Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Update of G4 simulation -- Development of Cosmic-Ray generator --

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Update of G4 simulation -- Development of Cosmic-Ray generator --"— Presentation transcript:

1 Update of G4 simulation -- Development of Cosmic-Ray generator --
September 27 , 2001 Balloon Analysis VRVS meeting T. Mizuno H. Mizushima, H. Tajima, and T. Kamae

2 Overview of this study Main purpose of this work is to construct reliable Cosmic-Ray generator and BFEM simulator. We have been developing Cosmic-Ray generator, to reproduce observed L1T rate (~500Hz), neutral event rate (~50Hz), and hit distribution in TKR. Just extrapolating electron spectrum down to 10MeV did not give a satisfactory result. (

3 L1T rate and neutral event rate
Electron Spectrum: Updated (see next page) Positron spectrum and gamma-ray spectrum: newly implemented L1T Rate ~230Hz~460Hz in total Proton :~200Hz ~200Hz (same model) Electron: ~25Hz~100Hz (updated, see next page) Positron: not implemented~60Hz Gamma: not implemented~100Hz Neutral event rate ~5Hz~60Hz in total Proton :~4Hz ~4Hz (same model) Electron: ~1Hz~12Hz (updated, see next page) Positron: not implemented~7Hz Gamma: not implemented~40Hz

4 Updated CR spectrum Electron spectrum: extrapolated down to 10 MeV with E^-1 Positron spectrum: based on AMS, similar to that of electron Gamma spectrum: based on balloon/satellite measuremts. (see below) Downward gamma E^-1 Downward electron Please note that positron/gamma ray generator are under development.

5 Distribution of Top-most hit layer
BFEM data vs. G4 simulation Contribution of each component positron gamma electron Proton   Calorimeter Top of TKR Basically good.

6 Distribution of Hit Frequency
BFEM data vs. G4 simulation Contribution of each component positron gamma electron proton Basically good. Slight deviation is seen in layer

7 Distribution of Number of Layers with Hits
BFEM data vs. G4 simulation Contribution of each component positron gamma electron Proton Basically good.

8 Distribution of Hit Frequency for neutral events
BFEM data vs. G4 simulation Contribution of each component positron gamma electron proton Geant4 shows slightly higher hit frequency in layer 5-20. We may need to adjust gamma-ray flux or angular distribution.

9 Summary With CR proton, updated electron, positron, and gamma, we can approximately reproduce the oberved L1T rate, neutral event rate, and hit distribution in TKR. Future plan Implement CR muon. Apply proton/muon cuts to both real data and simulation data, and adjust proton (muon) flux in generator. See hit distribution in TKR and adjust gamma, electron and positron flux/angular distribution.


Download ppt "Update of G4 simulation -- Development of Cosmic-Ray generator --"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google