Introduction Acknowledgments Discussion The study area is located within the Upper Mississippi River Valley of the western part of La Crosse County, Wisconsin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Another example of interference that is often observed is interference from a thin film. Light incident on the surface of a thin film is reflected from.
Advertisements

Wave Nature of Light  Refraction  Interference  Young’s double slit experiment  Diffraction  Single slit diffraction  Diffraction grating.
Chap 8 Analytical Instruments. XRD Measure X-Rays “Diffracted” by the specimen and obtain a diffraction pattern Interaction of X-rays with sample creates.
Lecture 20 X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)
© 2007 Pearson Prentice Hall This work is protected by United States copyright laws and is provided solely for the use of instructors in teaching their.
The Wave Nature of Light
CHAPTER 3: CRYSTAL STRUCTURES X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)
Modeling Geologic Columns With Sand Art By Debra Rockey Wellsburg Middle School 1.Prepare the plastic tube. One end should be permanently sealed. If necessary,
Internal – External Order We described symmetry of crystal habit (32 point groups) We also looked at internal ordering of atoms in 3-D structure (230 space.
X-Ray Crystallography The most important technique for mineralogy The most important technique for mineralogy Direct measurement of atomic arrangement.
Topic 11.3 Diffraction.
Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 6e
Followed by a few examples of
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Outline Chapter 28 Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker.
Crystal Structural Behavior of CoCu₂O₃ at High Temperatures April Jeffries*, Ravhi Kumar, and Andrew Cornelius *Department of Physics, State University.
Chem Single Crystals For single crystals, we see the individual reciprocal lattice points projected onto the detector and we can determine the values.
X-Ray Diffraction. The XRD Technique Takes a sample of the material and places a powdered sample which is then illuminated with x-rays of a fixed wave-length.
Yat Li Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry University of California, Santa Cruz CHEM 146C_Experiment #3 Identification of Crystal Structures by Powder.
X-ray diffraction to identify phases
PHY 1371Dr. Jie Zou1 Chapter 37 Interference of Light Waves.
X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Forensic Geology X-ray diffraction pattern for goethite X-ray diffractometer (XRD) laboratory.
X-Ray Diffraction ME 215 Exp#1. X-Ray Diffraction X-rays is a form of electromagnetic radiation having a range of wavelength from nm (0.01x10 -9.
X-Ray Diffraction and X-Ray Crystallography. Diffraction Diffraction: the various phenomena that are associated with wave propagation (e.g., bending and.
Physics 52 - Heat and Optics Dr. Joseph F. Becker Physics Department San Jose State University © 2005 J. F. Becker.
Submitted By:- Nardev Kumar Bajaj Roll NO Group-C
Rocks Minerals and Crystals By Guest Scientist Dr. David Walker LDEO-Columbia University.
CHE (Structural Inorganic Chemistry) X-ray Diffraction & Crystallography lecture 2 Dr Rob Jackson LJ1.16,
X-ray Diffraction Outline Crystals and Bragg Diffraction
Miller Indices And X-ray diffraction
Chapter 7 X-Ray diffraction. Contents Basic concepts and definitions Basic concepts and definitions Waves and X-rays Waves and X-rays Crystal structure.
CHAPTER 37 : INTERFERENCE OF LIGHT WAVES
Crystalline Solids CaF2 Unit Cell
Powder X-ray Crystallography
Chapter 36 In Chapter 35, we saw how light beams passing through different slits can interfere with each other and how a beam after passing through a single.
Chapter 36 Diffraction In Chapter 35, we saw how light beams passing through different slits can interfere with each other and how a beam after passing.
X-Ray Diffraction Dr. T. Ramlochan March 2010.
Diffraction Basics Coherent scattering around atomic scattering centers occurs when x-rays interact with material In materials with a crystalline structure,
Diffraction When monochromatic light from a distance
Diffraction at a single slit Sketch the variation with angle of diffraction of the relative intensity of light diffracted at a single slit
Chem Structure Factors Until now, we have only typically considered reflections arising from planes in a hypothetical lattice containing one atom.
Chapter 33 Electromagnetic Waves. 33.2: Maxwell’s Rainbow: As the figure shows, we now know a wide spectrum (or range) of electromagnetic waves: Maxwell’s.
Chapter 3: Structures via Diffraction Goals – Define basic ideas of diffraction (using x-ray, electrons, or neutrons, which, although they are particles,
Wave superposition If two waves are in the same place at the same time they superpose. This means that their amplitudes add together vectorially Positively.
Diffraction Introduction to Diffraction Patterns
Fundamental Physics II PETROVIETNAM UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCES Vungtau, 2013 Pham Hong Quang
1© Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. Young’s double slit experiment Young’s double slit experiment 9.10 Interference of light waves Relationship between x,,
Unit 12: Part 1 Physical Optics: The Wave Nature of Light.
Physics 1C Lecture 27A. Interference Treating light as a particle (geometrical optics) helped us to understand how images are formed by lenses and mirrors.
Crystal Structures & X-ray Diffraction Chemistry 123 Spring 2008 Dr. Woodward.
