A Successful Collaboration Among Systems : El Paso County Family Treatment Drug Court: A Program Model Putting the Pieces Together: 1 st National Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustaining Ohios Waiver Reforms: Possibilities & Challenges 12 th Annual CW Demonstration Projects Meeting, June 2008 Human Services Research Institute.
Advertisements

To Eliminate Poverty and Family Violence in El Paso County.
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
On The Right Track Multiple Response System (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) North Carolina’s Child Welfare Reform Model 1, 2008.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Presentation.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
Denver Family Integrated Drug Court
El Paso County COMMUNITY CUSTODY PROGRAM AN OVERVIEW Originally Presented to EPC Board of County Commissioners November 14, 2002 CCP.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
“It’s All About the Data” The Interface of Evaluation, Program Development, and Partnership to Address Substance Abuse and Reduce Child Abuse and Neglect.
Tribal & State Partnership Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs.
Sustainability and Impact OMHSAS Children’s Bureau of Behavioral Health Services August 16, 2012 Presentation to OMHSAS Children’s Advisory Committee.
Karen L. Mapp, Ed.D. Deputy Superintendent, Boston Public Schools
Common Ground One Approach, Many Adaptations Juanita Blount-Clark August, 2011.
Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Family Dependency Treatment Court An Introduction.
Multiple Response System (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) North Carolina’s Child Welfare Reform Model The North Carolina Foster and Adoptive Parent Association.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
Heading Home Hennepin: The Ten-Year Plan to End Homelessness in Minneapolis and Hennepin County Presented by: the Hennepin County and City of Minneapolis.
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies American Society of Criminology November 16, 2011.
The Norfolk Hotline and the Homeless Action Response Team (HART) Presentation by Jill Baker Norfolk Department of Human Services.
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 6: Reentry.
Family Court Mediation and Counselling Service of Western Australia 1 The Columbus Program and its impact on the Family Court of Western Australia Kay.
Creating a “Work- Ready” Supportive Housing Environment Wendy M. Coco Senior Program Manager Corporation for Supportive Housing June
The 10 Key Components of Veteran’s Treatment Court Presented by: The Honorable Robert Russell.
Veterans Healthcare Administration Detroit VA Medical Center
It is the mission of Options and Advocacy to enhance and protect the lives of children and adults with disabilities. Options and Advocacy for McHenry County.
Preventing Family Crisis Finding the Assistance that your Family Needs.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
A Framework to Guide Full Service Partnerships for Adults Maria Funk, Ph.D. Mental Health Clinical District Chief ASOC Countywide Programs Los Angeles.
Polk County Family Drug Court The Honorable Karla Fultz Todd Beveridge, M.S.W., M.S.
I am for the child ™ A new initiative to fight for the rights of neglected and abused children. I am for the child ™ A new initiative to fight for the.
Making RBS Happen in the Bay Area Establishing a Regional Child and Family Reconnection Resource.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
RISK AND NEED TRACKS SAMHSA 2013 Orleans Parish Drug Court Expansion Grant.
Cathy Worthem, MSW Joyce Washburn, MPA BFSS, May 2011 Phoenix, AZ.
Stemming the Tides Minnesota’s Child Maltreatment Prevention Programs Seventh Annual Citizen Review Panel Conference May 22, 2008 Brenda Lockwood, MN Dept.
Addressing Maternal Depression Healthy Start Interconception Care Learning Collaborative Kimberly Deavers, MPH U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
 Performance assessments can:  help identify potential problems in the program  help identify areas where streamlining the process could be useful.
Children’s Mental Health & Family Services Collaboratives ~ Minnesota’s Vision ~
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Skills for Success Program Savenia Falquist Youth Development Coordinator Jefferson County Juvenile Officer July 14, 2005.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Maine DHHS, Office of Child and Family Services 1 Reinstatement of Parental Rights Policy Effective 2/1/2012.
PL THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING FAMILIES ACT WASHINGTON STATE'S RESPONSE TO THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Behavioral Health Integration of Services for Justice Involved Clients Veronica Kelley, LCSW Assistant Director San Bernardino County.
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
CROW WING COUNTY PROBATION SERVICES TASK FORCE Presented by Central Minnesota Community Corrections.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
4 th Judicial District Family Reunification Grant April 27, 2011 Colorado State Drug Court Conference.
Purpose Of Training: To guide Clinicians in the completion of screens and development of Alternative Community Service Plans.
Problem Solving Courts Bench Bar Conference Double Tree Hotel April 20, rd Judicial District Court of Common Pleas – Berks County.
1 A Program funded through a five-year cooperative agreement with Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’s.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Wraparound Oregon Designing a coordinated service system for children, youth and their families.
BY: Honorable Robert S. Anchondo
Presentation transcript:

A Successful Collaboration Among Systems : El Paso County Family Treatment Drug Court: A Program Model Putting the Pieces Together: 1 st National Conference on Substance Abuse, Child Welfare and Dependency Court July 14 – 15, 2004 Baltimore, MD Julia L. Polland, MA, LPC, CACIII Savio Child Protection Coordinator Shirley Rhodus, MSW EPC DHS Child Protection Administrator

Welcome and Introductions Who’s In The Room? Name… System… Job Responsibility… Expectations…

CONFERENCE LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Participants Will… Learn How Three Major Systems Came Together To Develop an Integrative and Creative Program With Limited Fiscal Resources Learn the Structure of El Paso County’s Family Treatment Drug Court Including: –Program Design –Graduated Sanctions Learn How to Manage Child Safety and Risk with The Substance Abusing Population Learn About Developing, Collecting and Using Outcome Data Have the Opportunity to Ask Questions

The Road Map

El Paso County Recognized a Need For Specialized Services For Substance Involved Families –Many Children Were Entering Foster Care and Not Returning Home –Fragmented Response to Cases By All Systems Involved Initial Work Group –Financial Situation Stopped Meetings –Brought in Savio Direct Link –Identified Joint Service Management Partners 4 th Judicial District, DHS, TANF, Savio and Connect Care

Reasoning Behind Building The Partnership Why Each System Was Identified and Brought to the Table Each System Was Asked to Bring Resources –Connect Care – Dedicated a Staff Member –TANF – Assigned a Worker –DHS – Re-Assigned Staff –Savio – Had the Model, Hired and Trained Staff –Court – Dedicated Docket Time

Joint Service Management Requires Different Participation by Each Member Traditionally Services are Fragmented JSM Partners are Jointly Responsible for…. –Program Design and Development –Continuous Quality Improvement –Case and Program Outcomes –Collection and Reporting of Data Doing Business Differently…

Making It Work Systemic Problems We Addressed Head On –Some of the JSM Partners were Competitors – This Was Shift In Their Relationship –Getting Judicial On Board – Changing Standard Practice –Developing Trust and Cooperation Within The Treatment Team Setting a Start Date –Ready, Start, Aim… –It’s Important Not To Just Plan Forever – Nothing Would Ever Start

Entrance Criteria Referred Through DHS Intake Substance Abuse Primary Concern One Child Under the Age of 12 –Focus on EPP Population At Least One Parent Willing To Participate Violent Offenders EXCLUDED Children Would Have Been Placed Were It Not For This Intervention

Referral Process DHS Intake Worker Checks With DHS Gatekeeper Refers to Savio Direct Link –Intensive In-Home Services Begin Immediately OCA Flags Case D&N Filed FTDC Counsel Appointed at Filing Waiver Provided To Family Pre-Trial In Front Of FTDC Magistrate Family Enters or Returns To Regular Docket System

Program Capacity DHS Dedicated 52 Savio Direct Link Slots To FTDC Average Length of Stay 7.5 Months –Annually Serving 83 Families Will Use Outcomes to Promote Program Sustainability

*William Miller and Stephen Rollnick (1991). New York: Guilford Press Treatment Philosophy Strength Based with An Emphasis on Motivational Interviewing*

Phases of Treatment There are Four Phases of Treatment –Orientation –Achieving Sobriety –Treatment –After Care Planning and Treatment Completion These are Designed to Follow the Treatment Process Behaviorally Anchored to Make Advancement and Regression Consistent All Phases are Tied Into The Treatment Model

Phase O - Orientation

Two to Four Weeks Sign Waiver Begin 3 Times Per Week Drug Screening Received Sanctions, Rewards & Tx Responses Provided FGC Information Has Every Choice You Make Notebook Has Treatment Team List & Phone Numbers Began Parenting Skills Enhancement Program Signed and Following Safety Plan Attendance At Court Met With Savio Worker for Required Time

