 Disambiguation Effect: › Ambiguity task with a familiar object and an unfamiliar object › Children choose the unfamiliar object when presented with.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School of Social Sciences and Law Department of Psychology Writing development in children with language difficulties – An analysis of product and process.
Advertisements

Children Aged 5 to
Role of communication experience in facial expression coding in preschool children Vera Labunskaya a a Academy of psychology and pedagogy of Southern Federal.
Communication Disorders Pat Caldwell, SLP Speech and Language Pathologist.
18 and 24-month-olds use syntactic knowledge of functional categories for determining meaning and reference Yarden Kedar Marianella Casasola Barbara Lust.
Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination Jessica Maye, Janet F. Werker, LouAnn Gerken A brief article from Cognition.
The Symbolism of Pictures Clara Yoon Nathan Winkler-Rhoades.
Learning outcome: By the end of this 25 minutes you will be able to discuss a strength and a limitation of using qualitative methods to study children’s.
Children challenged by writing: The handwriting execution speed of children with specific language impairment (SLI) Vince Connelly, Julie Dockrell Sarah.
True Experimental Design
Segmenting Nonsense Sanders, Newport & Neville (2002) Ricardo TaboneLIN 7912.
Nonword Repetition and Sentence Repetition as Clinical Markers of SLI: The Case of Cantonese Stokes, F. S., Wong, M.Y.A., Fletcher, P., & Leonard, B. L.
Do Children Pick and Choose? An Examination of Phonological Selection and Avoidance in Early Lexical Acquisition. Richard G. Schwartz and Laurence B. Leonard.
WWB Training Kit #2 Understanding the Impact of Language Differences on Classroom Behavior.
Verb inflections as indicators of Bilingual SLI Sharon Armon-Lotem, The Bilingual SLI project* Bar Ilan University *This project is funded by ISF grant.
PSYC512: Research Methods PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 14 Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho.
Teaching Students with Autism Discrete Trial Training & Naturalistic Teaching Strategies.
Learning Objective – To investigate the similarities and differences of boy’s and girl’s lives in the city states of Athens and Sparta Success Criteria.
What influences English and Mathematics attainment at age 11? Evidence from the EPPSE project.
Functional Learning Objectives for Young Children with Special Needs.
TEACHING ALPHABETIC KNOWLEDGE SKILLS TO PRESCHOOLERS WITH SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT AND TYPICALLY DEVELOPING LANGUAGE Addie Lafferty, Shelley Gray,
Memory and the power of suggestion
James thinks you can’t see him now.
Preschool-Age Sound- Shape Correspondences to the Bouba-Kiki Effect Karlee Jones, B.S. Ed. & Matthew Carter, Ph.D. Valdosta State University.
Answers to Group Questions Brownell, Svetlova, & Nichols (2009)
The partner effect in non- native speech Speech Accommodation Group Jiwon Hwang May 9, 2007.
Sebastián-Gallés, N. & Bosch, L. (2009) Developmental shift in the discrimination of vowel contrasts in bilingual infants: is the distributional account.
Working Memory Deficits as They Relate to Academic Growth of Students with RD Olga Jerman, Ph.D. Director of Research Frostig Center, Pasadena, CA Minyi.
Background Infants and toddlers have detailed representations for their known vocabulary items Consonants (e.g., Swingley & Aslin, 2000; Fennel & Werker,
Language Development.
Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind November 20, 2013
Rhythmic Performances of Young Children Chet-Yeng Loong, Ph.D.
Communication, Language & Literacy
EARLY IDENTIFICATION FOR SPEECH IMPEDIMENTS EARLY IDENTIFICATION → EARLY INTERVENTION → BETTER FUTURE.
1 E-learning Activities for Articulation in Speech Language Therapy and Learning for Preschool Children 報告人 : 潘輝銘.
The Impact of Exposure to MSA on the Acquisition of Basic Language and Literacy Skills in Arabic Elinor Saiegh-Haddad Bar-Ilan University
Phonological development in lexically precocious 2-year-olds by Smith, McGregor & Demille Presented by: Marrian B. Bufete.
Electrophysiological Processing of Single Words in Toddlers and School-Age Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Sharon Coffey-Corina 1, Denise Padden.
Late Talkers Phoniatric Dept., 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague, Czech Republic O. Dlouhá.
1 Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception Sandra Anacleto uOttawa.
Children Getting Lost: Language, space, and the development of cognitive flexibility in humans.
Presented by: Odelya Ohana. Gathercole & Baddeley, 1989 NWR phonological short-term memory. Gathercole, 2006 Phonological storage is the key capacity.
English-Language Development Domain California Preschool Learning Foundations Volume 1 Published by the California Department of Education (2008) English-Language.
How likely it is that an event will occur the chance that a particular event will happen PROBABILITY.
Heilmann, J., Ellis Weismer, S., Evans, J. and C. Hollar. (2005). Utility of the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventory in Identifying Language.
Reinforcement Look at matched picture after sound ends & it moves 10 trials (5 of each pairing) 2 or 4 blocks (2 pairs of words, 2 pairs of swoops) Participants.
Theory: As children develop they become more able to use causal relationship (as opposed to feature commonality) when they use inductive reasoning. Experiment.
Background Purposes of the Study Methods Elayne Hansen and Dr. Marie Stadler, Ph.D. CCC-SLP  Communication Sciences and Disorders  University of Wisconsin-Eau.
Assessing Spoken Language in Toddlers using the Open- & Closed-set Task DAVID J. ERTMER PH.D., CCC-SLP SPEECH, LANGUAGE AND HEARING SCIENCES PURDUE UNIVERSITY.
Development of a Bilingual (Armenian-English) Vocabulary Test Alice Hovsepian, Ph.D. Candidate Department of Speech-Language Pathology Carla J. Johnson,
Late talkers (Delayed Onset)
Assessing Grammar Module 5 Activity 5.
Relationships between phonological and lexical development:
Verbal inflection: why is it vulnerable in SLI?
Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Assessing Grammar Module 5 Activity 5.
New title: Biofunctional Mutual Exclusion in Early Word Learning
A perceptual investigation of prosodic accuracy in children with typical language and specific language impairment Peter Richtsmeier
Language Development.
From the laboratory to the classroom: Creating and implementing a research-based curriculum around the use of comparison Courtney Pollack, Harvard University Dr.
Self-confidence and self-awareness prompts
Self-confidence and self-awareness posters months
Making relationships prompts
Young Children’s Reasoning about Gender: Stereotypes or Essences?
O ’clock reveal- PowerPoint months
Contemporary Study: Sebastian and Hernandez-Gil (2012)
Half past time reveal- PowerPoint months
Self-confidence and self-awareness prompts
Pair and Group Work – Conclusion
Presentation transcript:

 Disambiguation Effect: › Ambiguity task with a familiar object and an unfamiliar object › Children choose the unfamiliar object when presented with an unfamiliar name  Children as young as 15 months disambiguate (Markman, Wasow, & Hansen, 2003)  Phonetic similarity disrupts disambiguation (Merriman & Schuster, 1991)  Preschoolers disambiguate even when the adult gestures toward the familiar object (Jaswal & Hansen, 2006)

To investigate how children with SLI resolve ambiguity in a disambiguation task given three word conditions: › a phonetically distinct (PD) word, › a phonetically similar (PS) word, › and an oppositional gesture (OG) combined with a PD word

 36 object pairs : one familiar object and one unfamiliar object › 30 experimental trials (10 PD, 10 PS, 10 OG) › 6 real word foils  The OG trial: pointing to the familiar object (e.g., the bowl) while simultaneously asking for an object with a PD word (e.g., “Get the clird”)

 15 Children: 10 Boys and 5 Girls  3 Groups: SLI, TD Chronological Age (CA) peers, and TD Language Age (LA) peers GroupsAge Equivalent NDW SLI n = 5 5;0 to 6;11 M = M = M = 75 CA n = 5 5;0 to 6;11 M = M = M = 98 LA n = 5 3;5 to 5;0 M = M = M = 83

 5 and 6 year olds with SLI selected unfamiliar objects more than chance but significantly less often than same- age typically developing children  Could explain fast mapping deficits

 SLI: select familiar objects with PS words  TD: show varied responses  May be explained by › differences in lexical and phonological activation › limited processing capacity

 7/10 TD children selected unfamiliar objects, overriding the gesture to the familiar object  SLI made random selections  Multiple factors in the event may be processed more flexibly by TD children

Christina H. Fikes, M.S. Julie M. Estis, Ph.D., CCC-SLP Brenda L. Beverly. Ph.D., CCC-SLP