Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation – Measuring Success Cheryl Cichowski Kira Rodriguez Michelle Mitchell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Engaging Your Community in Practical Program Evaluation Stephanie Welch, MS-MPH, RD, LDN Knox County Health Department Phone (865)
Advertisements

Northern Kentucky Health District Northern Kentucky Planning Process.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Evaluation Capacity Building Identifying and Addressing the Fields Needs.
Audrey Desjarlais, Signetwork Coordinator Survey Findings SPDG Initiative Goals SPDG Initiative Outcomes.
How to Request Technical Assistance Sera Morgan Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration HIV/AIDS Bureau Division.
1 Department of State Program Evaluation Policy Overview Spring 2013.
Presentation at The Conference for Family Literacy Louisville, Kentucky By Apter & O’Connor Associates April 2013 Evaluating Our Coalition: Are We Making.
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
Designing an Effective Evaluation Strategy
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Everyday Program Evaluation Sheena Cretella MSPH SC DHEC Diabetes Division Program Evaluator 1.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Keeping It All Together:
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Legal & Administrative Oversight of NGOs Establishing and Monitoring Performance Standards.
Program Evaluation M9205 November 28, Columbia University School of NursingM6920, Fall, 2000 Program evaluation: a special case l Often done by.
HEALTHY KIDS LEARN BETTER A Coordinated School Health Approach.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Presentation on Managing for Development Results in Zambia By A. Musunga Director M&E MOFNP - Zambia.
Cross Border Animal Health Plan of Action – Kenya and Uganda Four Strategic areas 1. To improve prevention, management and control of cross border animal.
Funding Opportunity: Supporting Local Community Health Improvement Sylvia Pirani Director, Office of Public Health Practice New York State Department of.
Health Promoting Health Service: Development day.
What Works in Multi-Site Evaluations of Nutrition Education Interventions? Andy Fourney, Andrew Bellow, Patrick Mitchell, Sharon Sugerman, Angie Keihner.
Performance Measures AmeriCorps Project Director Training Saratoga, NY October 7 th – 9 th, 2013.
Community Health Improvement in Action (CHIA). CHIA Overview What is the CHIA project? What distinguishes funded partners from other participants? What.
York District Local Public Health System Assessment Sharon Leahy-Lind District Public Health Liaison-York York District Public Health Sanford DHHS Office.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Chapter 9 Developing an Effective Knowledge Service
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
 How do we begin?  What are the different types of evaluation research?  How do these different types fit together?  What purpose do they serve?
MARKETS II M&E FRAMEWORK AND CHALLENGES Joseph Obado.
Dr. David Mowat June 22, 2005 Federal, Provincial & Local Roles Surveillance of Risk Factors and Determinants of Chronic Diseases.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
Evaluation Overview: Rochelle Schultz Spinarski, Rural Health Solutions Community Care Learning Collaborative October 29, 2014.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Evaluating Title IIID Programs. November 8, :00-2:00 PM Webinar conference line toll free number (888) Code Login information
Evaluation Tools and Models Northern Plains CCC Program Comprehensive Cancer Control 2008 Annual Grantee Meetings May 14th, 2008 Atlanta, GA.
HMP Evaluation Overview and Tools UNE-CCPH June 22, 2011 Presenters: Kira Rodriguez Michelle Mitchell Patrick Madden Pamela Bruno-MacDonald.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas A Framework for Program Evaluation.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Introduction to Program Evaluation Frances Stillman, EdD Institute for Global Tobacco Control Johns.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Welcome to the IPFS Webinar The National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health and Health Care (The National CLAS.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
School Focused Youth Services Strengthening links between schools and communities Agency Logo To be ½ DEECD size logo and below it.
1 National Indicators and Qualitative Studies to Measure the Activities and Outcomes of CDC’s PRC Program Demia L. Sundra, MPH Prevention Research Centers.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
ACTED AME Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation. Summary 1/ ACTED AME department 2/ AME Responsibilities 3/ AME throughout project cycle 4/ Involvement.
Erik Augustson, PhD, National Cancer Institute Susan Zbikowski, PhD, Alere Wellbeing Evaluation.
Unit 9: Evaluating a Public Health Surveillance System #1-9-1.
Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Control Program 3/10/2015 Program Monitoring and Evaluation Activities Short-Term Outcomes Long-Term Outcomes Intermediate.
Performance Measurement 101. Performance Measurement Performance Measurement is: –The ongoing monitoring and reporting of program accomplishments and.
Demonstrating the Value of Stakeholder Input for Evaluation Design, Implementation and Dissemination Yvonne Abel, MS Abt Associates Inc. AEA Annual Conference,
Yvonne Abel, Abt Associates Inc. November 2010, San Antonio, TX Enhancing the Quality of Evaluation Through Collaboration Among Funders, Programs, and.
Increased # of AI/AN receiving in- home environmental assessment and trigger reduction education and asthma self-management education Increased # of tribal.
RTI: Linking Academic and Behavior Support Wesley Temple Dawn Davis.
Abstract # TUAE0102: Health Services Reporting Tool Helps ASOs and Funders Meet Accountability Requirements, Monitor Programs and Identify Emerging Trends.
Dr. Anubha Rajesh, Early Education Services, ICF January 13, 2016 Invest in Young Children: National Conference on Mother- tongue Based Multilingual Early.
Evaluating the Quality and Impact of Community Benefit Programs
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
A Framework for Program Evaluation
Civic Engagement in Minnesota
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation – Measuring Success Cheryl Cichowski Kira Rodriguez Michelle Mitchell

MonitoringEvaluation Measuring success 2

The difference between monitoring and evaluation 3 MonitoringEvaluation When is it done?ContinuouslyOccasionally What is measuredEfficiencyEffectiveness Who is involved?Internal staffExternal contractors What sources of information are used? Internal documentsInternal and external documents Who uses the results?Managers and program staff Mangers, staff, donors, beneficiaries, etc How are the results used?To make minor changesTo make major changes in policy, strategy, and future work

Group Exercise: Monitoring or Evaluation? Attendance at the District Coordinating Council meeting Completion of milestones Policy and / or environmental changes in the community Correct use of funding Representation of Advisory Council Change in knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and skills Number of strategies implemented 4

Monitoring A continuous process of reviewing information gathered from program activities to compare the efficiency of the activities in meeting strategies. Monitoring helps focus the direction of program activities and facilitates minor changes.

Some Areas of State Monitoring Milestones Quarterly Reports Quarterly Counts Resources Success Stories

Why your Project Officer Monitors Compliance with contract Provide TA when needed State program needs to show work progress to federal funders Learn from the grantees and share with others Facilitate a network of prevention providers

Everyday Evaluation Labor Day Weekend activity 8

Evaluation A systematic and objective assessment of an ongoing or completed program, its design, implementation and results. 9

10 Engage Stakeholders Describe the Program Focus the Evaluation Design Gather Credible Evidence Justify Conclusions Ensure use and lessons learned Accuracy UtilityFeasibility Propriety

Overarching Evaluation Questions How well does the HMP Initiative help strengthen Maine’s public health infrastructure? How well is the HMP Initiative being implemented at community and state levels? What impact does the HMP Initiative have on the health status of Maine residents?

Data Collection Coalition Characteristics & Functioning Survey Objective Tracking Environmental Indicators Survey Secondary Surveillance Datasets

Coalition Characteristics Survey 13

Objective Tracking 14 Objective Database Breathe Easy Maine Tobacco- Free College Network Maine Tobacco- Free Hospital Network Department of Labor Maine KeepMEWell HMW

Environmental Indicator Surveys Sample Results from 2011 Muni Survey 15 RESA: How familiar are you with HMP? (All Respondents) Count% $RESaVery Familiar 286% Somewhat Familiar 20842% Somewhat Unfamiliar 11022% Very Unfamiliar 14530% DK/NO ANSWER 51% Total % RESB: Do you know who your local HMP is? (All Respondents) Count% $RESbYes 9720% No 39380% DK/NO ANSWER 71% Total % RESC: Have you had any interaction with your local HMP in the past year? (All Respondents) Count% $REScYes 9119% No 39581% DK/NO ANSWER 112% Total %

Surveillance 16

Ensuring use of findings Reports Data sheets Presentations Website Peer Journals Annual Conferences Display tables

18 5 CLICKS TO EVALUATION DOCUMENTS HMP Grantee ResourcesResources and DocumentsUseful Documents Evaluation Resources

19 Contact Information Please contact us with any questions Cheryl: Kira : Michelle: