The Year Three Report and Visit Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by Dr. Tanmay Pramanik Overview of On-Site Team Evaluation.
Advertisements

School Improvement Plan 6 Main Areas
NWCCU Standards for Accredition The new process. Revised NWCCU Accreditation Standards New Standards: reduced from 9 to 5 Standard One--Mission, Core.
Promotion and Tenure Planning Workshop Spring 2013 Susan S. Williams Vice Provost for Academic Policy and Faculty Resources.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
New Traditions: NWCCU Standards and Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Moving on to our Second Report! Due to NWCCU by Fall 2012.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Highlights from Dr. Robin Dasher-Alston To Periodic Review Report Committee November 24, 2003.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
2006 BYU Reaffirmation of NWCCU Accreditation Executive Accreditation Committee February 12, 2006.
Venue: M038 Date: Monday Sep 26,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.7 How to write the Self-Study Report ? Presented by: JIC ABET COMMITTEE.
Accreditation Liaison Officer WorkshopFebruary 4, 2011 Accreditation Liaison Officer Workshop Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities DoubleTree.
Year Three Self-Evaluation WorkshopMarch 13, 2012 Year Three Self-EvaluationWorkshop Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) DoubleTree.
NEASC FIVE YEAR REPORT FITCHBURG STATE COLLEGE JANUARY 2007.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation WorkshopMarch 14, 2012 Year Seven Self-EvaluationWorkshop Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) DoubleTree.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
Moving on to our Second Report! Due to NWCCU by Fall 2012.
SACS Compliance Certification Orientation Meeting June 23, 2008.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
THE VISIT. BASIC PRINCIPLES Peer Evaluation Standards-Based System Relationship to Standards: compliance; substantial compliance; or non compliance.
March 15-16, Inquiry and Evidence An introduction to the TEAC system for accrediting educator preparation programs 3/15/12, 9:00-10:00a.m. CAEP.
Reviewer Training Welcome & Introductions Co-Chairs.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
NWCCU Workshop on Institutional Self Study1February 1-2, 2007 Workshop on Institutional Self Study Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission.
2012 Middle States Accreditation Report Review Chapter 1: Institutional Excellence Standards 1 and 6.
Expectations and Accountability in Regional Accreditation Ellie A. Fogarty, EdD – Vice President Debra G. Klinman, PhD – Vice President Middle States Commission.
Northwest Accreditation. Sandra Elman Visit ( ) General Recommendations  pages maximum  3 major themes for all chapters (standards) Descriptive.
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
Year Seven Mission Fulfillment and Sustainability Report and Comprehensive Visit Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU)
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Council March PREVIOUS Reductionistic Whole = Sum of the Parts A Snapshot of the institution at a specific moment in time NEW Synergistic Whole.
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
Evaluator Training Workshop March 1, 2012 Jeff Jordan Vice President for Student Life Seattle Pacific University.
Welcome The Mid-Cycle Evaluation Workshop. Background and History of MCE NWCCU emphasis on outcomes Review of Year Seven Self-Evaluations – Needing more.
THE VISIT Year Seven Self-Evaluation. BASIC PRINCIPLES Peer Evaluation Standards-Based System Relationship to Standards: compliance; substantial compliance;
Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.
Accreditation 101 STEVEN SHEELEY, PHD VICE PRESIDENT – SACSCOC GACRAO NOVEMBER 2, 2015.
Performance-Based Accreditation
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Learning by Doing: Participating on an Evaluation Team
New Program Proposal Workflow Chart
Year One/Year Three Self Evaluation Workshop
YEAR ONE SELF-EVALUATION REPORT
“The Visitors are Coming” – Accreditation 401
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
All About Resources: Standard III
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Faculty Promotions Information Meeting
University of Alaska Fairbanks Accreditation
A primer for the April 2019 visit
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
New Certificate Program
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
External Examiner Reports
New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation
Supporting SEACs across the Province:
To achieve improvement through: Self assessment Benchmarking
Fort Valley State University
Radiopharmaceutical Production
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

The Year Three Report and Visit Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities

Year Three Self-Evaluation Report Title page to include: Title of Self-Evaluation Report Name of Institution Date Submitted Table of Contents Institutional Overview [Two (2) pages maximum] Preface Brief Update on Institutional Changes Since Last Report Response to Addenda Requested by NWCCU

Year Three Self-Evaluation Report *Chapter One: Mission, Core Themes, and Expectations Eligibility Requirements 2 and 3 (Executive Summary) Standard 1.A Mission to include (3 pages max) : Institution’s Mission Statement Interpretation of Mission Fulfillment Articulation of Acceptable Extent of Mission Fulfillment Standard 1.B Core Themes One Section per Core Theme (3 pages max each) to include: Title of the Core Theme Brief Description of the Core Theme Objectives of the Core Theme Indicators of Achievement of Core Theme Objectives Rationale for the Selection of those Indicators *Updated since last report

Year Three Self-Evaluation Report Chapter Two: Resources and Capacity Eligibility Requirements 4 through 21 (Executive Summary) Standard 2.A Governance Standard 2.B Human Resources Standard 2.C Education Resources Standard 2.D Student Support Resources Standard 2.E Library and Information Resources Standard 2.F Financial Resources Standard 2.G Physical and Technological Infrastructure Conclusion

Evidence List of required documents in development Provide evidence to support report Use 2003 Accreditation Handbook as guide Electronic or printed

Standard 2.A Governance Overarching Considerations Governing Board Leadership and Management Policies and Procedures Academics Students Human Resources Institutional Integrity Academic Freedom Finance

Standard 2.B Human Resources Sufficiency Qualifications Duties/Responsibilities/Workloads Evaluation Professional Development

Standard 2.C Education Resources Overarching Considerations Undergraduate Programs Graduate Programs Continuing Education/Non-Credit Programs

Standard 2.D Student Support Resources Requirements/Policies/Procedures Orientation/Advising Student Records Rights and Responsibilities Financial Aid/Obligations

Standard 2.E Library and Information Resources Adequacy Appropriateness Accessibility Instruction/Use

Standard 2.F Financial Resources Adequacy Accuracy Stability Security Planning/Forecasting

Standard 2.G Physical and Technological Infrastructure Physical Infrastructure Adequacy Accessibility Safety/Security Master Planning Equipment Technological Infrastructure Appropriateness Adequacy Instruction/Support Update/Replacement Planning

Third Party Comment Notice US DOE regulations require an opportunity for third-party comment concerning an institution’s qualifications for accreditation or preaccreditation. The institution is expected to provide notification to its publics regarding the impending visit and send a verification copy of that public notice to the office of the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities. 34 CFR § (b)

Chair Standards 1.A; 1.B; 2.A; ERs 2-21 Year Three Committee Structure Evaluator 1 Standards 2.B; 2.D (Students) Evaluator 2 Standard 2.C (Academics) Evaluator 3 Standard 2.E (Library) Evaluator 4 Standards 2.F; 2.G (Finance)

Evaluator Volunteers his/her time From out-of-state institution Specific area(s) of responsibility Knowledgeable in assigned area(s) Completed evaluator training

Anatomy of the Visit Day 0 4:00 p.m. Organizational Meeting Day 1 Introductory Opening Meeting Evaluation Activities Private Committee Meeting Day 2 Evaluation Activities Private Committee Meeting Day 3 Final Private Committee Meeting Chair Meets with President Exit Meeting

Post Visit Institution: Reviews draft of peer-evaluation report for correction of factual errors Receives final report from NWCCU office May provide Commissioners with written response to peer- evaluation report. Invited to meet with Commissioners when the evaluation is considered

Comments and Questions