Lightweight Machine Gun and Ammunition: The “Clean Slate” Approach

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Systems Engineering From a Life Cycle Perspective John Groenenboom Director Engineering – Mesa Boeing Rotorcraft Dec 12, 2007.
Advertisements

Prescriptive Process models
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
DLA's Aviation Supply & Demand Chain Manager Defense Supply Center Richmond Aviation Engineering Reliability and Sustainment Programs Defense Logistics.
OICW System Enhancements STO III.WP Specific Goal: Design, Build and Demonstrate Prototype Micro-Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) based Safe &
Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Overview
1 AO Milan 40MM Manufacturing Support Capabilities J. Fine & J. Solgaard January 28, 2004.
CPIS 357 Software Quality & Testing I.Rehab Bahaaddin Ashary Faculty of Computing and Information Technology Information Systems Department Fall 2010.
1 Achieving Total Systems Management (ATSM) Acquisition Strategies to Increase Reliability and Reduce Logistics Footprint PEO/SYSCOM Workshop November.
Anthony Cannone Mechanical Engineer
AMCHP 2005 Conference 1 Establishing & Maintaining Partnerships Michael Webb IT Project Manager Utah Department of Health.
Overview of Advanced Design White Paper Farrokh Najmabadi Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting June 23, 1998 OFES Headquarters, Germantown.
Iterative development and The Unified process
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
Systems Engineering Management
TECH 101 Product Design and Manufacturing. TECH 1012 System Life-Cycle Engineering 2 Major phases in almost all products and in many cases services –Acquisition.
System Engineering Instructor: Dr. Jerry Gao. System Engineering Jerry Gao, Ph.D. Jan System Engineering Hierarchy - System Modeling - Information.
The Software Product Life Cycle. Views of the Software Product Life Cycle  Management  Software engineering  Engineering design  Architectural design.
Systems Analysis and Design. Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Systems Analysis Systems Design Programming Testing Conversion On-going maintenance.
What are MRLs ? Alfred W. Clark Dawnbreaker, Inc.
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
Chapter 2 The process Process, Methods, and Tools
1. Infection Control Risk Assessment Terrie B. Lee, RN, MS, MPH, CIC Director, Infection Prevention & Employee Health Charleston Area Medical Center Charleston,
Resources Performance time. resources Performance time 2.
Introduction to Software Engineering LECTURE 2 By Umm-e-Laila 1Compiled by: Umm-e-Laila.
Software Engineering Lecture # 17
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
ERP. What is ERP?  ERP stands for: Enterprise Resource Planning systems  This is what it does: attempts to integrate all data and processes of an organization.
0 PM Metrics Briefing COL Stephen L. Rust PM ITTS 25 Mar 04.
Chapter – 9 Checkpoints of the process
2  Mission Statement.  Company’s overall purpose and direction, products, services and values.  Goals.  That accomplish the mission. E.g. 5 year plan.
NDIA, Slide NDIA, Slide 2 Outline Current M151/M423 Performance & Deficiencies APKWS Warhead & Fuze Development Program –Technology.
CHECKPOINTS OF THE PROCESS Three sequences of project checkpoints are used to synchronize stakeholder expectations throughout the lifecycle: 1)Major milestones,
Sustainability/Logistics – Transportation and Distribution Management (4b) Technology Enabled Capability Demonstration Alan Santucci
From the Installation and Certification Group to the Engineering and Development Section Patrick Grenard Chief, Engineering & Development, IMS Vienna International.
SWEN 5130 Requirements Engineering 1 Dr Jim Helm SWEN 5130 Requirements Engineering Requirements Management Under the CMM.
Software Engineering - I
3 1 Project Success Factors u Project management important for success of system development project u 2000 Standish Group Study l Only 28% of system development.
The Soldier: America’s Most Deployed Combat System Joint Small Arms Coordinating Group (JSACG) Small Arms Item Unique Identification Update Mike Friedman.
Fifth Lecture Hour 9:30 – 10:20 am, September 9, 2001 Framework for a Software Management Process – Life Cycle Phases (Part II, Chapter 5 of Royce’ book)
Aligning HR & Business Strategy. “The long-held notion that HR would become a truly strategic function is finally being realized.”
AMC Committed To Excellence ALACV PROGRAM ALACV Airburst Demonstration Fuze For 40mm Cannon Caliber Ammunition Fred Herr US Army ARDEC Mark Tomes Alliant.
Michael Campe U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command NDIA TID Technical Information Division Symposium Royal Sonesta Hotel, New Orleans, LA August 2003.
Systems Engineering Conceptual System Design. Systems Engineering and Analysis, B.S. Blanchard and W. J. Fabrycky, 3 rd edition, Prentice-Hall, 1998.
12 May 2004 Presented by Joel M. Goldman Chief, Joint Service Small Arms Program Office The National Small Arms Center ARDEC Providing America Advanced.
Verification and Validation — An OSD Perspective — Fred Myers Deputy Director, Test Infrastructure Test Resource Management Center November 4, 2009.
NCSX Systems Engineering Management Plan Peer Review Bob Simmons May 15, 2003.
SE&I Pre-Proposal Meeting GSFC - JPL Systems Engineering Management Colleen McGraw.
Smart Home Technologies
Process Asad Ur Rehman Chief Technology Officer Feditec Enterprise.
Transformation of a National Laboratory: ISMS Component Beth Streeper ISMS Program Manager Integrated Safety Management Workshop 2007 Brookhaven National.
Rational Unified Process Fundamentals Best Practices of Software Engineering Rational Unified Process Fundamentals Best Practices of Software Engineering.
Management February 20, Annual Review of the Muon Accelerator Program (MAP) Subcommittee members: Ron Prwivo, Ron Lutha, and Jim Kerby.
Tata McGraw CHAPTER 4 Product and Service Design.
9/4/2003 Preparing Warriors Individually through Development and Distribution of Joint Knowledge 1 Joint Knowledge Development and Distribution Capability.
Project Management Strategies Hidden in the CMMI Rick Hefner, Northrop Grumman CMMI Technology Conference & User Group November.
NSF INCLUDES Inclusion Across the Nation of Learners of Underrepresented Discoverers in Engineering and Science AISL PI Meeting, March 1, 2016 Sylvia M.
Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.
DESIGN OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES Chapter Three Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.
Supportability Design Considerations
Technology Readiness Levels
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
Level - 3 Process Areas (CMMI-DEV)
MRL 6 Artifacts (at End of TMRR) Page 1 of 6
Agenda Overview Tactical Employment ATK 25mm Barrett HEDP System
Project Management Chapter 11.
Engineering Processes
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Requirements Development in CMMI
Presentation transcript:

Lightweight Machine Gun and Ammunition: The “Clean Slate” Approach NDIA Joint Service Small Arms Symposium May 2004 Kori Spiegel Joint Service Small Arms Program (973) 724-7944 kspiegel@pica.army.mil

Lightweight Machine Gun and Ammunition Goals A “Clean Slate” Design with Reduced Weight as the Priority 35% Weapon Weight Reduction 40% Ammo Weight Reduction Light Machine Gun Medium MG Current Goal Weapon 17.5 lb 11.4 lb 27.7 18.0 Ammo (600 Rds) 20.4 lb 12.2 lb 39.3 23.6 System (Wpn +Ammo) 37.9 lb 23.6 lb 67.0 41.6

Requirements Ammunition Weapon External Interfaces

Lightweight Machine Gun and Ammunition The Method Investigated State of the Art Technologies Awarded 5 “Component” Contracts: ATK, Frontier, FNMI, Knox & Veritay Researched previous and ongoing efforts Restarted caseless ammunition line at Picatinny Conducted Quality Function Deployments Serves as Voice of the User Held QFD’s for User, Designer and a combined group Results led to criteria for solicitation Awarded System Integration Contracts Contracts awarded to AAI Corporation and GD-ATP Multi phase program to analyze, build and test concepts Conduct integration testing and User demo Testing will encompass all Milestone B requirements and FFW Demo Completed at end of FY07 Transition to PM Soldier Weapons

Lightweight Machine Gun and Ammunition Schedule FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 Component Studies Component Demos Caseless Ammo Study Caseless Ammo Demo System Concept Design (Phase 1) Ltwt Machine Gun Development (Phase 2) Subsystem Testing System Integration Testing (Phase 3) Early Operational Test

Lightweight Machine Gun and Ammunition AAI Team

Lightweight Machine Gun and Ammunition AAI – Key Features Achieves weight reduction objective Ammunition Weapon Simplified weapon action Extensive use of composites Spiral development approach Light Machine Gun Medium Machine Gun

