The Northwest Georgia Science Education Partnership Mathematics and Science Partnership (MSP) Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda - January 28, 2009 Professional Learning Community – Jefferson HS Learning by Doing What does the data tell us? ITED results SIP Goals Data Questions.
Advertisements

A Guide to Implementation
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
Provisions for Training and Professional Development 1 Florida Digital Instructional Materials Work Group November 13, 2012.
Collaborative Evaluation Communities in Urban Schools.
District Professional Development Collaboratively Learning About Our New Curriculum April 20, 2012.
Action Research Opportunity Or Research Based Action.
ESTEEMS (ESTablishing Excellence in Education of Mathematics and Science) Project Overview and Evaluation Dr. Deborah H. Cook, Director, NJ SSI MSP Regional.
School Improvement Plan Results & Next Steps December, 2009 Central Elementary School Home of the Eagles.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
PISA Partnership to Improve Student Achievement through Real World Learning in Engineering, Science, Mathematics and Technology.
Teacher Professional Development Programs in Grades 3-8: Promoting Teachers’ and Students’ Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering Beth McGrath &
Student Growth Goals Professional Learning Jenny Ray, PGES Consultant (KDE) 1.
1 Developing an Evaluation Plan _____________________ The Mathematically- Connected Communities MSP Developed for the February, MSP Conference Dr.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
June 19 th – PLC Day June 19 th – PLC Day Year In Review – Year In Preview District Road Map District Road Map TPEP Early Release Collaboration Early Release.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Mathematics and Science Partnership (MSP) Colleton County Middle School and Clemson University Department of Mathematical Sciences PDI 2 Professional Development.
Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Establishing a Culture of Mathematics Learning in Urban Schools Syracuse City School District / Syracuse University Partnership Beyond Access to Math Achievement.
THE DRAGON CONNECTION March Who are we?  Jefferson City Schools  Small, rural school district 60 miles north of Atlanta, 18 miles north of the.
St. Cloud Partnership in Mathematics Grant Presented by: Jona Deavel, Math Coach/7-8 th Grade Math Teacher and Jenny Merriam, Grant Coordinator.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
District Professional Development Collaboratively Learning About Our New Curriculum April 20, 2012.
Data Teams. Which comes first – the data or the team?
Using Understanding by Design
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Using SEC Data for Program Evaluation Report on SEC Data Analysis for a State MSP.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
PRIMES Partnerships and Research Investigations with Mathematicians, Engineers, and Scientists Professional Development Model MSP Regional Meeting February.
Georgia Performance Standards Curriculum Directors Conference September 20, 2006.
Tim Brower Professor & Chair Manufacturing & Mechanical Engr. Oregon Institute of Technology MSP Regional Meeting, San Francisco, February 14 & 15, 2008.
Professional Development is aligned to your district’s initiatives and tailored to your districts current needs. Our modules are designed to  Deepen.
Research and Evaluation Team Lines of Work Andy Porter, Director Building a Partnership – Susan Millar District Case Studies – William Clune Targeted Studies.
Professional Development in Challenged Environments Project: Making Mathematics Matter (PM³) A Model for Effective PD Conversations Among Colleagues March.
Challenges and Trade-offs in Measuring the Outcomes of NSF’s Mathematics and Science Partnership Program: Lessons from four years on the learning curve.
Intel ® Math William McCallum Institute for Mathematics and Education January 12, 2010 “Education and Innovation will be the currency of the 21 st century.”
Career Academic Technical Institute (CATI) Division of Career-Technical Education TN State Department of Education 25th NACTEI New Orleans, 2005.
CURRICULUM RENEWAL EDD 7913 CRN BY JAMIE LEEDER, GENEVIEVE LEYDIG, KEITH MABE NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY APRIL 4, 2013.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
South Jersey Math/Science Partnership at Rowan University Dr. Eric Milou Dr. Jill Perry SJMP.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Lenoir STEM Learning Community. Just the facts, ma’am… 0 What is Lenoir STEM? A program funded by MSP grant with additional financial support from industry.
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Mathematics and Science Partnership (CaMSP) Grant.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
An Introduction to Co-Teaching for Professional Development Schools:
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
A Productive Partnership
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Presentation transcript:

The Northwest Georgia Science Education Partnership Mathematics and Science Partnership (MSP) Program

Project Objectives The specific objectives of the project are to 1) provide teachers with intensive professional learning experiences that build science content knowledge 2) improve teacher attitudes and confidence in implementing inquiry-based science units 3) provide teachers with differentiation and multiple assessment strategies 4) establish a professional learning community that will immerse teachers in supportive, sustained, professional learning experiences

Partnering Institutions

Project Management Team

InstitutesDescription Phase 1 Content-Focused Inquiry Institute: Curiosity and the Core Ideas of Science Introduction to inquiry, core science ideas, learning cycle approach, and backward design. Technology-Enhanced Professional Learning Communities: Using Technology to Improve Science Learning Establish professional learning communities and communication frameworks, integrate technology into science instruction. Our Professional Learning Initiative will take place in four developmental phases where participants complete eight interrelated (20 hour) science institutes. While each institute will have its own unique identity and objectives, their focus will converge on the overall goal of improving student achievement in science. Overview of Action Plan: Four Phases, Eight Institutes

Target Schools and Students: Schools not making AYP and students showing greatest needs Which students are neediest? When the data is disaggregated, it indicates that high percentages of certain subgroups (Blacks, Hispanics, Students with Disabilities, Limited English Proficient Students, and Economically Disadvantaged Students) did not meet the basic standards for achievement in science

What content is needed? Least Comfortable Science Discipline to Teach Self-assessment surveys point to a distinct area of need – physical science. Nearly two-thirds (63%) of our teachers reported that physical science was the discipline of science that they felt least confident in teaching.

What content is being taught The GPS’s and National Science Standards will serve as a guiding framework to focus science instruction on big ideas, enduring understandings, and essential questions. Our content institutes will focus on building our teachers understanding of 4 th physical science concepts – the area of science where student achievement is lowest and the area our teachers reported being the least comfortable in teaching.

Data used to for evidence of effectiveness of content institutes Evaluation Question Type of Data 1. Has student achievement improved? Criterion Referenced Science Tests (CRCT) 2. Has teacher content knowledge improved? Pre and Post Content Tests (MOSART) Teacher reflections 3. Have teacher attitudes toward science improved? Science Attitudes Inventory Institute Evaluations

Northwest MSP Summer Institute 4 th Grade North Cohort Evaluations

Northwest MSP Summer Institute 5 th Grade South Cohort Evaluations

Northwest MSP Summer Institute 8 th Grade South Cohort Evaluations

Most Effective Portion of Institutes

Suggested Improvements

Challenges faced by project leaders when teaching core content It is ineffective to separate the content from the pedagogy It is a challenge to find enough effective teacher leaders during the academic year It is difficult to find/develop 160 hours of quality training for each grade level

Lessons learned so far The success of the project depends on the quality of your lead teachers. The content must be embedded within hands- on lessons that are grade level specific and aligned with state performance standards Teachers appreciate being treated professionally with care Teachers need the time and materials to actually do and then discuss each lesson.

Support and professional development of STEM faculty We need to value science education programs and innovations as much as we value pure science programs and innovations We need to help STEM faculty adjust their teaching and materials to make them more effective for k-12 teachers We need to pair STEM faculty with experienced classroom teachers so that they can co-plan, co-teach, and co-llaborate.

Sample student pre-test results Q: Name the four seasons. A: Salt, pepper, mustard, and vinegar Q: Explain one of the processes by which water can be made safe to drink. A: Flirtation makes the water safe to drink because it removes large pollutants like grit, sand, dead sheep, and canoeists. Q. What does the word “benign” mean? A. Benign is what you will be after you be eight.

Disclaimer The instructional practices and assessments discussed or shown in these presentations are not intended as an endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education".