SII Compliance Forum Tim Lewis: CRD Update 19 July 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solvency ii: an overview Lloyds May © LloydsSolvency II May Contents Solvency II: key features Legislative process Solvency II implementation.
Advertisements

The Benefits and Challenges of Implementation of Basel II in Europe José María Roldán | 27 Sept 2005.
British Bankers’ Association CRD 3 and beyond How are you left? Simon Hills British Bankers Association.
FSVC/Central Bank of Libya Seminar - January Day 3 Establishing a Modern Risk Management Department Basel II and Bank Risk Management Garrett R.
1 The critical challenge facing banks and regulators under Basel II: improving risk management through implementation of Pillar 2 Simon Topping Hong Kong.
Basel III.
Investments Institute of Insurance and Risk Management (IIRM) Hyderabad, India 15 November 2005 Arup Chatterjee – Advisor International Association of.
Solvency II Reporting and Disclosure
Enhancements to Basel II and Regulatory and Supervisory Structures Gustavo Arriagada Superintendent of Banks and Financial Institutions Chile.
Agência Nacional de Saúde – ANS Federal Regulatory Agency for Health Plans and Health Insurance Renata Gasparello – Regulation Specialist - Actuary IAIS.
Hungarian Approach to Basel II. Katalin Mérő National Bank of Hungary September 2002.
Regulation, Basel II, and Solvency II
Training.
Financial Advice Programme (FAP)
B RITISH B ANKERS' A SSOCIATION Operational Risk & the Regulatory Environment Simon Hills Director - Prudential Capital team.
Gaselys Investment Firm Banque de France Regulations Abstract of Regulatory requirements.
Chapter Two Banking Background. Who is in charge of the banks? Germany: Federal Supervisory Authority (BaFin) France: Banking Commission Switzerland:
Oracle’s BASEL II Solution Bucuresti 24 th February 2004 Pal Ribarics Oracle Financial Services Consulting, EU Enlargement Countries Solution Team.
© 2012 Dechert LLP AIFMD Countdown: Breakfast Briefings One year to go Gus Black Stuart Martin.
+ Basel lll Summary “ Making Great Ideas Become Reality”
The Basel Committee’s Approach
Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence – Lessons from Basel II Mary Frances Monroe Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation Board of Governors.
Prudential Committee update 1 April 2014
Basel II and Bank Risk Management
1 Basel II – The Implementation Phase Simon Topping Hong Kong Monetary Authority / City University of Hong Kong 9 March 2005 Banking & Finance Technology.
Andrea Kuras-Eder Split, 14 June Experiences during the Implementation of the MiFID in Austria.
Management of a Bank’s Equity capital Position
Basel II Impact on banking processes ISACA Roundtable 2 November 2009 Ronald Holsbeeke RA RE CIA CISA.
AGM 2013 W E L O O K A T T H I N G S D I F F E R E N T L Y Monitoring Presentation January 2015 David Hewson W E L O O K A T T H I N G S D I F F E R E.
MiFID for Investment Managers, Client Relation Managers and Brokers 2007.
Implications of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (“MIFID”) Richard Thompson.
University of Palestine International Business And Finance Management Accounting For Financial Firms Part (3) Ibrahim Sammour.
Basel 2: Current Status Phil Rogers, HSBC Bank Credit and Risk 25 July 2006.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 20-1 © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Importance of Capital Adequacy Absorb unanticipated losses and preserve.
ICAAP – what you really need to know
Markets in Financial Instruments Directive Chris Bates September 2005 Interaction with the CRD.
24 th January 2007Craigcrook Management Services1 COMPLIANCE OFFICERS’ WORKSHOP MiFID – Firms and Markets.
