Common Core Circles: Part I How to Choose a Task Developed by the CMC-S CaCCSSM Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Advertisements

Empowering Learners through the Common Core State Standards
Smarter Balanced Assessment a Closer Look Level 1 Part 6.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
K–12 Session 4.3 Standards for Mathematical Practices Part 3: Looking for the Practices through Observation Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core.
Elementary Principals CCSS Update Robyn Seifert & Rita Reimbold April 10, 2013.
Welcome to Smarter Balanced Math Assessment Claims EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER - NORTH LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Spring 2014 Facilitator Name.
Mixed Grade Level Groups Each of you received a colored card on entry. Color denotes grade level - Pink denotes primary Blue denotes upper elementary Yellow.
Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
Using Number Talks and Frayer Models Susan Ritchie Michelle Armenta
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Kitty Rutherford and Amy Scrinzi.
Empowering Young Learners through the Standards for Mathematical Practice Juli K. Dixon, Ph.D. University of Central Florida
Common Core Circles Part II Developed by the CMC-S CaCCSSM Committee.
Common Core Circles - Monitoring 1. Common Core Circles A Joint Venture of CMC-S and CAMTE.
5 Pillars of Mathematics Training #1: Mathematical Discourse Dawn Perks Grayling B. Williams.
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
Depth of Knowledge in Math K-5 Math Back to School Conference
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
Wake County Public Schools Elementary Mathematics
The Use of Student Work as a Context for Promoting Student Understanding and Reasoning Yvonne Grant Portland MI Public Schools Michigan State University.
{ Problem Solving Dr. Melanie Maxwell & Dr. Stephen Sher Pythagoras Project Common Core SMP Event July 29 – August 2, 2013 Transitioning from Teacher Problem.
2014 Summer Session Day 1. Today’s Agenda Stipends SCECH’s Sign-in and out! Moodle
Engaging Learners and Realizing the Development of Mathematical Practices ALM Conference July 15, 2015 Trena L. Wilkerson Professor, Mathematics Education.
Elementary Math: Principals Professional Development Fall 2011.
Making Group Work Productive PowerPoints available at Click on “Resources”
 Connecting to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics- Assessment Tools for Student Success Anton Jackson, OSPI Sandy Christie, Puget Sound ESD.
K-1 TIPM3 Dr. Monica Hartman Cathy Melody and Gwen Mitchell November 2, 2011.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
 Connecting to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics- Assessment Tools for Student Success Anton Jackson, OSPI Sandy Christie, Puget Sound ESD.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
Common Core Mathematics. Learning Norms 2 Restrooms Parking Lot evaluation connections General comments.
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.
Lots of Squares: An Example from the Digital Library Sean Nank, PhD Tiffany Obrien Del Lago Academy October 25, 2014.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
CREATING A CLASSROOM CULTURE OF CONFIDENT PROBLEM SOLVING Presentation at Palm Springs 10/24/14 Jim
. Do one problem “Meal Out” or “Security Camera”.
Elementary Math: Grade 5 Professional Development Fall 2011.
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader CMP3 Professional Development Presented by: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach CFN204 1.
Mathematics Teachers Grade 8 October 10, 2013 Joy Donlin and Tony Lobascher.
Using Number Talks Susan Ritchie and Michelle Jennings
Mathematical Modeling with Strawberries and Videos Sean Nank, PhD October 24, 2014 Session 466.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
Engagement through student created math videos Sean Nank, PhD October 24, 2014 Session 466.
2014 Summer Session Day 1. 3 Day Goals Planning: Writing Assessment Items and Choosing a 3 Act Task Create a 3 Act Task.
Learning to love the number line! Fractions and decimals
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
© TUNING UP FRACTIONS LINDA WEST SMARTTRAINING, LLC.
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
Common Core Circles - Monitoring 1. Common Core Circles A Joint Venture of CMC-S and CAMTE.
M= Math in STEM College and Career Ready- Conference Summer, 2015.
Composing Problem Solving in your Common Core Classroom Presenters Jennifer Morris and Kristyl Nuckolls
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Indiana Room Math Leadership Teams December 8, 2014.
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Assessment in Common Core. Essential Questions How is CAASPP different than STAR? How is SBAC different than CST? What do students have to know and be.
SBAC-Mathematics November 26, Outcomes Further understand DOK in the area of Mathematics Understand how the new SBAC assessments will measure student.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Math and the SBAC Claims
Core Math Instruction RtI Innovations in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI October 12-13, 2017.
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 4
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 5
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
Principles to Actions: Establishing Goals and Tasks
Reflecting on Practice: Worthwhile Tasks
Elementary Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

Common Core Circles: Part I How to Choose a Task Developed by the CMC-S CaCCSSM Committee

Common Core Circles: Part I How to Choose a Task The handouts and PowerPoint are available on our webpage:

Outcomes Participants will – Learn how to choose appropriate math tasks to use with their students – Learn how to choose tasks that facilitate student thinking around common core mathematics standards. – Learn how to implement such tasks within their classrooms. – Receive information on submitting anonymous student work to be part of our study of this and other tasks.