X-ray diffraction and minerals. Is this mineral crystalline?
Physics 1202: Lecture 26 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: Friday Nov. 6… –Chap. 18, 19, 20, and 21 No HW for this week (midterm)No HW for this.
X-ray microanalysis in the electron microscope
X-Ray Diffraction Spring 2011.
Diffraction AP Physics B. Superposition..AKA….Interference One of the characteristics of a WAVE is the ability to undergo INTERFERENCE. There are TWO.
Physical optics Done by P G LOGAN. Physical optics Physical optics deals with phenomena that depend on the wave nature of light. There are three types.
Physics 102: Lecture 21, Slide 1 Diffraction, Gratings, Resolving Power Physics 102: Lecture 21.
X-RAY METHODS FOR ORIENTING CRYSTALS
Prepared By – Amit $hah M.Pharm 1 st sem QA Roll NO :- 03 Guided By – Mr. Pinak R. Patel Assistant Professor Dept. P’ceutical Chem. D Dharmaj Degree Pharmacy.
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE STRUCTURE OF SOLIDS
Diffraction in TEM Janez Košir
Wave superposition If two waves are in the same place at the same time they superpose. This means that their amplitudes add together vectorially Positively.
Wave superposition If two waves are in the same place at the same time they superpose. This means that their amplitudes add together vectorially Positively.
de Broglie Waves de Broglie argued
Phys102 Lecture 25 The Wave Nature of Light; Interference
Chapter 36 In Chapter 35, we saw how light beams passing through different slits can interfere with each other and how a beam after passing through a single.
X-Ray Diffraction and X-Ray Crystallography
Bragg Diffraction 2dsinq = nl Bragg Equation
Evidence of Cholesterol Accumulated in High Curvature Regions: Implication to the Curvature Elastic Energy for Lipid Mixtures  Wangchen Wang, Lin Yang,
Presentation transcript:

Introduction Acknowledgments Discussion The study area is located within the Upper Mississippi River Valley of the western part of La Crosse County, Wisconsin. The area contains the Olson/North Shore, Valley View, and Pammel Creek sites, as well as the local clay source used in this study. The known local clay source, sharing a similar mineral composition with numerous samples, is suggested to derive from the Savanna Terrace Formation, a late Wisconsinan glacio-fluvial terrace. The Savanna Terrace has been mapped along the Mississippi River and its tributaries, extending from Pepin, Wisconsin to Jackson, Illinois (Fig. 6). X-Ray Diffraction of Oneota Pottery Location X-Ray Diffraction Results References Determine the mineralogical source of currently unidentified diffraction peaks Quantitative analysis determining detailed mineralogical composition of pottery samples Comparison of samples from known Savanna terrace clay sources both locally and along the Mississippi River Valley in general Methods Future Work L.E. Roeglin 1,2, C.M. Arzigian 2, S.T. King 3, and G.L. Running 4 1 UW – Eau Claire Department of Geology 2 UW – La Crosse Department of Archaeology and Sociology 3 UW – La Crosse Department of Physics and Astronomy 4 UW – Eau Claire Department of Geography and Anthropology L.E. Roeglin 1,2, C.M. Arzigian 2, S.T. King 3, and G.L. Running 4 1 UW – Eau Claire Department of Geology 2 UW – La Crosse Department of Archaeology and Sociology 3 UW – La Crosse Department of Physics and Astronomy 4 UW – Eau Claire Department of Geography and Anthropology The underlying question of the present research is whether or not the pottery uncovered at each of the three archaeological sites within La Crosse came from a single source of local clay? Clays occur throughout this region as floodplain deposits, glacial outwash deposits and on older bluff tops (Boszhardt, 2008), thus, multiple clay sources possibly exist. A local clay sample was collected from Heaven’s Gate Cemetery, which is located on a river terrace, to be used as a local control sample. In 2010, research was initiated to investigate the mineralogical relationship between Oneota pottery recovered from three major archaeological sites in La Crosse, Wisconsin. The Oneota represent the last prehistoric culture that inhabited the upper Midwest between A.D – 1625; prior to European contact. One of the most distinguishing artifacts that characterize the Oneota is shell-tempered pottery (Fig. 1). There are three phases of Oneota occupation within the La Crosse area. Each phase is defined by a shift in decorative styles of pottery (Fig. 2). The Valley View, Olson/North Shore, and Pammel Creek sites selected for sample collection each represent a different phase of Oneota culture within the La Crosse region (Table 1). SitePhaseTime PeriodPottery Style Description # of Samples Collected Olson/North ShoreBrice PrairieAD Inner lip/rim decoration, shoulder motifs include punctate-bordered elements and handles that attach at lip 3 Pammel Creek AD Transition between the Brice Prairie and Valley View phases, bold impressed lip patterns, defined by finger or tool notching, inner lip/rim decoration disappears, wide decorated strap handles (some attached to lip) 9 Valley View AD Finer lip decoration, shoulder patterns, tool trail width decreases, patterns less bold 2 The research presented here applied the technique of powder x-ray diffraction (XRD) to preform qualitative analyses on the pottery samples and local clay sample. The goal was to provide a mineralogical “fingerprint” of each sample that would be compared across samples, and to the local clay source., to determine if there is a common clay source used in the production of Oneota pottery, and if the local clay tested was a possible source. All specimens