Sandy Auld Director, Research Ethics Office of Research University Centre 437 X56606.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research Methods in Crime and Justice Chapter 3 The Ethical Principles that Guide Researchers.
Advertisements

Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
Tri-Council Policy Statement 2010 Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
Conducting Ethical Research Slides Prepared by Alison L. O’Malley Passer Chapter 3.
The ethical conduct of research Jo Ferrie Interim Director of Graduate Training.
Institutional Review Board Guidance.  Independent Ethics Committee  Ethical Review Board  Research Ethics Committee 2.
Human Research and Ethics Dr Michèle de Courcy Chair, Faculty of Education HEAG University of Melbourne.
WHAT IS A RESEARCH ETHICS BOARD?
Research Ethics Applications D. Gordon E. Robertson, PhD School of Human Kinetics Faculty of Health Sciences.
Research Ethics Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board Letter of Information & Consent Process Grace Kelly Ethics Officer
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS. TRI-COUNCIL POLICY The University has adopted the Tri-Council Policy Statement on the Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,
THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.
Research Ethics An Overview of Research Ethics and the Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 Grace Kelly Ethics Officer Health Sciences.
Research Ethics Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 Grace Kelly Ethics Officer
An Overview of Research Ethics & The Tri-Council Policy Statement 2
Research Ethics Western University Non-Medical Research Ethics Board Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 Grace Kelly Ethics Officer
Research Ethics John Porter London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
Psychology 291 – Lab 4 Ethics October 9, 2012
15 September Development of Nursing Research.
Research Ethics PPAL February, 2012.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Dr. John N. Austin, Director and Ms. Renee S. Jones, Associate Director Delaware State University Office.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Tri-Council Policy Statement Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
IWK Research Ethics - Workshop Series Session #2 REB Review Procedures How to submit … October 24, 2013 Bev White, Manager, Research Ethics Research Services,
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
Research Ethics Research Methods Grace Kelly Ethics Officer Health Sciences Research Ethics Board.
Chapter 18 Ethical Precautions in Music Therapy Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
IWK Research Ethics - Workshop Series Session #2 REB Review Procedures How to submit … October 24, 2013 Bev White, Manager, Research Ethics Research Services,
John Russell Chair, Langara College Research Ethics Board Chair, Langara Department of Philosophy Talk for Langara PD Days April 24, 2013 (Revised May.
Psychology 291 – Lab 4 Ethics September 29 - October 2, 2013.
Welcome New IRB Members! Today we will discuss: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
EHE Office of Research Workshop 10/13/15 IRB Issues: Compliance, Quality, and Consent A Faculty Member’s Perspective: Considerations and Suggestions for.
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 6 Ethical Considerations in Experimental Research.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Cultural Competence Considerations [and other alliterations] in International Research IRB 2 Continuing Education March 10, 2015.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Paul Kelly Facility Research Compliance Officer for the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center.
Research Ethics PPAL February, 2011 Part 2.
M6728 Ethics in Research Informed Consent/IRBs Reporting Research Results.
HPTN Ethics Guidance for Research: Community Obligations Africa Regional Working Group Meeting, May 19-23, 2003 Lusaka, Zambia.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7 Generating Research Evidence Ethically.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7 Ethics in Nursing Research.
8 th November 2007 Research: ethics and research governance Rossana Dowsett Research and Regional Development Division [Pre Award Support] University of.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin A McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Medical Ethics  A set of guidelines concerned with questions of right & wrong, of duty & obligation, of moral responsibility.  Ethical dilemma is a.
Wilmington Medical Associates Patient’s Rights & Responsibilities You Have the Right to: Considerate and Respectful Care We respect your right to: expect.
Research ethics Rachel H. Ellaway
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
Chapter 3 Ethics in Research
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC
Research Ethics Matthew Billington
Tri-Council Policy Statement 2010
Ethical Principles of Research
Introduction to the Institutional Review Board
Institutional Review Board
Basic Practice of Statistics - 3rd Edition Lecture PowerPoint Slides
Research Ethics.
Human Participants Research
BWHS Science Research Project Guidelines for
Multijurisdictional FAQs (Workshop Stream 3)
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Sandy Auld Director, Research Ethics Office of Research University Centre 437 X56606

 NSERC, SSHRC, CIHR ◦ 1998 – First Edition ◦ 2010 – Second Edition  Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

Respect for Human Dignity  Concern for Welfare  Respect for Persons  Justice

 REB-General  REB-Natural, Physical, and Engineering Sciences

 Faculty representatives ◦ CSAHS ◦ CME ◦ COA ◦ OAC  Community members  Legal representative  Graduate Student

 Faculty representatives ◦ CPES ◦ CBS ◦ OVC  Alternative Health Care Provider  Community members  Legal representative  Medical representative  Graduate Student

 REB-NPES ◦ 10 members  REB-G ◦ 11 members  Monthly meetings  Full board review  Delegated review

 Proportionate  Ethics and the Law ◦ Duty to report ◦ Compelled to report  Perspective of the Participant

 living human participants  human biological materials ◦ living or deceased

 Publicly available information.  No expectation of privacy  Quality assurance studies.  Observation in public places  Secondary use of anonymous information  Creative practice

 Physical risk  Psychological risks  Social Risks (privacy)  Benefit

 PROCESS ◦ INITIATE before research begins. ◦ MAINTAIN throughout. ◦ ONGOING  FREE ◦ Undue influence ◦ Conflict of Interest  INFORMED ◦ Consent documents  Information letters  Recruitment  Written consent  scripts

 Directly identifying data  Indirectly identifying data  Coded information  Anonymized information  Anonymous information  Maintained “within the extent permitted by ethical principles and the law”

 E-Surveys  Chapter 9  Chapter 10 ◦ Observation  Chapter 11

 PROTOCOL ◦ Application to Involve Human Participants ◦ Recruitment documents ◦ Consent Document(s) ◦ Surveys/questionnaires ◦ Debriefing ◦ Permission from external agencies ◦ Signature page.

 Keep it simple.  DO NOT submit your grant proposal, thesis proposal.  Avoid jargon in all documents but particularly those to go to participants.  Read guidance documents beforehand.  Use your Ethics Office – we’re there to help.

 Full Board Review  Delegated Review  Revisions will be required ◦ work with the ethics office ◦ communication

Sandy Auld Director, Research Ethics Office of Research X56606