High Level View of PBR Educational Brief SVL unchanged for current and inforce business PBR is a system of rules and methodologies to replace old formulaic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © 2012, Big I Advantage®, Inc., and Swiss Re Corporate Solutions. All rights reserved. (Ed. 08/12 -1) E&O RISK MANAGEMENT: MEETING THE CHALLENGE.
Advertisements

1 U. S. Risk-Based Capital Requirements and Their Context Alfred W. Gross Virginia Commissioner of Insurance National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
Fall 2008 Version Professor Dan C. Jones FINA 4355 Class Problem.
1 PROVISIONS FOR PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES (MIS-35) Seminar on Ratemaking Nashville, TNRuss Bingham March 11-12, 1999Hartford Financial Services.
XXIII Annual ASSAL General Meeting US Risk-Based Supervision Director Christina Urias April 23, 2012.
1 New Changes to Medigap States Need to Adopt the Amended NAIC Medicare Supplement Model before July 1, 2009 / September 24, 2009.
Course on Professionalism ASOP 43 – Property / Casualty Unpaid Claim Estimates.
© 2011 National Association of Insurance Commissioners Reserves - P/C - Life ASSAL – July 2011 Todd Sells.
Assignment Nine Actuarial Operations.
THE ROLE OF THE ACTUARY IN THE ECONOMY
MODERATORCHARLES D. FRIEDSTAT FRIEDSTAT ACTUARIAL CONSULTING SPEAKERSRICHARD N. BUSH AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL PETER A. MARION SUN LIFE OF CANADA CONCURRENT.
Actuarial Resources Corporation NAIC Update SOUTHEASTERN ACTUARIES CONFERENCE MEETING November 19-21, 2003 Presented By: Matt McAllister, FSA, MAAA Actuarial.
Dan Barron FSA MAAA FIlAA CERA November Objectives To explore the impact of SII on actuaries To raise questions about the direction of the actuarial.
Enterprise Risk Management and the Own Risk Solvency Assessment Act Michelle M. Rogers, JD Director of Financial and Regulatory Policy National Association.
NAIC Oversight of Corporate Governance Commissioner Susan Donegan Vermont Department of Financial Regulation.
Automobile Insurance Deregulation Martin F. Grace Richard D. Phillips Department of Risk Management and Insurance Robinson.
Role of actuarial function supporting the FLAOR leading to the ORSA Ian Morris June 2014.
Basel II and Internal Models Mary Frances Monroe Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Presentation.
v The Framework of Insurance Regulation Rex Bagwell Business Development Manager Insurance Productivity Services Kurt Jackson EVP of Sales GhostDraft.
Risk-Focused Examinations David Vacca, Assistant Director – Insurance Analysis & Information Services, NAIC Welcome to the © 2009 The National Association.
An Overview of Risk Management based on a Disclosure from an Annual Report Jon Wu, November 19, 2014.
NAIC Review of ERM & Internal Controls David Altmaier Florida Office of Insurance Regulation.
1 APRA & Developments in General Insurance Robert Thomson Monday 13 September 2004.
ICP 14 Valuation Christina Urias Managing Director, International Insurance Regulatory Affairs National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
© 2007 MIB Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved Practical Applications of Credibility Theory Tom Rhodes, FSA, MAAA, FCA AVP & Actuarial Director MIB Solutions.
1 Business Continuity and Compliance Working Together Kristy Justice, AVP WaMu Card Services 08/19/2008.
Operational and Actuarial Aspects of Takaful Distribution of Surplus.
Wednesday, October 13, 2010 Licensing procedures of a Connecticut Domiciled Insurance Company.
Corporate Governance and Principle-Based Reserves: Applying the Basics
SVS Seminar on Risk-Based Capital Regulation and Corporate Governance in the Insurance Sector Todd Sells presents on U.S. Experiences.
MANAGEMENTMANAGEMENT REGULATORY REFORM FOR LTCI VIABILITY Session 22: February 27, 2006 Session Producer: Sharon Reed, Asst Vice President Strategic Operations.
Introduction to PBA: An Overview of a Principle-Based Approach
The Real Deal on Captives Superintendent Joe Torti, III (RI)
Legal/Regulatory Issues in Life and Health Insurance RMI 4115.
Actuarial Guideline CCC What is it and how will it affect ROP products?
Investor presentation Interim financial results 30 June 2001.
A market consistent framework requires a “risk-free” yield curve to assess the technical provisions The swap and bond curves have been identified as potential.
1 Lecture 20 Economic Analysis of Banking Regulation.
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Minneapolis, Minnesota September 18 – 19, 2000 Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 36 Discussion of Implementation Considerations.
Solvency Update2008 CAS Spring Meeting – Quebec City 1 U.S. Insurance Solvency Today & Future Kris DeFrain, FCAS, MAAA, CPCU Senior Financial Regulatory.
Solvency II Open Forum 4 th March 2008 Michael Aitchison.
Wenyen Hsu1 Agency Cost and Bonus Policy of Participating Policies Wenyen Hsu Feng Chia University
© 2011 National Association of Insurance Commissioners U.S. Solvency Modernization Initiative Christina Urias Director, Arizona Department of Insurance.
Midland National Life ® Insurance Company North American Company for Life and Health Insurance ® Sammons ® Corporate Markets Group Sammons Securities Company.
Implications of Dynamic Financial Analysis (DFA) on Demutualization by Jan Lommele and Kevin Bingham Guest Speaker: Stephen List, CFO The National Atlantic.
© AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS 101 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC Solvency Modernization and Corporate Governance ACLI’s Compliance.
© 2010 National Association of Insurance Commissioners NAIC Risk-Based Capital (RBC) HISTORY.
What’s Next in Store for PBR? Dave Neve, FSA, MAAA, CERA Vice President, Capital Management - Aviva USA Chairperson, American Academy of Actuaries Life.
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Actuaries CAS Spring Meeting June 16, 2008 Dave Sandberg, Chair American Academy of Actuaries Solvency and.
1999 CAS RATEMAKING SEMINAR PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (MIS - 32) BETH FITZGERALD, FCAS, MAAA.
December 29, 2010 Satyan Jambunathan Prudential requirements A Life industry perspective.
1 Larry J. Bruning FSA, MAAA, CLU International Life Actuary, NAIC USA 6 September 2011 Capital Adequacy and Supervisory Assessment of Solvency Positions.
1 Issues for Consideration in the Solvency Modernization Initiative Ramon Calderon Deputy Commissioner, California Department of Insurance Chair, NAIC.
Operational and Actuarial Aspects of Takaful Topic 13 Surplus Distribution.
©UFS Pennsylvania Long-Term Care Public Hearing March 10, 2016.
Aggregate margins in the context of level premium term life insurance Results of a study sponsored by the Kansas Insurance Department Slides prepared by.
PBR for life products IABA Annual Meeting James Collingwood, ASA, MAAA August 1, 2014.
© 2010 National Association of Insurance Commissioners U.S. Solvency Modernization Initiative Director Christina Urias, Chair Solvency Modernization Initiative.
24th India Fellowship Seminar
PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES (FIN-28)
Opportunity in Insurance areas (Life, General, Health)
Regulatory Issues in Health Reserving
High Level View of PBR Educational Brief
Session 3 – Risk Management and Internal Controls: Actuary Function ICP 8: Risk Management and Internal Controls 2017 ASSAL Regional Seminar on Training.
Making Healthcare Affordable
IS4550 Security Policies and Implementation
Rethinking Portfolio Management Based on New Regulation
Role of CMA in life insurance industry
Certified Information Technology Professional (CITP) Credential
Implementation of 2014 Revisions to Model #205
Presentation transcript:

High Level View of PBR Educational Brief SVL unchanged for current and inforce business PBR is a system of rules and methodologies to replace old formulaic valuation system PBR initiates a valuation system for reserves based on a company’s experience factors such as mortality, policyholder behavior and expenses.

PBR and Standard Valuation Law Standard Valuation Law #820 (SVL) remains unchanged for current policies The revised SVL will include new sections to authorize the use of a Valuation Manual (VM) and require insurers reporting of data experience The revised SVL preserves commissioner authority on insurers to require appropriate assumptions or methods, and engage qualified actuaries to review compliance with the VM requirements

PBR and Standard Nonforfeiture Law Standard Nonforfeiture Law #808 (SNL) sets minimum benefit values if policies are surrendered or lapsed The revised SNL will include new sections to refer to the SVL and VM as source for mortality and interest rates used for nonforfeiture calculations The SNL value calculations for older policies prior to the SVL implementation remain the same.

Valuation Manual The Valuation Manual (VM) provides reserve calculations requirements such as experience reporting, actuarial opinion, PBR reportings, and corporate governance requirements Dynamic in nature, adaptability to insurance marketplace and changes to the current economy VM change process similar to AP&P Manual changes through NAIC

Valuation Manual (cont.) Future changes to VM will require supermajority (42 states and 75 percent of total US premium Insurer implementation of approved VM changes can occur anytime within three years March update: – Nine states comprising 9.2 percent of premium have enacted (PBR) – Four states comprising 4.6 percent of premium awaiting governors' signatures – Another nine states to introduce legislation in 2014 and – Another eight states are expected to introduce legislation in – This would total 30 states with market premium of 60.3%.

What is PBR? Currently, formulas and assumptions are used to determine these reserves. Companies will hold the higher of a) the reserve using prescribed factors or b) the reserve which considers a wide range of future economic conditions and is computed using justified company experience factors, such as mortality, policyholder behavior, and expenses. The Valuation Manual is established by the Standard Valuation Law and would be used to detail the reserve calculation requirements. The new Standard Valuation Law and Valuation Manual are built to encompass requirements for all life and health insurers. Initially, reserving methods only change for life insurance. However, over time, PBR is expected to be developed for other product lines.

Need for PBR Old formulaic reserve approach needs frequent updating for new products PBR alleviates this need While current system locks in assumptions, PBR adjusts reserves to the current economic environment This should provide a more viable and robust life insurance market

Is PBR More Conservative? Some reserves will go down (term) Some reserves go both ways (ULSG) Overall, NAIC impact study estimated life reserves will go down approximately 5% This is considered to be “right-sizing” the reserves

What will make PBR successful? Regulators will collectively review PBR through NAIC activity and can easily adjust the Valuation Manual, if needed. Companies will be able to appropriately reflect their own company experience (i.e. mortality, lapse, expenses, etc.) in the reserves with an appropriate level of conservatism. Companies must justify their calculations. Regulatory resources will be enhanced. At present, the NAIC is studying the need for resources at the states and the ability for collective sharing of experience with the new requirements at the NAIC to aid the states. Regulators will be building more analytical tools and will be implementing data requirements to enhance regulatory oversight. PBR will allow better alignment of regulatory requirements with company risk exposures and risk management practices.

Impact on Consumers PBR should have a positive impact on consumers in that products should be cheaper PBR may stimulate the introduction of new and innovative products

Impact on companies Additional actuarial resources will be needed Companies can reflect own experience Rewarding good performance should be good for the company Freeing up capital and promoting its efficient use should be good for the company and consumers

How will PBR Affect Insurance Regulators? While PBR and the Valuation Manual are new, more modern valuation methods that have been in development for more than 20 years. Gradual implementation of PBR will give regulators more time to familiarize themselves with the new requirements. Regulators will need to consider how PBR fits into the risk-focused approach to financial examination & analysis; materiality of PBR reserves of blocks of business will be a consideration. A better understanding of the range of results and best practices will lead to appropriate changes to the Valuation Manual (dynamic model). PBR may reduce the un-level playing field created by product designs developed with the express intention to take advantage of the limitations of the formulaic approach.