Phase 1 - Achieving Sobriety

Minimum of 30 Days Completed Assessment (3 Drug Screens) 30 Consecutive Days of: –Clean Drug Screens –Attendance At Court –Attendance At Treatment Support –Meeting With Savio Worker for Required Time Completed Substance Abuse Treatment Intake and Began Treatment Treatment Plan Developed and Adopted by Court (Dispositional Hearing) CAC Completed Attend and Participate in FGC Signed IRC (If Applicable)

Phase 2 - Treatment

Four to Six Months 90 Consecutive Days of: –Clean Drug Screens –Attendance At Court –Attendance At Treatment Support –Meeting With Savio Worker for Required Time –Compliance with Visitation –Following IRC 120 Consecutive Days Attendance at Substance Abuse Treatment Complete 10 of 12 Parenting Classes Attendance and Participation in FGC Improvement on CAC

Phase 3 - After Care Treatment Completion

30 Consecutive Days of: –Attendance at Court Hearings –Attendance at Treatment Support –Meeting with Savio Worker for Required Time Successful Completion of Court Ordered Treatment Plan Presentation and Acceptance of Relapse Prevention/After Care Plan Demonstrate Ability to Be Self-Sufficient Improvement on CAC (Elimination of Safety Concerns)

Phase Advancement and Regression Participants Advance When Phase Advancement Requirements are Met - These are Behaviorally Anchored Participants Regress When They Receive Three Sanctions in a 60 Day Period - Again Behaviorally Anchored

Rewards, Sanctions and Treatment Response

Each Identified Behavior Will Have A Sanction Or Reward & Treatment Response Rewards Will Occur Regularly Throughout The Treatment Process (Every Choice You Make Program) & In Court Sanctions Are Given During Each Court Hearing and on A Graduated Scale Sanctionable Offenses are Outlined in The FTDC Waiver Offenses are Cumulative From Acceptance Into FTDC Through Graduation Participants will Receive One Sanction or Reward Per Court Hearing (Highest Offense) The Focus is On Supporting The Change Process

Court Rewards Court Rewards Clean, No Missed or Dilute Drug Screening Presentation and Acceptance of Relapse Prevention Plan to Treatment Team Successful Completion of Substance Abuse Treatment Phase Completion Improvement on Colorado Assessment Continuum More to Come Re: Every Choice You Make Program

Court Sanctions Sanctionable Offenses Positive Drug Screens –Admission Prior to Result –Admission After Result –Denial –Missed or Dilute Failure to Appear in Court Failure to Meet with Savio Worker

Useful Community Service Participants Will Be Sentenced to Useful Community Service They Must Complete The Hours Prior to Next Court Date (Or Deadline Given in Court) Participants Will Be Given a List of Agencies Where They Can Complete the Sentence If The Participant Chooses Not To Complete The Community Service - They Will Serve The Corresponding Number of Days in Jail

Jail Time Credit is Given To Participants For Being Honest About Drug Use Jail Time Is Not Given For First Positive Drug Screen Will Be Used For Failure to Attend Substance Abuse Treatment More Quickly Than Positive Drug Screen (Emphasis on Importance of Treatment) Will Be Used for Failure to Meet With Savio Worker

Treatment Focused Implementation The Treatment Team Wants to Acknowledge The Process of Treatment and Recovery and Will Only Regress Participants for Having Three Violations in a 60 Day Period The Treatment Team Will Also Take Into Consideration Confirmable, Reasonable, Mitigating Circumstance Prior to Imposing A Sanction

Outcomes? What Are Outcomes? Why Track Them? How Are They Utilized? Why Are They Valuable at Every Level of Service Delivery? How Do They Impact Daily Practice?

Family Treatment Drug Court 2003 Outcomes Summary

46 Families Served –83 Adults –95 Children 13 Families Discharge –25 Adults –31 Children Average Length of Stay 7.5 Months 87% of Children Were At Home or With Kin At Discharge 13 % Were Non-Relative Adoption 100% Were In Permanent Homes At The Time of Discharge

Creative Funding During Fiscally Challenging Times Need Support of Top Administration These Families Are Being Served Somehow Within The System Sometimes Intervention is More Costly Up- Front Managing Funding Creatively Search For Grant Funding Develop Collaborative Partnerships With Equal Investment

Some Resources Substance Abuse and Mental Health Association (SAMHSA) – Bureau of Justice Assistance & Office of Justice Programs Drug Courts Programs Office – National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges –

Questions and Answers