Hypnosis and Memory Triple Threat Sheila Krogh-Jespersen Victoria Cox Alicia Briganti Triple Threat Sheila Krogh-Jespersen Victoria Cox Alicia Briganti
Outline: The Basics Traditional vs. Sociocognitive Perspectives Enhancing Retrieval and the Cognitive Interview The Basics Traditional vs. Sociocognitive Perspectives Enhancing Retrieval and the Cognitive Interview
Kihlstrom: Hypnosis=1 person(subject) acting on suggestions from another person(hypnotist) for imaginative experiences involving alterations in cognition and voluntary action
Posthypnotic Amnesia: Inability to remember events/experiences which occurred during hypnotism Temporary Functional amnesia Impairs explicit memory Inability to remember events/experiences which occurred during hypnotism Temporary Functional amnesia Impairs explicit memory
Hypnotic Agnosia: Disrupts a subject’s semantic/procedural memory Forget the number 12 Meaningless word Disrupts a subject’s semantic/procedural memory Forget the number 12 Meaningless word
Hypnotic Hypermnesia: Performance enhancement Increase False Recollections Cognitive Interview Performance enhancement Increase False Recollections Cognitive Interview
Memory Enhancement and Hypnosis: Hypnotism increases the number of accurate recollections but…. It also increase the number of new errors Hypnotism increases the number of accurate recollections but…. It also increase the number of new errors
Hypnotic Age Regression: Ablation Reinstatement Revivification Ablation Reinstatement Revivification
In the Court and Clinic: Mock organized-crime execution Cognitive Interview Mock organized-crime execution Cognitive Interview
Why? Hypnosis is still used to recover “repressed” memories Hypnosis impairs explicit memory Public perceptions of the efficacy of hypnosis may increase the likelihood of memory distortions Hypnosis is still used to recover “repressed” memories Hypnosis impairs explicit memory Public perceptions of the efficacy of hypnosis may increase the likelihood of memory distortions
The Hypnotic Minidrama
The Two Perspectives Traditional – Hypnosis is an altered state of consciousness that enables people to have unusual experiences. Sociocognitive – Hypnosis refers to the historically rooted conceptions of situations that are labeled “hypnotic.” Traditional – Hypnosis is an altered state of consciousness that enables people to have unusual experiences. Sociocognitive – Hypnosis refers to the historically rooted conceptions of situations that are labeled “hypnotic.”
Components of Hypnosis Phrasing of the hypnotist Suggestion that specific behavioral responses are emerging automatically Phrasing of the hypnotist Suggestion that specific behavioral responses are emerging automatically
Do you buy it? The Social Construction of Hypnosis…
Challenges and Fallacies Behavior of “the hypnotized” and “the requested” does not differ Increased motivation makes increased suggestibility Cognitive processes in simulators and non-simulators Behavior of “the hypnotized” and “the requested” does not differ Increased motivation makes increased suggestibility Cognitive processes in simulators and non-simulators
Dramatic behaviors See no evil, hear no evil Stiff arm syndrome See no evil, hear no evil Stiff arm syndrome
Are they so dramatic? Hitting someone? Taking off clothes? Running a mile, or 2, or 3? Hitting someone? Taking off clothes? Running a mile, or 2, or 3?
Hypnotic Amnesia Automatically occurring Actively forgetting Socially responding Automatically occurring Actively forgetting Socially responding
Posthypnotic Responding Implant cues to automatically elicit a suggested response Context and belief dependent Implant cues to automatically elicit a suggested response Context and belief dependent
Hypnosis Creates… Human Automatons
Enhancing Retrieval and The Cognitive Interview
ACCORDING TO JONES Psychotherapists should: Educate clients Choose methods judiciously (Jones, 1999) Psychotherapists should: Educate clients Choose methods judiciously (Jones, 1999)
EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY Police techniques Hypnosis Cognitive Interview Police techniques Hypnosis Cognitive Interview
COGNITIVE INTERVIEW 4 Basic principles: 1. Event-interview similarity 2. Focused retrieval 3. Extensive retrieval 4. Witness-compatible questioning 4 Basic principles: 1. Event-interview similarity 2. Focused retrieval 3. Extensive retrieval 4. Witness-compatible questioning Temporal sequence: 1. Introduction 2. Free recall 3. Probing stage 4. Review 5. Conclusion (Fisher, Geiselman, & Amador, 1989)
FIELD TEST 16 detectives (1 trained group; 1 untrained group) Preliminary interviews Training Post-training interviews Analysis 16 detectives (1 trained group; 1 untrained group) Preliminary interviews Training Post-training interviews Analysis
EXPERIMENT 51 non-students watched videotapes of a crime Interviewed 48 hours later either by standard interview or cognitive interview 4 retrieval mnemonics and 5 memory- recovery techniques used in C.I. condition 51 non-students watched videotapes of a crime Interviewed 48 hours later either by standard interview or cognitive interview 4 retrieval mnemonics and 5 memory- recovery techniques used in C.I. condition (Geiselman, Fisher, MacKinnon, and Holland, 1986)
RESULTS VariableC. I.S. I. No. Correct* No. Incorrect No. Confabulated Question time (min) No. questions asked* No. leading questions asked More correct items recalled No difference in # of incorrect items recalled Fewer questions asked; more efficient
HYPNOSIS VS. the COGNITIVE INTERVIEW C.I. elicited 33.4% more information than hypnosis (Fisher, Geiselman, Raymond, Jurkevich, & Warhaftig, 1987) C.I. does not lead to increased error rate C.I. lessens subjects’ suggestibility to leading questions (Geiselman, Fisher, MacKinnon, & Holland, 1986) C.I. elicited 33.4% more information than hypnosis (Fisher, Geiselman, Raymond, Jurkevich, & Warhaftig, 1987) C.I. does not lead to increased error rate C.I. lessens subjects’ suggestibility to leading questions (Geiselman, Fisher, MacKinnon, & Holland, 1986)
FOOD FOR THOUGHT… Should the Cognitive Interview be incorporated into the standard training program of all investigative interviewers? Would it be as effective if the witness is a child? Would it still be as effective after a long delay? If the event was very traumatic? Should the Cognitive Interview be incorporated into the standard training program of all investigative interviewers? Would it be as effective if the witness is a child? Would it still be as effective after a long delay? If the event was very traumatic?