CRflux_protonAlpha_2003-10-14.ppt 1 Proton/alpha background flux models October 14, 2003 Tsunefumi Mizuno Background flux model.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ELENA VANNUCCINI ON BEHALF OF PAMELA COLLABORATION Measurement of the Hydrogen and Helium absolute fluxes with the PAMELA experiment.
Advertisements

Investigation of daily variations of cosmic ray fluxes in the beginning of 24 th solar activity cycle Ashot Chilingarian, Bagrat Mailyan IHY-ISWI Regional.
Solar flares and accelerated particles
GLAST The GLAST Balloon Flight experiment was performed with the collaboration of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center,
Simulations with ‘Realistic’ Photon Spectra Mike Jenkins Lancaster University and The Cockcroft Institute.
The Results of Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS01) Experiment in Space Behcet Alpat I.N.F.N. Perugia TAUP 2001 Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy.
Study of Galactic Cosmic Rays at high cut- off rigidity during solar cycle 23 Partha Chowdhury 1 and B.N. Dwivedi 2 1 Department of Physics, University.
21 ECRS, Kosice, 12/09/2008 Trapped charge particles measurements in the radiation belt by PAMELA instrument Vladimir V. Mikhailov (MEPHI) for PAMELA collaboration.
Cosmic-Ray Antiproton Spatial Distributions Simulated in Magnetosphere Michio Fuki Faculty of Education, Kochi University 2-5-1, Akebono-cho, Kochi ,
Paul Evenson, Waraporn Nuntiyakul,
Lecture 3 Jack Tanabe Old Dominion University Hampton, VA January 2011 Conformal Mapping.
Working Group 2 - Ion acceleration and interactions.
More phenomena difficult to observe A MacKinnon. More phenomena difficult to observe synchrotron radiation of positrons: sub-mm observations? inner bremsstrahlung.
PositronBG_ ppt 1 Positron BG on GLAST/EGRET GLAST Calibration/Analysis VRVS meeting April 17, 2006 Tsunefumi Mizuno Hiroshima University.
Neutron Monitor Detection Efficiency John Clem University of Delaware 2004 Annual CRONUS Collaboration Meeting.
May 26, 2002Thomas K. Gaisser Atmospheric neutrino fluxes Status of the calculations based on work with M. Honda.
EURISOL User Group, Florence, Jan Spin-Dependent Pre-Equilibrium Exciton Model Calculations for Heavy Ions E. Běták Institute of Physics SAS,
Paul Evenson January Low Energy Electron Observations (LEE, AESOP and the Historical Context) Paul Evenson and John Clem University of Delaware.
PLANETOCOSMICS L. Desorgher, M. Gurtner, E.O. Flückiger, and P. Nieminen Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern ESA/ESTEC.
Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:
6.1 The Atomic Models of Thomson and Rutherford 6.2 Definition of Cross Section 6.2 Rutherford Scattering 6.3 Structure of the Nucleus Rutherford Scattering.
Evaluation of the flux of CR nuclei inside the magnetosphere P. Bobik, G. Boella, M.J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita.
The PLANETOCOSMICS Geant4 application L. Desorgher Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern.
Cosmic-Ray Induced Neutrons: Recent Results from the Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation Measurements Aboard an ER-2 Airplane P. Goldhagen 1, J.M. Clem 2, J.W.
1 Observations of Charge Sign Dependence in Solar Modulation Kiruna 2011 LEE Low Energy Electrons P.I.C. June 30, 2010 John Clem and Paul Evenson.
PoGO_G4_ ppt1 Study on Key Properties of PoGO by Geant4 Simulator January 28, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno History of changes:
Currently the Solar Energetic Particle Environment Models (SEPEM) system treats only protons within the interplanetary environment, and the shielding analysis.
The ionosphere of Mars never looked like this before Paul Withers Boston University Space Physics Group meeting, University of Michigan.
P. Bobik, G. Boella, M. J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita 2D Stochastic Monte Carlo to evaluate the modulation.
Vladimir Mikhailov (NRNU MEPHI, Moscow) On behavior PAMELA collaboration SUB CUTOFF SPECTRA OF ELECTRONS AND POSITRONS measured in the PAMELA experiment.
1 PHY Lecture 5 Interaction of solar radiation and the atmosphere.
Aa GLAST Particle Astrophysics Collaboration Instrument Managed and Integrated at SLAC/Stanford University The Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST)
Trapped positrons and electrons observed by PAMELA Vladimir Mikhailov NRNU MEPHI, Moscow, Russia For PAMELA collaboration ICPPA 2015, PAMELA workshop,
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
Cosmic Rays2 The Origin of Cosmic Rays and Geomagnetic Effects.
RCCN International Workshop sub-dominant oscillation effects in atmospheric neutrino experiments 9-11 December 2004, Kashiwa Japan Input data to the neutrino.
GLAST Hiroshima University, ISAS Cosmic-Ray Source Generator Y.Fukazawa (Hiroshima U) M.Ozaki(ISAS) T.Mizuno(Hiroshima U) S.Hirano(Hiroshima U) T.Kamae(Hiroshima.
Geant4 for GLAST BFEM -Comparison with Distributions in BFEM Data – T. Mizuno, H. Mizushima, S. Ogata, Y. Fukazawa (Hiroshima/SLAC) M. Roterman, P. Valtersson.
GLAST The GLAST Balloon Flight experiment was performed with the collaboration of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center,
Primary Cosmic Ray Spectra in the Planet Atmospheres Marusja Buchvarova 1, Peter Velinov 2 (1) Space Research Institute – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences,
Daniel Matthiä(1)‏, Bernd Heber(2), Matthias Meier(1),
Sources emitting gamma-rays observed in the MAGIC field of view Jelena-Kristina Željeznjak , Zagreb.
Comparison between BFEM data and G4 simulation October 18, 2001 Balloon Analysis VRVS meeting T. Mizuno, H. Mizushima, Y. Fukazawa, and T. Kamae
GLAST_BGmodel_ ppt Tsunefumi Mizuno 1 Status of the GLAST BG model February 6, 2008 CA-SO Workshop Tsunefumi Mizuno (Hiroshima Univ.)
February 7, Long Term Decline of South Pole Neutron Monitor Counting Rate – A Possible Magnetospheric Interpretation Paul Evenson, John Bieber,
In high energy astrophysics observations, it is crucial to reduce the background effectively to achieve a high sensitivity, for the source intensity is.
PoGO_collimator_ ppt1 Study of PoGO background dependence on the collimator material/slow scintillator threshold April 21, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno.
A complete simulation of cosmic rays access to a Space Station Davide Grandi INFN Milano, ITALY.
PoGO_G4_ ppt1 Study of optimized fast scintillator length for the astronomical hard X- ray/soft gamma-ray polarimeter PoGO November 1, 2004 Tsunefumi.
Cosmic Ray Positron Fraction Observations during the A- Magnetic Solar Minimum John Clem and Paul Evenson* * Presenter AESOP Departing Esrange, Sweden.
After integration and test at SLAC and GSFC, BFEM was shipped to the National Scientific Balloon Facility (NSBF) at Palestine, Texas. The experiment was.
1 The law of gravitation can be written in a vector notation (9.1) Although this law applies strictly to particles, it can be also used to real bodies.
Topicality of this work is caused by the fact that modern detectors aren't effective in searching electrons and positrons with energies higher than 1 TeV.
Modeling of secondary cosmic ray spectra for Solar Cycles 23
Atmospheric radiation modeling of galactic cosmic rays using LRO/CRaTER and the EMMREM model with comparisons to balloon and airline based measurements.
Solar gamma-ray and neutron registration capabilities of the GRIS instrument onboard the International Space Station Yu. A. Trofimov, Yu. D. Kotov, V.
Search for Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station G. LA VACCA University of Milano-Bicocca.
June 1, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno Expected Modulation Factor of PoGO calculated with Geant4 Simulator with PoGO-fix June 1, 2004 Tsunefumi.
Determining the Spectrum of Cosmic Rays
Vladimir Mikhailov (MEPhI) on behalf PAMELA collaboration
Gamma-ray Albedo of the Moon Igor V. Moskalenko (Stanford) & Troy A
Cosmic Ray Electron Spectrum in 2009
University of Delaware
Cosmic-Ray Source Generator
Simulation of 14C production rates for the troposphere and stratosphere in weak geomagnetic intensity at 26,000 yr BP 1 Graduate School of Science and.
ICRC2003 OG Calculation of Cosmic-Ray Proton and Anti-proton Spatial Distribution in Magnetosphere Michio Fuki, Ayako Kuwahara, Nozomi, Sawada Faculty.
Update of G4 simulation -- Development of Cosmic-Ray generator --
Analysis of GLAST Balloon Experiment Data
by Andreas Keiling, Scott Thaller, John Wygant, and John Dombeck
electron/positron background flux models
Presentation transcript:

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 1 Proton/alpha background flux models October 14, 2003 Tsunefumi Mizuno Background flux model functions for proton/alpha in CRflux package are given here. The model is under construction and the function shown in this report could be modified in future.

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 2 Plan overview The background flux depends on satellite position (due to geomagnetic cutoff) and year (due to solar activity). We need to take these two effect into account. We refer to the solar modulation theory to take the solar activity effect into account. We also plan to collect the reference data at various positions and model them with analytic function (i.e., model function). Particles implemented in CRflux package: protons (primary/secondary) alphas (primary) electrons/positrons (primary/secondary) gammas (primary/secondary); position dependence is not yet implemented

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 3 Cutoff rigidity and solar modulation potential To calculate the cutoff rigidity (Rc), we assume that the earth magnetic field is the dipole shape and calculate Rc as Rc(GV)=14.9*(1+h/Rearth)^-2*(cos theta_M)^4, where h is the satellite altitude, Rearth is the earth radius (6380 km) and theta_M is the geomagnetic latitude (see Zombeck “Handbook of space astronomy and astrophysics” 2 nd edition (1990) p225; Longair “High Energy Astrophysics” 2 nd edition (1992) p ). Typical value of solar modulation potential phi (see formula in the next page) is ~550 MV and ~1100 MV for solar activity minimum and maximum, respectively (e.g., Seo et al. 1991, ApJ 378, 763; Boezio et al. 1999, ApJ 518, 457; Menn et al. 2000, ApJ 533, 281). It is difficult to predict the value in advance. Instead, we could use the Climax Neutron Monitor count ( to derive phi of the day of observation, for the neutron monitor count is a good indicator of the solar activity.

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 4 Model functions: Primary: Power-law with solar modulation effect (Gleeson and Axford 1968) and geomagnetic cutoff (introduced by T. Kamae and M. Ozaki to reproduce low geomag. lat. data of AMS). A similar formula is used for alphas, electrons and positrons. Secondary: Simple analytic functions such as power-law. Model functions are determined to reproduce the AMS data. Below 100 MeV, we do not have AMS data. Therefore, we just extrapolate the spectrum down to 10 MeV with E^-1. To keep the model simple, we use the same function to express the reentrant (downward) and splash (upward) spectra. proton spectrum model function Reference: AMS data (J. Alcaraz et al. 2000, Phys. Let. B 472, 215 and Phys. Let. B 490, 27) BESS data (T. Sanuki et al. 2000, ApJ 545, 1135) Solar modulation theory (L. J. Gleeson and W. I. Axford 1968, ApJ 154, 1011) Etc. [c/s/m^2/sr/MeV]

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 5 proton primary spectra phi=650 MV phi=800 MV phi=1100MV (Rc=0 GV) Rc=0.5GV in the formula given in the previous page. Proton primary spectra obtained by various balloon and satellite experiments at high geomagnetic latitude are given with our model functions. Please note that our formula of geomagnetic cutoff, 1/(1+(R/Rc)^-12.0), gives lower flux in low energy region. Except for this, our model function reproduces the observed spectra very well. references; J. Alcaraz et al. 2000, Phys. Let. B 490, 27 T. Sanuki et al. 2000, ApJ 545, 1135 Set et al. 1991, ApJ 378, 763 Boezio et al. 1999, ApJ 518, 457 Menn et al. 2000, ApJ 533, 281

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 6 proton models (1) Vertically downward/upward going proton flux data by AMS (geomagnetic latitude theta_M<0.2; geomagnetic equator) and model functions. AMS provides us with data of 0<theta_M<1.0 (from geomagnetic equator to polar). phi=650 MV Rc=13.0 GV Ek^-1 (below 100 MeV) primary secondary (100 MeV-10 GeV)

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 7 proton models (2) Vertically downward/upward going proton flux data by AMS (0.2<theta_M<0.3) and model functions. AMS provides us with data of 0<theta_M<1.0 (from geomagnetic equator to polar). phi=650 MV Rc=11.7 GV Ek^-1 (<=100 MeV) primary secondary Ek^-0.86 ( MeV) Ek^-2.4 ( GeV)

