Water Quality Data Interpretation College Creek Case Study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Testing!.
Advertisements

Investigation Plan for the Omaha WWTP – Stage One update Dr Mark James, Aquatic Environmental Sciences Ltd.
Water Quality Tests.
Water Monitoring Lab. Why Test Water Quality? Water testing allows scientists and citizens to have a full understanding of what is affecting their stream.
Water Chemistry Testing. We have been investigating the “health” of the Ramsey Brook in the following ways: Mapping Imperviousness Surveying Macroinvertebrates.
Watershed Assessment Analysis of Data. Q Values Raw data values are NOT Q values. We need to convert the raw data/observations into “grades” (Q values)
1 200 pt 300 pt 400 pt 500 pt 100 pt 200 pt 300 pt 400pt 500 pt 100 pt 200 pt 300 pt 400 pt 500 pt 100pt 200 pt 300pt 400 pt 500 pt 100pt 200 pt 300pt.
Alexandra McDevitt May 25 th, Abstract The water quality of Clermont College campus will help to determine the state of the environment and the.
Shell Creek Watershed Research Group Advisors: Mark Seier and Karen Malmkar Researchers: Audrey Wondercheck, Mark O’Brien, Alisha Dunlap, Caitlin.
Presented at the 9 th Stakeholder Meeting Mike Herrmann, NCEEP Central Watershed Planner April 20th, 2010 Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) Intake Stessor.
Henry Hagg Lake Water Quality Report. Location The testing site- Boat dock A.
Common Monitoring Parameters. Step 1 Consider purpose/objectives of monitoring Assess use attainment Characterize watershed Identify pollutants and sources.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
1 Water Quality: Temperature How is water quality affected by temperature?
Somebody call the doctor! An introduction to water health
Water Monitoring. What/Why? Water testing Identifying water content Allows scientists to have a full understanding of what is affecting their stream or.
DO NOW 1.Get out your calendar 2.Put your Water Filtration Lab in the bin 3.List and explain the steps of water filtration.
Dry Run Creek: Urban vs. Rural Surficial Water Quality Variability Nick Bosshart and Austin Cox.
Marilyn Murphy, David Plavcan, William Shepard, Donna Suevo, Jeff Thomas, Karen Trozzo, Timothy Woods and David Yezuita West Chester University July 2002.
Temperature of Stream Site (upstream to downstream) Temperature ( °C )Average ( °C ) °C °C °C °C °C °C According to.
Georgia Adopt-A-Stream Introduction Georgia Adopt-A-Stream 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. SW Suite 1462 East Atlanta, Georgia
.0. Median =100 cfu/100ml Avg. 567 cfu/100ml 2010.
IMPACTS OF LAND DEVELOPMENT ON OREGON’S WATERS 2001 This slide show was borrowed from the internet but we added our own research when we presented it.
WARM-UP Update your Table of Contents Write your homework! Get a list of Vocab Set 4 off the front table DateSession # ActivityPage # 10/2321Water Quality.
Impacts of Land Development on Oregon’s Waters 2001.
To determine how a manmade structure, an overpass, effects aspects of stream water quality and discharge.
Water Quality ESI Stream Water Mass after collecting by filtration Evaporate water after filtering, determine mass of residue TDS by conductivity since.
Physical Properties Discharge rate, temperature and other physical attributes of the stream.
SOMEBODY CALL THE DOCTOR! AN INTRODUCTION TO WATER HEALTH.
Shell Creek Watershed Study Advisors – Mark Seier, Suzy Goedeken, & Karen Malmkar Researchers –Katie O’Brien, Jake Kaufman, Mark O’Brien, Aubrey.
1 Floodplain Management Session 11 Biology Water Quality Prepared by Susan Bolton, PhD, PE.
Larkin Creek Phase II Project Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University.
What is a Watershed? An area of land, from ridge top to ridge top, that collects, stores, and releases water to a common point, such as a river or a lake.
METHODS. Physical Methods Steam Profile Discharge Air Temperature Water Temperature Relative Humidity.
Water Quality in Tryon Creek Initial Results from Portland’s Revised Watershed Monitoring Approach.
Water Quality Natural & Controlled Environments. Monitoring natural environments Photo courtesy of Melissa Gutierrez.
Coles Creek Watershed Assessment and Education Summary The Coles Creek Watershed, located in the southwestern quadrant of the state of Mississippi, with.
The Blue Planet The Blue Planet Indicators of Water Quality.
Water May 2-8, 2010: National Drinking Water Week!
Water Quality Assessment Cypress Creek Adrian L. Vogl Aquatic Resources Texas State University Jason Pinchback River System Institute Texas State University.
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
Warm Up Complete the text dependent questions for the Water Scarcity text. Do your own work. Homework: Read 16C-21C answer ?’s 1-3, 5 p22C Read 24C-31C.
Methods of Monitoring Pollution. Direct Performed by monitoring the level of the pollutant itself Performed by monitoring the level of the pollutant itself.
AQUATICS UNIT REVIEW *Check your study guide as we go through the slides.
National Wildlife Refuge San Diego, California. About the Refuge.. Established in 1996 Stretches from Jamul to communities in Spring Valley Over 11,152.
Water Quality Testing. Testing of water is used to determine if water needs to be cleaned up.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Indicators of Water Quality
Dissolved Oxygen Pollution Types.
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Warm up: Describe the features of a river basin.
Indicators of Water Quality Unit 4 – Ch 6
WATER QUALITY.
Water Quality Rice Creek Watershed.
8.E.1 Understand the hydrosphere and the impact of humans on local systems and the effects of the hydrosphere on humans. 8.E.1.3 Predict the safety and.
Determining The Health of a Stream/River
Point vs Nonpoint Source Pollution Water Quality Indicators notes
Chemicals Around us Water Near You Percents and Stuff 5 pt 5 pt 5 pt
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
Water health & pollution
Riverwood Middle School 8th Grade Science Mrs. McAven
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
Indicators of Water Quality
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
Indicators of Water Quality
Indicators of Stream Health
Question: Why should we monitor the quality of our rivers, lakes and streams? Water Quality A measure of the physical, chemical and biological factors.
Determining The Health of a Stream/River
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Data Interpretation College Creek Case Study

Response of indicators to pollution or negative alterations IndicatorIncreaseDecrease Alkalinity Dissolved Oxygen Fecal Coliform Nitrates pH Temperature Total Suspended Solids Macroinverterbrates

Response of indicators to pollution or negative alterations IndicatorIncreaseDecrease AlkalinityX Dissolved OxygenX Fecal ColiformX NitratesX pHX TemperatureX Total Suspended SolidsX MacroinverterbratesAbundance Pollution tolerant species Diversity Pollution intolerant species

ParameterMin. ValueMin. SiteMin. Month Site with Lowest Values Overall Site with Highest Values Overall Site with Greatest IQ Range Can Sites be Grouped? Alkalinity (ppm) DO (ppm) pH

ParameterMin. Value Min. Site Min. Month Site with Lowest Values Overall Site with Highest Values Overall Site with Greatest IQ Range Can Sites be Grouped? Alkalinity (ppm) 5.3WB1MayWB1 (18.3)EB1 (103.2)CC3 (19.2)CC1/EB1 (high) CC2/CC3/SB1 (low) WB1 (large range) DO (ppm) pH

ParameterMin. Value Min. Site Min. Month Site with Lowest Values Overall Site with Highest Values Overall Site with Greatest IQ Range Can Sites be Grouped? Alkalinity (ppm) 5.3WB1MayWB1 (18.3)EB1 (103.2)CC3 (19.2)CC1/EB1 (high) CC2/CC3/SB1 (low) WB1 (large range) DO (ppm) 3.0SB1May (annual min. in Aug!) CC3 (7.1)WB1 (12.0)SB1 (5.0)CC1/WB1 (high) CC2/EB1/SB1 (mid) WB1 (low) pH

ParameterMin. Value Min. Site Min. Month Site with Lowest Values Overall Site with Highest Values Overall Site with Greatest IQ Range Can Sites be Grouped? Alkalinity (ppm) 5.3WB1MayWB1 (18.3)EB1 (103.2)CC3 (19.2)CC1/EB1 (high) CC2/CC3/SB1 (low) WB1 (large range) DO (ppm) 3.0SB1May (annual min. in Aug!) CC3 (7.1)WB1 (12.0)SB1 (5.0)CC1/WB1 (high) CC2/EB1/SB1 (mid) WB1 (low) pH 5.0WB1MayWB1 (5.6)SB1 (16.8)* EB1 (8.0) SB1 (0.4)CC1/EB1 (high) CC2/CC3/SB1 (mid) WB1 (low)

