NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17,2007 Science Requirements Flowdown : Impacts on the Capabilities of Small* Satellites David Klumpar Montana State.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AMSAT-NA FOX Satellite Program Review, Status, and Future JERRY BUXTON, NØJY AMSAT VP-ENGINEERING.
Advertisements

Unit 3, Chapter 9, Lesson 9: Space Systems Engineering 1 The Systems-engineering Process Trading Requirements We use the requirements loopa necessary and.
Towards Low-cost Swedish Planetary Missions S. Barabash 1, O. Norberg 2, J.-E. Wahlund 3, M. Yamauchi 1, S. Grahn 4, S. Persson 4, and L. Blomberg 5 1.
Geospace Electrodynamic Connections (GEC) Mission The GEC mission has been in the formulation phase as part of NASA’s Solar Terrestrial Probe program for.
1 Architecture and Planning Strategies for Addressing Radiation, Space Weather, and Space Climatology Impact on NASA Missions Study Sponsor - NASA Office.
GSFC/Wallops Flight Facility 1 Small Satellite Opportunities at Wallops Flight Facility Dr. John Campbell Director, Wallops Flight Facility.
Understanding the Systems Engineering Process
Payload Design Criteria for the Space Test Program Standard Interface Vehicle (STP-SIV) Mr. Mike Marlow STP-SIV Program Manager Payload Design Criteria.
1 ESAIL proof of concept mission Juha-Pekka Luntama Pekka Janhunen Petri Toivanen.
Michael Lampton Overview of Space Sciences Laboratory 16 July 2003.
The Role of Suborbital Flights for Education and Technology Development within Penn State’s Student Space Programs Laboratory Allen T. Kummer Sven G. Bilén.
By Matthew Patterson. L ow E arth O rbit N anosatellite I ntegrated D istributed A lert S ystem.
Icarus Student Satellite Project Hannah Goldberg Dr. Brian Gilchrist BT Cesul Student Space System Fabrication Lab (S 3 FL) University of Michigan, College.
Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH ESA Wireless Sensor Motes Study George Prassinos, SSC, University of Surrey.
Icarus Student Satellite Project
Mission Operations in Small Satellite Projects Making Mission Operations Effective J. Burkert Colorado Space Grant Consortium.
The Hawaii Space Flight Lab and the LEONIDAS Project
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
“ PHOBOS - SOIL ” Phobos Sample Return Mission 1. goals, methods of study A.Zakharov, Russian academy of sciences Russian aviation.
Tony Monteiro, AA2TX VP, Engineering AMSAT Forum Dayton Hamvention 2011 AMSAT FOX.
5 Space Technology “Paving the Way for Future Micro-Satellite Missions” 1 NASA’s Space Technology 5 Mission NSF workshop on Small Satellite Missions for.
→ Potential ESA- Roscosmos Cooperation in Education Activities.
In-Space Propulsion Systems Low Thrust Micropropulsion Michael M. Micci The Pennsylvania State University Presented at the NASA Technology Roadmaps: Propulsion.
Nanosatellites as the Base of Monitoring System for the Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Currents. A.N.Zaitsev*, IZMIRAN, Troitsk, Moscow region, , RUSSIA.
Enabling Technology Development: High cadence imaging spectrograph development Low mass/power instrumentation Advanced communication/DSN for future deployment.
1 Formation Flying Project Proposal 2/5/07 Rachel Winters (Team Lead) Aziatun Burhan Tsutomu Hasegawa Shunsuke Hirayama Matt Mueller Masao Shimada Shelby.
ReVeal Passive Illumination by Radar (PAIR). Overview Payload / Mission Communication Launch Orbit Power Thermal Attitude Propulsion Finance.
Futron Corporation 7315 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 900W Bethesda, Maryland Phone Fax ISO 9001 Registered Better.
Cubesats A spacecraft concept to provide advances in international cooperation From: Doug Rowland, NASA GSFC Alexi Glover, ESA.
Galactic Bulge Time On Target May These charts examine the compatibility of a 500 day microlensing program with a 6 month SNe observing program.
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
September 20th TJ Faculty Presentation 2006
CAPACITY Operational Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring Missions CAPACITY Final Meeting - WP Ground Segment synthesis Final Meeting ESTEC02/06/05.
Mechanical SuperNova/Acceleration Probe SNAP Study Dave Peters George Roach June 28, a man who's willing to make a decision in the first place can.
Space Engineering 2 © Dr. X Wu, Space Engineering 2 Lecture 1.
NASA Centennial Challenges Nano-Satellite Launch Challenge Preliminary Rules Discussion Saturday, November 6, 2010 Menlo Park, California Andrew Petro.
ISU Science Center : Phase 3 : Dec Speedometer Station This station matches two areas of study into one cohesive system. Current will be induced.
May 17NSF Small Satellite Workshop 1 Student Space Experiment Access - A National Imperative David Yoel & Gil Moore Vanguard.
GSFC GOES-R Notional End-To-End Architectures Satellite Direct Readout Conference for the Americas December 9 – 13, 2002 Miami, Florida Sandra Alba Cauffman.
DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August Model Mission: Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) Mission Goal “To study the microphysics of three.
Living With a Star (LWS) and the Vision for Exploration LWS Mission Goal: Develop the scientific understanding necessary to effectively address those aspects.
29 April 2009 Brian Balm Program Manager Integrating New Capabilities in Operational Space Weather Systems.
Using Student Space Assets For Atmospheric Science Research NSF Workshop for Small Satellite Missions For Space Weather and Atmospheric Research George.
Intelligent Distributed Spacecraft Infrastructure Earth Science Vision Session IGARSS 2002 Toronto, CA June 25, Needs for an Intelligent Distributed.
ST5 PDR June 19-20, Section 4.0 Future Status James A. Slavin Project Scientist 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” GSFC.
Observing ion cyclotron waves M. R. Lessard, M. Widholm, P. Riley, H. Kim M. J. Engebretson University of New Hampshire Augsburg College NSF Workshop on.
SE&I Pre-Proposal Meeting GSFC - JPL Systems Engineering Management Colleen McGraw.
AFOSR SPACE SCIENCES 15 Jul 05 Major David L. Byers Program Manager AFOSR Air Force Research Laboratory Distribution C: Distribution authorized to U.S.
LiteBIRD US Team Meeting 10/13/2015 Team Meeting at UCB SSL1 Intro to SSL.
Tyler Croteau MSU Solar Physics REU: SSEL Mentor: Dr. Klumpar.
Engineering Team Support for the Roadmap Committee Mary DiJosephGSFC Tim VanSantGSFC Ron MullerGFSC/QSS Pete ClineGSFC Regan HowardGSFC Gregg MarrGSFC.
ESA Harwell Robotics & Autonomy Facility Study Workshop Autonomous Software Verification Presented By: Rick Blake.
Implementation Review1 Archive Ingest Redesign March 14, 2003.
This document contains proprietary and controlled information of National Space Organization (NSPO) of Taiwan and shall not be duplicated in whole or in.
New Opportunities for Space Grant CubeSats WRSGM Jackson, WY, Sept
ACE Science Workshop March 10 th, 2009 Armin T. Ellis, Deborah Vane, Mark Rokey Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
NanoRacks, LLC Michael D. Johnson (832) Page No. 1 NanoRacks, LLC Cube Lab Cube Lab Ops TIM – Cube Lab Introduction 11/19/2009 Michael D. Johnson.
Wayfarer Ryan Stelzer Dr. David Gaylor April 16 th, 2016 Arizona Space Grant Symposium.
Simplifying Customer Software Integration Tim Myers April 9 th, 2011 Colorado Undergraduate Space Research Symposium Payload Configuration GUI.
SmallSat Ground Systems, a C2 to RF Integrated Approach.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Radiation Environment Monitor Kevin Hargrave EO
Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI)
USNA Standard CubeSat Bus USNA-P1 CubeSat (USNA-14)
MSU Solar Physics NSF REU Final Presentation
Forecasting the Perfect Storm
CUBESATS Karla Vega Mechanical Engineering Department, Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
P2-SWE-X Enhanced Space Weather Monitoring System ESWW13
Systems Engineering Management
IlliniSat-3 Power Board
Controller Area Network in NanoSatellites
Presentation transcript:

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17,2007 Science Requirements Flowdown : Impacts on the Capabilities of Small* Satellites David Klumpar Montana State University Space Science and Engineering Laboratory May 16, 2007 * ~1-30 kg

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17, 2007 Klumpar Three Messages Impact of Requirements flowdown Nanosats (1-30 kg) have “taken off” CubeSats (1-3 kg): An introduction and a potential role in space weather science and in training the next generation workforce

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17, 2007 Klumpar Cost?Complexity? Mass?Size? Mission Requirements Science Requirements Engineering Requirements Who, What, Where, When?….Lots of questions

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17,2007 Q: What is the appropriate size for a satellite A: No larger than necessary This satellite is just small enough to allow its sensor to see the distant universe This satellite is just big enough to allow its sensor to measure the radiation belts

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17, 2007 Klumpar This satellite carries a 6 g energetic particle sensor: It - masses 1 kg - generates 1.5 w O.A. - size is 10 cm - passive magnetic ACS - TM rate 1200 bps This satellite carries a 1.5 kg energetic particle sensor suite: It - masses 30 kg - generates 8 w O.A. - size is 47 cm - active magnetic ACS - TM rate 9600 bps

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17, 2007 Klumpar Mission/Science Requirements that drive the S/C Bus Power --> are body mount solar arrays sufficient? … articulated extensible arrays are major cost driver Attitude Control: is active 3-axis pointing required? Attitude Determination --> Pointing knowledge Transceiver link margin/Telemetry Rate Chose the simplest instruments and concept of operations that close the mission requirement.