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 8 proton models (3) Vertically downward/upward going proton flux data by AMS (0.3<theta_M<0.4) and model functions. AMS provides us with data of 0<theta_M<1.0 (from geomagnetic equator to polar). phi=650 MV Rc=10.3 GV Ek^-1 (<=600 MeV) primary secondary Ek^-2.4 ( GeV)

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 9 proton models (4) Vertically downward/upward going proton flux data by AMS (0.4<theta_M<0.5) and model functions. AMS provides us with data of 0<theta_M<1.0 (from geomagnetic equator to polar). phi=650 MV Rc=8.7 GV Ek^-1 (<=100 MeV) primary secondary Ek^-1.3 ( MeV) Ek^-2.4 ( GeV)

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 10 proton models (5) Vertically downward/upward going proton flux data by AMS (0.5<theta_M<0.6) and model functions. AMS provides us with data of 0<theta_M<1.0 (from geomagnetic equator to polar). phi=650 MV Rc=7.0 GV Ek^-1 (<=100 MeV) primary secondary Ek^-1.2 ( MeV) Ek^-2.4 ( GeV)

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 11 proton models (6) Vertically downward/upward going proton flux data by AMS (0.6<theta_M<0.7) and model functions. AMS provides us with data of 0<theta_M<1.0 (from geomagnetic equator to polar). phi=650 MV Rc=5.3 GV Ek^-1 (<=300 MeV) primary secondary Ek^-2.3 ( GeV)

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 12 proton models (7) Vertically downward/upward going proton flux data by AMS (0.7<theta_M<0.8) and model functions. AMS provides us with data of 0<theta_M<1.0 (from geomagnetic equator to polar). phi=650 MV Rc=3.8 GV Ek^-1 (below 100 MeV) primary secondary (100 MeV-10 GeV)

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 13 proton models (8) Vertically downward/upward going proton flux data by AMS (0.8<theta_M<0.9) and model functions. AMS provides us with data of 0<theta_M<1.0 (from geomagnetic equator to polar). phi=650 MV Rc=2.5 GV Ek^-1 (below 100 MeV) primary secondary (100 MeV-10 GeV)

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 14 proton models (9) Vertically downward/upward going proton flux data by AMS (0.9<theta_M<1.0) and model functions. AMS provides us with data of 0<theta_M<1.0 (from geomagnetic equator to polar). phi=650 MV Rc=1.5 GV Ek^-1 (below 100 MeV) primary secondary (100 MeV-10 GeV)

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 15 proton models (10) Based on old rocket measurements (e.g., J.A.Van Allen and A.V. Gangnes 1950, Phys. Rev. 78, 50; S.F. Singer 1950, Phys. Rev. 77, 729), we adopt the zenith angle dependence of 1+0.6sin(theta) for secondaries. For primaries, we assume uniform distribution from cos(theta)=1.0 (vertically downward) to -0.4 (blocking by earth). The same angular dependence is used for alpha primaries and electron/positron primaries and secondaries. primary secondary upward secondary downward upward Zenith angle dependence of protons at Pelestine, Texas and solar activity maximum, generated by the program.

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 16 alpha models (1) [c/s/m^2/sr/MeV] Primary: Power-law with solar modulation effect and geomagnetic cutoff. Secondary: Could be negligible. (e.g., Fig. 1 in Alcaraz et al. 2000, Phys. Let. B 494, 193)

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 17 alpha models (2) Alpha primary spectra obtained by various balloon and satellite experiments at high geomagnetic latitude with our model functions. Except for that the formula of geomagnetic cutoff gives lower flux in low energy region, our model function reproduces the observed spectra very well. Note that model is expressed as a function of kinetic energy but the figure is given in unit of kinetic energy per nucleon. phi=650 MV phi=1100MV (Rc=0 GV) Rc=0.5GV in the formula given in the previous page.

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 18 alpha models (3) Alpha primary spectra obtained by AMS in various geomagnetic latitude are given below. Our model for intermediate region (0.4<theta_M<0.8) somewhat differs from the data. This could be because the corresponding region of Rc is too broad (Rc=9.6 and 3.1 GV for theta_M=0.4 and 0.8, respectively) to reproduce the spectrum with single value of Rc. For other region, our formula reproduces the data very well. data;0<theta_M<0.4 Model; Rc=12.2 GV (theta_M=0.2) data;0.4<theta_M<0.8 Model; Rc=6.2 GV (theta_M=0.6) data; above COR Model; Rc=0 GV