Did the prevention strategy work? Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Why Evaluate? xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

Background Information on the Newspoets Total Number: 78 active newspoets. 26 (of the original 36) newspoets from returned this year.
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
Agencies’ Participation in PBMS January 20, 2015 PA IL TX AZ CA Trained, Partial Data Entry (17) Required Characteristics & 75% of Key Indicators (8) OH.
MD VT MA NH DC CT NJ RI DE WA
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
House Price
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 240 sessions with 8,187 participants
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Children's Eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP by Income, January 2013
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Other Adults, January 2017
NJ WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NH NV
BUSINESS DEVELPOMENT TEAM DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC MPS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
Comprehensive Medicaid Managed Care Models in the States, 2014
Medicaid Costs are Shared by the States and the Federal Government
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Share of Births Covered by Medicaid, 2006
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Coverage of Low-Income Adults by Scope of Coverage, January 2013
Populations included in States’ SIMRs for Part C FFY 2013 ( )
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Mean
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 250 sessions with 8,352 participants
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Mean
Uninsured Rate Among Adults Ages 19–64, 2008–09 and 2019
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Post-Reform: Projected Percent of Adults Ages 19–64 Uninsured by State
United States: age distribution family households and family size
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Why Evaluate? Did the prevention strategy work?
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Presentation transcript:

Did the prevention strategy work? Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Why Evaluate? xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Where are we and where are we going? Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? 1. How is this disease distributed and what hypotheses might explain that distribution? 2. Is there an association between the hypothesized cause and the disease? 3. Is the association causal? 4. What should individuals and society do when preventable causes of disease are found? 5. Did the prevention strategy work?

1 How is this disease distributed? Hypotheses 2 Is there an association? 3 Is the association causal? 4 What should be done to prevent the disease? 5 Did the prevention strategy work? Did the exposure and the disease turn up together? Why did the exposure and the disease turn up together? What’s my hypothesis? Was it worth the effort? Should we continue it? What should I do? What should society do? Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Where are we and where are we going?

Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Why Evaluate?

Epi Talk Ethical In accordance with the accepted principles of right and wrong governing the conduct of a group. Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Review

Epi Talk Risk A measure of how often an event occurs in a defined group of people in a defined period of time. The likelihood of developing a disease. Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Review

Epi Talk Risk Management Steps taken to reduce the levels of risk to which an individual or a population is exposed. Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Review

Actual Evidence of Risk Perception of Risk Acceptability of Risk Risk Management Strategy Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Review

Epi Talk Strategy Evaluation Epi Talk A scientific investigation of the effectiveness of a risk management strategy. Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate?

Why Evaluate? Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Learn if the strategy is working Stop wasting, time, energy, and money Learn if a new strategy is needed Ensure public is not mislead Reasons to Evaluate

Why Evaluate? Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Learn if the strategy is working Stop wasting, time, energy, and money Learn if a new strategy is needed Ensure public is not mislead Reasons to Evaluate Save time, energy, and money Avoid having to admit that you were wrong Avoid embarrassment Avoid having people mad at you Reasons Not to Evaluate

Why Evaluate? Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Learn if the strategy is working Stop wasting, time, energy, and money Learn if a new strategy is needed Ensure public is not mislead Reasons to Evaluate Save time, energy, and money Avoid having to admit that you were wrong Avoid embarrassment Avoid having people mad at you Reasons Not to Evaluate

Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? United States TX CA MT AZ ID NV NM OR CO UT IL WY KS IA NE SD MN ND OK FL WA WI MO AL GA AR MI LA IN NY PA NC MS TN KY VA OH ME SC WV MI VT NH MD NJ MA CT DE RI

Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Missouri

Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? St. Louis County

Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Epi Teams

Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Epi Log Worksheet

Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Good Idea? 1 Ordinance Number: 20193

Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Will the strategy reduce violence? 2

Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Should the strategy be evaluated? 3 Video games in this establishment which are marked with a red dot may contain graphic violence not suitable for persons under age 17.

Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? What might happen if it is not evaluated? 4 Why Evaluate? Learn if the strategy is working Stop wasting, time, energy, and money Learn if a new strategy is needed Ensure public is not mislead Reasons to Evaluate Save time, energy, and money Avoid having to admit that you were wrong Avoid embarrassment Avoid having people mad at you Reasons Not to Evaluate

Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? How should the strategy be evaluated? 5 -

Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Found Ineffective? 6

Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Ethical? 7 Ordinance First Time

Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Ethical? 8 Ordinance After Time

Did the prevention strategy work? Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Essential Question 5 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Save time, energy, and money Avoid having to admit you were wrong Avoid embarrassment Avoid having people mad at you Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Did the prevention strategy work?

Learn if the strategy is working Stop wasting, time, energy, and money Learn if a new strategy is needed Ensure public is not mislead Save time, energy, and money Avoid having to admit you were wrong Avoid embarrassment Avoid having people mad at you Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Did the prevention strategy work?

CDC Investigation 5-1 has ended. Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 5-1: Why Evaluate? Why Evaluate?