Understanding mirror neurons : A bio-robotic approach 인지과학 협동과정 VCC 석사 2 학기 김시온

Understanding action 1.Introduction 사과때리다 왜?왜? 미워서, 웃겨서, 짜증나서 까불어서, 사랑의 마음으로 잘되라고, 말 안들어서 … -> 의도 파악의 필요성

Speech understanding machine Alvin Liberman(May 10, Jan. 13, 2000) 1.Introduction Analyzing the acoustic characteristics of spoken words Failed because of the limited computational power available SubjectsContext Sound Articulatory gestures

Acoustically –evoked motor “Resonance” 1.Introduction Perception 에도 관여한다. Production 에 관여한 지식들이 Action 과 관련하여 이러한 역할을 하는 것으로 보이는 영역이 발견되었다 !!

2. Physiological properties of monkey rostroventral premotor area (F5) Inferior premotor area

2. Physiological properties of monkey rostroventral premotor area (F5) Motor Neurons Goal-Directed action 들에 반응 (grasping, manipulating, tearing, holding) - 비슷한 손동작이 사용될지라도 목적이 다르면 발화하지 않음 많은 Grasping neuron 들은 특정한 종류 의 Grasping 에만 선택적 반응 (precision, finger prehension, whole hand grasping) -> a repository of motor actions

Visuomotor Neurons - Canonical Neurons 움직임이 있기 전에, 움직일 수 있는 대상을 보았을 때에도 발화 많은 canonical neurons 들은 하나, 혹은 소수의 대상에 선택적으로 반응한다. 2. Physiological properties of monkey rostroventral premotor area (F5)

Visuomotor Neurons - Mirror Neurons 내가 행동할 때 뿐만 아니라, 다른 행위자가 동일한 목표 - 지향적 행동을 할 때에도 발화 최근 연구 결과 F5 이외에도 PF 에서도 발견됨 다른 행위자가 손이나 입을 이용해 물체와 상호작용할 때 활발하게 반응 도구를 이용했을 때에는 반응하지 않음 대부분의 Mirror Neuron 들은 한 종류의 행동에만 선택적으로 반응 (Highly congruent neurons) 2. Physiological properties of monkey rostroventral premotor area (F5)

Visuomotor Neurons - Mirror Neurons 2. Physiological properties of monkey rostroventral premotor area (F5)

A role of F5 3. A model of area F5 and the mirror system Controller Classifier Object affordance Visual appearance of the hand

Controller-predictor formulation 3. A model of area F5 and the mirror system Acting Specific Motor PlanDesired action, timing Context ※ Feedback : to counteract disturbances and to learn from mistakes Comparison F5 forward information ≒ Sensory feedback(VMM) Desired action

Controller-predictor formulation 3. A model of area F5 and the mirror system Observing an action Transforming visual cues into motor information as before Mirror Neurons Bayesian approach??

Ontogenesis of mirror neurons 아기들이 행위자의 목표를 판단할 때 사용하는 Cue 는 ? (Path? Object?) Results 6,9 mos : new>old goal Woodward(1998) 3. A model of area F5 and the mirror system

1)Certain actions are more likely to be applied to a particular object 2)Objects are used to perform actions How do we achieve an action recognizing? Canonical Neuron Mirror Neuron Linking Particular action = particular effect Specific goals

The Bayesian interpretation

Question!! 과연 VMM 정보가 Action 인식에 도움을 줄까 ?? 로봇를 가지고 한번 직접 실험해 보자 !

4. A machine with hands Recording “motor awareness” Cyber-glove, a pair of CCD cameras, a magnetic tracker, two touch sensors Data was sampled at frame rate, synchronized and stored to disk by a Pentium class PC Cyber-glove has 22 sensors, recording the kinematics of the hand at up to 112Hz Two touch sensors were mounted on the thumb and index finger to detect the moment of contact with the object Matlab was employed for post-processing Motor-kinesthetic information + visual information vs only visual information

Grasping type followed Napier’s taxonomy 4. A machine with hands

Each grasping action was recorded from six different subjects. Moving the cameras to 12 different locations Images of the scene from the two camera synchronized with the cyber-glove and magnetic tracker data The visual features were extracted from pre-processed image data Using a simple color segmentation algorithm The data set was filtered through Principal Component Analysis => Bayesian Classifier Classification Task Motor-kinesthetic information + visual information vs only visual information

VMM Using a simple back-propagation neural network with sigmoidal units The input of the VMM was the vector of the mapping of the images onto the space spanned by the first N PCA vectors The output was the vector of joint angle acquried the data glove. 4. A machine with hands

Experiment 1 - Classification 4. A machine with hands > -> 운동정보가 Action recognition 에 도움을 줄 수 있다 !!!

Cog 5. Robotic experiment Flipper A mirror neuron-like representation could be acquired by simply relying on the information exchanged during the robot- environment interaction ( 로봇 - 환경 간의 상호작용에서 mirror-neuron 과 같은 표상을 획득할 수 있는가 ?)

Causal indirection, brain area and function 5. Robotic experiment If any neural unit is active in these two situations(both when acting and observing) Then it can be regarded in all respects as a “mirror” unit. 1 by repetitive exposure and manipulation

Rolling affordances 6. Learning object affordances Grasping(x) Touching, poking, prodding, sweeping(o)

6. Learning object affordances Rolling affordances

Generic poking actions Can this information be re-used when acting to generate anything useful Showing exploitation of the object affordance? 6. Learning object affordances 100/15 … 3 번만 완전 실패 ( ≒ Canonical Neuron) Another interesting question is whether knowledge about object directed actions can be reused in interpreting observed actions performed by a human experimenter.

mimicry 7. Developing mirror neurons Same segmentation procedure section 6 generated by human and robot … LEARNING??

Passive vs Active imitation Demiris & Hayes, Developing mirror neurons

mimicry 7. Developing mirror neurons Learning of mirror neurons can be carried out by a process of autonomous development

The motor information plays a role in the recognition process A mirror-like representation can be developed autonomously on the basis of the interaction between an individual and the environment 7. Conclusion

감사합니다.