A solar eruption driven by rapid sunspot rotation Guiping Ruan, Yao Chen, Shuo Wang, Hongqi Zhang, Gang Li, Ju Jing, Xing Li, Haiqing Xu, and Haimin Wang.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of 2008 Science Team Meeting. Collaboration With Dr. Wiegelmann 1. NLFFF extrapolation, leading person: Ju Jing. Objective: adapt codes to BBSO.
Advertisements

Back Reaction on the Photospheric Magnetic field in Solar Eruptions Dandan Ye.
Observational evidence of a magnetic flux rope eruption associated with the X3 flare on 2002 July 15 Liu Yu Solar Seminar, 2003 June 16.
Study of Sunspot Motion Associated with the 2006 Dec. 13 X3.4 Flare Shuo Wang Advisor: Chang Liu Haimin Wang.
Observations on Current Sheet and Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares Haimin Wang and Jiong Qiu BBSO/NJIT.
The magnetic nature of solar flares Paper by E.R. Priest & T.G. Forbes Review presented by Hui Song.
The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
TRACE and RHESSI observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical Institute University of Wrocław.
Jan 13, 2009ISSI1 Modeling Coronal Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A Collaborators:
A flare compilation Lots of people including Louise Harra, Lidia van Driel Gesztelyi, Chris Goff, Sarah Matthews, Len Culhane, Cristina Mandrini, Pascal.
Hard X-ray Production in a Failed Filament Eruption David, Alexander, Rui Liu and Holly R., Gilbert 2006 ApJ 653, L719 Related Paper: Ji. H. et al., 2003.
Non-Equilibrium Ionization Modeling of the Current Sheet in a Simulated Solar Eruption Chengcai Shen Co-authors: K. K. Reeves, J. C. Raymond, N. A. Murphy,
Chip Manchester, Fang Fang, Bill Abbett, Bart van der Holst Patterns of Large- Scale Flux Emegence Patterns of Large- Scale Flux Emegence.
Modeling the Magnetic Field Evolution of the December Eruptive Flare Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Simulation of Flux Emergence from the Convection Zone Fang Fang 1, Ward Manchester IV 1, William Abbett 2 and Bart van der Holst 1 1 Department of Atmospheric,
Changyi Tan et al. NJIT, April 2008 Evolution of Evershed and Shear Flows Associated with the X3.4 Flare of 2006 December 13 Evolution of Evershed and.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
SHINE Campaign Event: 1-2 May 1998 Brian Welsch (& Yan Li) Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley Introduction: Data, Context, etc. Work: Completed & Ongoing.
Two energy release processes for CMEs: MHD catastrophe and magnetic reconnection Yao CHEN Department of Space Science and Applied Physics Shandong University.
MSU Team: R. C. Canfield, D. W. Longcope, P. C. H. Martens, S. Régnier Evolution on the photosphere: magnetic and velocity fields 3D coronal magnetic fields.
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
Nonlinear Force Free Field Models for AR J.McTiernan, H.Hudson (SSL/UCB) T.Metcalf (LMSAL)
Free Energies via Velocity Estimates B.T. Welsch & G.H. Fisher, Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley.
The Change of Magnetic Inclination Angles Associated with Flares Yixuan Li April 1,2008.
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
Coronal Mass Ejections: Models and Their Observational Basis (P.F. Chen Living Rev. Solar Phys.) 张英智 中国科学院空间科学与应用研究中心空间天气学国家重点实验室.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan Coupling of the Coronal and Subphotospheric Magnetic Field in Active Regions by Shear Flows Driven by The Lorentz.
Flows in NOAA AR 8210: An overview of MURI progress to thru Feb.’04 Modelers prescribe fields and flows (B, v) to drive eruptions in MHD simulations MURI.
On the Origin of Strong Gradients in Photospheric Magnetic Fields Brian Welsch and Yan Li Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, CA ,
Flows and the Photospheric Magnetic Field Dynamics at Interior – Corona Interface Brian Welsch, George Fisher, Yan Li, & the UCB/SSL MURI & CISM Teams.
Free Magnetic Energy in Solar Active Regions above the Minimum-Energy Relaxed State (Regnier, S., Priest, E.R ApJ) Use magnetic field extrapolations.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
Magnetic Reconnection Rate and RHESSI Hard X-Ray Imaging Spectroscopy of Well Resolved X-class Flares Yan Xu, Ju Jing, Wenda Cao, and Haimin Wang.
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
Active Region Flux Transport Observational Techniques, Results, & Implications B. T. Welsch G. H. Fisher
B. T. Welsch Space Sciences Lab, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA J. M. McTiernan Space Sciences.
EUV vs. B-field Comparisons Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Coauthours: Leon Golub, Aad Van Ballegooijen, Maurice Gros. HMI/AIA Science.
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
UCB MURI Team Introduction An overview of ongoing work to understand a well observed, eruptive active region, along with closely related studies…..
Magnetic Structures of Active Regions and their Link to Coronal Mass Ejections Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Big Bear Solar Observatory, Big Bear City, CA 92314,
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
LINE OF SIGHT MAGNETIC FIELD EVOLUTION & DATA ANALYSIS Dandan Ye.
The Occurrence and Speed of CMEs Related to Magnetic Helicity Injection in Their Source Regions Sung-Hong Park Solar and Space Weather Research Group Korea.
Comparison on Calculated Helicity Parameters at Different Observing Sites Haiqing Xu (NAOC) Collaborators: Hongqi, Zhang, NAOC Kirill Kuzanyan, IZMIRAN,
1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
Three-dimensional MHD simulation of a flux rope driven CME Manchester IV, W.B., Gombosi, T.I., Roussev, I., De Zeeuw, D.L., Sokolov, I.V., Powell, K.G.,
Flare Energy Build-Up in a Decaying Active Region Near a Coronal Hole Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Collaborators: A. A. van Ballegooijen,
Nonlinear force-free coronal magnetic field extrapolation scheme for solar active regions Han He, Huaning Wang, Yihua Yan National Astronomical Observatories,
1 Introduction: Onset of solar flares and coronal mass ejections Yokoyama, T. Dept. Earth & Planetary Science, University of Tokyo Isobe, H. Univ. Tokyo.
Forecasting the Solar Drivers of Severe Space Weather from Active-Region Magnetograms and Recent Flare Activity David A. Falconer (UAHuntsville/MSFC),
Properties of CME Acceleration in the Low Corona Jie Zhang George Mason University SHINE June 28 – July 2, 2004 Big Sky - Montana Address.
SHINE 2006 David Alexander Rice University Exploring the dynamics of flux-emergence in magnetically-complex solar active regions David Alexander and Lirong.
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
Evolutionary Characteristics of Magnetic Helicity Injection in Active Regions Hyewon Jeong and Jongchul Chae Seoul National University, Korea 2. Data and.
Coronal and Interplanetary Magnetic Fields in October-November 2003 and November CMEs Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory,
1 Yongliang Song & Mei Zhang (National Astronomical Observatory of China) The effect of non-radial magnetic field on measuring helicity transfer rate.
A Numerical Study of the Breakout Model for Coronal Mass Ejection Initiation P. MacNeice, S.K. Antiochos, A. Phillips, D.S. Spicer, C.R. DeVore, and K.
Magnetic Helicity and Solar Eruptions Alexander Nindos Section of Astrogeophysics Physics Department University of Ioannina Ioannina GR Greece.
The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) has continuously measured the vector magnetic field, intensity, and.
Data-constrained Simulation of CME Initiation and Propagation Antonia Savcheva ESPM 2014 September 11, 2014 Collaborators: R. Evans, B. van der Holst,
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
Coronal Mass Ejection: Initiation, Magnetic Helicity, and Flux Ropes. L. Boundary Motion-Driven Evolution Amari, T., Luciani, J. F., Aly, J. J., Mikic,
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan
Abstract We simulate the twisting of an initially potential coronal flux tube by photospheric vortex motions. The flux tube starts to evolve slowly(quasi-statically)
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
MHD Simulation of Plasmoid-Induced-Reconnection in Solar Flares
Ju Jing, Vasyl B. Yurchyshyn, Guo Yang, Yan Xu, and Haimin Wang
Presentation transcript:

A solar eruption driven by rapid sunspot rotation Guiping Ruan, Yao Chen, Shuo Wang, Hongqi Zhang, Gang Li, Ju Jing, Xing Li, Haiqing Xu, and Haimin Wang

Contents Contents  Introduction  Observations and data reduction  Results and summary

Introduction Introduction Sunspot rotation was first observed a century ago by Evershed (1910) which has been considered to be an important process (e.g., Stenflo 1969; Barnes & Sturrock 1972; Amari et al. 1996; Tokman & Bellan 2002; T ö r ö k & Kliem 2003) Previous studies revealed some temporal and spatial association of sunspot rotation with solar flares (Brown et al. 2003;Regnier et al. 2006; Yan et al. 2007, 2008a, 2008b, 2009; Zhang, Li & Song 2007; Zhang,Liu & Zhang 2008; Jiang et al. 2012, Vemareddy et al. 2012) : focusing on flares, yet not VERY strong, especially, the asso. to CMEs has not been well-examined. Based on the MHD flux rope modeling,T ö r ö k et al. (2013) assumed that the CME on 6 July 2006 from AR10898 was triggered by the weakening and expansion of the overlying coronal fields caused by sunspot rotation, yet lack of observational support/evidence

The flare-CME-filament eruption on Sept (AR 11283), well observed by SDO/STEREO! X2.1 FLARE (peaking: 22:20) CME: 1200 km/s What process/mechanism driving this MAJOR eruption?

First, examine the sunspot evolution in ~12 hs pre-eruption  Apparent sunspot rotation in ~6 hs before the eruption!

Put the sunspot rotation and filament eruption together  During the 6h rotation, the filament rises gradually and erupts eventually ! Left: angular-time plot Right: Height-time plot

The filament is rooted in the rotating sunspot! Contours: Bz=±350 G

Previous slides show direct evidences supporting the association of the filament eruption and the sunspot rotation, now we present other indirect evidences! 1.Gradual decrease of Bh during the sunspot rotation; 2.Gradual decrease of B_inclination angle ( tan − 1 (Bx 2 + By 2 ) 1/2 /Bz ); 3.Gradual levitation of the coronal current density map as inferred from the NLFFF modeling.

1.Change of Bh (the horizontal magnetic field). Pre- and post- flare JUMP (Wang et al., 1994,2010,2012). We examine the Bh evolution in the region of interest.

Bh: a gradual decrease during the sunspot rotation B_inclination angle: a gradual decrease Red line: Start of sunspot rotation

Gradual levitation of the coronal current density map as inferred from the NLFFF model (Wiegelmanne,04)

Previous slides show direct evidences supporting the association of the filament eruption and the sunspot rotation, now we present other indirect evidences! 1.Gradual decrease of Bh during the sunspot rotation 2.Gradual decrease of B_inclination angle 3.Gradual levitation of the coronal current density map as inferred from the NLFFF modeling Putting them together with a flux rope model: Gradual levitation of the flux rope  B gets more vertical, inclination angle smaller, the whole current structure moves higher!

Indeed, we find flux rope structure with the NLFFF model!

And, significant free energy stored in the corona during the sunspot rotation (~30% of the total free energy released by the eruption)! Start of sunspot rotation End of flare

= Along with the sunspot rotation, significant amounts of magnetic energy (~10 31 erg) and helicity (~10 41 Mx 2 ) were transported into the corona. △ H=3.5x10 41 Mx 2 (LCT method, Chae et al. 2001) Start of sunspot rotation

Conclusion We find direct evidences connecting the CME-flare-filament eruption to the sunspot rotation: (1) corresponding dynamical motion of the filament along with the rotation (2) the filament is rooted in the rotating sunspot Also, indirect evidences including: 1. Gradual decrease of Bh during the sunspot rotation 2. Gradual decrease of B_inclination angle 3. Gradual levitation of the coronal current density map as inferred from the NLFFF modeling All these aspects of observations can be explained with a flux- rope eruption model driven by sunspot rotation!

Thanks !