Lightweight Machine Gun and Ammunition GD-ATP Team Lead System Integrator Lethality lead for system level performance Established system requirements and functional analysis and allocations with flow down to subsystem IPT’s Responsible for risk management, effectiveness analysis, configuration management, interface and data management Lead on Technical Performance (TPM) tracking (DTUPC and DTUW) Key member for Weapon Design and Development & IPT Co-design selected weapon concept Assist GDATP weapon TPM tracking (DTUPC and DTUW) Lead Design and Integrator for Ammunition Design and Development Design lead on ammunition Lead on ammo TPM tracking (DTIPC and DTUW) Reliability and maintainability lead for ammo

Lightweight Machine Gun and Ammunition GD-ATP Concept Meets or exceeds weight reduction objectives Emphasis on PROCESS to achieve PRODUCT Flexible weapon and ammunition design Current Future

Caseless Ammunition Capability Demonstration Patricia M. O’Reilly Chief, Energetic and Organic Materials Laboratory Branch Energetics and Warheads Division Energetics, Warheads, and Environmental Technology Directorate Armaments Engineering and Technology Center US Army Armament Research Development Engineering Center NDIA Small Arms Symposium & Exhibition May 12, 2004 Las Vegas, Nevada

Caseless Ammunition Capability Demonstration Objective To develop and demonstrate an in-house capability and core competency to manufacture Caseless Ammunition prototypes in support of the Lightweight Machine Gun and Ammunition Science & Technology Objective Deliver Caseless Ammunition for a live-fire/ballistic demonstration Establish ARDEC with a World Class Caseless Ammunition Capability

Caseless Ammunition Capability Demonstration Why Caseless Ammunition? Lightweight Force Multiplier Decreased Logistics Burden High Ignition Temperature Propellant (HITP) provides improved propellant characteristics & energetic behavior High level interest Push the State of the Art – A Technology that fits the “clean slate” approach

Caseless Ammunition Capability Demonstration Background Previous work performed under Advanced Combat Rifle (ACR) Program nearly 15 years ago Technology Development funded by US (ARDEC) and Germany to Heckler & Koch (H&K)/Dynamit Nobel (DNAG) Successful Demonstration of Caseless Ammunition Rifle System Technology Licensed & Transferred to the US at ARDEC

Caseless Ammunition Capability Demonstration Why ARDEC In-house Effort? Original Caseless Ammunition prototype manufacturing capability exists/retained Risk of Technology being lost - Loss of expertise Develop and maintain expertise/competency area Provides new hires hands-on experience Development of cutting edge technology

Caseless Ammunition Capability Demonstration Technical Approach Determine Feasibility Identify and address technical challenges/potential risk areas Near term & long term Material needs and source suppliers - availability Assess equipment condition Costs Determined viability Organizational Commitment Re-establish capability and prototyping process utilizing existing technology Validation of In-house Caseless Ammunition capability for 5.56mm

Caseless Ammunition Capability Demonstration Status of Progress Accomplishments Materials, supplies and services obtained Maintenance and service equipment – test and manufacturing SOPs and Manufacturing Process procedures Baseline Formulation Selected First HITP mix manufactured Pressing Study completed

Caseless Ammunition Capability Demonstration

Caseless Ammunition Capability Demonstration Status of Progress Next Steps Select initial charge weights Manufacture initial quantity of prototypes Charge Weight Determination (Ballistic Evaluation) Evaluate results and select next charge weight(s) Characterization Implementation of any processing improvements Interior Ballistic Modeling Manufacture second HITP mix and qty of prototypes Charge weight(s) verification (Ballistic Evaluation) Evaluate results and determine optimal charge weight Manufacture HITP for Demonstration Quantity Small qty of prototypes for charge wt and ballistic performance validation Manufacture demonstration qty Deliver Demonstration quantity - June ‘04

Caseless Ammunition Capability Demonstration Technical Challenges Long term availability and identification of source suppliers Material replacements Environmentally friendly alternatives/ manufacturing processes for constituents Summary Validation of the in-house capability proceeding Efforts focused to bring Caseless Ammunition Capability/Technology to a sufficient maturation level Acknowledgements JSAAP Office PPP Entire Caseless Ammunition IPT

Lightweight Machine Gun and Ammunition Summary By using “Clean Slate”, program goals are feasible Program progressing successfully Close partnering between Government & Industry Comments/Questions?