Mobile, X-band Doppler radar data collected in the 4 May 2007 Greensburg, Kansas tornadic storm Robin L. Tanamachi Ph.D. Candidate OU School of Meteorology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tornadogenesis within a Simulated Supercell Storm Ming Xue School of Meteorology and Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms University of Oklahoma.
Advertisements

Polarimetric Radar Observations of Hydrometeor Refreezing in Winter Storms Matthew R. Kumjian 1,2, Alexander V. Ryzhkov 1,2, Terry J. Schuur 1,2, and Heather.
Lemon and Doswell (1979) Lemon, L. R., and C. A. Doswell III, 1979: Severe thunderstorm evolution and mesoscyclone structure as related to tornadogenesis.
RAPID-SCAN DOW RADAR OBSERVATIONS OF TORNADOES DURING VORTEX and 2010 Joshua Wurman, Karen Kosiba, Paul C. Robinson Center for Severe Weather Research.
Observations of the Surface Boundary Structure within the May 23 rd Perryton, TX Supercell Patrick S. Skinner Dr. Christopher C. Weiss Texas Tech University.
Contributors to Measurement Errors (Chap. 7) *1) Widespread spatial distribution of scatterers (range ambiguities) *2) Large velocity distribution (velocity.
Tornadogenesis in a Simulated Mesovortex: The Role of Surface Friction Alex Schenkman Co-authors: Ming Xue and Alan Shapiro.
 Definition of Spectrum Width (σ v ) › Spectrum width is a measure of the velocity dispersion within a sample volume or a measure of the variability.
Operational Weather Radar Featuring: WSR-88D Doppler Radar
Carlos A. Rodríguez Rivera Mentor: Dr. Robert Palmer Carlos A. Rodríguez Rivera Mentor: Dr. Robert Palmer Is Spectral Processing Important for Future WSR-88D.
Chapter 7: Atmospheric Disturbances Part II: T-storms, Tornadoes, Lightning & Forecasting.
An Efficient Ensemble Data Assimilation Approach and Tests with Doppler Radar Data Jidong Gao Ming Xue Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, University.
RADAR EXAMPLES Images from Sandra Yuter, NCSU Frederic Fabry, McGill University Weatherworld 2010, University of Illinois Robin Hogan, University of Reading.
Convective Initiation and Flow Regimes of Severe Storms Across the Central High Plains Scott F. Blair National Weather Service Goodland, Kansas.
Dual-polarimetric and multi-Doppler analysis of a High Plains supercell Darren Clabo Nick Guy Nathan Hitchens.
Assimilating Reflectivity and Doppler Velocity Observations of Convective Storms into Storm-Scale NWP Models David Dowell Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale.
High-Resolution X-band Dual-Polarization Weather Radar: Theory and Applications Sense and Nonsense on precipitation and drop size distribution estimation.
Basic RADAR Principles Prof. Sandra Cruz-Pol, Ph.D. Electrical and Computer Engineering UPRM.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Operational thunderstorm nowcasting in the Alpine region.
Spaceborne Radar for Snowfall Measurements
WSR‐88D Dynamic Scanning
Ensemble Numerical Prediction of the 4 May 2007 Greensburg, Kansas Tornadic Supercell using EnKF Radar Data Assimilation Dr. Daniel T. Dawson II NRC Postdoc,
Forecasting in a Changing Climate Harold E. Brooks NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory (Thanks to Andy Dean, Dave Stensrud, Tara Jensen, J J Gourley,
A Doppler Radar Emulator and its Application to the Detection of Tornadic Signatures Ryan M. May.
Printed by Investigating Rapid Storm Intensification Mechanisms Including the Role of Storm Mergers in the 22 May 2011 Joplin, MO.
AN OVERVIEW OF TORNADOGENESIS AND VORTEX STRUCTURE by Ernest M. Agee Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana.
Collaborating on the Development of Warn-On-Forecast Mike Foster / David Andra WFO Norman OK Feb. 18, 2010 Mike Foster / David Andra WFO Norman OK Feb.
1 Supercell Thunderstorms Adapted from Materials by Dr. Frank Gallagher III and Dr. Kelvin Droegemeier School of Meteorology University of Oklahoma Part.
Assimilating Reflectivity Observations of Convective Storms into Convection-Permitting NWP Models David Dowell 1, Chris Snyder 2, Bill Skamarock 2 1 Cooperative.
Initiation and Evolution of the South Dakota Tornado Outbreak of 24 June 2003 Jay Trobec.
Real-time Doppler Wind Quality Control and Analysis Qin Xu National Severe Storms Laboratory/NOAA Pengfei Zhang, Shun Liu, and Liping Liu CIMMS/University.
WSN05 6 Sep 2005 Toulouse, France Efficient Assimilation of Radar Data at High Resolution for Short-Range Numerical Weather Prediction Keith Brewster,
Chad Entremont Daniel Lamb NWS Jackson, MS
RAdio Detection And Ranging. Was originally for military use 1.Sent out electromagnetic radiation (Active) 2.Bounced off an object and returned to a listening.
The structure and evolution of vortex lines in supercell thunderstorms
NSSL’s Warn-on-Forecast Project Dr. Lou Wicker February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma.
The EnKF Analyses and Forecasts of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Tornadic Supercell Storm By Nusrat Yussouf 1,2 Edward Mansell 2, Louis Wicker 2, Dustan.
CASA Update for MPAR Group David McLaughlin University of Massachusetts – Amherst V. Chandrasakar Colorado State University March 20, 2007 – OFCM/Silver.
Deep Convection Ordinary Cells Multicell storms Supercells.
Impacts of Running-In-Place on LETKF analyses and forecasts of the 24 May 2011 outbreak Impacts of Running-In-Place on LETKF analyses and forecasts of.
Welcome to the 2012 Warn-on-Forecast and High Impact Weather Workshop!
RADAR METEOROLOGY Courtney Schumacher Texas A&M University ATMO 352.
Spatial Verification Methods for Ensemble Forecasts of Low-Level Rotation in Supercells Patrick S. Skinner 1, Louis J. Wicker 1, Dustan M. Wheatley 1,2,
Jidong Gao, Kristin Kuhlman, Travis Smith, David Stensrud 3DVAR Storm-scale assimilation in real- time.
Alexander Ryzhkov Weather Radar Research Meteorological Applications of Dual-polarization Radar.
Comparisons of kinematical retrievals within a simulated supercell: Dual-Doppler analysis (DDA) vs. EnKF radar data assimilation Corey Potvin and Lou Wicker,
Convective-Scale Numerical Weather Prediction and Data Assimilation Research At CAPS Ming Xue Director Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms and.
Radar Requirements David J. Stensrud NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory 2013 Warn-on-Forecast Workshop and Technical Guidance Meetings.
DOPPLER SPECTRA OF WEATHER SIGNALS (Chapter 5; examples from chapter 9)
Numerical Simulation and Prediction of Supercell Tornadoes Ming Xue School of Meteorology and Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms University of.
94-GHz Doppler Radar Observations of Mammatus in Tropical Anvils During Crystal- Face Experiment Ieng Jo Radar Meteorology Group Univ. of Miami.
Prediction Thrust Activities in CASA Briefing for WNI Dr. Ming Xue Director of CAPS Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms August 2, 2006.
Our experiences with EnKF assimilation of high-res radar observations collected in the 5 June 2009 Vortex 2 tornadic supercell. Jim Marquis, Yvette Richardson,
Analysis of the Goshen County, Wyoming, tornadic supercell on 5 June 2009 during VORTEX2 using EnKF assimilation of mobile radar observations Jim Marquis,
Assimilation of Pseudo-GLM Observations Into a Storm Scale Numerical Model Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter Blake Allen University of Oklahoma Edward Mansell.
The Performance of a Weather-Adaptive 3DVAR System for Convective-scale RUA and some suggestions for future GSI-based RUA Jidong Gao NOAA/National Severe.
Observations of ClearAir Boundaries Made By the UMass “Tornado Radar” During the International H 2 O Project (IHOP) Data Summary and Collection Strategy.
The Effect of Downdraft Strength on Tornado Intensity and Path Length Dylan R. Card and Ross A. Lazear Department of Atmospheric & Environmental Sciences,
Verification of Warn-on-Forecast Adam J. Clark - CIMMS 9 February 2012 Warn-on-Forecast and High Impact Weather Workshop Stensrud et al. 2009; BAMS.
Multi-scale Analysis and Prediction of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Tornadic Supercell Storm Assimilating Radar and Surface Network Data using EnKF Ting.
A Moment Radar Data Emulator: The Current Progress and Future Direction Ryan M. May.
WSR - 88D Characteristics of Significant Tornadoes in New York and New England Lance Franck University of Massachusetts Hayden Frank NOAA/NWS/Weather.
AOS 100: Weather and Climate
CAPS is one of the first 11 NSF Science and Technology (S&T) Centers
An overview by: Thomas Jones December 2, 2002
the University of Oklahoma
Observations of ClearAir Boundaries
Comparison of secondary eyewall and principal rainband in Hurricane Rita (2005) Not a modeling study Several theories out there for secondary eyewall formation.
Dawson, D. T. II, M. Xue, J. A. Milbrandt, and A. Shapiro, 2015
Presentation transcript:

Mobile, X-band Doppler radar data collected in the 4 May 2007 Greensburg, Kansas tornadic storm Robin L. Tanamachi Ph.D. Candidate OU School of Meteorology High Plains Conference 13 August 2010

Motivation The process of tornadogenesis (tornado formation) is not well understood (hence VORTEX2) Many significant and violent tornadoes occur as part of a series of tornadoes (cyclic tornadogenesis) Some storms transition between short-track cyclic and long-track cyclic tornadogenesis We want to exploit the high spatial and temporal resolution of mobile Doppler radar data, as well as data collected at low altitudes, to illuminate this process.

