Topics in Search Theory The Secretary Problem. Theme Paper Who Solved the Secretary Problem? – Thomas Ferguson, 1989.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Introduction to Game Theory Part V: Extensive Games with Perfect Information Bernhard Nebel.
Advertisements

Heuristic Search techniques
Markov Decision Process
Seminar in Auctions and Mechanism Design Based on J. Hartline’s book: Approximation in Economic Design Presented by: Miki Dimenshtein & Noga Levy.
Social Security Literacy and Retirement Well-Being Hugo Benítez-Silva (SUNY-Stony Brook) Berna Demiralp (Old Dominion University) Zhen Liu (SUNY-Buffalo)
The Structure of Networks with emphasis on information and social networks T-214-SINE Summer 2011 Chapter 16 Ýmir Vigfússon.
1 1 Slide © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning™ Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide STATISTICS FOR BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS Seventh Edition AndersonSweeneyWilliams Slides Prepared by John Loucks © 1999 ITP/South-Western College.
Design and Analysis of Algorithms NP-Completeness Haidong Xue Summer 2012, at GSU.
Theory of Computing Lecture 16 MAS 714 Hartmut Klauck.
1 1 Slide IS 310 – Business Statistics IS 310 Business Statistics CSU Long Beach.
Markov Decision Processes
Planning under Uncertainty
Optimal Stopping -Amit Goyal 27 th Feb 2007 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.:
1 Introduction to Computability Theory Lecture12: Decidable Languages Prof. Amos Israeli.
Project: – Several options for bid: Bid our signal Develop several strategies Develop stable bidding strategy Simulating Normal Random Variables.
ECO 6120: The Ramsey-Cass-Koopmans model
CS 589 Information Risk Management 23 January 2007.
1 Introduction to Linear and Integer Programming Lecture 9: Feb 14.
Maximum likelihood Conditional distribution and likelihood Maximum likelihood estimations Information in the data and likelihood Observed and Fisher’s.
Maximum likelihood (ML) and likelihood ratio (LR) test
Decision Theory: Sequential Decisions Computer Science cpsc322, Lecture 34 (Textbook Chpt 9.3) April, 12, 2010.
Lecture 9 Today: –Log transformation: interpretation for population inference (3.5) –Rank sum test (4.2) –Wilcoxon signed-rank test (4.4.2) Thursday: –Welch’s.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 11 ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHM EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHM EFFICIENCY.
Optimization Methods One-Dimensional Unconstrained Optimization
Chapter 6: Transform and Conquer Genetic Algorithms The Design and Analysis of Algorithms.
1 1 Slide © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Copyright (c) 2004 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Chapter 8 Tests of Hypotheses Based on a Single Sample.
Example 10.1 Experimenting with a New Pizza Style at the Pepperoni Pizza Restaurant Concepts in Hypothesis Testing.
Simpler Models of Rational Decision Making
The Marriage Problem Finding an Optimal Stopping Procedure.
Utility Theory & MDPs Tamara Berg CS Artificial Intelligence Many slides throughout the course adapted from Svetlana Lazebnik, Dan Klein, Stuart.
Ch 8.1 Numerical Methods: The Euler or Tangent Line Method
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 9, Part B Hypothesis Tests Population Proportion Population Proportion Hypothesis Testing and Decision Making.
The Multiplicative Weights Update Method Based on Arora, Hazan & Kale (2005) Mashor Housh Oded Cats Advanced simulation methods Prof. Rubinstein.
1 1 Slide Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Classifying Attributes with Game- theoretic Rough Sets Nouman Azam and JingTao Yao Department of Computer Science University of Regina CANADA S4S 0A2
1 Lesson 8: Basic Monte Carlo integration We begin the 2 nd phase of our course: Study of general mathematics of MC We begin the 2 nd phase of our course:
DPA51 Dynamic Programming Applications Lecture 5.
Chapter 7 Additional Integration Topics
Chapter 7 Sample Variability. Those who jump off a bridge in Paris are in Seine. A backward poet writes inverse. A man's home is his castle, in a manor.
MENTORING ACCORDING TO THE PRACTICE OF CENTRAS Constantza Mamaia 2- 3 June 2011.
1 Markov Decision Processes Infinite Horizon Problems Alan Fern * * Based in part on slides by Craig Boutilier and Daniel Weld.
GG 313 Geological Data Analysis Lecture 13 Solution of Simultaneous Equations October 4, 2005.
Testing Hypothesis That Data Fit a Given Probability Distribution Problem: We have a sample of size n. Determine if the data fits a probability distribution.
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Chapter 5 Parameter estimation. What is sample inference? Distinguish between managerial & financial accounting. Understand how managers can use accounting.
Introduction to LDA Jinyang Gao. Outline Bayesian Analysis Dirichlet Distribution Evolution of Topic Model Gibbs Sampling Intuition Analysis of Parameter.
Models for Strategic Marketing Decision Making. Market Entry Decisions To enter first or to wait Sources of First-Mover Advantages –Technological leadership.
Decision Making Under Uncertainty CMSC 471 – Spring 2041 Class #25– Tuesday, April 29 R&N, material from Lise Getoor, Jean-Claude Latombe, and.
Game Theory: Optimal stopping problem I: Introduction Sarbar Tursunova.
Calculus-Based Optimization AGEC 317 Economic Analysis for Agribusiness and Management.
Knowing When to Stop: The Mathematics of Optimal Stopping 1 Minimize Cost and Maximize Reward.
Cascade Principles, Bayes Rule and Wisdom of the Crowds Lecture 6 (Largely drawn from Kleinberg book)
Module 3: Selecting Locations and Respondents Outcome Monitoring and Evaluation Using LQAS.
Theory of Computational Complexity Yusuke FURUKAWA Iwama Ito lab M1.
Optimal Stopping.
Decisions Under Risk and Uncertainty
Chapter 19 Decision Making
Markov Decision Processes
Topics in Search Theory
Announcements Homework 3 due today (grace period through Friday)
Objective of This Course
St. Edward’s University
Instructors: Fei Fang (This Lecture) and Dave Touretzky
Coding Concepts (Basics)
Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Simulation Berlin Chen
Calculus-Based Optimization AGEC 317
Presentation transcript:

Topics in Search Theory The Secretary Problem

Theme Paper Who Solved the Secretary Problem? – Thomas Ferguson, 1989

Background Problem appeared in late 50’s and early 60’s Also known as “marriage problem”, “the dowry problem” Highly appealing problem: – Easy to state – Striking solution Since then the problem has been extended and generalized in many directions to become a “field” of study (see [Freeman, 1983])

Problem Statement Simplest form: – There is one secretarial position available – The number of applicants is known – The applicants are interviewed sequentially in random order (each sequence is equally likely) – You can rank all the applicants from best to worst without ties – The decision to accept or reject the applicant must be based only on the relative ranks of those applicants interviewed so far – An applicant once rejected cannot later be recalled – You will be satisfied with nothing but the very best (meaning: your payoff is 1 if choosing the best of the n applicants and 0 otherwise)

Analysis Attention can be restricted to the class of rules that for some integer r≥1 rejects the first r-1 applicants and then chooses the next applicant who is best in the relative ranking of the observed applicants (since we don’t learn anything new about the population over each interview) timeline n reject first r-1accept (and stop) if better than max so far

Analysis What is the probability of selecting the best applicant? – For r=1 or r=n, 1/n – For r>1: timeline n max of r-1max of j-r> the probability that the maximum number in a sample of j-1 is one of the first r-1 numbers the probability that this is the best candidate

Analysis The optimal r is the one that maximizes this probability For small values of n the optimal r can be easily computed (see excel file) Approximation can be supplied for large n

Kepler’s Problem In 1611, the German astronomer Johannes Kepler lost his wife Since his first marriage had been arranged for him, he decided this time to make his own decision He arranged to interview and to choose from among no fewer than eleven candidates The process consumed much of his attention for nearly 2 years, investigating: – Virtues and drawbacks – Dowry – Negotiation with the parents – Advice of friends – …

Kepler’s Problem Of the eleven candidates interviewed, Kepler eventually decided on the fifth What a surprise! Check the excel sheet for the optimal strategy here… Perhaps if Kepler had been aware of the secretary problem, he could have saved himself a lot of time and trouble Of course, it is not exactly the same problem: – Recall option – Discount factor? – Other utility aspects? – Maybe it’s an optimal stopping rule problem?

Back to Secretary problem: Analysis This is actually a Riemann approximation to an integral! When:

Optimal Solution First derivative: Substituting in : Interpretation: wait until 37% of applicants have been interviewed and then select the relative best one. The probability of success in this case will be 37%

Differences from One-Sided Search Rankings No search costs Decision horizon Recall Goal function (find the best vs. optimize expected value)