April 10, 2007 Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I-95 HOT/HOV Lanes Project Fairfax County TAC August 16, 2011.
Advertisements

1 I-95/395 HOV/Bus/HOT Lanes April Current Status Project Sections Military Corridor Improving Transit & HOV Other Issues Agenda 2.
Parsons Brinckerhoff Chicago, Illinois GIS Estimation of Transit Access Parameters for Mode Choice Models GIS in Transit Conference October 16-17, 2013.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
Significant Additions and Changes to the 2014 Update to the CLRP Access for All Advisory Committee July 24, 2014.
How can we relieve congestion in the I-95 corridor? I-95 Congestion Relief Study.
A Toll Choice Probability Model Application to Examine Travel Demand at Express and Electronic Toll Lanes in Maryland.
February 26, 2012 Managed Lanes Overview Dr. Adrian Moore Vice President Reason Foundation
A National County-Level Long Distance Travel Model Mike Chaney, AICP Tian Huang, PE, AICP, PTOE Binbin Chen, AICP 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning.
THE PLANET99 MODEL DEMAND AND REVENUE FORECASTING TOOL FOR RAIL OPERATORS 8th EUROPEAN EMME/2 USERS CONFERENCE Jeremy Douch GIBB Transport Planning May.
Developing a Regional Express Lane Network Hercules City Council Meeting April 28, 2009 Doug Kimsey MTC Planning Director.
Davie Road/S.R. 84 Transit Facility Demand Estimation Presented by Jeff Weidner & Jeremy Mullings Florida Department of Transportation Yongqiang Wu & Kasey.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
Presentation to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Peggy Catlin, Deputy Executive Director.
11 May, 2011 Discrete Choice Models and Behavioral Response to Congestion Pricing Strategies Prepared for: The TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. TRB Applications Conference – Freight Committee May 7, 2013.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas presented by John (Jay) Evans, P.E., AICP Cambridge.
AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS OF THE 2013 CONSTRAINED LONG RANGE PLAN & FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DRAFT June 13, 2013 Transportation.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
I-95 Transit & TDM Plan I-95 Transit and TDM Plan I-95 Corridor Stakeholder and Service Provider Meeting #2 June 13, 2011.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
TRB Transportation Applications Conference Congestion-Free Freeways US Department of Transportation Establishing a Metropolitan.
Convergence of Transportation Policy and RFID Enabler of Future Transportation Policy Chris Body Mark IV Vice President, Business Development.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Modeling HOT Lanes TPB’s Approach AMPO Travel Modeling Group March 21, 2006 I:\ateam\meetings_conf\ampo_tms\ \Hot_Lane_Pres_to_AMPO_Final.ppt.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
February 8, 2008 SERPM65 vs. SERPM6-Corradino 1 SERPM-6.5 & SERPM-6: Differences & Future Directions Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12 th Annual TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
EMME/2 Conference Gautrain Rapid Rail Link: Forecasting Diversion from Car to Rail 8 September 2004 Presented by Johan De Bruyn.
Dynamic Tolling Assignment Model for Managed Lanes presented to Advanced Traffic Assignment Sub-Committee presented by Jim Hicks, Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Enhancement and Validation of a Managed-Lane Subarea Network Tolling Forecast Model May 19, 2005 Stephen Tuttle (RSG), Jeff Frkonja (Portland Metro), Jack.
FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Bill.
Comparative Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Risks Associated with Priced Facilities 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
SHRPII C04: TEG Meeting, Washington, DC - January 14, 2010 Results today based primarily on three data sources… Seattle 2006 household travel survey (RP)
Modeling Various Tolling Schemes Using Emme: Seattle Experience Andrew Natzel, Parsons Brinckerhoff Bhanu Yerra, Parsons Brinckerhoff Craig Helmann, Puget.
11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, Validation of Speeds and Volumes in a Large Regional Model Southeast.
Prince William County Potomac River Commuter Ferry Study & Route Proving Exercise A Summary of Project Purpose and Results Presented by: Charles “Cody”
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Board Transportation Committee December 1, 2015 Randy.
I-680 Value Pricing: A HOT Lane Demonstration Project of “Smart Carpool Lanes” Sponsor: Alameda County Congestion Management Agency 2003 Sponsor: Alameda.
Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.
A Sketch Planning Assessment of Managed-Lane Options for the I-5 Freeway Corridor Master Plan William R. Loudon, DKS Associates.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
1 Forecasting Traffic for a Start-Up Toll Road 12 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference May 18, 2009 David Schellinger, P.E. Vice.
1 Toll Modeling Analysis for the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project 19 th Annual International EMME/2 Users’ Conference October 19-21, 2005 Presented.
May 9, th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference – Session 18 1 IMPROVING CONSISTENCY BETWEEN TRANSIT PATH- BUILDING AND MODE.
Garden State Parkway HOT Lanes By Matt Lawson October 14, 2010.
The Partnership between Transportation and Technology Jennifer Mitchell, Director Department of Rail and Public Transportation ITSVA Conference.
Using Public-Private Partnerships to Move More People The Story of HOT Lanes in Northern Virginia January 30, 2017 Morteza Farajian, Ph.D.
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Slugging in the I-395 Corridor
Board Transportation Committee October 13, 2015
Charles “Cody” Smith, PE
Interstate 95 Corridor Improvement Plan
Presentation transcript:

April 10, 2007 Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada May 8-12, 2011 Presented by: Jaesup Lee, Virginia Department of Transportation Paul Agnello, Virginia Department of Transportation Patrick Coleman, AECOM

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Overview 1.Project under consideration 2.Potential travel markets for new facility 3.Forecasting tool (soon to be) available 4.Potential Forecasting Methodology 5.Questions

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Proposed Project South of US 17 in Spotsylvania County to just south of Route 234 in Prince William County Proposed to operate as HOV (and Bus)/HOT facility Overlaps/connects with I- 95 HOV/Bus/HOT Lanes project (to DC area) Source: USDOT/FHWA/VDOT, Environmental Assessment, I-95 HOV/Bus/HOT Lanes Project, August 2010

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference The project, con’t. Two-lane, reversible, limited access express route in I-95 median Buses, HOV-3, and motorcycles travel free Electronic tolling (EZPASS) for other users – rate could vary by time of day, travel speed, etc. Conceptual operations plan: Midnight to 10 am – northbound 10 am to noon – closed for switchover Noon to 10 pm – southbound 10 pm to midnight – closed for switchover Source: USDOT/FHWA/VDOT, Environmental Assessment, I-95 HOV/Bus/HOT Lanes Project, August 2010

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Potential Travel Market- Person Trips to DC Core Source: 2009 NHTS Virginia Add On Version 2 I-95 Project Year 2009 Average Weekday Person Trips

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Potential Travel Market - Travel to DC Core by Transit Virginia Railway Express (VRE) Fredericksburg Line Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission (PRTC) Commuter Buses Source: 2007 VRE On Board Survey Source: 2008 MWCOG Regional Bus Survey Other private commuter bus operators

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Slug Travel Market (We’re not talking Mollusks)! Source: Unique to DC area (and maybe SF) Casual carpools Pick up/drop off at designated areas Free ride, drivers get HOV access “Slug” coined by bus operators – similar to counterfeit tokens

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Slugs, con’t. Source: SIR/VDOT, Survey of Northern Virginia Sluggers, January 2011

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference The Tool - Fredericksburg Area MPO (FAMPO) model Current Version (3) Assigns highway trips to three time periods (AM Peak, PM Peak, Off Peak) Models HOT lanes using a diversion curve from I-394 MnPass project Contains a process to estimate Virginia Railway Express (VRE) commuter rail trips from Fredericksburg to Washington, DC area No full mode choice Version 4 under development Part of VDOT Major Models Update plan Updated trip generation/distribution using NHTS Virginia Add On Final highway assignment in four time periods (AM Peak, Midday, PM Peak, Night) Revised volume-delay functions (and forecast tolling methodology)

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference More FAMPO model enhancements Expanded model area to include the southern Prince William County region below the Occoquan River. The zones, nodes and links are from the NCRTPB model network (v2.2 with 2191 zones) and renumbered Select link analysis procedures in the NCRTPB model to obtain the additional trip flows from/to southern Prince William County Transit networks coded and skim procedures set up for the “regular” transit (FRED buses and VRE feeders) and “commuter” transit (PRTC, MARTZ, QUICK and VRE routes). Full mode choice models Internal trip purposes (FRED Routes) Commuter (HBW IE) trip purpose (travel on I-95 corridor to DC area) CUBE Scripts and catalogs consistent with other VDOT models

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Fredericksburg Expanded Model Area

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Updated Fredericksburg Highway Network

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Potential Forecasting Methodology No existing toll facility in immediate area No available Stated Preference (SP) survey in corridor Current FAMPO model uses toll diversion curve on experience in Minnesota (SP data from I-394 MnPASS Express Lanes) New model will use a logit-type assignment based procedure start with South Florida SP data addresses differing values of time constants to capture reliability and other unquantifiable aspects

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Toll Choice Model from South Florida Source: RSG, Documentation for South Florida SP Travel Survey and Toll Mode Choice Models, July 2006

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference $5 toll comparison between MSP and South Florida Illustrates differing VOTs by region For 20 minute savings 20% toll in MSP but 30% in South Florida Source: AECOM

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Potential Implementation in Fredericksburg Coefficients: Transfer Palm Beach coefficients to the FAMPO model Adjust cost coefficients to reflect differences in income between Palm Beach County and Fredericksburg Examine Dulles Toll Road SP survey for more localized VOTs Constants: Not transferable due to unique nature of travel in South Florida No existing facility in Fredericksburg for calibration Use a relatively close Peer facility to do a simple “calibration” in a spreadsheet Careful testing to ensure any modeled results are reasonable

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Dulles Greenway – potential peer facility 12.5 mile privately owned toll road in Northern Virginia Connects end of Dulles (Airport) Toll Road with the Leesburg Bypass (U.S. 15/SR 7) Best regional candidate because of “base” and “congestion management” toll rates and electronic (EZPASS) discounts similar to many HOT lanes

Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Questions?