An Regional Enemble Kalman Filter Data Assimilation System Employing GSI Observation Processing and Initial Tests for Rapid Refresh Forecast Configurations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lightning data assimilation techniques for convective storm forecasting with application to GOES-R Geostationary Lightning Mapper Alexandre Fierro, Blake.
Advertisements

Adaptation of the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) for hourly cycled application within the Rapid Refresh Ming Hu 1,2, Stan Benjamin 1, Steve.
1 What constrains spread growth in forecasts initialized from ensemble Kalman filters? Tom Hamill (& Jeff Whitaker) NOAA Earth System Research Lab Boulder,
CHOICES FOR HURRICANE REGIONAL ENSEMBLE FORECAST (HREF) SYSTEM Zoltan Toth and Isidora Jankov.
Rapid Refresh and RTMA. RUC: AKA-Rapid Refresh A major issue is how to assimilate and use the rapidly increasing array of off-time or continuous observations.
The 2014 Warn-on-Forecast and High-Impact Weather Workshop
Experiments with Assimilation of Fine Aerosols using GSI and EnKF with WRF-Chem (on the need of assimilating satellite observations) Mariusz Pagowski Georg.
Convection-permitting forecasts initialized with continuously-cycling limited-area 3DVAR, EnKF and “hybrid” data assimilation systems Craig Schwartz and.
Assimilating Sounding, Surface and Profiler Observations with a WRF-based EnKF for An MCV Case during BAMEX Zhiyong Meng & Fuqing Zhang Texas A&M University.
Performance Characteristics of a Pseudo-operational Ensemble Kalman Filter April 2006, EnKF Wildflower Meeting Greg Hakim & Ryan Torn University of Washington.
1 Comparison of GSI-based ETKF, LETKF and DART-EnKF Hybrids from the MMM Regional Hybrid Testbed Arthur P. Mizzi NCAR/MMM HFIP Ensemble.
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System Cliff Mass, Dave Ovens, Jeff Baars, Mark Albright, Phil Regulski, Dave Carey University of Washington.
Background Tropopause theta composites Summary Development of TPVs is greatest in the Baffin Island vicinity in Canada, with development possibly having.
Real-time WRF EnKF 36km outer domain/4km nested domain 36km outer domain/4km nested domain D1 (36km) D2 (4km)
Brian Ancell, Cliff Mass, Gregory J. Hakim University of Washington
Advanced data assimilation methods- EKF and EnKF Hong Li and Eugenia Kalnay University of Maryland July 2006.
Lili Lei1,2, David R. Stauffer1 and Aijun Deng1
Francesca Marcucci, Lucio Torrisi with the contribution of Valeria Montesarchio, ISMAR-CNR CNMCA, National Meteorological Center,Italy First experiments.
WWOSC 2014 Assimilation of 3D radar reflectivity with an Ensemble Kalman Filter on a convection-permitting scale WWOSC 2014 Theresa Bick 1,2,* Silke Trömel.
“1995 Sunrise Fire – Long Island” Using an Ensemble Kalman Filter to Explore Model Performance on Northeast U.S. Fire Weather Days Michael Erickson and.
A Radar Data Assimilation Experiment for COPS IOP 10 with the WRF 3DVAR System in a Rapid Update Cycle Configuration. Thomas Schwitalla Institute of Physics.
Ensemble-variational sea ice data assimilation Anna Shlyaeva, Mark Buehner, Alain Caya, Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Research Jean-Francois.
EnKF Overview and Theory
ISDA 2014, Feb 24 – 28, Munich 1 Impact of ensemble perturbations provided by convective-scale ensemble data assimilation in the COSMO-DE model Florian.
Computational Issues: An EnKF Perspective Jeff Whitaker NOAA Earth System Research Lab ENIAC 1948“Roadrunner” 2008.
MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.
Development of an EnKF/Hybrid Data Assimilation System for Mesoscale Application with the Rapid Refresh Ming Hu 1,2, Yujie Pan 3, Kefeng Zhu 3, Xuguang.
Vaisala/University of Washington Real-observation Experiments Vaisala/University of Washington Real-observation Experiments Clifford Mass, Gregory Hakim,
AMB Verification and Quality Control monitoring Efforts involving RAOB, Profiler, Mesonets, Aircraft Bill Moninger, Xue Wei, Susan Sahm, Brian Jamison.
Sensitivity Analysis of Mesoscale Forecasts from Large Ensembles of Randomly and Non-Randomly Perturbed Model Runs William Martin November 10, 2005.
11 Background Error Daryl T. Kleist* National Monsoon Mission Scoping Workshop IITM, Pune, India April 2011.
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA) Jimy Dudhia.
Development and Testing of a Regional GSI-Based EnKF-Hybrid System for the Rapid Refresh Configuration Yujie Pan 1, Kefeng Zhu 1, Ming Xue 1,2, Xuguang.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Vertical localization issues in LETKF Breogan Gomez, Andreas Rhodin, Hendrik Reich.
NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center & *Environmental Modeling Center Camp Springs, MD Impact of High-Frequency Variability of Soil Moisture on Seasonal.
MCS Introduction Where? Observed reflectivity at 3km from
Statistical Post Processing - Using Reforecast to Improve GEFS Forecast Yuejian Zhu Hong Guan and Bo Cui ECM/NCEP/NWS Dec. 3 rd 2013 Acknowledgements:
Implementation and Testing of 3DEnVAR and 4DEnVAR Algorithms within the ARPS Data Assimilation Framework Chengsi Liu, Ming Xue, and Rong Kong Center for.
DRAFT – Page 1 – January 14, 2016 Development of a Convective Scale Ensemble Kalman Filter at Environment Canada Luc Fillion 1, Kao-Shen Chung 1, Monique.
Influence of Assimilating Satellite- Derived High-resolution data on Analyses and Forecasts of Tropical Cyclone Track and Structure: A case study of Sinlaku.
NCAR April 1 st 2003 Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Data Assimilation in AMPS Dale Barker S. Rizvi, and M. Duda MMM Division, NCAR
Current modification gridinfo.f90Add new subroutine: getgridinfo_reg --- calculate the pressure in each sigma level and the virture temperature gridio.f90Add.
MPO 674 Lecture 2 1/20/15. Timeline (continued from Class 1) 1960s: Lorenz papers: finite limit of predictability? 1966: First primitive equations model.
A Random Subgrouping Scheme for Ensemble Kalman Filters Yun Liu Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland Atmospheric and oceanic.
Assimilation of AIRS SFOV Profiles in the Rapid Refresh Rapid Refresh domain Haidao Lin Ming Hu Steve Weygandt Stan Benjamin Assimilation and Modeling.
MODIS Winds Assimilation Impact Study with the CMC Operational Forecast System Réal Sarrazin Data Assimilation and Quality Control Canadian Meteorological.
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC. RUC A major issue is how to assimilate and use the rapidly increasing array of offtime or continuous observations (not a 00.
LOCAL ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER (LETKF) ANALYSIS OF LOOP CURRENT & EDDY IN THE GULF OF MEXICO Fanghua Xu 1, Leo Oey 1, Yasumasa Miyazawa 2, Peter Hamilton.
Demonstration and Comparison of Sequential Approaches for Altimeter Data Assimilation in HYCOM A. Srinivasan, E. P. Chassignet, O. M. Smedstad, C. Thacker,
Xiujuan Su 1, John Derber 2, Jaime Daniel 3,Andrew Collard 1 1: IMSG, 2: EMC/NWS/NOAA, 3.NESDIS Assimilation of GOES hourly shortwave and visible AMVs.
Multi-scale Analysis and Prediction of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Tornadic Supercell Storm Assimilating Radar and Surface Network Data using EnKF Ting.
Progress in development of HARMONIE 3D-Var and 4D-Var Contributions from Magnus Lindskog, Roger Randriamampianina, Ulf Andrae, Ole Vignes, Carlos Geijo,
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC
Tadashi Fujita (NPD JMA)
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2013
Jianyu Liang (York U.) Yongsheng Chen (York U.) Zhiquan Liu (NCAR)
BACY = Basic Cycling A COSMO Data Assimilation Testbed for Research and Development Roland Potthast, Hendrik Reich, Christoph Schraff, Klaus.
University of Washington Ensemble Systems for Probabilistic Analysis and Forecasting Cliff Mass, Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington.
Coupled atmosphere-ocean simulation on hurricane forecast
background error covariance matrices Rescaled EnKF Optimization
Vertical localization issues in LETKF
Presented by: David Groff NOAA/NCEP/EMC IM Systems Group
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC Rapid Refresh-RR High Resolution Rapid Refresh-HRRR RTMA.
CAPS Real-time Storm-Scale EnKF Data Assimilation and Forecasts for the NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Forecasting Experiments: Towards the Goal.
Lidia Cucurull, NCEP/JCSDA
Real-time WRF EnKF 36km outer domain/4km nested domain D1 (36km)
Comparison of different combinations of ensemble-based and variational data assimilation approaches for deterministic NWP Mark Buehner Data Assimilation.
NWP Strategy of DWD after 2006 GF XY DWD Feb-19.
Lightning Assimilation Techniques
Project Team: Mark Buehner Cecilien Charette Bin He Peter Houtekamer
Presentation transcript:

An Regional Enemble Kalman Filter Data Assimilation System Employing GSI Observation Processing and Initial Tests for Rapid Refresh Forecast Configurations Kefeng Zhu, Yujie Pan, Xue Ming and Xuguang Wang CAPS

Code development status EnKFv1----we modified the global EnSRF code from Dr. Jeff Whitaker of ESRL and linked this EnSRF package with the regional GSI for RR application. EnKFv2---- we merged regional EnKF with the latest global EnKF, by moving codes specific to regional EnKF into a unified version. And a new flag ‘iflagreg’ was added to control the regional analysis option. In this unified version, the variables updated during the regional EnKF assimilation were x-component wind (U), y-component wind (V), potential temperature (T), perturbation geopotential (PH, not used in the previous EnKFv1), water vapor mixing ratio (Q) and perturbation dry air mass in column (Mu). EnKFv3----instead of interpolating the U and V to the A grid during the EnKF analysis process, we keep the U and V in the original C grids

~13km Rapid Refresh(RR) Diabatic integration Full physics integration

Verification followed

EnSRF EnSRF—RR RUC EnKF Test Domain 207x207 grid points ~40 km, 51 levels The 13 km RR-like forecast Domain 532x532 grid points ~13 km, 51 levels Current RUC Domain as indicated Domains

Experiment flowchart

ADPSFC SFCSHP ADPSFC 280/ / / / ADPUPA SFCSHP 282 ADPUPA 220/120 Observation type used for verification Surface: Land ,281,284 (U,V) 187,181,184 (RH,T,PRMSL) Sea---280,282 (U,V) 180 (RH,T,PRMSL) Up air: 220,221,223 (U,V) 120 (RH,T,PRMSL) Quality mark: 2 PROFLR 223

ExperimentSimple covariance State-dependentHorizontal (km) EnKFnofixA02L0 6 b=0c=0.2r cut =600 EnKFfixA02L06b=0.2c=0.2r cut =600 EnKFfixA09L12b=0.2c=0.9r cut =1200 GSI Inflation factors and horizontal cutoff radius configuration test Note: Here the EnKF comes from the 40 members 3-h forecast ensemble mean; GSI is a single deterministic forecast. The verification period are from 00 UTC May 8 ~ 06 UTC May 16, There are 66 samples collected for the observation type ADPSFC, SFCSHP, PROFLR, but 16 samples for the ADPUPA

Horizontal and vertical localization factor where

Inflation algorithms Simple covariance State-dependent covariance inflation Double inflation taper(r)

RH---ADPUPA T---ADPUPA V---ADPUPA U---ADPUPA U---PROFLR V---PROFLR

ExperimentSimple covariance State- dependent VerticalHorizontal (km) EnKFLn20VHb=0.2c=0.9lncut=2.0r cut =1200*500/p ob EnKFLn12VObb=0.2c=0.9lncut=1.2Varies with ob type EnKFLn11VObHb=0.2c=0.9lncut=1.1 lncutps=1.5 Varies with ob type and height GSI Vertical and horizontal cutoff radius setting test Note: Here the EnKF comes from the 40 members 3-h forecast ensemble mean; GSI is a single deterministic forecast. The verification period are from 00 UTC May 8 ~ 06 UTC May 16, There are 66 samples collected for the observation type ADPSFC, SFCSHP, PROFLR, but 16 samples for the ADPUPA

RH---ADPUPA T---ADPUPA V---ADPUPA U---ADPUPA U---PROFLR V---PROFLR

CasenameDFI setting VerticalHorizontal (km) EnKFdfi20m40sBackward 20m Forward 10m dfi_cutoff_seconds=3600s time_step_dfi=40s lncut=1.1 lncutps=1.5 Varies with ob type and height EnKFdfi40m60sBackward 40m Forward 20m dfi_cutoff_seconds=3600s time_step_dfi=60s lncut=1.2 lncutps=1.2 Varies with ob type EnKFdfi40m40sBackward 40m Forward 20m dfi_cutoff_seconds=2800s time_step_dfi=40s lncut=1.2 lncutps=2.0 Varies with ob type GSIBackward 20m Forward 10m dfi_cutoff_seconds=3600s time_step_dfi=40s DFI setting test

EnKFdfi20m40s3600s/GSI/GFSEnKFdfi40m60s3600s EnKFdfi40m40s2800s

RH---ADPUPA T---ADPUPA V---ADPUPA U---ADPUPA U---PROFLR V---PROFLR

land sea Surface verification: The plots above are the average forecasts innovation of single forecast from ensemble mean analyses for the time period from 00UTC May 8 to 03 UTC May 16, The cycle interval is 3 hours. Totally, there are 66 samples for this statistic. Up air verification: since the observation of ADPUPA are only available at 00, 12 Z. Therefore, for the vertical profile followed, we average the 12 hour forecasts innovation from 00, 12Z. There are totally 17 samples. Longer hour single forecast from ensemble mean analyses

Temperature at 2m-LandTemperature at 2m-Sea RH at 2m-Land RH at 2m-Sea

U at 10m-LandU at 10m-Sea V at 10m-Land V at 10m-Sea

3h 6h9h 12h15h 18h RH

3h 6h9h 12h15h 18h Tmperature

3h 6h9h 12h15h 18h UGRD---ADPUPA

3h 6h9h 12h15h 18h VGRD---ADPUPA

3h 6h9h 12h15h 18h UGRD---PROFLR

3h 6h9h 12h15h 18h VGRD---PROFLR

13 km Verification followed Against Stage IV---GSS(ETS)

GSS (ETS) scores

00~12 UTC May 10,2010 Stage IV 00~12 UTC May 11, ~12 UTC May 13,2010 GSI based forecastEnKF based forecast