photographed before preparing for XRD analysis Sample Preparation: Samples ground into uniform powder to measure all possible atomic spacing (Fig. 4a below) Mounted onto clear plastic slide XRD data collected via Siemens D500 Powder X-ray Diffractometer (Fig. 4b) Copper x-ray source (λ = 1.54 Å) Data obtained from 20 to 120° 2θ Data processing Stripped Kα 2 and removed background using Match! Powder X-ray Diffraction software Overlay line profiles for qualitative comparison of peak locations Figure 2: Schematic diagram of Oneota pottery type evolution at La Crosse, c.a (Boszhardt, 1994). Figure 1: Oneota shell-tempered pot ( m/artifacts/archives/pot.jpg). Table 1. Oneota phase descriptions and associated archaeological sites. Incident x-ray Reflected x-ray Detector 2θ2θ The x-ray diffraction process is shown schematically in Fig. 3a, with data characteristic of pure sodium chloride powder presented in Fig. 3b. In an XRD experiment, an x-ray of known wavelength is send incident onto a crystalline material at and incident angle (θ). This x-ray is then reflected off of the crystalline planes of the sample in a specular manner such that the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection. Due to the wave nature of light, x-rays reflecting off adjacent crystalline planes may either constructively or destructively interfere upon reflection due to the difference in path length traveled by the respective x-rays. This path length difference is twice the product of the distance between crystal plane (d), and the sine of the angle of incidence. The condition for constructive interference is given by Bragg’s Law : X-ray source Sample Detector Fig. 5 shows characteristic data obtained from the Olson/North Shore site, and the Valley View site. Since quartz is present in both the pottery samples of study, and the locally sourced clay, a known high intensity diffraction peak corresponding to quartz was used as reference. A calcium carbonate peak, originating from the shell temper, was used as an additional reference between pottery samples. Both lines are labeled above. Using these peaks as reference, a qualitative comparison of the lineshapes may be performed by looking at the location and intensity of peaks which appear above the background. The results of such a comparison suggest: 1.All features observed in the XRD pattern of locally sourced clay are observed in data obtained from pottery samples suggesting they are of similar origin. 2.Obvious changes occur in the relative intensity of many of these peaks. This is attributed to the degradation of the clay crystal structure through firing of the pottery. Data obtained from the Pammel Creek site (not presented) suggest similar results. a. b. Figure 4: Photos of (a) mounted powder sample, and (b) the D500 Powder X-Ray Diffractometer. Figure 3.: (a) A schematic diagram of the XRD process, and (b) an example XRD pattern obtained from powdered NaCl (adapted from Figure 5: XRD Patterns obtained for samples from the Olson/North Shore (left) and Valley View (right) sites compared to a sample of locally sourced clay. Dashed lines represent the quartz and calcium carbonate peaks used to calibrate the data. I would like to thank Dr. Connie Arzigian and Dr. Seth King from UW - La Crosse for their continued assistance and support. I’d also like to thank MVAC and the UW - La Crosse Physics Department for providing the resources and equipment used to perform this work. I also thank the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs for supporting this research, and Learning & Technology Services for printing this poster. Figure 6: Locations of the Savanna Terrace Formation (yellow) in relation to the American Bottom (red). Modified from Flock (1983). The Savanna Terrace is also present within the American Bottom (the central home of the Mississippian culture) with mineral composition of clays in this region being slightly different. This provides an opportunity to compare the mineralogy of pottery between Oneota and Mississippian cultures and consider cultural interactions, such as trade, at a larger scale Boszhardt, R.F., 1994, Oneota group continuity at La Crosse: The Brice Prairie, Pammel Creek, and Valley View Phases: The Wisconsin Archeologist, v. 75, p Boszhardt, R.F., 2008, Shell-tempered pottery from the Upper Mississippi River Valley: Southeastern Archaeology, v. 27, p Flock, M.A., 1983, The Late Wisconsinan Savanna Terrace in tributaries to the Upper Mississippi River: Quaternary Research, v. 20, p a. b. When taking an XRD scan, the angle of incidence is varied along with the position of the x-ray detector to determine at what angles Bragg’s Law is met which results in high intensity peaks in the XRD pattern. In the actual experiment the detector is moved twice as fast as the sample to maintain the necessary geometry. Therefore XRD data is plotted as an function of relative intensity versus the detector angle of 2θ as shown above. Once an XRD pattern is obtained, two basic methods of analysis may be performed: 1.The distance between all possible crystal planes may be determined via Bragg’s Law, and the mineral phase identified. 2.The pattern may be used to “fingerprint” a material of unknown crystalline composition since the locations of the set of Bragg peaks are unique. In the current study, a combination of these methods was used. Quartz and calcium carbonate peaks were located within the samples of interest, after which a qualitative comparison was made between the of the angular locations of diffraction peaks observed in pottery samples and those observed from samples of locally sourced clay.