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17, 2007 Klumpar Four Nanosatellites scheduled for launch 12/06 on STS-116 and Minotaur : : 14 Historical Trends: Nanosatellite (<20 kg) Launch Log

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17, 2007 Klumpar Specific Recent Nanosat Sciencecraft -1 Quakesat 4.5 kg (US) -- ULF Earthquake Precursor signals (2003) ST-5 3 x 25 kg (US) Technology validation and geospace science (2006) Munin (Sweden) 5.5 kg Auroral Physics (2000) FalconSat kg (US A.F. Academy): Ionospheric plasma (2006- FTO)

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17, 2007 Klumpar Specific Recent Nanosat Sciencecraft -2 SNAP-1 (UK) 6.5 kg Surrey Satellite Technologies. Demonstrated rendezvous and formation flying (2000). GeneSat kg NASA-Ames Biological sciences investigation (12/2006)

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17, 2007 Klumpar CubeSat-101 The CubeSat ICD

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17, 2007 Klumpar What is a CubeSat? The basic 1U CubeSat (rules of thumb): –10x10x10 cm cube –Mass < 1 kg –Power: about 2 w orbit avg –Available payload volume: cm 3 1U, 2U, 3U constitute present systems with space heritage (P-Pod launch deployer) “2U” “3U” 30 cm “1U” 10 cm

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17, 2007 Klumpar

Delivery to Launch - 15 days July 9, 2006 Baikonur Cosmodrome July 12, 2006 July 26, 2006

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17, 2007 Klumpar

July 2006 Cluster Launch: A single rocket carrying 18 satellites (unrelated) was to place payloads in LEO. Fourteen were nanosatellites from kg each. Four of these were ScienceCraft nanosatellites built by U.S. universities. MEROPE -- 1 kg Trapped Radiation Variations (2006-FTO) MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY ION -- 2 kg Mesospheric Airglow (2006-FTO) UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS Ice Cube (-1, -2) 1 kg ea Ionospheric Scintillations (2006-FTO) CORNELL Specific Recent CubeSat-class Sciencecraft

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17, 2007 Klumpar CubeSats Rule!!??? NO !! Definitely not appropriate for most missions. Why not? Limited resources Power Volume Telemetry Yet the concept has legs: - Small carriers for small low-power, simple sensors - Deployed as an array as space weather monitors - Non-intrusive launch as secondary payloads -And…. It is a model that is scalable

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17, 2007 Klumpar Space Weather System Concept Approach: Large numbers of small low-cost satellites will make simultaneous coordinated multi-point measurements throughout appropriately-sized regions of Geospace carrying thoughtfully selected operational-grade instruments. Hypothesis: Nanosatellite technologies are sufficiently advanced to enable low-cost, low-mass constellation class satellites carrying operational instruments for space weather. Enablers: Advances in microelectronics, microthrusters, MEMs sensor devices, low-power electronics, high-efficiency solar cells, & microminiaturization have enabled satellites with mass fractions of % (payload mass/total mass) leading to the concept of: The “ScienceCraft”: An instrument(s) containing the satellite rather than a satellite bus carrying instruments.

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17, 2007 Klumpar Characteristics of an Operational Space Wx System-1 The concept model has the following characteristics: – the recognition that operational space weather data will be provided from a distributed array of autonomous measuring stations many of which will be in space (with the largest number in LEO) – the stations are designed for, and built in, a production environment – the unit cost of the hardware is minimized by: –employing relatively simple sensors (sufficient to meet the measurement requirements with no unnecessary frills) –limiting the sensor complement to those that provide only the essential measurements – single string, simple support system for the sensors (i.e., the s/c bus)

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17, 2007 Klumpar Characteristics of an Operational Space Wx System-2 – the lifetime system costs overall are minimized by: designing the system to be tolerant of unit failures using the aforementioned production run philosophy on the hardware component automating data flow from sensor-to-enduser (minimizing operations manpower) – launch costs for the LEO assets are minimumized by launching large numbers of stations on two or three single small launch vehicles (cluster launches) Robust system design: Acceptance of risk that some fraction of the individual stations will fail at no impact to system performance

NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17, 2007 Klumpar Summary – Three Messages Impact of Requirements flowdown –The mission goal sets the science requirements –Science requirements drive the engineering implementation Nanosats (1-20 kg) have “taken off” –14 launched –50 launched –Jan-April 2007, setting a new record? CubeSats (1-3 kg) may have a role –Ease of integration (sats --> dispenser --> launcher) –Low-risk as secondaries (containment, inert at launch) –Flexibility to accommodate on virtually any launcher –Standard interface minimizes NRE –Science -- you decide IMHO, 70 1 kg nanosats carrying simple sensors deployed simultaneously in LEO make a compelling mission for operational space weather