ParameterMax. Value Max. Site Max. Month Site with Highest Values Overall Site with Lowest Values Overall Site with Greatest IQ Range Can Sites be Grouped? Bacteria (FC) (col/100 ml) 320CC3Sept. (low flow) CC3 (145) SB1 (140) WB1 (0) Check! CC3 (175)CC3/SB1 (high)

ParameterMax. Value Max. Site Max. Month Site with Highest Values Overall Site with Lowest Values Overall Site with Greatest IQ Range Can Sites be Grouped? Bacteria (FC) (col/100 ml) 320CC3Sept. (low flow) CC3 (145) SB1 (140) WB1 (0) Check! CC3 (175)CC3/SB1 (high) Nitrate (ppm) 17.2EB1May (high flow?) EB1 (8.7) SB1 (8.3) WB1 (0.1) Check! EB1 (2.8)EB1/SB1 (high) WB1 (low)

ParameterMax. Value Max. Site Max. Month Site with Highest Values Overall Site with Lowest Values Overall Site with Greatest IQ Range Can Sites be Grouped? Bacteria (FC) (col/100 ml) 320CC3Sept. (low flow) CC3 (145) SB1 (140) WB1 (0) Check! CC3 (175)CC3/SB1 (high) Nitrate (ppm) 17.2EB1May (high flow?) EB1 (8.7) SB1 (8.3) WB1 (0.1) Check! EB1 (2.8)EB1/SB1 (high) WB1 (low) Temp. ( ° F) 86CC3JulyCC3 (70.5)WB1 (38)CC2 (24) Check! CC2/CC3 (high)

ParameterMax. Value Max. Site Max. Month Site with Highest Values Overall Site with Lowest Values Overall Site with Greatest IQ Range Can Sites be Grouped? Bacteria (FC) (col/100 ml) 320CC3Sept. (low flow) CC3 (145) SB1 (140) WB1 (0) Check! CC3 (175)CC3/SB1 (high) Nitrate (ppm) 17.2EB1May (high flow?) EB1 (8.7) SB1 (8.3) WB1 (0.1) Check! EB1 (2.8)EB1/SB1 (high) WB1 (low) Temp. ( ° F) 86CC3JulyCC3 (70.5)WB1 (38)CC2 (24) Check! CC2/CC3 (high) TSS (ppm) 456CC3May (high flow?) CC3 (130)WB1 (8.6)SB1 (133) Check! CC3 (high) CC2/SB1 (mid) WB1 (low)

ParameterMin. Value Min. Site Min. MonthSite with Lowest Values Overall Site with Highest Values Overall Site with Greatest IQ Range Can Sites be Grouped? Alkalinity (ppm) 5.3WB1MayWB1 (18.3)EB1 (103.2)CC3 (19.2)CC1/EB1 (high) CC2/CC3/SB1 (low) WB1 (large range) DO (ppm) 3.0SB1May (annual min. in Aug!) CC3 (7.1)WB1 (12.0)SB1 (5.0)CC1/WB1 (high) CC2/EB1/SB1 (mid) WB1 (low) pH 5.0WB1MayWB1 (5.6)SB1 (16.8)* EB1 (8.0) SB1 (0.4)CC1/EB1 (high) CC2/CC3/SB1 (mid) WB1 (low) ParameterMax. Value Max. Site Max. MonthSite with Highest Values Overall Site with Lowest Values Overall Site with Greatest IQ Range Can Sites be Grouped? FC (col/100 ml) 320CC3Sept. (low flow) CC3 (145) SB1 (140) WB1 (0) Check! CC3 (175)CC3/SB1 (high) Nitrate (ppm) 17.2EB1May (high flow?) EB1 (8.7) SB1 (8.3) WB1 (0.1) Check! EB1 (2.8)EB1/SB1 (high) WB1 (low) Temp. ( ° F) 86CC3JulyCC3 (70.5)WB1 (38)CC2 (24) Check! CC2/CC3 (high) TSS (ppm) 456CC3May (high flow?) CC3 (130)WB1 (8.6)SB1 (133) Check! CC3 (high) CC2/SB1 (mid) WB1 (low)