Greensburg Tornado: 5 May 2007 First EF-5 tornado First EF-5 tornado Strongest U.S. tornado since 1999 Strongest U.S. tornado since 1999 Widest damage path: 3.1 km (1.9 mi) Widest damage path: 3.1 km (1.9 mi) Path length: 53 km (33 mi) Path length: 53 km (33 mi) 11 people died 11 people died Destroyed 95% of buildings in Greensburg, Kansas Destroyed 95% of buildings in Greensburg, Kansas Damage: $250 million Damage: $250 million Complex storm origin (Bluestein 2009) Complex storm origin (Bluestein 2009) Source: Lemon and Umscheid (2008), Marshall (2008) © 2007 Robert Fritchie

LLJ 0115 UTC KDDC 0.5° 0230 UTC Greensburg Storm

Greensburg Storm Tornado Tracks Focus of this study Graphic from Lemon and Umscheid (SLS, 2008) UMass X-Pol Radar Kansas Oklahoma Nebraska Texas

X-band (3 cm wavelength) Beamwidth: 1.2° Max. unambiguous range: 75 km Max. unambiguous velocity: 19.2 m s -1 Range gate spacing: 150 m University of Massachusetts Mobile, X- band, Polarimetric Doppler Radar UMass X-Pol 2007 configuration

Serendipity?

What we saw:

Radar coverage comparison UMass X-Pol reflectivity, 3.0°, 0226 UTCKDDC reflectivity, 0.5°, 0225 UTC

UMass X-Pol data 01:48 UTC; 6.5° elev. #2#2 #3#3 #4#4 #2 #3 © R. Tanamachi

UMass X-Pol data 02:01 UTC; 4.0° elev. #5 #5 #3(remnant)#3(remnant)

UMass X-Pol data 02:20 UTC; 3.1° elev. #5#5

UMass X-Pol data 02:27 UTC; 4.4° elev. Large hail attenuating X-band signal #10#10 #5#5

Greensburg radar coverage KDDC 65 – 75 km from storm Continuous coverage VCP 12 (“storm mode”) Volumes every 4.1 min UMass X-Pol 10 – 55 km from storm Single-elevation scans from UTC Volumetric sector scans (3° to 10°, 15°, 20°) from UTC Greensburg struck Moved truck Battery

UMass X- Pol data: caveats V r, edited Elev. angle 3.1° 0230 UTC V r, raw Reflectivity not well calibrated (~30 dBZ < KDDC) Dual-pol data incomplete – imaginary phase not recorded – Z DR, ρ hv probably OK – No K DP or Φ DP available Truck may not have been oriented exactly N- S (± 3°); pitch/roll ± 1° Manual V r dealiasing Z (uncalibrated)

ZVrVr ρ hv Z DR #5

(uncalibrated) Echo overhang BWER Weak-echo hole / tube Attenuation

(ρ hv ) Low-ρ hv hole / tube Low-Z DR hole / tube

Dowell and Bluestein (2002, Part II): Cyclic tornadogenesis in the 8 June 1995 McLean, Texas storm resulted from “a mismatch between the horizontal motion of successive tornadoes and the horizontal velocity of the main storm-scale updraft and downdraft.” As a corollary, long-track tornadoes resulted when the horizontal motion of a tornado closely matched that of its associated updraft and downdraft. “Vortex shedding” model Updraft Downdraft Z (uncalibrated)

#4 tilts NE w/height

Mature Greensburg tornado closely matched updraft motion U V

Future work GBVTD analyses of UMass X-Pol data, e.g. Lee and Wurman (2005) and Tanamachi et al. (2007) Dual-Doppler analyses between KDDC and UMass X-Pol (Jana Houser, OU) High-resolution EnKF experiments (Δx = Δy = 1 km, 500 m, 250 m; Δz = 200 m, 100 m) assimilating UMass X-Pol V r data

Acknowledgments NSF grant ATM and ATM Ph.D. Committee: – Howie Bluestein – Lou Wicker – Alan Shapiro – Ming Xue – Robert Palmer – John Albert Steve Frasier Kery Hardwick Les Lemon Mike Umscheid Jeff Hutton David Dowell SoM Staff Vijay Venkatesh Dan Dawson Aaron Botnick Nate Snook Ryan May Ted Mansell Chuck Doswell Python / Matplotlib And many, many others…

VORTEX2: 25 May 2010 near Tribune, Kansas UMass W-band radar 2316 UTC 0.7° ZVrVr