CH124 Sea King Fleet Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aircraft Maintenance Records
Advertisements

1 Copyright Electric Power Research Institute 2008 Steam Turbine-Generator Guidelines Quick Start VolumeContent 1General Practices Condition assessment,
DLA's Aviation Supply & Demand Chain Manager Defense Supply Center Richmond Aviation Engineering Reliability and Sustainment Programs Defense Logistics.
Issues regarding Acceptable Design Data Rodger Chalk & Richard Doig.
JHP Case Study Introduction 1 UNCLASSIFIED notional data for notional program.
LEADING YOUR LEGACY INTO THE FUTURE. Leading Your Legacy into the Future Mission Statement Erickson is striving to become the recognized leader in legacy.
1 PBL Panel Discussion F-22 System Program Office F-22 System Program Office F-22 System Program Director 13 January 2015.
PM AAVS Program Brief For 2005 Combat Vehicles Conference.
Project Change Management
(c) 2007 Mauro Pezzè & Michal Young Ch 1, slide 1 Software Test and Analysis in a Nutshell.
Future Defence Aviation Safety Regulation Module 3 EMAR Part M – Continuing Airworthiness Requirements May 2015.
System Integration Management (SIM)
1 CLASSIFICATION SSO SAR Update Brief CASARA BoD meeting May 24 Maj Scott Frost.
Aircraft Maintenance. Introduction Aircraft Handling follows on from knowledge learnt in Airmanship It builds on this and prepares you for your first.
Costs of Operating AC & RC Flying Units Al Robbert June 2013.
Requirements for a Maintenance Program
13. Airworthiness of Aircraft-1 Certificate of Type Approval Certificate of Type Approval A Certificate of Type Approval approves the basic design and.
Rotor Track and Balance Only????. Agenda History of Rotor Track and Balance. Vibration Requirements Increasing. Using the Tools You Have. Cost Savings.
The Maintenance and Engineering Organization
1 Root Cause Analysis of BIT False Alarms Presented to National Defense Industrial Association 6th Annual Systems Engineering Conference Mr. Kerry Westervelt.
ATN2001 Rev New Kent Fisher, Program Manager Boeing Air Traffic Management Kent Fisher, Program Manager Boeing Air Traffic Management.
OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT AGENCY DEPARTURE & CONTINGENCY PROCEDURES CW3 MICHAEL R. JEWETT OSAA FLIGHT STANDARDS CW3 MICHAEL R. JEWETT OSAA FLIGHT STANDARDS.
Condition-based Maintenance Plus Structural Integrity (CBM+SI) & the Airframe Digital Twin Pamela A. Kobryn & Eric J. Tuegel Structural Mechanics Branch.
NCHPS Fall Meeting CFR Part 37 Update. Reference: IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR 10 CFR PART 37 PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF BYPRODUCT MATERIAL CATEGORY.
St Louis Flying Club I 2008 Annual Meeting 2008 Annual Meeting.
PLANNING RSTWG Review of Planning Concept of Operations & Requirements Tasks.
Western Regional Gas Conference August 24, 2010 Distribution Integrity Management Programs (DIMP) Rule.
1 SA AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON DEFENCE 17 NOVEMBER 2010 Brig Gen W.S. Mbambo Director Air Capability Plan.
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
CD NH WING CD MEMBER TRAINING objectives General Program and Procedures Operations Training and Eval Equipment Forms.
Inoperative Equipment And Minimum Equipment List
Continuing analysis and surveillance system (CASS)
7-1 Design of UAV Systems Sorties ratesc 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss Sortie rate analysis including … - Mission planning and preparation.
Presented to: Transport Airplane Metallic and Composite Structures Working Group and Airworthiness Authorities By: Walt Sippel and Mike Gruber Date: Sept.
Overcoming The Challenges Together Fred Brisbois Director, Aviation & Product Safety Sikorsky Aircraft REDUCING THE ACCIDENT RATE.
1 S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Scheduling Periodic Maintenance of Aircraft through simulation-based optimization Ville.
By: Caleb Harris.  The main purpose of QA is to monitor programs to determine their effectiveness, and if they are ineffective, to implement appropriate.
Excerpts from Tom Jackson’s slides shown at Nov 2013 SMAP CalVal workshop with comments added by E. Kim in green TJJ–1 Green comments added by E.Kim.
Jack Stanton Manager Intelligence Safety & Risk Analysis Unit.
1 DISTRIBUTION A. Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. 88ABW , 23 May Integrity  Service  Excellence ADT 101: Introduction.
Managing Rotorcraft Safety During Frequently Performed Unique Missions September 28, 2005 AHS International Helicopter Safety Symposium 2005 Philip G.
Optimal Repair Strategy for Rotables during Phase-out of an Aircraft Fleet NAME: DATE: Jan Block, Support & Services, Luleå University of Technology
Next Generation ISEA Roadmap
Active Corrosion Process Nisource – COH/CKY. Objectives  Understanding the terminology –Active Corrosion –& Suspected Areas of “Active Corrosion”  Developing.
System Monitoring at the DAEC SysMon SMART Teaming up to get the most out of System Monitoring!
Repair and Overhaul (R&O) Component Value Engineering Trust in All Transactions Commercial Aircraft Aftermarket Consultancy.
1 CLASSIFICATION CASARA Liaison Officers and CASARA Trainers Meeting 24 Jan 15 Maj Scott Frost SO SAR Rdns.
Development Report Engineering Node August 2006
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration AIRWORTHINESS Positive Safety Culture Failure to Follow Procedures 1 R1.
1 Software Quality Engineering. 2 Quality Management Models –Tools for helping to monitor and manage the quality of software when it is under development.
Markland J. Benson, Computer Systems Manager, White Sands Complex, (575) , Technology Infusion of CodeSonar into the Space.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency AGEING MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT Module 9 Session 9 Resource document: AMAT Guidelines, Reference document for Ageing.
Most Airlines Are Not Operating at Previous 737NG Maintenance Planning Data (MPD) Document
Quality Assurance and Risk Management Services, Inc. 
3/5/2016 Aircraft Maintenance Module1 Aircraft Maintenance Management Module Reliability and Technical Services Processes.
General Avionics Software Specification Paper by: C. Douglass Locke, David R. Vogel, Lee Lucas, John B. Goodenough Presented by: Jeremy Erickson August.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
HPHC - PERFORMANCE TESTING Dec 15, 2015 Natarajan Mahalingam.
AIRCRAFT INSPECTION INSPECTION PROCESS. The Art of Inspection What inspection What inspection Who can inspect Who can inspect Phases of inspection Phases.
Long-Term Stewardship: Institutional Controls on Department of Energy Sites Steve Schiesswohl, Senior Realty Officer November 2006.
Wind Composite Services Group/WindCom
Helicopter B1 and B2 Technician Continuation Training
Types of Inspections.
Aircraft maintenance forms
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Introduction to Materials Management
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
From AS :   Part 4— Commissioning, operation and asset management
Shipboard Composite Repair Challenges
Presentation transcript:

CH124 Sea King Fleet Update “Keepin’ ‘em Flying!!” Major Richard Loewen Senior Design Engineer

US Army Air Corps – 1941 – Recruiting Slogan

Universal Pictures – 28 November 1941

CH124 Highlights General Fleet Information Fleet Service Life Status Attributes of Success Maintenance Program Aircraft Structural Integrity Sunset Years Challenges & Capabilities Wrap-Up

General Fleet Information 24 of 41 “Available for Operations” (4 x non-active) High 16658.1 = AC 412 Low 12956.5 = AC 435 – Crashed Jul 13 Low 13081.4 = AC 429 Avg 14848.39 = avg AF Hrs High Time Aircraft – 16 658 Hrs Low Time Aircraft – 13 081 Hrs Fleet Average – 14 848 Hrs

CH124B – Utility & Troop Config (14 Pax) CH124A – ASW - Dipping Sonar, Self Defense, ISR CH124B – Utility & Troop Config (14 Pax)

Main Operating Bases & HQ 443 Sqn Victoria, BC NDHQ Ottawa, ON 406 OTS 423 Sqn 12 AMS Shearwater, NS

CH124 Highlights General Fleet Information Fleet Service Life Status Attributes of Success Maintenance Program Aircraft Structural Integrity Sunset Years Challenges & Capabilities Wrap-Up

Fleet Service Life Status Entered service – May 1963

Fleet Service Life Status Entered service – May 1963 Oct 1992: ELE extended to Dec 2000 Oct 1998: ELE extended to Dec 2005 xxx 2005: ELE extended to Dec 2012 Jul 2011: ELE extended to Dec 2015

Fleet Service Life Status Summer 2013: 50th Anniversary Celebrations

Fleet Service Life Status Sept 2014: … ELE Extension Request … Align with CH148 Cyclone (S-92) Introduction CH124 operations out to August 2018 Proposed Flying Rates FY14/15 FY15/16 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY18/19 Flying Hours 7200 5500 3700 500 Fleet Size 28 24 20 16 12 to 0

CH124 Highlights General Fleet Information Fleet Service Life Status Attributes of Success Maintenance Program Aircraft Structural Integrity Sunset Years Challenges & Capabilities Wrap-Up

Attributes of Success

Attributes of Success Maintenance Program Preventive Corrective Upgrades / Modifications Mechanical System Avionics/Electrical/Mission System

Maintenance Program Preventive Depot Level Maint (Third Level Insp & Repair - TLIR) Base Level Maint (Periodic Inspections – PER) 600 hrs +/- 50 hrs PER #1 & #3 – Minor PER #2 & #4 – Major Squadron Level Maint (Supplementary Insp – SUPP) 25 hrs +/- 2.5 hrs After & Before Flight Checks Corrosion - #1 & #2 – Alternate Every 7 Days Conditional Inspections – Hard Ldg, Lightening Strike, etc

Maintenance Program Corrective Structural Repair Manual (Standard Repairs) System Maint Manuals (Fault Diagnosis & Repair) OEM or Contractor Developed Repairs Temp or Non-Standard Repairs Aircraft Battle Damage & Repair

Maintenance Program Upgrades / Modifications Mechanical System Avionics/Electrical/Mission System CD (Depot Level) Approx 225 CD mods to date CF (Field Level) Approx 600 CF mods to date

Attributes of Success Maintenance Program Aircraft Structural Integrity

Attributes of Success Aircraft Structural Integrity Technical Airworthiness Manual Since 2003 provides ASI related Rules & Standards Replaced Tech Order based on MIL-STD-1530C ASI ASI Program Elements Statement of Operating Intent Baseline Usage Spectrum with Mission Profiles Structural Usage Monitoring (SUM) Structural Condition Monitoring (SCM) Aircraft Structural Integrity Mgmt Plan (ASIMP)

Aircraft Structural Integrity Process Inspection-generated data SCM uses data from: Scheduled maintenance, Repairs SIs Service bulletins Full-scale tests Foreign operators OEM Baseline Usage (SOI) Structural Condition Monitoring Fleet Structural Maintenance Plan Structural Analysis Final product of ASI process, used to generate maintenance program Analytical Methods Structural Usage Monitoring Models, software, data Includes usage data collection, transfer, analysis and reporting

Baseline Usage Spectrum CH124 BUS Analysis (Sikorsky 2005) BUS Development Operations & Flight Witnessing Pilot Interviews Usage Data Analysis from CF335 Forms Dynamic Component Fatigue Usage Spectrum Adjusted fatigue lives 9 Mission Profiles Produced Composite Worst Case Usage Spectrum

Baseline Usage Spectrum CH124 Mission Profiles A – Reconnaissance/Surveillance (Recce) B – Crew Operational Readiness (COREX) C – Pilot Proficiency Flight (PPF) D – Maintenance Test Flight (MTF) E – Helicopter Delivery Service/Utility (HDS/Utility) F – Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) G – Search and Rescue (SAR) H – Cross-Country/Pilot Proficiency Instrument Flight K – Waterbird (Ceased Trg Fall 2013)

COREX Mission Profile (a) Flight Initiation, RADAR Tracking / Surveillance (d) Return to Base (e) Yard Work (off-levels) (b) SAR Exercise (f) Yard Work (slung loads) (c) SONAR Dips (g) Flight conclusion

Baseline Usage Spectrum Sikorsky Report SER-611984 “Composite Worst Case” Spectrum, presented in Table 22, be used for the dynamic component and airframe fatigue assessments.

Baseline Usage Spectrum CH124 “Composite Worst Case” Spectrum (cont)

Aircraft Structural Integrity Mgmt Plan CH124 Structural Usage Monitoring (SUM) Fatigue monitoring program Includes individual aircraft tracking Requires sufficient and relevant data to track usage Review process to compare actual to baseline Process to re-evaluate component lives Maintenance program review based on findings

Aircraft Structural Integrity Mgmt Plan CH124 SUM Dataset Mission Type; Approx % of time spent: # of main rotor starts and stops; Below 90 knots; Between 90 and 120 knots; Above 120 knots; # of landings; Approx time spent in In-ground Effect (IGE) and Out-of-Ground Effect (OGE) hover; and # of auto-rotations; Slung Loads; Fuel weight at take-off and at landing; Approx time running on ground in flight drive. Flight duration; Approx time spent above 103% Nr;

Aircraft Structural Integrity Mgmt Plan CH124 Usage Spectrum Mission Weighting

Aircraft Structural Integrity Mgmt Plan Comparison of Mission Usage to Baseline

Aircraft Structural Integrity Mgmt Plan CH124 SUM - Exceedences from Baseline Limit or adjust usage patterns or mission profile AC 412 continue to limit usage of Mission A (Recce/Surv) AC 441 limit usage of Mission H (X-Country / PPIF) Autorotations / One Engine Inoperative / Waterbird Add or increase inspection requirements Reduce Interval for SSI#12- Left/Fwd Sponson Mount to 600hrs

Baseline Usage Spectrum CH124 Mission Profile - Damage Severity Most Damaging - Dynamic Components & SSIs A – Reconnaissance/Surveillance (Recce) C – Pilot Proficiency Flight (PPF) G – Search and Rescue (SAR) K – Waterbird (Ceased Trg Fall 2013) Moderate Damage to Specific Components D – Maintenance Test Flight (MTF) E – Helicopter Delivery Service/Utility (HDS/Utility) F – Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) H – Cross-Country/Pilot Proficiency Instrument Flight Non-Damaging B – Crew Operational Readiness (COREX) Damage Severity on Dynamic Components and SSIs.

Aircraft Structural Integrity Mgmt Plan CH124 Structural Condition Monitoring (SCM) Program to monitor structural repairs and inspection records Long-term impact assessment of structural repairs Review of inspection records to determine trends Review of structural related in-service monitoring data Process to re-evaluate the maintenance program Adjust Preventive Maint Inspections (i.e. Corrosion Control)

Aircraft Structural Integrity Mgmt Plan CH124 SCM Policy SCM Function in CH124 ASIP SCM Data Sources & Tools Definition of Structurally Significant Items (SSIs) Damage Mapping Corrosion Fatigue Mechanical SCM Reporting Annually

Aircraft Structural Integrity Mgmt Plan SCM Function in CH124 ASIP Monitor Structural Repairs & Inspection Records; Consider Primary Structure as a minimum; Determine trends in frequency of damage by location; Review service difficulty reports impacting ASI longterm; Document identified trends & provide recommendations; Dynamic Components Currently outside SCM scope but coming soon…

Aircraft Structural Integrity Mgmt Plan SCM Data Sources & Tools Primary Data Sources Historical TLIR & PER#4 Reports reviewed in FY11/12 Up to four reports/aircraft were reviewed SCM Dataset Primary Structure not defined in Sikorsky documents CH124 SCM Policy classifies Primary Structural Elements

Aircraft Structural Integrity Mgmt Plan CH124 SCM Definition of SSIs The part is a subset of aircraft primary structure; Failure of the part could cause direct loss of the aircraft (Category I); Failure of the part could cause substantial damage to the aircraft (Category II); The part has been shown, by experience or analysis, to be prone to damage; and Part geometry and/or load carrying capability and material did not change with a structural modification yet show a history of chronic, severe damage.

Aircraft Structural Integrity Mgmt Plan 37 x Structurally Significant Items SSI List is available to review if interested 64 x Structurally Significant Modifications modifications or repairs on the aircraft that have a significant impact on the life and airframe structural integrity

Aircraft Structural Integrity Mgmt Plan CH124 SCM Damage Mapping Corrosion Fatigue Mechanical

CH124 Highlights General Fleet Information Fleet Service Life Status Attributes of Success Maintenance Program Aircraft Structural Integrity Sunset Years Challenges & Capabilities Wrap-Up

Sunset Years

Sunset Years Challenges 51 Year old Aircraft Obsolescence Limited Parts Availability Long Lead Times Increased Costs

Sunset Years ELE Initiatives Parts Procurement Project FY14/15 & FY15/16 Aircraft Sampling Inspection Post TLIR Areas of Interest Obsolescence Mod Projects Minor system updates

Sunset Years Capabilities through Transition Increased focus on Intelligence, Reconnaissance, and Surveillance; Prototype EO/IR, TCDL, SONAR Digitization Three letter snake names…From ASP to BOA. Augmented Surface Plot Basic Operational Augmentation Tactical Mission System enhancements

CH124 Highlights General Fleet Information Fleet Service Life Status Attributes of Success Maintenance Program Aircraft Structural Integrity Sunset Years Challenges & Capabilities Wrap-Up

51 Yrs … Keepin’ ‘em Flying!!

Fleet Service Life Status Entered service – May 1963