Quest for GMO Free Poland Paweł Połanecki Coalition GMO Free Poland Food and Democracy Conference Lucern April 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basel Protocol on Liability and Compensation Civil Liability Magda Gosk Chief Inspectorate for Environmental Protection Division of Transboundary Movement.
Advertisements

Chapter 20 REGULATIONS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY. Regulations Are intended to allow us to safely use the benefits of biotech. Help in developing and using biotech.
ForGMOfreeRussia For GMO free Russia! January, 2006 Victoria Kolesnikova CIS Alliance for Biosafety Moscow, Russia.
Wild Rice White Paper. ANISHINAABE STANCE ON MANOOMIN  Manoomin is a sacred plant.  Manoomin is a living entity that has it’s own unique spirit.  We.
Domestic Import Regulations for GMOs and their Compatibility with WTO Rules: Some Key Issues Heike Baumüller ICTSD Trade and Development Symposium
Violation of the Rights of Nature and Transgenics Elizabeth Bravo.
RANA FAWADLEH. EXPROPRIATION IN FRANCE WHAT IS EXPROPRIATION? * Nationalizing private property compulsorily for public interests by the state. * Converting.
SOURCE: “Co-existence project kicked-off”, European Biotechnology News, Vol. 4, 2005 European Commission project aimed at co- existence of GE and non-GE.
PPKE JÁK Budapest Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence Environmental Democracy Conference 19th October, 2012.
History of Nuclear Safety Legislation in Pakistan
Access and Benefit Sharing and the Nagoya Protocol Nashina Shariff Manager Environmental Stewardship Branch November 2014.
ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS
Issues and Ethics in Biotechnology. ETHICS Set of moral principles governing an individual’s action Reflects morality (perception of what is right) Essential.
UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES IN VIETNAM Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam – 12 Sept 2012.
GMO. What are GMOs? GMOs are plants or animals whose cells have been inserted with a gene from an unrelated species in order to take on specific characteristics.
GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM PRESENTATION 13 September 2013 By Department of Trade and Industry.
Biosecurity Laws and Regulations in Turkey Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Avni Öktem Nanobiotechnology R&D Group, Department of Biological Sciences Middle East Technical.
GMOs and the WTO Rules Mark Halle Minsk, 24 October 2008.
“PRECAUTION AND THE REGULATION OF LIVING MODIFIED ORGANISMS (LMOs)” EMMA ISSATT.
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Drew L. Kershen University of Oklahoma College of Law Earl Sneed Centennial Professor of Law Copyright 2005, all rights.
U D T Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Warsaw June 2004 INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC SYSTEM OF ENSURING.
Oviedo Convention and Its Protocols – Impact on Polish Law International Bioethics Conference Oviedo Convention in Central and Eastern European Countries.
THE NATIONAL SITUATION ON THE HEALTHAND THE SAFETY AT WORK in Poland prepared by: Małgorzata Żydło Danmar Computers.
Biotechnology in Switzerland FOEN Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) Activities Responsibilities and Competences Objectives of GMO Regulation Key.
EU Regulatory framework on GMOs
Confronting Contamination: Biosafety Lim Li Lin, Third World Network.
Training Workshop for Regional Advisors Bangkok, Thailand 15 – 27 May 2006.
LECTURE GEOG 270 Fall 2007 November 28, 2007 Joe Hannah, PhD Department of Geography University of Washington.
Ole Kr. Fauchald Introduction to biodiversity n What is ”biodiversity”? ä Distinguish between levels of biodiversity ä Development of biodiversity.
The Precautionary Principle in the Sweden, the EU and the US Comparative Risk Regulation Workshop at University of California, Berkeley December
Kathrine Kleveland, president of The Norwegian Society of Rural Women ” Norwegian GMO regulation” 6 th European Conference of GMO-Free Regions September.
Geneticaly modified Food and Feed – current situation in EU Petr Beneš Food Safety Department Prague, 9 October 2009.
The environmental (in)coherance of European food policy Adrian Bebb Friends of the Earth Europe September 2006.
Christina Laganas HW220 GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS BENEFITS AND RISKS.
FEASIBILITY OF NATIONAL DISCLOSURE OF ORIGIN REQUIREMENTS 21 April 2005 WTO Symposium, Geneva Disclosure Requirements: Incorporating the CBD Principles.
Kavala Workshop 1-2 June 2006 Legal protection of Transitional Waters [in the Cadses area]: A comparative analysis Dr. Petros Patronos / Dr. Liliana Maslarova.
Genetically modified plants Istituto Tecnico Statale “Enrico Mattei” DECIMOMANNU DECIMOMANNU ITALIA ITALIA COMENIUS - HELP RO1-COM
THE BIOSAFETY BILL, 2007 JACARANDA HOTEL, 26 TH JULY 2007.
GM crops in the EU Campaigning opportunities and challenges FoEE and Greenpeace.
SOURCE: European Commission also adopted today three decisions on the placing on the.
Food Laws and Food Control Management Structures – the Polish Perspective Aleksandra Wesołowska Polish Consumers Association.
Conference of African Ministers responsible for Civil Registration Theme: Reforming and Improving Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Systems in Africa.
Issues and Ethics in Biotechnology
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety And India’s Obligations By Desh Deepak Verma Joint Secretary, Ministry of Environment and.
Brownfields in Baltic States - Lifelong Educational Project CZ/08/LLP-LdV/TOI/ Legal aspects of brownfield redevelopment in Latvia Edmunds Teirumnieks.
1 DEAT PERSPECTIVE ON GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS 31 JULY 2007.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, associated professor.
Status of Agricultural Biotechnology and Biosafety in Romania Aurel Popescu, Prof., PhD University of Pitesti, Romania.
EPHA Presentation Healthcare and social services treated equally as estate agents or advertising companies excluded from the Directive or Healthcare and.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 13 – Fisheries Brussels, 5-6 Jun 2013.
Week 12. Lecture 2. Health Law & the EU Cross-border healthcare: patients’ rights.
Documents and Procedure Steps to Access EU Markets Grant Wilkinson Defra.
Romanian framework concerning GMOs Dr. Valeria GAGIU Institute of Food Bioresources 6 Dinu Vintila Street, , 2 nd district, Bucharest ROMANIA Tel.
T.A.I.E.X. Workshop on Cross-border Healthcare Directive SPECIAL ISSUES Prof. Juozas Galdikas, MD, PhD Kazimieras Simonavicius University Vilnius, Lithuania.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 29 – Customs union Bilateral screening:
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 29 – Customs union Bilateral screening:
EU legislation on GMOs: Overview and challenges Alberto Volpato, Counsellor for Health, Consumers, Agriculture Presented by Guy Van den Eede, Adviser for.
 Why does environmental policy differ across countries?  Why doesn’t science necessarily lead to convergent outcomes?  What is the relationship of science.
Priority Agricultural Policies and Standards to Advance Agricultural Trade and Access to Inputs Regional Feed the Future and Trade Africa Meeting
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 10 – Information society and media.
The need for a new seed legislation
The activities of the state tax authorities
13 September 2013 By Department of Trade and Industry
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
Reconsidering requirements for research ethics in Lithuania
GMO Fact or Fiction?.
GMO Fact or Fiction?.
FUNDAMENTAL SOCIAL RIGHTS IN EU
National Legislation in the Pressure Sector and the PED
Dovilė Juodkaitė Inclusion Europe conference, Vilnius 6 June, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Quest for GMO Free Poland Paweł Połanecki Coalition GMO Free Poland Food and Democracy Conference Lucern April 2009

1. We do not want GMOs in Poland 1.1 Social base for gmo resistance in Poland - 60% of Poles believe that eating GMO foods can be harmful for your health - two in three Poles wouldn't buy GMO foods even if they were significantly cheaper than traditional products. - one in two would support a ban on the cultivation of GM plants even if that were to mean higher food prices % belives that none of the strict legal rules will be observed, scientists and biotech industry will do what they want ( source : PBS DGA for Gazeta Wyborcza, ) 1.2 Political background for „GMO free Poland” - All the 16 Regional Selfgovernment Assemblies adopted positon to obtain the satus of GMO free.( 5 Feb ) Territory of Poland became a gmo free zone. - Framework Position of the Government of Poland regarding GMO ; 3 Apr 06 „The Government of Poland seeks that Poland acquired the status of ”GMO- free country”, therefore, pronounces : - against a deliberate release of GMO into the environment for experimental purposes on the territory of the Republic of Poland. - against the introduction of GMO approved on the base of Dir 2001/18 as products or in products into the market. - against the introduction of genetically modified plants into the market with the possibility of cultivation.” „During the authorization procedure for introduction of new genetically modified products into the EU market, Poland will be always voting against the marketing of such products”

2. Illegal GMO cultivations in Poland 2.1 Violence of Polish SEED ACT The Seed Regulation Act of 27 April 2006 Art. 57 point 3, ascertains literally that “Seed material of genetically modified crops is prohibited for turnover on the territory of Poland.” The term “turnover”, which was intentionally considered by the legislative bodies to cover “importing, distributing and handling” and also “operating with or using and applying “ - has been publicly reduced by the GMO industry’ lobbyists to the meaning of “ placing on the market “ ( as defined in reg no 1829/2003) Consequently this has created a gap in the strict prohibition legal regulation. Erroneous interpretation, provides for individual farmers the “ legal” conditions to deal with and cultivate transgenic crops “for their own use.” Meanwhile Monsanto, which controls the Polish Association of Maize Producers, together with numerous corrupted scientists, has been promoting among the corn farmers a campaign to smuggle Mon 810 seeds into Poland as the only panaceum for the ‘corn borer’ which, surprisingly, expanded widely in recent years. The farmers are exactly instructed how to explain their “own use.” 2.2. Violence of Polish GMO Act. Despite recent efforts to introduce a new Polish GMO Law initiative, which has since been rejected by the European Commission, (Case T-69/08) the so called “old” GMO regulation adopted in 22nd June 2001 still remains valid. This act comprises rigorous procedures for internal notification and penal consequences in the case of unauthorised application of GMOs, especially in an open field. Nobody is entitled to operate with GMO on Polish territory without prior and appropriate acceptance of the Ministry. In Chapter 7, numerous civil and penal code responsibilities are prerequisite, including imprisonment up to 8 years for unauthorized use of GMO materials. Furthermore, following the requirements of that law, the Ministry of Environment keeps a “Public Register of GMOs”, in which all of the written applications placed by potential GMO operators are specified. In 2007 and 2008 no permissions for any GMO materials for commercial cultivation were issued. Any cultivations of GMO plants in Poland are illegal and as such, have no right to be shown in the “official” GMO application reports. We urge the Government to ban MON 810 immediately !!!

Departure from basic principles of democracy Coalition GMO Free Poland demand a full respect of the Polish Constitution Article 39 No one shall be subjected to scientific experimentation, including medical experimentation, without his voluntary consent. Our positon : GMO in food and feed are potentially hazardous. This is a world wide experiment. Up to now science is not able to proove the absolute safety of GMOs. Poles, as well as other European citizens are unconsciously exposed both to food and feed as well as dangerous Bt transgens spread in the environment. With the lack of proper labeling and cultivation sites information, we are subjects of a hidden experiment. Article 74 Public authorities shall pursue policies ensuring the ecological security of current and future generations. Our position : Illegal, unregistered plantations of Bt MON 810 create biological contamination, destroy natural biosafety systems and case unreversible damages to the environment. Article 64 Everyone shall have the right to ownership, other property rights and the right of succession. Our position : The property rights of conventional and organic producers are not protected. They loose due to disqualification of yealds. The value of their land and buildings is significantly reduced while GMO contaminated. None of insurance or compensation measures are implemented in Poland up to now.

4. Conclusions 4.1 Scientific studies increasingly expose the fact that GMO are harmful to human, animal and environmental health. It has also been unequivocably established that it is simply not possible to have 'co-existence' between GM and GM-Free crops and plants. 4.2 GMO are hazardous no doubts, no disscusions. EU law says it clearly. That is why is so restricted. 4.3 We need that those legal regimes are fully implemented in Poland - with provision to forbid GMO in food, feed and cultivation if we decide to do so. 4.4 In this critical situation we demand immediate ban for cultivation of MON 810 before the seeding season stars. Help us to preserve GMO Free Poland.

r Thank you for your attention © Paweł Połanecki Warsaw, Lucern 2009 r.