Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Governance: A Key to Quality Organizations
Advertisements

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Building a Strategic Management System Office for Student Affairs, Twin Cities Campus Ground Level Work Metrics Initiatives Managing Change Change Management.
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
World’s Largest Educational Community
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
HOUSTON EMPLOYEE ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW (HEAR) INTERIM APPLICATION ORIENTATION FOR TRAINERS & HEAR ADMINISTRATORS For more information, visit
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
Collaborative Assessment: A Strategy to Relate, Reflect, and React Leah Barrett, Assistant Vice President, Student Affairs Matt Barone, Assistant Director,
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
“Ensuring Employment Sector Service Excellence Across Communities” Carol Stewart Employment Sector Council London-Middlesex (ESCLM)
Illinois Educator Code of Ethics Training
AQIP: “Academic Quality Improvement Program” Same Great Quality, Less Filling.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards 77th Annual Congress Orlando, Florida Accreditation 101 & Panel Discussion Saturday May 3, :00 – 10:00.
An Overview of the Accreditation Process and Important Policies Megan Scanlan, Director of Accreditation, Stacy Wright, Site Visit.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Quality Assurance and Development Unit College of Applied Medical Sciences Females 1.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
PHAB Slide Set 2013 The slides in this set are made available for use in presentations and educational sessions by health departments. The information.
The National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory Sciences Philosophy of Accreditation And Approval.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Professional Standards 2009 Suzanne Scott, Ph.D., IDEC, ASID, Megan Scanlan, Director of Accreditation,
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Orientation for New Site Visitors Site Visitor Responsibilities, Expenses, and Training.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
Consistency in Accreditation ASPA April 4, 2011 Department of Medical Laboratory Science Rush University Herb Miller, Ph.D. NAACLS.
© 2011 Partners Harvard Medical International Strategic Plan for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Program Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center Strategic.
Expanding the Dialogue: Consistency, Quality, and Responsibility in Accreditation | 2010 | 1 Expanding the Dialogue: Consistency, Quality,
SCHOOL BOARD A democratically elected body that represents public ownership of schools through governance while serving as a bridge between public values.
Banner County Schools Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Amy Trauernicht Stacy McDaniel Troy Lurz Maribeth Moore Kaci Kearns Dan Spatzierath.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Murray County Schools February 26-29, 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Lincoln Trail District Health Department Strategic Plan Our Foundation Strategic Goals & Objectives Measures of Success Mission: The Lincoln Trail District.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
Scottsbluff ESU #13 Oral Exit Report February 1, 2012 Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Unit Accreditation.
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
Orientation for New Site Visitors
Curriculum and Accreditation
Accreditation and curriculum
Presentation transcript:

Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review

2 Introduction This presentation will introduce CIDA’s mission, values, and the guiding principles of peer review. Before participating in a site visit, you should review the training presentations on CIDA’s website, the Site Visitor Handbook, and attend an in-person training workshop.

3 CIDA’s Mission The Council for Interior Design Accreditation provides the foundation for future excellence in the interior design profession by setting standards for education and accrediting academic programs that meet those standards.

4 Value of CIDA  Accreditation is a quality assurance process that replaces government regulation of higher education.  Accreditation is a process of program self-evaluation and peer review.  CIDA is a specialized (discipline-specific) accreditor.  CIDA accredits interior design programs that culminate in a minimum of a bachelor’s degree.

5 Value of CIDA  Accreditation promotes the achievement of high academic standards and makes education responsive to student and society.  Volunteer site visitors are essential to the accreditation process.  Site visitors serve as ambassadors of CIDA by promoting understanding of it’s mission and work to interior design programs and the community at large.

6 Value of CIDA CIDA ensures quality in interior design education by:  Setting standards for postsecondary interior design education.  Evaluating and accrediting interior design programs at colleges and universities.  Facilitating outreach and collaboration with all stakeholders in the interior design community.

7 Value of CIDA Setting Standards:  A core responsibility of CIDA is to set and periodically update standards for interior design education.  CIDA exercises a well-established protocol in developing educational standards.  CIDA’s Standards Committee stewards the standard- setting process.