What is a Common Core Math Circle? Inspired by Math Circles – Student Math Circles A social context for students to explore math – Teacher Math Circles A social context for teachers to explore math and its pedagogy. Common Core Math Circles – A social context for teachers to explore Common Core Math Standards and related pedagogy.

Math Circles Part II Part I5 Practices 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Mathematics Discussions: 1.Anticipating 2.Monitoring 3.Selecting 4.Sequencing 5.Connecting

Performing the Task By Grade Level: – Grades K - 2 Whole Number task – Grade 3 - 5: Fraction Task – Grade 6 & 7: Decimal Task or Integer Task – Grade 8 & High School: Real Number/Algebra Task

Labeling Numbers on the Number Line: Fractions Instructions: 1.Solve the task as an adult learner. 2.In your group, choose the task that you found to be the most challenging and the task that you found to be the easiest. 3.Prepare a rationale for your rating.

Share Solutions Come to consensus in your group of your choices of the least and most challenging problems. Be prepared to share your reasoning and justifications with the whole group.

Making Connections At your table, Reflect on the task: –What were similarities and differences in approaches to this task? –What mathematics were you engaged in while you worked on this task? –Was there any selection of least and most challenging that surprised you? –What did you learn from the discussion? –How might your experience today influence your pedagogy?

Copies of the Task at all grade levels By Grade Level: – Grades K - 2 Whole Number task – Grade 3 - 5: Fraction Task – Grade 6 & 7: Decimal Task or Integer Task – Grade 8 & High School: Real Number/Algebra Task

The Mathematics of the Task What domain or conceptual category is targeted by this task? What content standards? What standards for mathematical practice What assessment claims are targeted? Next slide What Depth of Knowledge Level? Next slides

The Mathematics of the Task What assessment claims are targeted? – Primary Claim 3: Communicating Reason: Students can clearly and precisely construct viable arguments to support their own reasoning and to critique the reasoning of other. – Secondary Claim 1: Concepts and Procedures: Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts and interpret and carry out mathematical procedures with precision and fluency. – Other Claims include: Claim 2: Problem Solving Claim 4: Modeling and Data Analysis

The Mathematics of the Task What Depth of Knowledge Level? – If enacted at highest level: DOK Level 3: Strategic Thinking – If enacted at a lower level: DOK Level 2: Skills and Concepts – Other Levels include: Level 1: Recall Level 4: Extended Thinking

Task Evaluation What follows is a list of criteria for worthwhile tasks. The first 4 criteria are essential for every task. The others are recommended, but may not be possible in every situation.

Essential Criteria The task: 1.Is built around Important, useful mathematics 2.Requires higher-level thinking and problem solving 3.Contributes to the conceptual development of students’ thinking. 4.Provides formative assessment opportunities Did the number line task meet these characteristics? How?

Additional Criteria The Task: 5.Allows for multiple entry points and solution strategies 6.Allows for multiple claims for which evidence can be provided 7.Encourages student engagement and discourse 8.Connects to other important mathematical ideas and/or ideas in other disciplines Did the number line task meet these characteristics? How?

Additional Criteria The Task: 9.Promotes the skillful use of mathematics 10.Provides an opportunity to practice important skills 11.Displays sensitivity to and draws on students’ diverse background experiences & dispositions 12.Promotes the development of all students’ disposition to do mathematics Did the number line task meet these characteristics? How?

Choosing a Worthwhile Task Of the three tasks listed below, which one is the most worthwhile? Why? – To multiply or not to multiply? – Running to School – Making Cookies Discussion

Resources for Tasks: Illustrative Mathematics – For K-8: – – For 9-12 – – For SMP – Inside Mathematics (K-12) – content-standards content-standards

Resources for Tasks NCTM Illuminations (K-12) – Annenberg Learner – Thinkfinity (K-12) – Questions? – CMC-S website ( – Diane Kinch at

Send your text message to this Phone Number: Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Disagree Agree Speaker was well- prepared and knowledgeable (0-3) Speaker was engaging and an effective presenter (0-3) Session matched title and description in program book (0-3) Other comments, suggestions, or feedback (words) ___ ___ ___ ___________ _______ Example: Great session! 5 digit poll code for this session (no spaces) Non-Example: Great session! (1 space) Non-Example: Great session!

Send your text message to this Phone Number: Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Disagree Agree Speaker was well- prepared and knowledgeable (0-3) Speaker was engaging and an effective presenter (0-3) Session matched title and description in program book (0-3) Other comments, suggestions, or feedback (words) ___ ___ ___ ___________ _______ Example: XXXXX 323 Great session! 5 digit poll code for this session (no spaces) Non-Example: XXXXX Great session! (1 space) Non-Example: XXXXX3-2-3Great session! The Poll Code for this session: 44379