PBL Post-Project Review. 1. Student Engagement2. Project Idea3. Student Learning4. Authenticity of Project Tasks and Products5. Quality and Use of Driving.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leading Learning in the Social Sciences MARGARET LEAMY National Coordinator Social Sciences Te Tapuae o Rehua Consortium
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
Project-Based Learning and Performance-Based Assessment.
The 21st Century Context for
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Module 1: Teaching functional skills – from building to applying skills 0 0.
UNDERSTANDING NBPTS STANDARDS
PORTFOLIO.
Differentiation: What It Is/What It Isn’t
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) “Designing” © Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
Annie Michaelian Jill Okurowski Stephen Toto. Tri-State Quality Review Rubric.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
Whole site approach to improvement Leading the Learning Workshop 3 - for leadership teams in secondary sites Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Problem Based Lessons. Training Objectives 1. Develop a clear understanding of problem-based learning and clarify vocabulary issues, such as problem vs.
ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009 Veronica Jaramillo, Ph.D. Mona Panchal Anthony Cadavid ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009.
Assessing Students’ Skills in Science & Technology Hong Kong University – May 19 th 2006 Graham Orpwood York/Seneca Institute for Mathematics, Science.
QUESTIONS TO PROMOTE SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING SAMANTHA RONSICK AET/531 DECEMBER 8, 2014 DANENE MIMS, INSTRUCTOR.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Project Based Learning
Session 2: Are We There Yet? Integrating Understanding by Design and Historical Thinking.
Authentic Learning and Assessment Erin Gibbons Five Standards of Authentic Instruction  Higher-Order Thinking  Depth of Knowledge  Connectedness to.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 3: Quality Instructional Design.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
“The great end of education is to discipline rather than furnish the mind; to train it to the use of its own powers, rather than fill it with the accumulation.
Project Based Learning What, Why & How. Objectives for Today Have you experience the beginning of a project (= Making your own project) Analyze your experience,
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Stage 3: Learning Activities and Performance Tasks Thursday, August 4th, 2010.
CASD Librarians: Do You Speak SAS? What We Need to Know October 25, 2011.
Project Based Learning Protect the Environment and Live Well Denise Tallakson June 2014.
Project-Based Learning (PBL) Vivene Robinson.
Boot Camp 2014 The 4 Cs in the Common Core. Marta Stirling School Library Coordinator, East River Joan Upell School Library Coordinator, West River.
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
ASSESSING THE WHOLE CHILD Creating Powerful Portfolios and Student Led Conferences.
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Teacher’s Institute September 14, MES Mission Statement “Dedicated to the education, support, and encouragement necessary for lifelong learning.
“…the ability to think and act flexibly with what one knows.” David Perkins in Teaching for Understanding, Wiske et al (1998)
Assessment My favorite topic (after grammar, of course)
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
Learning AP ILD November 8, 2012 Planning and Monitoring for Learning.
By: Harvey Silver R. Thomas Dewing Matthew Perini.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
Module 5: Questioning, Inquiry and Problem Based Learning Introduction and Module Overview Standards Knowledge and skills Assignments.
A Review of Project Based Learning for JAG Specialists.
+ Priory Curriculum & Instruction Faculty Inservice, August 2014.
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
Curriculum that Brings the Common Core to Life Session 1 Elementary
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Curriculum that Brings the Common Core to Life Session 1 Secondary
Competency Based Learning and Project Based Learning
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
E-learning and E-assessments
NHN member organizations
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Project-Based Learning (PBL)
Magothy River Middle School
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Presentation transcript:

PBL Post-Project Review

1. Student Engagement2. Project Idea3. Student Learning4. Authenticity of Project Tasks and Products5. Quality and Use of Driving Question 6. Scope: Length, Complexity, Number of Students Participating and Community/Expert Participation 7. Technology Integration 8. Selection of Content Standards & 21 st Century Skills 9. Selection of Culminating Products & Performances10. Effectiveness of Entry Event11. Quality and Use of Rubrics 12. Quantity and Use of Scaffolds and Learning Activities 13. Team Work14. Students’ Capacity to Work Independently 15. Ability of Students to Engage in Inquiry and Deep Thinking 16. My Management of the Process, Coaching of Students and Providing of Resources 17. Involvement of Other Adults and Colleagues18. Adequacy of Resources 18 Lenses for Reflection

1. Student Engagement What was the level of student engagement during the project? What key aspects of the project design or delivery contributed to the level of student engagement?

