How to use prep’ time & generate content. Overview 1.Work as a team. It is not a case of two individual speeches being delivered and/or who can deliver.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Judge training. What to look for when judging. Content Analysis Role-Fulfilment Structure and Timing Presence Style.
Advertisements

INTRODUCTION TO UNI DEBATING Part 2. Plan! 1. Using prep time effectively 2. Case construction 3. Thinking of arguments 4. Info about trials.
LD: Lincoln-Douglas Debate History:  Illinois senatorial debates between Abraham Lincoln & Stephen Douglas  Became high school competitive.
Bottom Half Strategy I Training, 26/10/2011 Warwick Debating Society Proudly sponsored by.
The Structure of a Debate Constructive Speeches 1AC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 2NC: 3 Minutes 1NC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 1AC: 3 Minutes 2AC: 8.
Lincoln – Douglas Debate
Topic 1. Getting Started 8/10/13. Outline  Introduction to “speaker development” sessions  Introduction British Parliamentary Debating  Role fulfilment.
Rebuttal By Chanise (My favorite speech). First Speaker Position Rebuttal You have the advantage of a full four minutes of attacking your opponents case.
Final Focus The best two minutes of your (debate) life.
Summary Speeches clarity, destruction and magic. Recap: Role of a Whip Speaker Identify the “clash points” aka the voting issues. Destroy the opposition’s.
The World Schools Format  2 teams, 1 proposing the topic (or motion) and 1 opposing it  Each team has three speaking members, one of whom speaks twice.
Lincoln-Douglas Debate An Examination of Values. OBJECTIVES: The student will 1. Demonstrate understanding of the concepts that underlie Lincoln-Douglas.
Social Choice Session 20 Carmen Pasca and John Hey.
Judge’s Briefing Here!. So you want* to become a Debate Judge? *were forced by your kid.
THE BASICS COACHING SESSION. WHAT DO YOU NEED TO KNOW? What happens in a debate? What do you say in your speech? How do you give a good speech? How do.
INTRODUCTION TO DEBATING: SPEAKER ROLES DBAT 101.
INTRODUCTION TO DEBATING: ARGUMENTS DBAT 101. What should I say?  Principled Arguments:  We are more ‘Fair’. Often comes down to rights.  Burden is.
Parts of a Debate. Opening Statements Organization It must have an intro, body, and conclusion Try to think of a slogan to tie everything together Argument.
By Mrs. Fisher 12/1/14 Period 0 How To Make a Power Point Presentation Title Page Title Your Presentation Your Name, Date, & Period.
Basic Debating Skills.
An Overview By: Christina Weber
Leadership Cases Group Presentation Instructions.
Debates LG 2014.
Lesson Plan 1 Lincoln-Douglas Debates. Activity #1 The Beginning Activity #1 The Beginning Students will research the following resolution for debate:
Workshop 2 Your leadership – How do effective leadership teams respond to change? Dame Pat Collarbone Workshop 2 page 1 © Creating Tomorrow Ltd.
Teaching BP Lessons, Practices, and Drills China Debate Education Network.
What Makes a Debate? Although millions of people all over the world enjoy a good debate, they do not all debate in the same way, in the same format, or.
REBUTTALS (the second speech for your team…) David Childree.
Lincoln Douglas Debate RJ Pellicciotta, Cary Academy Dogwood Speech & Debate League.
Descriptions of Debating
NSDC 2013 ADJUDICATION SEMINAR.
Quebec Student DebatingAssociation Judge’s Briefing.
“Content Generation” Training Session 17 Oct 2014.
Sydney Apple Boston College 2015 Georgia Debate Institutes
Rules of Debate We want this! We don’t want this!.
Debating 101. What’s the deal?  3v3  Affirmative team and Negative team  30 minutes prep  Each team comes up with arguments to support or oppose the.
Role Fulfillment TRAINING SESSION 21 OCT Plan  Announcements  Quick review of last time’s stuff  Positions and their roles  How to prepare for.
WELCOME to DEBATE! First: Choose 1 of the 2 questions below Write an argument with 2-3 warrants. (1)The best way to find the slope of the line through.
Quebec Student DebatingAssociation Judge’s Briefing.
Week 7 Debates. On a separate sheet of paper, Who is on your debate team? (Not the topic, but your specific stance) In your opinion, who are the best.
Public Forum Debate Basic Forensics. What is public forum debate? Style of debate compared to a nationally- televised debate, like Crossfire. Debaters.
JUDGING PUBLIC FORUM DEBATE Find the PuFo in You!.
Most of you will be familiar with the quote: ‘Failing to prepare is preparing to fail’ This session should provide help with what to do in prep time to.
EJVED 09. Getting to know debating Debating is a clash of argumentations among the Government team and Opposition team Everything starts from the word.
30 ways to get 30s SCFI 2011 How to get better speaks or die trying.
Presentation by Jessica Prince March 13, 2010 The Pre-competition for the 14 th FLTRP Cup National English Debating Competition 1.
WHY!? Sponsored by:. Recap 4 teams of 2 people, with 2 teams in favour of each side 4 teams of 2 people, with 2 teams in favour of each side 15 minutes.
Lincoln-Douglas Debate. Resolutions: The resolution is a statement with which one contestant must agree (affirm) and the other contestant must disagree.
Welcome to Debating  Introduction  2008 changes  Speaker roles  Types of debates  Coaching tips  Draw announcement for the Senior Competition.
Parts of a Debate. Opening Statements Organization It must have an intro, body, and conclusion Try to think of a slogan to tie everything together Argument.
Basic Structure of a Round. a) Before the Round Pre-flowed arguments.
What is Debate?. Debate is a formal contest in which the affirmative and negative sides of a proposition are advocated by opposing speakers. Each team.
Judge training- Warwick IV What did that person just say?
LD Debate Study Information
Prep time and content generation Training Session
Types of Debate Lincoln/Douglas Public Forum Policy
Thanks to Ionut Stefan and Eliot Pallot
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Analyze a problem Conduct research Utilize principles of argumentation
Advanced Summary SPEECHES
Quebec Student Debating Association Judge’s Briefing.
Change and continuity in immigration (c )
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Quebec Student Debating Association Judge’s Briefing.
Blue Group The Motion Our Position.
Debate April 12/13.
Four Debate Characteristics
Debating metal bonding
Presentation transcript:

How to use prep’ time & generate content

Overview 1.Work as a team. It is not a case of two individual speeches being delivered and/or who can deliver the better speech i.e. don’t hog material! 2.Challenge one another; constantly ask «why » 3.Write your analysis down! 4.Always consider your arguments in relation to those of the opposition, not in isolation.

Top-Half 10-point plan for success 1.First four minutes should be used for silent preparation on burdens and arguments (includes time to the room). 2.Write down burdens. 3.Determine what the most important arguments are. 4.The FIRST speech should provide arguments which meet all burdens.

5. Divide points between the team. The first speaker should have three points (two pivotal and one important), the second speaker should be given one point (pivotal) and then will work out their second point during the debate. 6. Help the PM/LO write their speech. 7. Signpost one point per page.

8. Bullet point the lines of analysis under these signposting using the SPEEL or PEELS structure. 9. After eleven minutes the first speaker should have at least 1.5points written out properly. 10. Second speaker should then work on writing their first point out whilst first speaker finishes theirs speech.

Bottom-Half 10-point plan for sucess 1.First four minutes as per opening teams. 2.Write down burdens and key arguments. 3.Consider how these arguments play out during the debate (demonstration).

4. Note the arguments your opening team will most probably say. 5. Work out the rebuttal to the opposition. 6. Determine what gaps your opening team are likely to leave i.e. “how this policy will actually work”.

7. Make a list/thematic spider diagram of all the arguments you can think of. 8. Write down key examples, lines of analysis under each of these headings. 9. Star/circle/happy face arguments you think are most important and be aware of arguments you think will definitely be new. 10. Consider what you think the clash points will be.

Content 1.Principles (there is nearly always more than one way to justify the same principle) i.e. Principle of Non-Intervention 2.HOW the policy does/doesn’t work 3.Utilitarian framework 4.Short-term effects 5.Long-term effects

6. Stakeholders media, minorities (women, ethnic groups, children) the group the policy targets the rest of the citizenary