Transforming the Learning Experience: Promoting Conversations about Research-Engaged Teaching and Learning (ReTaL) Experiences Karin Crawford

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
Advertisements

The story so far Dr Rachel Maunder School of Social Sciences, University of Northampton.
Middle Years Programme
Renewed Outcomes-based Curriculum 6-9. Purpose for Renewal Teacher feedback –Provide concise & coherent curriculum –Time allocations have not changed.
An e-Learning Strategy to promote technology enabled learning i n UCC Teaching & Learning workshop 30 October, 2012.
SCONUL ACCESS GROUP JUNE , MMU Northern Collaboration.
Quality Enhancement and Communications The development and delivery of a research active curriculum will be promoted as a core and high quality activity.
Barriers and Enablers to Technology- Enhanced Learning What can Universities do to encourage innovative teaching? Steve Williams - Newcastle University.
Higher Education as a public good: Pushing forward, pushing boundaries Dr Karin Crawford - Principal Teaching Fellow Ian Mathews – Senior Lecturer Diane.
Students as co- researchers in epistemic communities: new forms of engagement and knowledge construction Dr. Sue Timmis, Graduate School for Education.
Information Literacy and Inquiry-based learning Pamela McKinney Learning Development and Research Associate (Information Literacy) at CILASS CILASS identifies.
Assessment practices: Quality and standards. Assessment and the assurance of academic standards The assurance of academic standards embraces a wide range.
INTEGRATE: INTerlinking and Embedding GRaduate ATtributes at Edinburgh Dr Jessie Paterson, Institute for Academic Development.
Faculty of Health & Social Care School of Nursing Shape your own future.
Consistent Teacher judgement
What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?
Macquarie University Library1 LAMS, e-learning & Information Literacy: possibilities & practicalities Margaret Wright, Macquarie University Heather Cooper,
CULTURERESOURCECENTRE Internationalisation of Sydney Institute cultureresourcecentre.com.au – 14 May 2010 LEADERSHIP FORUM INTERNATIONALISATION OF SYDNEY.
Existing Frameworks: UNESCO Integration in stages The introduction and use of ICT in education proceeds in broad stages that may be conceived as a continuum.
LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.
INTEGRATED LEARNING: STAGE 4 (SECONDARY COGS) Principles and process.
Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council.
Exchange A7: Linking activity in Europe – UNEP mapping and building sustainability across universities and colleges in Europe Wayne Talbot, WTA Education.
STRATEGIES FOR ONLINE LEARNING IN A GLOBAL NETWORK UNIVERSITY INTED 2013 Annette Smith, Kristopher Moore, Erica Osher Reifer New York University.
Diana Laurillard Head, e-Learning Strategy Unit Overview of e-learning: aims and priorities.
Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO): Update Deborah Roseveare Head, Skills beyond School Division Directorate for Education OECD 31.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Transforming lives through learning Profiling 3-18.
By Dr Tracy Bhamra Department of Design and Technology Loughborough University.
Dr. Mark Allen Poisel Vice President for Student Affairs Georgia Regents University Today’s Transfer Students: Building a Foundation of Success Transfer.
Learning design as a foundation for the future success of e-learning Diana Laurillard 2007 European LAMS Conference University of Greenwich 5 July 2007.
Catherine Paul Community of Practice Facilitator Office of Learning Technology, University of British Columbia UBC.
»The project will be implemented in line with the Operational Programme for Human Resources Development , 3rd priority axis: Development of human.
The Art of the Designer: creating an effective learning experience HEA Conference University of Manchester 4 July 2012 Rebecca Galley and Vilinda Ross.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
The Areas of Interaction are…
Professor Norah Jones Dr. Esyin Chew Social Software for Learning – The Institutional Policy of the University of Glamorgan ICHL 2012, China
The DIAL project Digital Integration into Arts Learning University of the Arts London DIAL Project manager Chris Follows ARLIS Annual Conference
Joint Information Systems Committee 14/10/2015 | | Slide 1 Effective Assessment in a Digital Age Sarah Knight e-Learning Programme, JISC Ros Smith, GPI.
Aims of Workshop Introduce more effective school/University partnerships for the initial training of teachers through developing mentorship training Encourage.
Assessment - as a catalyst for innovation Grainne Conole, University of Southampton University of Edinburgh, 16 th April 2004.
© International Baccalaureate Organization 2006 The Middle Years Program At a Glance.
Working towards a connected future; understanding the changing dynamics in the relationships between students and teachers in higher education Karin Crawford,
The Brain Project – Building Research Background Part of JISC Virtual Research Environments (Phase 3) Programme Based at Coventry University with Leeds.
LORO (Languages Open Resources Online): A Repository for the Department of Languages Anna Comas-Quinn & Hélène Pulker Department of Languages, FELS The.
The students’ voice in the enhancement of teaching and learning: Students Consulting on Teaching (SCOTS) SCOTsSCOTs SCOTsSCOTs SCOTsSCOTs Karin Crawford.
Inspirational teaching and learning: Developing and encouraging autonomous student learning through enquiry and using digital media. Mike Bramhall Keith.
Linking research and teaching Associate Professor Angela Brew The University of Sydney.
CEDAR INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL Middle Years Programme CEDAR INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL.
1 Roles and Responsibilities of The Learning Evidence Team at CCRI Presented at CCRI Peggy Maki
March E-Learning or E-Teaching? What’s the Difference in Practice? Linda Price and Adrian Kirkwood Programme on Learner Use of Media The Open University.
Curriculum Design through Technology Enhanced Learning Christine Davies,
Bringing together the pieces of the jigsaw: the experience of developing and implementing an institutional CPD framework Karin Crawford, Howard Stevenson,
Building Schools for the Future Transforming the Learning Landscape in Birmingham.
OER in the Social Sciences: Tacit models of resource creation Anna Gruszczynska, C-SAP (Higher Education Academy Subject Centre for Sociology, Anthropology.
COLLABORATIVE WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN EDUCATION USING WIKIS & BLOGS IN THE CLASSROOM.
- lincoln.ac.uk/EDEU Twitter Pedagogies of Partnership in Research-engaged Teaching Dr. Karin Crawford.
EdShare, OERs and impact Debra Morris University Library University of Southampton edshare.soton.ac.uk.
Padding around – Using iPads to promote collaborative learning. Deborah O’Connor, Claire Hamshire and Hannah Crumbleholme Faculty of Health, Psychology.
Embedding Aboriginal ways of knowing, being and doing in social work curriculum: Co constructing curriculum with community Bindi Bennett, Joanna Zubrzycki.
What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?
UCL Peer Dialogue Scheme
Enabling and engaging students within an e-learning environment using WordPress Background By exploring the development of the principles and practices.
Learning in Partnership: pedagogy for empowement
Amit Kumar Assistant Professor
Encouraging student engagement to increase learning gain
Gina Wisker University of Brighton
Implications of openly licenced resources for librarians
Presentation transcript:

Transforming the Learning Experience: Promoting Conversations about Research-Engaged Teaching and Learning (ReTaL) Experiences Karin Crawford University of Lincoln, United Kingdom ICED June 2010

Presentation aims Share experience and reflect on a project that aims to promote learning and dialogue amongst faculty; Consider the opportunities and challenges of such a project; Discuss the experience of engaging faculty in dialogue about teaching and learning innovations; Explore the wider applicability of this approach.

Institutional context Teaching and learning at University of Lincoln based on principle and practices of research-engaged teaching; There is much debate and discussion about what this actually means; Whilst research-engaged teaching is prevalent in HE, there is no University in the UK that has taken this on as a unifying principle for its pedagogic practices; ‘… a 21st century expression of the old university ideal, where the student focus is paramount, at the same time as fulfilling the modern tasks of knowledge creation and transfer for the economic, social and cultural benefit of our society’ (Mary Stuart, Vice Chancellor

Research-engaged teaching A further development of the best aspects of research-informed teaching (Healey and Jenkins 2009); Not a new concept, grounded in the intellectual history and tradition of the modern university; Moves away from HE activity being defined by government policy, to reclaim the core activities and purpose of HE, research and teaching; Underpinning concepts include ‘the student as producer’, students produce and discover knowledge rather than learning only that which has already been discovered (Neary and Winn 2009); Division of roles between teacher and student is minimized (Brew 2006); A move from an instructional paradigm to a learning paradigm (Barr and Tagg 1995).

Our working definition ‘A fundamental principle of curriculum design, where students learn primarily by engagement in real research projects, or projects which replicate the process of research in their discipline. Engagement is created through active collaboration amongst and between students and academics, underpinned by the effective use of information resources’ (Neary 2010: 07)

The pilot project In one large Faculty (Health, Life and Social Sciences); Use of Web2 technologies; Recognition that many colleagues were already working with students on research-like teaching and learning activities; Some work so embedded in day-to-day practices that it may not be recognised within this frame; A priority activity in the Faculty Teaching, Learning and Assessment Plan.

Objectives of the pilot project Promote academic community dialogue about ReTaL, including facilitating cross-faculty dialogue; Provide an opportunity to share practice across the Faculty and beyond; ‘Showcase’ examples of ReTaL Further understanding about what is meant by ReTaL; To provide a mode of staff-development related to ReTaL that is accessible, flexible and in the tradition of ReTaL, is produced and developed by those how are directly involved.

The pilot project – stage 1 Exploring technological options; Exploring possible cost implications; Engaging with Faculty committees and central committees and departments to establish permissions and agreements; Agreeing the scope, boundaries and timescales for the project.

The pilot project – stage 2 Setting up the technological interface, with appropriate support (WordPress blogging platform); Deciding on criteria for content – type, form, time or space limit for each entry; Developing a format that would become the on-line submission form; Encouraging small number of colleagues to provide examples ‘to work with’.

The pilot project – stage 3 Plan to hold a workshop event, open to all teaching staff and students; Using examples from the site supplemented with representation from the school/department; Discussion and debate about each example.

Opportunities Other faculties soon keen to be a part of this; An element of friendly competition; A marketing tool; A repository of good practice; An opportunity to engage students in different ways; Use of multi-media tools with links to youtube, slide-share, facebook etc.

Challenges Who would manage, maintain, upload, administrate? Who has ‘ownership’ long term? Engaging faculty – some keen to ‘showcase’, but few keen to engage in on-line dialogue; Continuing need to motivate others, difficult to see the mutual benefits at the early stages; Ensuring enough standardisation to enable searching across categories, whilst valuing creativity, flexibility to account for discipline and individual difference.

or

Conclusion A new quality learning development in Teaching and Learning across the institution; Need to engage and develop staff accordingly, whilst recognising current expertise and activity; Three-stage pilot, using technological solutions to share practice and facilitate dialogue and learning; Needs constant energy and enthusiasm from all; Has potential for engagement beyond the faculty and institution.

Your thoughts? Are you doing something like this? How do your colleagues create space for dialogue about pedagogic practice? Wider application? Have you got experience of using this technology … or another appropriate platform perhaps?

References Barr, R. B. and Tagg, J ‘From Teaching to Learning: A New Paradigm for Higher Education’ Change Magazine, 27 (6): Neary, M. (2010) Student as Producer: Research-Engaged Teaching and Learning at the University of Lincoln (User’s Guide ) University of Lincoln Brew, A. (2006) Research and Teaching: Beyond the Divide Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Healey, M. and Jenkins, A. (2009) Developing Undergraduate Research and Enquiry York: Higher Education Academy Neary, M. and Winn, J. (2009) ‘Student as Producer: Reinventing the student experience in higher education’ in L. Bell, H. Stevenson and M. Neary (2009) The Future of Higher Education Policy, Pedagogy and the Student Experience London: Continuum

For further information, or to discuss potential collaborative research opportunities, please contact: Karin Crawford University of Lincoln Brayford Pool Lincoln LN6 7TS United Kingdom