Market reviews and Narrowband Internet access Justin Moore Internet Project Manager, Oftel 9 April 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stakeholder workshop 3 February 2006 EU Review – UK Response.
Advertisements

Plum Consulting, London, T +44 (0) , Relevant markets - The Times They are a-Changin Brian Williamson ETNO MLex Regulatory.
Review of NTS entry charge setting arrangements - IA 1 July 2010.
National leased lines: effective competition review and policy options 7 September Heather Clayton.
London Compliance MiFID Overview BCS 25 th April 2005 Simon Barker Head of Regulatory Affairs BNP Paribas London branch.
Broadband to everybody!? Torstein Olsen Director Norwegian Post and Telecommunications Authority LLU Conference, Bucharest, 5 July 2005.
©Ofcom Review of the Framework Some issues under discussion by regulators Jim Niblett International Policy Director 22 December 2005.
©Ofcom Voice – the need to take a long term view on sector evolution Chris Rowsell 18 October 2007.
CROATIAN REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR NETWORK INDUSTRIES (HAKOM) TELECOM SINGLE MARKET – CHALLENGES AND CONCERNS DOMAGOJ MARIČIĆ, CROATIAN REGULATORY AUTHORITY.
Review of BEREC Common Positions Stage 1: high level principles on issues of non-discrimination Lara Stoimenova – Remedies EWG Chair Public workshop Brussels,
Effective competition review : Mobile February 2001.
Open access to communications networks Ensuring competition in the provision of services Anil Patel.
TELECOMS REGULATION IN THE UK. Communications Act introduced 25th July 2003 This implemented the new European Directives in the UK and gave powers to.
Development of BB markets Access markets (M4 & M5) and remedies applied Linda Paršova 10 TH BALTIC ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND POSTAL SERVICES REGULATORS’
Operating Margins. 2 Competitive Provision of Operating Margins Change to National Grid Gas’s Transporter Licence which:  Introduced Special Condition.
The economic regulation of gas processing services Key issues and initial thoughts Ofgem presentation 18 June 2007.
The California energy crisis Introduction (Wolak March ‘01) –Wholesale: averaged $33 MWH in 1999, $116 MWH in 2000, $310MWH Jan –Natural gas $3-$4.
Review of corporate numbering and use of the 05 number range Elizabeth Greenberg Numbering Policy Adviser
Law Institute Prof. Dr. Rolf H. Weber Hong Kong University, July 5, 2013 Regulatory Framework for Cloud Computing.
TRC - JORDAN Regulating interconnection The Jordanian experience 1st Regulatory Meeting for the ITU Arab Region, Algeria, April 2003 Muna Nijem Chairman.
Change to presentation of financial results Phil Moses – Group Controller & Director of Investor Relations 23 January 2008.
Theory and Practice Under The New Regulatory Framework: Some Case Studies Peter Alexiadis Partner Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP/Brussels FROM TELECOMMUNICATIONS.
From NTS review to unmetered calls: an Internet company’s perspective Simon Hampton European Public Affairs Director AOL Europe.
Research DEVELOPMENTS IN REGULATION Presentation to Conference Natalie Jacottet, Head of Research Tuesday 24 May 2011.
Nov/Dec 2003ElectraNet BSP-2 Workshop (khb) 1 EU Telecoms Regulatory Status Governing Legislation Package 2002  Directive 2002/19/EC Access to, and interconnection.
Imposing access obligations under the new framework Karen Hardy.
Market reviews in Oftel Elaine Axby 31 October 2002.
EU Market Reviews PFG Update - September 2002 Elaine Axby Project Director.
Surftime Industry Forum 21/12/99. OFTEL Internet Forum BT SurfTime BT Announcement on 7 December Possibilities from new Network Approach NTS remains for.
DG Information Society 1 Liberalisation and regulation in Electronic Communications in the EU 2nd ICT Summit Istanbul, 3-6 September 2002 Hans-Peter Gebhardt.
Implementation of EU Electronic Communication Directives.
Mobile market review: summary The market is not yet effectively competitive but competitive pressures are growing intend to remove Market Influence obligations.