What reflections do you have about the overall idea for the project? 2. Project Idea

3. Student Learning What goals did you establish regarding student performance on the culminating products? To what degree did you achieve your goals? What key aspects of the project design or delivery contributed to the overall results for student learning?

4. Authenticity of Project Tasks and Products Did the project focus on an actual community issue? If so, what issues? If it did not, could it be refined to focus on actual issues? Was the project useful to an outside audience? Did it meet an authentic need? If it did not, could it be refined to meet an authentic need?

5. Quality and Use of Driving Question Were your students able to easily read and comprehend the driving question? The driving question should clearly state the purpose of the project and give a focus to all of the tasks students do. To what degree did your driving question accomplish this? How effectively did your students answer the driving question in completing their products and performances? What strategies did you use to maintain a focus on the driving question throughout the project? Do you plan to refine the driving question before launching this project in the future?

6. Scope: Length, Complexity, Number of Students Participating and Community/Expert Participation Would you adjust the scope of the project before launching this project in the future? Duration? Complexity? Interdisciplinary planning? Involvement with local experts?

7. Technology Integration Did you feel you were able to implement technology effectively? What types of technology would you need support on during future projects?

8. Selection of Content Standards & 21 st Century Skills To what degree did the project demand breadth and depth of specific knowledge of central concepts? To what degree were the driving question, end products, rubrics, and key learning experiences aligned and linked to the selected standards? What 21 st century skills did you teach and assess? Would you add any additional 21 st century skills in subsequent projects?

9. Selection of Culminating Products & Performances How well did your culminating products and performances align with your intended outcomes? How authentic were the products and performances? (How similar was the student work to the work that people in the professional world would do if they were involved in a similar project?)

10. Effectiveness of Entry Event How effective was your entry event in sparking student interest and igniting their curiosity? Did your entry event cause your students to pose questions about the topic and tasks? Would you make any revisions to your entry event or adjust your approach when launching the project in the future?

11. Quality and Use of Rubrics Ideally, your rubrics clearly articulate the criteria for success to enable students to easily use the rubric to evaluate their work during the revision process. To what degree did your rubrics accomplish this? Did you use your rubric as a teaching tool?

12. Quantity and Use of Scaffolds and Learning Activities How well did you build your students' background knowledge for inquiry? How effective was your project “scaffolding”. (To what degree did you provide the necessary amount of skill instruction, mini-lessons, and use of models and drafts to build the understanding and skills needed to produce high quality work?)

13. Team Work How well did the students work in groups? How did your selected project management strategies/structures contribute to your students' level of success with team work?

14. Students’ Capacity to Work Independently How well did the students work independently? How did your selected project management strategies/structures contribute to your students' level of success in working independently?

What did you observe about your students' ability to use inquiry skills and think deeply about the topic of study? 15. Ability of Students to Engage in Inquiry and Deep Thinking

16. My Management of the Process, Coaching of Students and Providing of Resources What role did you play while students were engage in group work? How did you respond when students needed support? To what degree did you promote a culture of independence?

17. Involvement of Other Adults and Colleagues What role did adults from the community, or other places beyond the community, play in your project? Were they involved in helping you design the project? Teaching the students? Critiquing work against professional standards? Were they helpful? Would you make any adjustments in the way in which you used these resources in the future?

18. Adequacy of Resources Would you make any adjustments to the resources that you provided students to help them engage in inquiry? Can you identify additional resources you would need to carry out this project again?

Final Synthesis What were the overall highlights and celebrations from this project? What were the biggest challenges and constraints from this project? What steps will I take to refine it prior to launching it again?