8 Value of CIDA Setting Standards:  Major standards revisions are conducted on a 5- to 10- year cycle and encompass all standards criteria.  Limited standards revisions are conducted on an as- needed basis and encompass select standards criteria.  CIDA just completed a major standards development project that resulted in the implementation of new standards (Professional Standards 2009) on July 1, 2009.

9 Value of CIDA Evaluating and accrediting interior design programs:  CIDA’s Standards are used to review and evaluate interior design programs.  The accreditation process includes program self- evaluation and an on-site review conducted by volunteer site visitors.

10 Value of CIDA Evaluating and accrediting interior design programs:  CIDA’s seven-member Accreditation Commission (composed of 5 experienced site visitors, 1 accredited program representative, and 1 public representative) reviews all information collected throughout the accreditation process.  The Accreditation Commission decides to grant or deny accreditation depending on a program’s level of compliance with the Standards.

11 Value of CIDA Facilitating outreach:  CIDA consistently communicates with all relevant stakeholders in the interior design community.  This communication guides CIDA’s outreach efforts and actions.  These efforts and actions utilize brainstorming, teamwork, and consensus-building to address issues and concerns in the interior design community.

12 Value of CIDA Examples of CIDA’s outreach efforts include:  Interior Design Profession’s Body of Knowledge, 2005 and 2009 Updates, joint sponsorship with 4 other design associations.  Future Vision 2006, interior design visionaries from education and practice participated in a joint session with CIDA’s Board of Directors to describe priorities for future interior design curriculum.  Careers in Interior Design Website –

13 Value of CIDA As a site visitor, you will assist CIDA in serving:  Academic programs  Parents and students  The interior design profession

14 Value of CIDA CIDA serves academic programs by:  Facilitating self-assessment and development by requiring programs to complete a self-study process.  CIDA accreditation also acts as a strong marketing tool and helps programs fulfill enrollment goals.

15 Value of CIDA CIDA serves student and parents by:  Assisting them in selecting the right school.  CIDA accreditation serves as a strong indicator of quality for those looking at various schools and programs.  Accreditation also provides an objective third-party assessment of these programs.

16 Value of CIDA CIDA serves the profession by:  Assuring employers that interns and potential employees with CIDA accredited degrees have received an education that meets specific standards of competency.  Assuring potential clients that designers will meet professional standards.  CIDA accreditation serves interior design professional organizations’ commitment to enhancing and strengthening education and the profession.

17 Guiding Principles of Peer Review  Site visitors are drawn from the field of interior design and have an essential role in the accreditation process.  Site visitors participate in the peer review process by gathering evidence and making informed decisions regarding program compliance using CIDA’s Professional Standards for evaluation.

18 Guiding Principles of Peer Review  The goal of peer review is to evaluate a program’s compliance with CIDA Standards and to document this evaluation clearly in a written report.  You must always use unbiased judgment when determining program compliance.  Following good practices for peer review will help you perform well in the role of site visitor. Examples of these practices are outlined in the following slides.

19 Guiding Principles of Peer Review  Always use your background and experience to make informed judgments regarding program quality.  CIDA visiting teams consist of three members, each team includes at least one educator and one practitioner.  CIDA site visitors are experts who come together to evaluate the quality of an interior design program.

20 Guiding Principles of Peer Review  Focus only on criteria included in CIDA’s Standards for evaluation.  CIDA Standards are based upon thorough research into the interior design field and must be applied equally to each program that is reviewed.  The visiting team’s evaluation must not be excessively influenced by one team member’s area of expertise or ideas regarding the necessary requirements for practice.

21 Guiding Principles of Peer Review  Accreditation uses threshold standards as a measure of quality – CIDA accreditation status makes no distinction between programs that meet standards and those that exceed standards.  Not all programs will exceed CIDA Standards.  When reviewing a program, be objective.  Comparisons to other programs are strictly prohibited.

22 Guiding Principles of Peer Review  As a site visitor, you must observe appropriate protocols.  Professional courtesy sets the stage for respectful dialogue between site visitors, program representatives, and others engaged in the review process.