Regulating competition in the mobile telecommunications market AMTA Conference 25 & 26 September 2003 Chris Pattas A/g General Manager TelecommunicationsACCC.
FAQs about the new regulatory framework Lucy Rhodes
1 EHV DG Charging Nigel Turvey. 2 Background Our current EHV charging methodology was not vetoed on 18 th February 2010 with the following treatment of.
Jerker Torngren 2. Implementation of USO Comments and some Personal recommendations by Jerker Torngren 1.
The Notification Procedure of national telecoms markets Pál Belényesi 27 October 2006.
1 OFTEL’s 2000/01 review of the dial-up Internet access market Oftel Internet Forum 29 September 2000
Mod 0333: Update of default System Marginal Prices Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
1 1Page Interconnection and Facilities Leasing Discussion 1. Introduction and Objectives 2. Chapter 10 Market Review Process - Overview 3. Relevant markets,
Directorate General for Energy and Transport European Commission Directorate General for Energy and Transport Regulation of electricity markets in the.
Kingston Communications SMP obligations and their implications for “NTS calls originating in Hull” Huw Saunders Group Regulatory Affairs and Technology.
This project is funded by the European Union EU regulatory framework for electronic communications - Access Directive Richard Harris Independent EU telecommunications.
Governance and Charging Methodology for User Pays Services 10 th January 2007.
Review of the charge control on calls to mobiles.
Erkki Liikanen - Date The Challenges for the Mobile Sector The European Commission’s perspective Pearse O’Donohue European Commission DG INFSO.
1 FRIACO OFTEL INTERNET FORUM - 11 December 2000 Geoff Brighton JanWillem van den Bos.
VoIP Regulation Klaus Nieminen TKK Table of Contents Background EU Regulatory Framework Objectives, PATS and ECS definitions VoIP Classification.
SMP and dominance Pál Belényesi Verona 29 November November 2006.
Fundamental review of entry charging principles UNC Transmission Workstream - 6 th August 2009.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Competition In International Markets Vince Affleck Friday 12 November 1999.
Facilitating Release of Non-obligated Entry Capacity Draft – for discussion purposes only 22 November 2007.
Financial reporting obligations in SMP market Cost accounting and accounting separation Chris Rowsell.
OFTEL’s Approach to Tariff Packages for Accessing the Internet Penny Hierons Economic Adviser.
Energy Market Issues for Biomethane Projects Workshop - 31 October 2011 RIIO-GD1 Environmental Incentives.
Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 4: Regulation in the EU Copyright © 2007.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services 14 th September 2007.
Briefing for financial market analysts 30 April 2013 Draft report on the effectiveness of information disclosure regulation at Auckland Airport.
Pros& cons Dr. Musab Barakat Ahmed Ali PhD.;FCCA;FCMI Chartered Certified Accountant Practicing firm Barakat&co Senior partner & CEO Consultant National.
Community Choice Aggregation Demonstration Project Marin County Base Case Feasibility Analyses Overview April 5, 2005.
ROMANIA NATIONAL NATURAL GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY Public Service Obligations in Romanian Gas Sector Ligia Medrea General Manager – Authorizing, Licensing,
Developments and the regulatory environment in the electronic communications market Rivo Mets.
DNPC05 Consultation Paper Balance of Revenue Recovery between LDZ System Charges and Customer Charges Steve Armstrong 27 th July 2009.
Defining Market Power and Competition* ANRT & ITU Rabat Workshop on Competition Jake E. Jennings, FCC December 19-21, 2005 * The views expressed are solely.
New competition tool in the European regulation:
Regulation of NGA networks – the EU experience
The new European regulatory framework for electronic communications and perspectives 27th january.
Case IT/2005/0260.
Energy Supply Business Model enabled by the Clean Energy Package
Presentation transcript:

Market reviews and Narrowband Internet access Justin Moore Internet Project Manager, Oftel 9 April 2003

