Conservation Commissions and the Kinder Morgan Proposed Gas Pipeline PRESENTATION TO NORTHEAST MUNICIPAL GAS PIPELINE COALITION SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 MASSACHUSETTS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NEPA, CWA, THE FARM BILL, THE BAY ACT, ESC, ASA, WQIA Understanding Laws that Shape Virginia’s Soil and Water Conservation Districts defiance-county.com.
Advertisements

NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
General Information on Permitting Electric Transmission Projects at the California Public Utilities Commission June 2009 Presentation created by the Transmission.
OVERVIEW OF CHAPTER 40B FUNDAMENTALS The Next Chapter of 40B: A Training on the Latest Developments in the Affordable Housing Law Fall 2011 Presented by.
BRUCE FREEMAN RAIL TRAIL ARTICLES 22, 23, & ANNUAL TOWN MEETING.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Conference on Environmental Assessments in Federations A Montana Perspective September 14, 2009 Tom Livers, Deputy Director Montana Department of Environmental.
1 Public Lands Advocacy HOW TO REVIEW A FEDERAL PLANNING DOCUMENT.
1 Procedural Issues: Adoption, Amendment, Enforcement, and Appeals.
1 Massachusetts Wetlands Regulations and the MCP Rachel Freed Mass. Department of Environmental Protection Wetlands and Waterways Program Northeast Regional.
Eric J. Tomasi – Project Manager Division of Gas – Environment & Engineering Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Northeast Energy.
Carbon Capture and Storage State Legislation Kathy G. Beckett Midwest Ozone Group January 22-23, 2009.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, :30 PM.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project Public Scoping Meetings November 5, 2014 (Sacramento and Red Bluff) State Water Resources Control Board Division of.
1 Brace Centre for Water Resources Management McGill University, Sept. 25 François Boulanger, Regional Director The New Canadian Environmental Assessment.
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
OVERVIEW OF CHAPTER 40B FUNDAMENTALS The Next Chapter of 40B: A Training on the Latest Developments in the Affordable Housing Law Fall 2011 Presented by.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Roles and Responsibilities in Municipal Land Use.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Budget Committee Workshop February16, Oregon’s local budget law is a group of statutes that require local governments to prepare and adopt annual.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
The Community Preservation Act in Harwich – July 28, 2004.
May 16, 2007 Board of Directors Texas Regional Entity Division Update Sam R. Jones ERCOT President & CEO.
The Community Preservation Act Hadley – April 14, 2004 The Community Preservation Coalition What is the CPA and how does it work? What does the CPA mean.
Bassett Creek Water Management Commission Joint Advisory Group Meeting January 23, 2001.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
WIND ENERGY SITING REFORM LEGISLATION Kenneth Kimmell, General Counsel, Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS IN NATURE CONSERVATION AND HABITATS LAW IN 2011 Margaret Austin 29 March 2012.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Lynne Welsh Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
The Community Preservation Act in Sutton – May 27, 2004.
FERC Office of Energy Projects 1 Richard Hoffmann, Director Division of Gas – Environment & Engineering Office of Energy Projects Policies Affecting.
The Community Preservation Act in Kingston. Open Space Historic Preservation Affordable Housing Allows communities to establish a dedicated fund for:
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Outdoor Heritage Fund. Established on August 1, 2013 by the Legislature. Continuing Appropriation of $20,000,000 annually from oil and gas taxes. Outdoor.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
After-the-Fact Conservation Area Impact Permit Request* Keene’s Pointe Community Association, Inc. District 1 November 1, 2011 *Postponed from the December.
The Community Preservation Act. Open Space Historic Preservation Affordable Housing Allows communities to establish a dedicated fund for: The Community.
INTERSTATE PIPELINE FORUM Presented by: Rebecca F. Zachas, Esq.
Carolina North Carolina North Annual Report for Chapel Hill Town Hall September 29, 2010.
The Development Process
The Community Preservation Act in Northborough
Hudson Wetlands Protection Bylaw
The Community Preservation Act in Topsfield – August 31, 2004
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Environmental Assessment PUC Application Process
WIND ENERGY SITING REFORM LEGISLATION
Request Permission to Proceed to the EMC for Approval of Delegation of the Neuse Buffer Program to Johnston County and Delegation of Further Approval Authority.
Presentation transcript:

Conservation Commissions and the Kinder Morgan Proposed Gas Pipeline PRESENTATION TO NORTHEAST MUNICIPAL GAS PIPELINE COALITION SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS

Massachusetts Assocation of Conservation Commissions (MACC) Non-profit, established in 1961, incorporated in 1978 Membership Organization ◦Conservation Commissions pay annual dues and are the voting members ◦Corporate, individual, and government members Funding ◦Membership Dues ◦Earned Income ◦Grants and Donations Board and Staff ◦3 full-time; 1 part-time staff ◦21 person Board of Directors; majority current or former conservation commissioners MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS

Massachusetts Assocation of Conservation Commissions (MACC) Mission ◦MACC protects Massachusetts natural resources by supporting conservation commissions through education and advocacy Programs ◦Education: Annual Environmental Conference; Fall Conference; Fundamentals for Conservation Commissioners training program; workshops throughout the year ◦Support: Helpline; Protecting Wetlands and Open Space: MACC’s Environmental Handbook for Massachusetts Conservation Commissioners; Massachusetts Runoff, Erosion & Sediment Control Field Guide; MACC Web Forum; model bylaws and forms ◦Advocacy: sound, science-based laws and regulations; advisory committees, comments on proposed laws, regulations, and policies MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS

Role of Conservation Commissions What may conservation commissions do concerning the proposed pipeline, considering their statutory responsibilities and authorities to: ◦Implement and enforce the MA Wetlands Protection Act and local wetlands bylaws ◦Own and manage open space ◦Inform, advocate, and plan for natural resources protection ◦Be on Community Preservation Committees and be consulted on use of CPA funds MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS

Now that KM has pre-filed with FERC KM may be doing more surveys, requesting landowner permission to survey property Landowners are not required to give permission. It is an individual decision. KM can file with the MA Department of Public Utilities (DPU) or FERC for an order giving it authority to enter property to survey where a landowner denies permission For land with conservation restrictions or easements: the restriction or easement may not allow the landowner to give permission for some surveys, but FERC and DPU can nonetheless authorize entry and surveying. Take a look at what KM proposes to do with the survey and compare it to the wording for the conservation restriction or easement MACC advises Commissions to know and map what is on the land they own/manage, and for which they have conservation easements: vernal pools, endangered species, protected habitats, archeological resources, historic sites, etc. Also: confirm that all the deeds for conservation land and CRs are recorded at the Registry of Deeds MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS

Now that KM has Pre-filed with FERC KM is not exempt from state and local laws until it receives a certificate or order from FERC MA Wetlands Protection Act and local wetlands bylaws thus apply to KM surveying work KM surveying may be exempt from WPA if it is a minor activity within a buffer zone that is temporary in nature, has negligible impacts, and is necessary for planning and design purposes (e.g., surveying, sediment sampling) KM surveying is not exempt in a buffer zone if it would have more than a negligible impact or is more than temporary in nature. If there is a question about the survey work, KM should file a Request for Determination or Notice of Intent, or the commission could consider a RDA filed by someone else or itself. If there is a positive Determination of Applicability, KM must file a Notice of Intent and receive an Order of Conditions before it may proceed with the survey MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS

Now that KM has Pre-filed with FERC KM public meetings (open houses) to discuss the project FERC should be there to explain the FERC pre-filing process and the public comment opportunities MACC advises commission involvement in the open houses, including providing information on possible environmental impacts of the proposed pipeline route and asking that a full environmental impact statement be prepared for the project MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS

NEPA KM’s pre-filing with FERC will trigger review of the project under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA goal: assess the environmental impact of the project and alternatives and identify mitigation for impacts NEPA requires public involvement, including public notice and public comment FERC will hold site visits and scoping meetings in the project area. Scoping highlights the issues that should be addressed in the NEPA review (for example, potential other routes for the pipeline, impacts on wetlands and endangered species, and the no-build alternative) MACC advises that it is very important to be involved in the NEPA process, submit detailed comments, and show that there are significant environmental concerns The NEPA process will conclude after KM’s formal filing with FERC FERC ultimately decides if the NEPA review was adequate. The FERC NEPA decision can be appealed to court (issue for court review is process, not substance) MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS

NEPA Environmental Impact Statement MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS

NEPA Process FERC, not KM, is responsible for the documents and process MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS

During the FERC Process KM files a formal application with FERC “Public convenience and necessity “must be shown by KM Environmental Report filed by KM / NEPA process completed People and groups can petition to intervene or protest the application ◦Request that FERC require KM to get approval from legislature to cross Ch 97 land ◦Advocate for an alternative route with less environmental impact FERC will schedule a public hearing on the application – can be a long process at the FERC If FERC approves the project, it will issue a certificate of public necessity and convenience. With that certificate, local and state laws and regulations are pre-empted unless the certificate states otherwise. Potential: use the FERC process to have the FERC include conditions in the certificate that require compliance with MESA, MA WPA and Ch.44 §53G MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS

After the FERC Process MACC will schedule meetings with commissions if KM receives the FERC certificate so that we can review the certificate and discuss next steps from there. Important considerations: What is involved in constructing a gas pipeline? What did FERC include as conditions in the certificate? Will there be a role for commissions? How can commissions ensure that lands disturbed during construction are restored and that there is other appropriate mitigation? How can commissions ensure that KM maintains the pipeline route in an environmentally sensitive and appropriate manner? Federal laws are not pre-empted. Commissions can participate in those reviews (e.g., CWA) MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS

What Can Commissions Do Now? Inventory conservation lands and document valuable resources ◦Submit rare species reports to NHESP ◦Certify vernal pools ◦Document archaeological resources ◦Identify historic sites Do homework necessary to establish value of conservation land in case of a negotiated easement or an eminent domain taking Review conservation restrictions on conservation land to see if proposed survey methods would violate restrictions Make sure CRs and conservation land deeds are recorded at the Registry of Deeds Make sure your commission has adopted rules for implementing Ch.44 §53G (hiring outside consultants at applicant’s expense) Review MassDEP’s Wildlife Habitat Guidance document MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS

Summary: Opportunities for Commissions to be Involved Decisions on survey requests Wetland Protection Act review of surveys when applicable Kinder Morgan Open Houses NEPA process FERC process Federal Permits (e.g., Clean Water Act) Construction and restoration phases (WPA permitting?) Maintenance of the right of way after project construction completed MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS

Questions and Next Steps DISCUSSION MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS