sustainable development Dredging must be safe and sound

Sources of Information CEDA IADC WODA PIANC IAPH WEDA EDA

CEDA IAPH WEDA EDA