DoD Integrated Product Support Roadmap Tool LOG FIPT 19 October 2012 Mary G. Ryan DAU Global Learning & Technology Center

The Roadmap Journey History – The Beginning Requirements – What PSAT wanted Team – Who was on the team Roadmap Tool Overview – What the team delivered Include slide with original wording

History Nov 2009 - DoD Weapon System Acquisition Reform Act (WSARA) & Product Support Assessment Report Product Support Assessment Team (PSAT) IPT #3 Human Capital 06 Sep 2010 - USD (AT&L) DTM 10-015 Requirements for Life Cycle Management and Product Support Jan 2011 - DoD Integrated Product Support Roadmap Tool - Multi-Service Working Group Formed

Requirements Develop and publish a training aid in the form of an: Tasking from IPT #3 Develop and publish a training aid in the form of an: interactive web tool printable wall chart Stated requirements: Interactive web tool – met (training, job aid, resource) Printable wall chart – met (training, job aid, resource) Incorporate new PS competencies into workforce – met via Performance Learning Tool Expand training at DoD and public universities – met via Performance Learning Tool Training products to be centered on tenet of PSBM - met

History (cont.) Nov 2009 WSARA Product Support Assessment (PSA) Human Capital Recommendations: Section 2. Incorporate new or modified product support competencies into DoD and industry logistics and acquisition workforce career field training, recruitment, and retention strategies 2.6 - Build on web-enabled US Army LOGSA Life Cycle Logistics wall chart to develop a “purple” web-enabled "concept-to-disposal" DoD Life Cycle Logistics wall chart

Requirements Tasking from IPT #3 Develop and publish a training aid in the form of an interactive web tool and printable wall chart In support of the following objectives: To incorporate new product support competencies into the DoD acquisition work force Expand integrated life cycle management training at DoD and public universities New training products will be centered on the tenets of the Product Support Business Model Stated requirements: Interactive web tool – met (training, job aid, resource) Printable wall chart – met (training, job aid, resource) Incorporate new PS competencies into workforce – met via Performance Learning Tool Expand training at DoD and public universities – met via Performance Learning Tool Training products to be centered on tenet of PSBM - met

Requirements Goals for the Tool Serve as a standard reference for acquisition & life cycle logistics workforce personnel throughout DoD Incorporated into DAU logistics courses & continuous learning modules Provide current guidance for acquisition program management offices to develop & implement product support strategies Provide a standard reference to design & conduct Independent Logistics Assessments for acquisition programs

PS Roadmap Homepage Include slide with original wording

Printable PS Roadmap Shot of Printable chart Include slide with original wording

Printable PS Roadmap Include slide with original wording

Requirements Project Description Interactive Web page on DAU Portal Will depict sustainment activities and be in a format similar to the AT&L, Life Cycle Management Chart Joint services perspective – activities, processes,& guidance to plan and implement product support throughout each phase of DoD material acquisition life cycle Each activity will link to an informative “article” in the DAU Knowledge base Each “article” will describe the activity, when it is accomplished, responsible entities and reference current regulations and policy guidance Each “article” will also link to best practices, automated tools & other relevant information The chart will be hosted on the DAU Portal It will depict sustainment activities and outputs and be similar to the ILC Chart I depicts a Joint Services perspective Each activity and output links to a metacard that links to available resources (this is much more that an “article”). Resources include the DAU Glossary definition DAG PSM Guidebook LA Guideboo IPS Element Guidebook LCSP Outline ACQuipedia articles Service Specific Links Other

The Team Working Group Representatives: Ms. Mary Ryan - DAU Dr. Teresa Fazio – NAVAIR Mr. Pat Rowe – Army Mr. Gordon Taylor – MARCORSYSCOM Mr. Greg Grejawick – Air Force Ms. Andrea Reese Hurst & Ms. Jennifer Zearley – CSC Technical Support

Tool Resources & References OSD policy/guidance, not limited to but including: DoD 5000.02 DAG PSM Guidebook LA Guidebook LCSP Outline Other applicable references or tools IPS Element Guidebook (DAU) ACQuipedia Articles iGlossary Other functional area tools Service Specific Links Examples of confusing terms: LCSP, Product Support Package, LCMP, ILSMP Gate Reviews are not included because they aren’t mandated across DoD.

The Roadmap Tool 229 Meta Cards 2500+ Knowledge Topics 137 - Glossary definitions 129 - ACQuipedia Articles 220 - DAG Links 85 - PSM Guidebook Links 110 - LA Guidebook Links 103 - IPS Element Guidebook Links 50 - LCSP Outline Links 25 - Policy Links Service Specific Links Numerous other references

The Link https://dap.dau.mil/dodpsroadmap

The Roadmap Tool Rows are aligned with IPS Elements Columns are aligned with acquisition phase Rows & columns reflect relationships among: IPS Elements (activities & outcomes) Major program key events and products Logistics/Program/Technical reviews Milestones Terminology - language used to reflect end-state of product support management DoD Specific Perspective Horizontal will reflect activities and outputs for that element across all phases. Vertical will reflect what is happening in that particular phase for: each element’s activities & outputs what logistic/programmatic/technical reviews are occurring major program key events and products.

Backup Slides

Working Group Established Boundaries 1st level indenture – AT&L Framework Chart 2nd level indenture – Logistics/Sustainment row on “The AT&L Framework Chart” 3rd level of indenture – DoD Integrated Product Support Roadmap Tool “Generic” plans, activities, documents, events 4th Level of indenture – Service specific Logistics processes and charts This is a dated slide showing how we originally were going to integrate with the ILC chart. Due to the unclear future of this chart and the fact that no planned update is coming we chose to disassociate ourselves from this chart. We are now a “stand alone” for Product Support. The PS Roadmap can stand on its own very well and the reconnect to whatever new “charts” are implemented in the future. (written 11 Oct 12).

The Chart Roadmap Columns: Acquisition Phases Activities/Outputs Rows: Integrated Product Support Elements Decision Points/Milestones Logistics/Sustainment Major Program Key Events/Products Logistics/Technical/Program Reviews

Identified Primary Users Product Support Managers Life Cycle Logisticians Program Managers Subject Matter Experts Government & Industry Acquisition Professionals DAU students - resident and online courses, continuous learning modules

Usage Objectives The PSM & Life Cycle Logistician must be knowledgeable about: Activities & Outputs of the IPS Elements during each acquisition phase Activities, Documents, & Decisions they must lead, participate in, write and contribute to Consequences of Integration of IPS Elements Preparation for DAB Milestone Reviews Consequences of Integration – referring to knowledge of the effects on other elements if there is change to one. Preparation for DAB requires Knowledge & Diligence.

The 4th level of indenture. Service specific charts such as, “The Army’s Life Cycle Logistics Chart” (by Pat Rowe). NAVAIR is also doing their own chart. All services have the opportunity to link into the DoD Life Cycle Product Support Chart at this level of indenture. The charts show the logical flow from Integrated Defense Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Life Cycle Management to the DoD Life Cycle Product Support Chart to the service specific Life Cycle charts. The DoD Life Cycle Product Support Chart shows the evolution or incremental implementation of Product Support from: requirements determination to the Material Development Decision, to the analysis of product support strategies, to the selection of a product support strategy, to the development a product support plan, to the testing of the product support plan, to the implementation and fielding of the product support package to the identification of new requirements or major upgrades of declining systems during O&S