Overview Background Current regulations Market review proposals for regulation –NTS –FRIACO –wholesale Internet termination

Background New regulatory framework comes into effect from 25 July 2003 Undertake market reviews to implement appropriate SMP regulatory conditions, eg –requirement to publish prices –requirement to supply specific products

Current Regulation BT supply of NTS and FRIACO BT Internet termination –publish prices –non-discrimination Call origination Wholesale Metered & unmetered Internet termination Retail metered and unmetered Internet access FRIACONTS Wholesale Internet termination products (eg SurfPort, SurfPort24)

Market reviews Define relevant markets Analyse market to assess Significant Market Power (SMP) Consider regulatory options

Which market reviews are relevant to narrowband Internet? Review of wholesale call origination –consider regulation of NTS and FRIACO Review of unmetered narrowband Internet termination –previous review identified competitive issues in supply of wholesale unmetered

Fixed narrowband wholesale call origination NTS and FRIACO proposals

Wholesale call origination and local-tandem conveyance Fixed narrowband conveyance Initial view - BT has SMP General SMP conditions –Provision of network access, no undue discrimination, basis of charges etc Supply specific products –IA, FRIACO, NTS etc

NTS call origination Origination of Freephone,Special local rate, Special national rate and Premium Rate Services calls Retail operator undertakes retailing of calls on behalf of terminating operator

NTS Options Option 1: No specific regulation for NTS call origination Option 2: Regulated retention and annually set retail uplift Option 3: Regulated retention and charge control on retail uplift –3 options for charge control

NTS Initial conclusions Regulated retention –promotes competition and innovation in downstream markets –significant benefits to consumers Retail uplift charge control (4 yrs) –avoids costs and uncertainty of annually set charge

NTS retail uplift charge control

NTS in the Hull area Current unregulated arrangements appear to be satisfactory Introducing regulation may –introduce significant regulatory costs and practical difficulties in billing –risk higher consumer prices Initial view is that regulation would not be proportionate

FRIACO Options Option 1: No FRIACO product Option 2: DLE FRIACO only Option 3: DLE FRIACO and unrestricted ST FRIACO Option 4: DLE FRIACO and ST FRIACO with ‘stranded assets’

FRIACO Initial conclusions Option 3: Requirement to supply DLE FRIACO and ST FRIACO –necessary to promote competition in unmetered markets –stranded assets no longer relevant –unrestricted ST FRIACO facilitates entry into market

FRIACO in the Hull area Currently no FRIACO product Initial view is not to impose FRIACO requirement on Kingston –Not appropriate without reasonable demand being demonstrated Still need to provide network access on reasonable request

Review of Unmetered Narrowband Internet Termination

Unmetered narrowband Internet termination Jan 02 statement on broader market concluded –BT had market power –competition issues with unmetered rather than metered termination Market review appropriate for unmetered termination

Internet termination market definition Unmetered v metered Demand side –limited evidence of switching –unmetered not justified for low users –flexibility verses security Supply side –cost / time to set up FRIACO network

Internet termination market analysis Unmetered separate to metered markets –Market shares changed considerably –Evidence of entry/competing services –some countervailing buyer power –BT does not appear to charge a significant price premium

Internet termination conclusions BT does not have SMP Although concentrated, initial view is that no collective dominance No SMP means no regulation –need appropriate call origination regulation –can review market again in future

Unmetered narrowband Internet termination in Hull Separate geographic market for Internet calls originating in Hull area Initial view : Kingston has SMP –only firm offering unmetered termination and no FRIACO product –its ISP has a large share of retail market

Unmetered narrowband Internet in Hull - Remedies Remedies needed to promote retail ISP competition Requirements on Kingston –to provide network access –not to discriminate unduly –publish a Reference Offer –publish charges, and technical information

Summary of proposed changes NTS principles remain with charge control to give predictability of costs FRIACO remains, with ST FRIACO limitations lifted No regulation of metered and unmetered Internet termination

Questions