Efficiency of the L1 Trigger for SUSY Study performed by L. Boldizsár, P. Hidas KFKI Budapest J. Erö, M. Fierro, A. Jeitler, N. Neumeister, P. Porth, H.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Advertisements

Level-1 Trigger CMS Week, Brussels 14 Sep C.-E. Wulz Deputy Trigger Project Manager Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna Prepared with slides/material.
 Trigger for Run 8 Rates, Yields, Backgrounds… Debasish Das Pibero Djawotho Manuel Calderon de la Barca Analysis Meeting BNL October 16, 2007.
Search for Large Extra Dimensions at the Tevatron Bob Olivier, LPNHE Paris XXXVI ème Rencontre de Moriond Mars Search for Large Extra Dimensions.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.

Alain Romeyer - January Light higgs decay in SUSY cascade - Status report Introduction Trigger efficiency B tagging Jet calibration Invariant mass.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern SM Higgs Discovery Channels ATLAS High Level Trigger Trigger & Physics Selection Higgs Channels: Physics Performance.
The CMS Trigger.
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu 1 Silvia Ochesanu Thomas Maes, Hans Van Havermaet.
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
LHC pp beam collision on March 13, 2011 Haijun Yang
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers1 Salavat Abdullin For CMS Collaboration SUSY 2005, July 18-23, 2005 Durham, UK.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
IOP HEPP 6-8 April 2009Matthew Tamsett, RHUL 1 Determining the ATLAS electron trigger efficiency in BSM channels from Data Matthew Tamsett, RHUL Supervisor:
The CMS Level-1 Trigger System Dave Newbold, University of Bristol On behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Institute for Anything of the University of Everything Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz New Physics at the LHC C.-E. Wulz (Institute of High Energy Physics) 1 Institute.
NLC – The Next Linear Collider Project Colorado Univ. - Boulder Prague LCD Presentation Status of SPS1 Analysis at Colorado Uriel Nauenberg for the Colorado.
Simulation Calor 2002, March. 27, 2002M. Wielers, TRIUMF1 Performance of Jets and missing ET in ATLAS Monika Wielers TRIUMF, Vancouver on behalf.
Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Institute for High Energy Physics Vienna Level-1 Trigger Menu Working Group CERN, 9 November 2000 Global Trigger Overview.
2004 Xmas MeetingSarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS.
Olivier RavatLes Houches/June 3rd Higgs associated production at LHC : Thecase Olivier Ravat, Morgan Lethuillier IPN Lyon Les Houches 2003 : Physics.
Four Seas Conference Istanbul, 10 September 2004 Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Institute for High Energy Physics, Vienna Fast Event Selection at CERN’s Large.
Il Trigger di Alto Livello di CMS N. Amapane – CERN Workshop su Monte Carlo, la Fisica e le simulazioni a LHC Frascati, 25 Ottobre 2006.
Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Anton Taurok Institute for High Energy Physics, Vienna Hannes Sakulin CERN Annual Review CERN, 24 Sep Global Trigger Global.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation1/ Electron/ physics in CMS Kati Lassila-Perini HIP Activities in the.
M. Poli Lener XI Spring School - "Bruno Touschek" 1 Luminosity measurements with dimuon and single muon reconstruction of Z 0 and W decays OUTLINE:  LHCb.
June 29, 2000DOE/NSF USCMS Computing and Software Report. HLT Studies D. Acosta1 High-Level Trigger Studies Darin Acosta University of Florida DOE/NSF.
1 Triggering on Diffraction with the CMS Level-1 Trigger Monika Grothe, U Wisconsin HERA-LHC workshop March 2004 Need highest achievable LHC Lumi, L LHC.
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
Eduardo RodriguesLHCb Collaboration Week, 11 Dec L0 Bandwidth Division Update Eduardo Rodrigues, CERN Physics channels under study and set-up Pile-up.
CMS Week Sept '07Leonard Apanasevich (UIC) Pedrame Bargassa (Rice) 1 Physics Priorities for Trigger Development Leonard Apanasevich (UIC) Pedrame Bargessa.
A Linear Collider Run Scenario Choose a physics scenario that is CONSERVATIVE in the sense that it has many particles and thresholds to explore. Assume.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Hardware: Software:
Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
1 Jet Triggers and Dijet Mass Selda Esen and Robert M. Harris Fermilab TTU Weekly HEP Group Meeting Feb 16, 2006.
Trigger Group of the Institute for High Energy Physics, Vienna presented by Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz CPT Week, Plenary Session CERN, 18 April 2002 GLOBAL.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
L1 Global Muon Trigger Simulation Status URL of this presentation:
Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
CMS week1 Agenda Sarah Eno: Status of project Volker Drollinger: jet energy scale and top mass Ritua Kinnunen: Higgs mass resolution E. Doroshkevic:
Alain Romeyer - Sept Light Higgs search in SUSY cascades Introduction (Previous studies) Plans for this analysis Simulation chain Reconstruction.
University of Iowa Study of qq->qqH  qq ZZ Alexi Mestvirishvili November 2004, CMS PRS Workshop at FNAL.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Effects of Endcap Staging/Descoping D.Acosta University of Florida.
Backup slides Z 0 Z 0 production Once  s > 2M Z ~ GeV ÞPair production of Z 0 Z 0 via t-channel electron exchange. e+e+ e-e- e Z0Z0 Z0Z0 Other.
Model Independent Measurements Jon Butterworth University College London MCnet school Spa, Belgium September 2015.
Sridhara Dasu115 April 2002 L1CaloTrigger Algorithms Sridhara Dasu University of Wisconsin Algorithms: Details, Updates and Simulation - 2 x cm -2.
Measuring the t-tbar Cross-Section in the Dilepton Channel at CDF* J. Incandela for C. Mills Jan. 17, 2008 DOE Site Visit UC Santa Barbara * PhD Thesis.
A Search for Higgs Decaying to WW (*) at DØ presented by Amber Jenkins Imperial College London on behalf of the D  Collaboration Meeting of the Division.
Measurement of SM V+gamma by ATLAS
Central Exclusive Production of BSM Higgs bosons decaying to jets
Supersymmetric Particle Reconstructions at CMS
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Low Level HLT Reconstruction Software for the CMS SST
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
SUSY particles searches with R-parity violation at DØ, Tevatron
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
Global Muon Trigger Update
Presentation transcript:

Efficiency of the L1 Trigger for SUSY Study performed by L. Boldizsár, P. Hidas KFKI Budapest J. Erö, M. Fierro, A. Jeitler, N. Neumeister, P. Porth, H. Rohringer, L. Rurua, H. Sakulin, A. Taurok, C.-E. Wulz HEPHY Vienna presented by Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz CPT Week, CERN, 8 May 2003

CPT Week, May 2003 C.-E. Wulz2 Tridas Scenario and Physics Channels Luminosity: 2x10 33 cm -2 s -1 Tridas scenario: 50 kHz Level-1 trigger rate (16 kHz with safety factor) 8 physics channels studied (A-H) -A: Smuons at Snowmass point 1a -  L  L with  L ->    -B: Charginos/neutralinos at Snowmass point 1a -       - with    ->      and    ->     ;    ->      ;    -> e  -C: Gluinos/squarks Snowmass point 1a - D: Gluinos/squarks Snowmass point 2 -E: Sparticles JetMet mSUGRA4 -F: Sparticles JetMet mSUGRA5 -G: Sparticles JetMet mSUGRA6 -H: WW with W ->  (benchmark channel) ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~

CPT Week, May 2003 C.-E. Wulz3 Parameter Choice Snowmass point 1a Snowmass point 2 tan  = 10, sgn(  ) =  A 0 =  100 GeV (A,B,C) A 0 =  GeV (E,F,G)

CPT Week, May 2003 C.-E. Wulz4 mSUGRA Jet and Missing E T distributions

CPT Week, May 2003 C.-E. Wulz5 Monte Carlo Input A, B, C, D, H: PYTHIA E, F, G: ISAJET 7.51 Parton distribution functions CTEQ5L used for all channels events for SUSY channels, 2000 events for WW channel. On average 3.5 minimum bias events produced with PYTHIA added.

CPT Week, May 2003 C.-E. Wulz6 Detector and Trigger Simulation CMSIM 125 used for hit simulation, separately for signal and pile-up. Digis produced with ORCA 6, mixing signal plus in-time pile-up. Out-of-time pile-up simulated by superposing bunch crossings -5, …, +3. HCAL non-linearity correction applied. Intrinsic RPC noise not added due to CPU time constraints. Level-1 performance simulated in ORCA. Bit-wise arithmetic used wherever possible. Results are given at the end of the Level-1 chain, i.e. at the output of the Global Trigger.

CPT Week, May 2003 C.-E. Wulz7 Trigger Menu Thresholds chosen to yield total rate of 16 kHz, which are allocated to physics triggers at Level-1. Muon thresholds are from the DAQ/HLT TDR. Bandwidth quota is divided into four roughly equal groups:  /  e /ee  /  Jets, E T sums and combinations Total rate is smaller than sum of rates for 4 groups due to overlaps. 3.6 kHz } 4.3 kHz 3.0 kHz } 3.6 kHz } }

CPT Week, May 2003 C.-E. Wulz8 Efficiencies Nr. of events generated (no geometrical restrictions) Efficiency = Nr. of events passing L1 trigger in its fiducial volume Individual efficiency: eff. of a trigger as if it were the only trigger applied In practice: triggers overlap Additional efficiency: events found by previous trigger not counted (order of trigger conditions relevant) Exclusive efficiency: eff. for events found by one and only one trigger

CPT Week, May 2003 C.-E. Wulz9 Efficiencies A-D, H (WW)

CPT Week, May 2003 C.-E. Wulz10 Efficiencies E, F, G (mSUGRA) Efficiencies at the upper mass reach of Tevatron Run II

CPT Week, May 2003 C.-E. Wulz11 Total Efficiencies Channel Total efficiency A 93.4 % B 72.3 % C 97.9 % D % E 96.2 % F 96.3 % G 88.9 % H 81.3 %  Chargino/neutralino channel has lowest efficiency.

CPT Week, May 2003 C.-E. Wulz12       : generated E T vs  of highest-E T electron  E T is either low or electrons are outside trigger acceptance ~~

CPT Week, May 2003 C.-E. Wulz13       : generated E T and E of invisible particles Can trigger on missing E T help? ~~ Invisible E T about the same for accepted and rejected events, whilst E is higher for rejected than accepted events! Rejected events tend to balance their contributions in E T. Probability for cancellation high due to many invisible particles.

CPT Week, May 2003 C.-E. Wulz14 Effects of thresholds, resolution, acceptance For a qualitative appreciation of the different effects the  and  trigger efficiencies were studied for smuons (A) (   = 92.5%,   = 68.8%) and gluinos/squarks (C) (   = 27.8%,   = 13.8%). Generated p T of 2 highest-p T muons Smuons Squarks/gluinos

CPT Week, May 2003 C.-E. Wulz15 p T of Level-1 Muon Candidates Level-1 p T of 2 top muons SmuonsSquarks/gluinos Single-muon threshold

CPT Week, May 2003 C.-E. Wulz16  of Generated and Level-1 Muons Generated  of 2 highest-p T muons Smuons Squarks/gluinos  trigger acceptance boundary Level-1  of 2 top muons

CPT Week, May 2003 C.-E. Wulz17 Conclusions Level-1 trigger efficiencies for 7 SUSY channels and WW studied for the initial low luminosity LHC run with scenario of 50 kHz maximum Level-1 trigger rate  Most efficiencies are good, over 90%  Lower efficiency for charginos/neutralinos comes mainly from physics