ParameterMin. Value Min. Site Min. MonthSite with Lowest Values Overall Site with Highest Values Overall Site with Greatest IQ Range Can Sites be Grouped? Alkalinity (ppm) 5.3WB1MayWB1 (18.3)EB1 (103.2)CC3 (19.2)CC1/EB1 (high) CC2/CC3/SB1 (low) WB1 (large range) DO (ppm) 3.0SB1May (annual min. in Aug!) CC3 (7.1)WB1 (12.0)SB1 (5.0)CC1/WB1 (high) CC2/EB1/SB1 (mid) WB1 (low) pH 5.0WB1MayWB1 (5.6)SB1 (16.8)* EB1 (8.0) SB1 (0.4)CC1/EB1 (high) CC2/CC3/SB1 (mid) WB1 (low) ParameterMax. Value Max. Site Max. MonthSite with Highest Values Overall Site with Lowest Values Overall Site with Greatest IQ Range Can Sites be Grouped? FC (col/100 ml) 320CC3Sept. (low flow) CC3 (145) SB1 (140) WB1 (0) Check! CC3 (175)CC3/SB1 (high) Nitrate (ppm) 17.2EB1May (high flow?) EB1 (8.7) SB1 (8.3) WB1 (0.1) Check! EB1 (2.8)EB1/SB1 (high) WB1 (low) Temp. ( ° F) 86CC3JulyCC3 (70.5)WB1 (38)CC2 (24) Check! CC2/CC3 (high) TSS (ppm) 456CC3May (high flow?) CC3 (130)WB1 (8.6)SB1 (133) Check! CC3 (high) CC2/SB1 (mid) WB1 (low)

ParameterMin. Value Min. Site Min. MonthSite with Lowest Values Overall Site with Highest Values Overall Site with Greatest IQ Range Can Sites be Grouped? Alkalinity (ppm) 5.3WB1MayWB1 (18.3)EB1 (103.2)CC3 (19.2)CC1/EB1 (high) CC2/CC3/SB1 (low) WB1 (large range) DO (ppm) 3.0SB1May (annual min. in Aug!) CC3 (7.1)WB1 (12.0)SB1 (5.0)CC1/WB1 (high) CC2/EB1/SB1 (mid) WB1 (low) pH 5.0WB1MayWB1 (5.6)SB1 (16.8)* EB1 (8.0) SB1 (0.4)CC1/EB1 (high) CC2/CC3/SB1 (mid) WB1 (low) ParameterMax. Value Max. Site Max. MonthSite with Highest Values Overall Site with Lowest Values Overall Site with Greatest IQ Range Can Sites be Grouped? FC (col/100 ml) 320CC3Sept. (low flow) CC3 (145) SB1 (140) WB1 (0) Check! CC3 (175)CC3/SB1 (high) Nitrate (ppm) 17.2EB1May (high flow?) EB1 (8.7) SB1 (8.3) WB1 (0.1) Check! EB1 (2.8)EB1/SB1 (high) WB1 (low) Temp. ( ° F) 86CC3JulyCC3 (70.5)WB1 (38)CC2 (24) Check! CC2/CC3 (high) TSS (ppm) 456CC3May (high flow?) CC3 (130)WB1 (8.6)SB1 (133) Check! CC3 (high) CC2/SB1 (mid) WB1 (low)

What is the data telling us? 1.How are the indicators related to one another? How do they affect each other?

What is the data telling us? 1.How are the indicators related to one another? How do they affect each other?  Temp  DO  Temp  FC?  Alk  pH  Nitr  TSS?

What is the data telling us? 2. Does flow seem to have an effect on WQ indicators? If so, how?

What is the data telling us? 2. Does flow seem to have an effect on WQ indicators? If so, how? Increasing flow  TSS  Alk  Nitr Decreasing flow  FC

What is the data telling us? 3. Do any data suggest that point sources may be impacting the stream? If so, which indicators?

What is the data telling us? 3. Do any data suggest that point sources may be impacting the stream? If so, which indicators? Discharge #7 (WWTP) – high FC at CC3

4.Do any data suggest that non-point source pollution may be impacting the stream? If so, which indicators?

Ag runoff to SB1 – high FC Ag runoff to EB1 – high nitrate with high flow (check into further)

5.Overall, what would you say about the health of the College Creek Watershed?

WB1 (sandstone) & EB1 (limestone) baseline conditions WQ at CC3 significantly degraded

6. If this was your watershed, what are some ways to improve the condition of the stream and raise awareness in the community?

Investigate non-point source Ag inputs above SB1 – education & outreach? WWTP – investigate summer discharges Protect summer baseflows and water temp – riparian vegetation and wetland creation