Regional Seminar on the Basel Framework: Implementing Pillar 2 under Basel III Organised by the Arab Monetary Fund and the Financial Stability Institute.
1 IFRS in the Banking Sector A supervisor’s perspective REPARIS Workshop Marc Pickeur Vienna CBFA March 2006 Belgium.
Regulatory Convergence under Post Basel II: some comments Giovanni Majnoni Contractual Saving Conference Washington, DC, May 1, 2002.
Advanced Program in Auditing and Accounting Regulation Module 12 Enhancing Statutory Audit Quality from a Financial Regulator’s Perspective Presenter:
Preview Basel Accord is global regulatory standard on bank capital adequacy A liquidity agreed upon by the members of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
The Fiduciary Services Regulatory Codes Industry Briefing John Aspden Chief Executive Financial Supervision Commission 23 November 2004.
Various Stages of MiFID Implementation in Lithuania Tomas Talutis Lithuanian Securities Commission.
1 BASEL II: ONE CREDIT ANALYST’S PERSPECTIVE Presented November 9, 2004 in Quito, Ecuador, on the occasion of the 10th anniversary celebration of ECUABILITY.
OpRisk Europe – April 2006 Compliance & Capital, or ‘MiFID and the CRD’ ISDA Copyright ® 2006 International Swaps and Derivatives Association,
Undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) Worldbank Global Development Learning Network The Advanced Program in Accounting.
Future of Credit Risk Management: Supervisory Approach to Basel II CIA Annual Meeting Session 4405 Ben Gully Director, Basel Implementation Division Office.
Financial Markets & Institutions
IFRS and Basel 2 Ian Michael Accounting and Auditing Policy Department
1  The objective of operational risk management is the same as for credit, market and liquidity risks that is to find out the extent of the financial.
Basel Committee Norms. Basel Framework Basel Committee set up in 1974 Objectives –Supervision must be adequate –No foreign bank should escape supervision.
Towards Basel 2- India’s Preparedness. Towards Basel 2 India’s approach to Basel 2 India’s approach to Basel 2 Current level of preparedness Current level.
MiFID implementation Paul Richards, ICMA November 23, 2006 The information and expressions of opinion contained in this presentation are not intended to.
Consumer Credit Act 1974 Rebecca & Lee. What is it The Consumer Credit Act 1974 regulates consumer credit and consumer hire agreements for amounts up.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 9 – Financial Services Bilateral.
Overview of the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process framework used by the PFSA Polish Financial Supervision Authority, Financial Services, Licensing.
Institute for Eastern Studies & National Institute for Strategic Studies Second Europe-Ukraine Forum February 27-29, 2008 Kyiv, Ukraine Opportunities and.
1 Introduction to EU Banking Directives Laszlo Butt DG Internal Market and Financial Services Banking & Financial Conglomerates Unit.
Role of Financial Markets and Institutions
Commodity Standing Group (COMSG). IRegulatory background Current lighter touch regime for UK commodity firms not undertaking ISD Investment Business MiFID.
1 FINANCIAL SUPERVISION: MEASURING UP TO GLOBAL STANDARDS Lee Jang-Yung Assistant Governor Financial Supervisory Service.
1 IASB Risk Disclosure Proposals Russell Picot Group Chief Accounting Officer HSBC Holdings plc.
MiFID II/R Systematic Internalisers for bond markets Updated November 2016 Author: Andy Hill.
Investment Forum Regulatory Update Round
Capital Regulations and Management Chapter 6
Current Legal and Regulatory Issues
CEBS’ role in the CRD implementation
Investor protection and MIFID
Neopay Practical Guides #2 PSD2 (Should I be worried?)
Presentation transcript:

SII Compliance Forum Tim Lewis: CRD Update 19 July 2006

Capital Requirements Directive Update: Overview 1. Today’s regulatory capital requirements – designated investment business firms, banks 2. When the CRD changes happen/what is changing 3. Action points for firms

Notice This presentation is a general overview of the forthcoming requirements for Securities & Investment Institute compliance officers only. It is not intended to be advice and must not be relied on as such. Firms should seek specific advice on their own positions.

Today’s requirements BCDFGD EU FSMA PRU IPRU (BANK) IPRU (INV) UK Law FSA SYSC CAD ISD

Today’s requirements 1.Investment Services Directive (“ISD”) List of investment activities/instruments (different to UK “regulated activities”) performed by “investment firm”. Exemptions – if apply, outside ISD and CAD. 2.Capital Adequacy Directive (“CAD”) Capital requirements for most ISD “investment firms” based on types of “investment activity” performed. CAD “exemptions” for some firms.

Today’s requirements 1.IMRO/SFA/PIA rules  IPRU(INV) Covers firms: within Capital Adequacy Directive (“CAD”) (e.g. segregated managers, agency brokers, principal brokers); exempt from CAD but within Investment Services Directive (“ISD”) (e.g. advice/arranging only, no client money); and outside both directives (e.g. pure UCITS managers, some private equity firms). 2.Banking Supervisory Policy  IPRU(BANK)

Today’s requirements: ISD firms 1.Own funds €50,000 (if no client assets/money); or €125,000 (hold client money or assets); or €730,000 (full principal trader) 2.Financial resources (a) Investment mangers/non-principal brokers - ¼ or 6/52 of annual audited expenses some add-ons (e.g. for foreign exchange exposure “market risk”) (b) Principal brokers Based on ¼ annual audited expenses and trading book “market risk” add-ons 3.Large exposures limits NB Does not apply to all ISD firms 4.Consolidated reporting NB Investment managers and non-principal brokers currently exempt/waiver

Today’s requirements: Banks 1.Liquidity 2.Banking book Risk of counterparty defaulting on obligation (asset) Risk of current/future loss (contingent liability) _______________Capital_____________ ≥ Individual Capital Risk weighted assets Ratio% 3.Trading book Risk add-ons 4.Large exposures limits 5.Consolidated reporting Mandatory

Today’s requirements: Summary SCOPE Solo/Consolidated Minimum Capital Banking book or Expenditure Based Requirement Trading Book Liquidity (banks) Large Exposures

CRD – what is it? “Recasting” of current Banking Consolidation and Capital Adequacy Directives Legislation implementing Basel II in EU for banks and investment firms Will result in new FSA rules Will result in new rules across EEA NB: MiFID replaces ISD on 1 November 2007 so is relevant

SCOPE Solo/Consolidated Pillar I Minimum Capital Pillar II Supervisory Review Supervisory Review Process (“ SREP” ) monitoring Individual Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (“ ICAAP” ) using Supervisor Risk Assessment Systems (“ RAS”) resulting in Individual Capital Guidance (“ ICG ”) Pillar III Market Discipline Public Disclosure of Systems & Controls Banking Book (i) Standardised (ii) IRB Foundation (iii) IRB Advanced or Fixed Overheads Requirement Concentration risk Operational Risk (i) Basic Indicator (ii) Standardised (iii) Advanced Measurement Trading Book

CRD changes: 1 January 2007 New FSA rules GENPRU/BIPRU 1 set of rules to cover wide range of firms (banks, brokers, managers) – so more complex, harder to navigate Affects “BIPRU firms”, i.e.: -Banks -“ISD firms” which are limited licence firms, i.e. (i) not “exempt CAD firms” (ii) do not trade as principal (iii) do not underwrite; e.g. segregated portfolio managers, UCITS investment managers, corporate finance firms, agency brokers -“ISD firms” which are limited activity firms (certain limited principal dealing, meets certain other conditions – not dealt with further here) -“ISD firms” which trade as principal and/or underwrite (“full scope firms”) -Firms in same group as a bank, limited licence, limited activity or full scope firm (NB these changes are NOT covered today)

CRD changes: 1 January 2007 New mechanical capital requirement under “Pillar I”: -Limited licence firms: higher of (a) €50,000 (no client money/assets); €125,000 (client money/assets); €730,000 (MTF operators); €125,000 plus an excess for FuM (UCITS firms) (b) ¼ adjusted audited expenditure; and (c) credit risk + market risk -Full scope firms: higher of (a) €730,000; and (b) credit risk + market risk + operational risk -Banks: higher of (a) €5 million; and (b) credit risk + market risk + operational risk NB Pillar I operational risk charge only applies to full scope firms and banks

CRD changes: 1 January 2007 EEA parent undertaking in group must meet new mechanical group capital requirement. For limited licence firms this is the higher of: -¼ group expenses; and -a “credit risk requirement” plus a “market risk” requirement for the group For full scope firms and banks this is credit risk + market risk + operational risk for the group Existing waivers/guidance lapse, circumstances in which waivers available change Group “waiver” only changes the requirement from parent’s consolidated accounts to parent’s unconsolidated accounts No transitional provision Options -move outside of “group” (definition roughly follows accounting definition) -move activities to separate/single entity -insert more capital -go offshore

CRD changes: 1 January 2007 New definition of capital Changes to SYSC required by CRD

CRD changes: 1 November 2007 MiFID implemented – replaces and widens ISD New MiFID activities: investment advice, placing without firm commitment, MTF operator For some firms, will change capital category, i.e. -firm previously within ISD but not within CAD (i.e. exempt CAD firm); - firm previously outside ISD which is subject to MiFID– could be limited licence or exempt CAD firm. “Exempt CAD firms” - investment advice/reception and transmission, no client money/assets Until 1 November 2007, continue with current IPRU(INV) rules (as non-ISD or ISD firm) FSA draft rules expected Q3: INVPRU. NOT subject to GENPRU/BIPRU FSA has indicated capital will be: €50,000; or €25,000 + professional indemnity insurance; or professional indemnity insurance

CRD changes: 1 January 2008 Changes apply to BIPRU firms Pillar II Individual Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (“ICAAP”): process for senior management to assess how much additional capital (if any) is required in the business to meet certain risks in addition to the mechanical Pillar I minimum Part of the amendments to risk management rules Non-relationship managed firms must send form to FSA reflecting ICAAP results FSA can challenge with Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (“SREP”) Pillar III Disclose publicly (e.g. on a website) how the firm/its group addresses certain risks, e.g. details of risk management policies

BIPRU firms: summary at Pillar I: limited licence (a) €50,000 (no client money/assets); €125,000 (client money/assets); €730,000 (MTF operators); €125,000 plus an excess for FuM (UCITS firms) (b) ¼ fixed overheads requirement; and (c) credit risk + market risk 2Pillar I: full scope BIPRU/banks (a) €730,000 (full scope) or €5 million (bank); and (b) credit risk + market risk + operational risk 3.Pillar I: Large exposures/Concentration rules limits 4.Pillar I: Consolidated reporting Applies to limited licence/limited activity firms for the first time 5.Pillar II Individual Capital Adequacy Assessment Process 6.Pillar III Disclosure

Recap: today’s requirements BCDCADFGD EU FSMA PRU IPRU (BANK) IPRU (INV) UK Law FSA ISD

Changes post-CRD BCD recast CAD Recast FGD EU FSMA PRUIPRU (INV): non-MiFID/non- UCITS firms UK Law FSA GENPRU new! BIPRU new! UPRU new! – UCITS firms IPRU (BANK) SYSC updated! BIPRU firms [INVPRU:] MiFID / non- BIPRU firms

CRD Action points NOW How will your firm(s) be classified from 1 January 2007/1 November 2007? What capital requirement your firm will need to comply with? Is additional capital, waivers or restructuring necessary? Will the new group capital requirements will apply to your firm? Is additional capital, waivers or restructuring necessary? BEFORE OCTOBER 2006 Apply for any waivers which you will need to rely on. BEFORE 1 JANUARY 2007 Comply with the new CRD rules

Presented by Tim Lewis Travers Smith 10 Snow Hill London EC1A 2AL Telephone: