MR. LEE Lau vs. Nichols. Background Information Approximately 1,800 Chinese immigrants were not receiving a proper education because they could not speak.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
Advertisements

Bilingual Education Programs
Steven Robinson Blackman High School
The Constitution and the Branches of Government Landmark Civil Rights Cases.
Legal Obligations of the Juvenile Justice System for Limited English Proficient Youth Sam Jammal Legislative Staff Attorney MALDEF.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network 1.
 Kelly Fogle EDPS  Included with Brown v. Board of Education as one of the cases with the greatest impact on the field of education in the.
Lau vs. Nichols Group 1.
Bilingual Education Chapter Seven.
From the Courtroom to the Classroom: Learning About Law © 2003 Constitutional Rights Foundation, Los Angeles, CA All rights reserved.
Branches of the U.S. Government Judicial. The Supreme Court Highest court in the United States – There will always be a majority vote Chief Justice is.
SUPREME COURT CASES. Marbury v. Madison (1803)  William Marbury was commissioned Justice of the Peace of the District of Columbia at the end of President.
Gratz v. Bollinger A Supreme Court Case © 2003 Constitutional Rights Foundation, Los Angeles, CA All rights reserved.
Lesson 3: Warren Court and Johnson’ Great Society.
Major Court Rulings for ESL Students Jonathan Hooper North Parkway Middle School
Language Barriers in a Classroom of First Generation English Language Learners Thang Xiong, Mentor: Dr. Lila Waldman University of Wisconsin – Whitewater,
Section III: Legislation & Supreme Court Rulings in Support of ELLs
Judicial Process How does a case get to the Supreme Court?
Chapter 16 The Federal Courts.
Lau vs. Nichols Stacy Miller. What is Lau vs. Nichols?  1974 Supreme Court Case  San Francisco school district  Non-English speaking Chinese students.
LANDMARK CIVIL RIGHTS COURT CASES. BROWN VS. BOARD OF EDUCATION  Who?- 3 rd grader Linda Brown was bussed 21 blocks from her house to a segregated school.
ESLP Overview Dr. Kristen Pennycuff Trent
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
The Federal Court System According to the Constitution, Congress has the power to create inferior courts (all federal courts, other than the Supreme Court.)
Jennifer Lloyd Una Elementary ESL LEGISLATION.
Diverse Students of Today Chapter 10 EDCI 201 Contexts of Education 1.
Brown vs. Board of Education By Jackson Sullivan.
ESL LEGISTLATION ELS Language Centers Daiva Berzinskas Contact Information:
Background of the Case  Who’s Who?  William A O’Neill: Governor of CT (Defendant)  Milo Sheff (4 th grader) & 16 other children (Plaintiffs)  1989-Lawsuit.
META CONSENT DECREE Cecilia Diaz Student # May 27, 2014.
1 ESL Legislation and its effects on society. 2 Why is ESL education so important? Question -Why is there a need to implement laws and policies to mandate.
Educating English Language Learners James Crawford
Bilingual and ESL Classrooms: Teaching in Multicultural Contexts – Chapter 2 Policies and Programs Dr. Ellen de Kanter University of St. Thomas Instructional.
English Language Learners and the Law Gema Sieh Highland Rim.
Laws Governing ESL Programs in the US Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI prohibits discrimination on the grounds of race, color,
Fighting For Education Brown v. Board of Education.
STANDARD(S): 12.1 Students explain the fundamental principles and moral values of American democracy. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/ GOALS/ SWBAT 1.Contrast the.
Ana Grajeda Marisol Quiroz Lizet Salazar
The Civil Rights Era. Segregation The isolation of a race, class, or group.
4. Plessy vs. Ferguson.   SWBAT analyze the Supreme Court case of Plessy vs. Ferguson and judge the extent to which it set back Civil Rights efforts.
Compliance with Lau v. Nichols u Why is this an issue? u What has been done? u What needs to be done? u Where do we go from here?
Matt Selby. BROWN VS BOARD OVERVIEW Segregation was commonplace in many public areas in the United States in the 50s 12 parents filed a suit against the.
FIVE KEY COURT RULINGS IN EDUCATION Tony Mango EL620.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 1978.
Time line of ESL Legislation Jena Tabor- ESL Teacher Flintville Elementary School
Mobile County Public School System English as a Second Language Program Classroom Accommodations for ESL Students.
 1969: Community activists and students establish Chinese for Affirmative Action to advocate on behalf of Chinese Americans who are systematically denied.
Court cases. Schenck v. US Argued January 8,1919 Decided March 2,2919.
The Judicial Branch. I. Two Types of Law In America A. Criminal Law – Laws protecting property and individual safety 1. Most of these laws are made at.
O What is an official language minority o What rights does the CCRF give official language groups o What impact has Minority education rights had in Alberta.
Judicial Branch Interpret the Laws Uphold the Constitution Judicial Review- the power of the Supreme Court to review laws and acts and declare them unconstitutional.
Chapter 7 Section 2 A Flexible Framework. The Role of the Supreme Court Overturning a Decision – Court decisions set important precedents, but can be.
Castañeda vs. Pickard Jennifer Nelson EDBI October 28, 2016.
Marbury v. Madison.
Chapter 5: The Court System
Bilingual Education in the US:
Article III – The Judicial Branch
The Federal Court System
ESL in Wisconsin and the United States: Presented by Suzy Klein
Ms. Hoskins, Transitioning, Expanding and Commanding Students
The Judicial Branch Supreme Court.
Looking into the Important Cases in the Past
The Judicial Branch.
The Judicial Branch.
Bakke v. The board of regents in california
How the Supreme Court Shapes Public Policy
How the Federal Gov’t Works: The Judicial Branch
Chapter 5: The Court System
Topic 6 – Role of the people
Oliver Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka
Presentation transcript:

MR. LEE Lau vs. Nichols

Background Information Approximately 1,800 Chinese immigrants were not receiving a proper education because they could not speak or understand English. In 1970, United States District Court for Northern California ruled in favor of the school district. Alan Nichols – President of the school board) Group of Chinese immigrants filed the suit. The “leader” was Mr. Lau, whose daughter dropped out of high school.

Many Points for Prosecution Denying Chinese speaking children a proper education  Students perform poorly in school  Eventually dropout of school  Find it hard to get and hold a job  Deny them the chance to exercise their rights as citizens

Past Court Cases Under Brown vs. Board of Education, “All children regardless of race or ethnic background, had the SAME RIGHT to an education.” Because the children were being taught in an unfamiliar language, attorney Edward Steinman claimed that their right to an education was violated.

Ruling Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff. (Mr. Lau) Because the children were being taught in an unfamiliar language, attorney Edward Steinman claimed that their right to an education was violated. The judge, Steinman, also claimed that by accepting federal funds, the school district was obligated to provide services to all language minority students.

Impact Education is not a right it is a PRIVILEGE. The San Francisco Unified school district acknowledged that they received federal funds to establish a Chinese bilingual and ESL program which served as many students as possible. All students whose first language isn’t English throughout the country MUST receive either ESL or Bilingual services, unless the student proves his/her proficiency in English.

Reasons English was the basic and the ONLY language used in the classroom. Students had to prove that they knew English in order to graduate.

References Eisler, Kim Isaac (1993), A Justice for All: William J. Brennan, Jr., and the Decisions That Transformed America, New York: Simon & Schuster, ISBN Simon & SchusterISBN Greenhouse, Linda. Nixon Appointee Eased Supreme Court Away from Liberal Era, New York Times, June 26, 1995.New York Times