NMDB Kiel Meeting, 3-5/12/2008 On the possibility to use on-line one-minute NM data of NMDB network and available from Internet satellite CR data for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cosmic Rays and Space Weather
Advertisements

ELENA VANNUCCINI ON BEHALF OF PAMELA COLLABORATION Measurement of the Hydrogen and Helium absolute fluxes with the PAMELA experiment.
Investigation of daily variations of cosmic ray fluxes in the beginning of 24 th solar activity cycle Ashot Chilingarian, Bagrat Mailyan IHY-ISWI Regional.
Workshop „X-ray Spectroscopy and Plasma Diagnostics from the RESIK, RHESSI and SPIRIT Instruments”, 6 – 8 December 2005, Wrocław Spectroscopy Department.
Cosmic Ray Using for Monitoring and Forecasting Dangerous Solar Flare Events Lev I. Dorman (1, 2) 1. Israel Cosmic Ray & Space Weather Center and Emilio.
Possible anomalous magnetic moment and spin- flavor neutrino precession Lev I. Dorman a,b (a) Israel Cosmic Ray and Space Weather Center and Emilio Segre’
Cosmic Rays and Space Weather Erwin O. Flückiger Laurent Desorgher, Rolf Bütikofer, Benoît Pirard Physikalisches Institut University of Bern
Further development of modeling of spatial distribution of energetic electron fluxes near Europa M. V. Podzolko 1, I. V. Getselev 1, Yu. I. Gubar 1, I.
21 ECRS, Kosice, 12/09/2008 Trapped charge particles measurements in the radiation belt by PAMELA instrument Vladimir V. Mikhailov (MEPHI) for PAMELA collaboration.
Cosmic-Ray Antiproton Spatial Distributions Simulated in Magnetosphere Michio Fuki Faculty of Education, Kochi University 2-5-1, Akebono-cho, Kochi ,
Towards a European Infrastructure for Lunar Observatories Bremen, Wednesday 23 rd March 2005 A 3D cosmic ray detector on the Moon X. Moussas University.
Earth’s Radiation Belt Xi Shao Department of Astronomy, University Of Maryland, College Park, MD
From Geo- to Heliophysical Year: Results of CORONAS-F Space Mission International Conference «50 Years of International Geophysical Year and Electronic.
Solar Energetic Particles -acceleration and observations- (Two approaches at the highest energy) Takashi SAKO Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory,
SHINE 2008 June, 2008 Utah, USA Visit our Websites:
Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:
Accuracy assessment of the space weather characteristics forecasts used in the Russian Federal Space Agency Monitoring System V. Anashin 1, G. Protopopov.
Establishing a Space Weather Service based upon Neutron Monitors for the ESA SSA Program 1 Nuclear & Particle Physics Section, Physics Department National.
New results for Radiation Effects on the Human Health Obtained during the COST-724 Action F. Spurný a, Ts. Dachev b, a Nuclear Physics Institute, Czech.
Ground Level Enhancement of May 17, 2012 Observed at South Pole SH21A-2183 Takao Kuwabara 1,3 ; John Bieber 1 ; John Clem 1,3 ; Paul Evenson 1,3 ; Tom.
System for Radiation Environment characterization (fluxes, doses, dose equivalents at Earth, Moon and Mars) on hourly thru yearly time frame Example: Snapshots.
Ultimate Spectrum of Solar/Stellar Cosmic Rays Alexei Struminsky Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDIZATION ORGANIZATION TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION Space Environment (Natural and Artificial) Probabilistic model of fluences and.
On the probability of solar cosmic ray fluency during SEP event in dependence of the level of solar activity L.I. Dorman a,b, L.A. Pustil’nik a (a) Israel.
Evaluation of the flux of CR nuclei inside the magnetosphere P. Bobik, G. Boella, M.J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita.
The PLANETOCOSMICS Geant4 application L. Desorgher Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern.
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Ground level enhancement of the solar cosmic rays on January 20, A.V. Belov (a), E.A. Eroshenko (a), H. Mavromichalaki (b), C. Plainaki(b), V.G.
1 IGY The ALERT signal of ground level enhancements of solar cosmic rays: physics basis, the ways of realization and development Anashin V., Belov A.,
Operation of the Space Environmental viewing and Analysis Network (Sevan) in 24-th Solar Activity Cycle A. Chilingarian A. Chilingarian Yerevan Physics.
NMDB - the European neutron monitor database Karl-Ludwig Klein, for the NMDB consortium.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
Exploitation of Space Ionizing Radiation Monitoring System in Russian Federal Space Agency STRUCTURE OF THE MONITORING SYSTEM The Monitoring System includes.
Matteo Palermo “Estimation of the probability of observing a gamma-ray flare based on the analysis of the Fermi data” Student: Matteo Palermo.
IAGA Symposium A12.2 Geomagnetic networks, computation and definition of products for space weather and space climate Melbourne, Australia, 2011 GLOBAL,
Nishu Karna Mentor:Dr. William Dean Pesnell Code: 671 SESI Program-2009 Goddard Space Flight Center St. Cloud State University Date: August 5, 2009 RELATIVISTIC.
1 Seasonal variations of the m flux seen by the muon super telescope MuSTAnG Ganeva 1 M., Peglow 1 S., Hippler 1 R., Berkova.
Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, Sept 2009 On the Connection of Cosmic Ray Long- Term Variation with Sunspot Numbers: Convection-Diffusion and.
Study of high energy cosmic rays by different components of back scattered radiation generated in the lunar regolith N. N. Kalmykov 1, A. A. Konstantinov.
Japan, ICRC 2003 Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather By Lev Dorman for INTAS team (A. Belov, L. Dorman,,
20th ESA Symposium Lev Dorman (1, 2) for the Team (A. Belov, I. Ben Israel, U. Dai, L. Dorman,, E. Eroshenko, N. Iucci, Z. Kaplan, O. Kryakunova, A. Levitin,
Radiation Storms in the Near Space Environment Mikhail Panasyuk, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics of Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Daniel Matthiä(1)‏, Bernd Heber(2), Matthias Meier(1),
Athens University – Faculty of Physics Section of Nuclear and Particle Physics Athens Neutron Monitor Station Study of the ground level enhancement of.
End-to-End Overview of Hazardous Radiation Len Fisk University of Michigan.
Median Filtering Algorithms for Multichannel Detectors and their influence on Thunderstorm Peaks in Cosmic Ray Data Armen Hovhannisyan Alikhanyan Physics.
ENERGY ESTIMATION OF THE INTERPLANETARY PLASMA DURING STRONGEST GEOMAGNETIC STORMS OF THE CURRENT 24 SOLAR CYCLE ON MARCH 2015 The geomagnetic storms.
Space Environmental Viewing and Analysis Network (SEVAN) Chilingarian 1, Ch.Angelov 2, K. Arakelyan 1, T.Arsov 2, Avakyan 1, S. Chilingaryan 1,4, K. A.Hovhanissyan.
Understanding SEP properties through Neutron Monitor data modeling Neutron Monitor Network: a tool for revealing the relativistic SEP properties Ground.
It is considered that until now in the 24th cycle of solar activity 2 ground level enhancements of solar cosmic rays (GLEs) are registered: on May 17,
GLOBAL SURVEY METHOD: WHAT DO NEUTRON MONITORS SEE? Belov A.1, Eroshenko E.1, Abunin A. 1, Abunina M. 1, Yanke V. 1, Oleneva V.1, Mavromichalaki H.2, Papaioannou.
Extreme Event Symposium 2004 MAGNETOSPHERIC EFFECT in COSMIC RAYS DURING UNIQUE MAGNETIC STORM IN NOVEMBER Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
GLOBAL SURVEY METHOD: WHAT DO NEUTRON MONITORS SEE? Belov A.1, Eroshenko E.1, Abunin A. 1, Abunina M. 1, Yanke V. 1, Oleneva V.1, Mavromichalaki H.2, Papaioannou.
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
A New Solar Neutron Telescope working at the International Space Station K. Koga, T. Goka (PI), H. Matsumoto, T. Obara, O. Okudaira (JAXA) Y. Muraki (Nagoya)
The Real-Time Neutron Monitor Database Christian T. Steigies (2), Karl-Ludwig Klein & Nicolas Fuller (1), on behalf of the NMDB team (1) Christian-Albrechts.
Paul Evenson University of Delaware
SPACE WEATHER PREDICTION CENTER
A Relation between Solar Flare Manifestations and the GLE Onset
Early Alert of Solar Radiation Hazard
Development of a GLE Alarm System Based Upon Neutron Monitors
THEMIS and Space Weather
R. Bucˇık , K. Kudela and S. N. Kuznetsov
Quantification of solar wind parameters from measurments by SOHO and DSCOVR spacecrafts during series of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections in the.
Alexander Mishev & Ilya Usoskin
Application of neutron monitor data for space weather
ICRC2003 OG Calculation of Cosmic-Ray Proton and Anti-proton Spatial Distribution in Magnetosphere Michio Fuki, Ayako Kuwahara, Nozomi, Sawada Faculty.
On the relative role of drift and convection-diffusion effects in the long-term CR variations on the basis of NM and satellite data Lev Dorman (1, 2) Israel.
NMDB - the European neutron monitor database
A. Mishev, I.Usoskin, S. Tuohino & A. Ibragimov
Presentation transcript:

NMDB Kiel Meeting, 3-5/12/2008 On the possibility to use on-line one-minute NM data of NMDB network and available from Internet satellite CR data for forecasting of great radiation hazard L.I. Dorman (a, b) (a) Israel Cosmic Ray & Space Weather Center and Emilio Segre’ Observatory, affiliated to Tel Aviv University, Technion and Israel Space Agency, P. O. Box 2217, Qazrin 12900, Israel (b) Cosmic Ray Department of IZMIRAN, Russian Academy of Science, Troitsk , Moscow Region, Russia

Proton events and anomalies Mean satellite anomaly frequencies in 0- and 1-days of proton enhancements in dependence on the maximal > 10 MeV flux

Proton events and anomalies Probability of any anomaly ( high altitude – high inclination group) in dependence on the maximal proton > 10 and >60 MeV flux

FORECAST STEPS 1. AUTOMATICALLY DETERMINATION OF THE FEP EVENT START BY NEUTRON MONITOR DATA 2. DETERMINATION OF ENERGY SPECTRUM OUT OF MAGNETOSPHERE BY THE METHOD OF COUPLING FUNCTIONS 3. DETERMINATION OF TIME OF EJECTION, SOURCE FUNCTION AND PARAMETERS OF PROPAGATION 4. FORECASTING OF EXPECTED FEP FLUXES AND COMPARISON WITH OBSERVATIONS 5. COMBINED FORECASTING ON THE BASIS OF NM DATA AND BEGINNING OF SATELLITE DATA IN THE FRAME OF ISOTROPIC MODE 6. USING TWO OR THREE NMDB STATIONS IN THE FRAME OF ISOTROPIC MODE 7. BASING ON ANISOTROPIC AND KINETIC MODE OF PROPAGATION: USING DATA OF ABOUT ALL NMDB STATIONS

1.1. AUTOMATICALLY DETERMINATION OF THE FEP EVENT START BY NEUTRON MONITOR DATA

1.2. SCHEME OF ALHORITHMS FOR “FEP ON-LINE SEARCH”

1.3. THE PROBABILITY OF FALSE ALARMS

1.4. THE PROBABILITY OF MISSED TRIGGERS 10% ~7 , , The probability of this negative fluctuation in one channel in one minute is equal The probability of missed trigger for two successive minutes of observation simultaneously in two channels is 4 times larger:. It means that missed trigger is expected one per about events.

1.6. EXAMPLE OF INTERNET PRESENTATION OF REAL TIME DATA FROM ESO (ISRAEL)

2.1. DETERMINATION OF ENERGY SPECTRUM OUT OF MAGNETOSPHERE BY THE METHOD OF COUPLING FUNCTIONS

2.2. DETERMINATION OF ENERGY SPECTRUM OUT OF MAGNETOSPHERE BY THE METHOD OF COUPLING FUNCTIONS

3.1. DETERMINATION OF TIME OF EJECTION, SOURCE FUNCTION AND PARAMETERS OF PROPAGATION (1-st CASE: K(R) DOES NOT DEPEND FROM DISTANCE TO THE SUN)

3.2 DETERMINATION OF TIME OF EJECTION, SOURCE FUNCTION AND PARAMETERS OF PROPAGATION (1-st CASE: K(R) DOES NOT DEPEND FROM DISTANCE TO SUN)

3.3 DETERMINATION OF TIME OF EJECTION, SOURCE FUNCTION AND PARAMETERS OF PROPAGATION (1-st CASE: K(R) DOES NOT DEPEND FROM DISTANCE TO SUN)

3.4 DETERMINATION OF TIME OF EJECTION, SOURCE FUNCTION AND PARAMETERS OF PROPAGATION (2-nd CASE: K(R, r) DEPENDS FROM DISTANCE TO THE SUN)

3.5 DETERMINATION OF TIME OF EJECTION, SOURCE FUNCTION AND PARAMETERS OF PROPAGATION (2-nd CASE: K(R, r) DEPENDS FROM DISTANCE TO THE SUN)

4.1 FORECASTING OF EXPECTED FEP FLUXES AND COMPARISON WITH OBSERVATIONS (2-nd CASE: K(R, r) DEPENDS FROM DISTANCE TO THE SUN)

5.1. COMBINED FORECASTING ON THE BASIS OF NM DATA AND BEGINNING OF SATELLITE DATA

5.2. COMBINED FORECASTING ON THE BASIS OF NM DATA AND BEGINNING OF SATELLITE DATA

5.3. COMBINED FORECASTING ON THE BASIS OF NM DATA AND BEGINNING OF SATELLITE DATA

5.4. COMBINED FORECASTING ON THE BASIS OF NM DATA AND BEGINNING OF SATELLITE DATA

5.5. COMBINED FORECASTING ON THE BASIS OF NM DATA AND BEGINNING OF SATELLITE DATA

5.6. COMBINED FORECASTING ON THE BASIS OF NM DATA AND BEGINNING OF SATELLITE DATA

5.7. COMBINED FORECASTING ON THE BASIS OF NM DATA AND BEGINNING OF SATELLITE DATA

5.8. COMBINED FORECASTING ON THE BASIS OF NM DATA AND BEGINNING OF SATELLITE DATA

Forecasting of expected FEP fluency for.

CONCLUSIONS 1. BY ONE-MINUTE NEUTRON MONITOR DATA WE DETERMINE AUTOMATICALLY THE BEGINNING OF BIG SOLAR CR INCREASINGS AND GIVE IN INTERNET THE ALARM IN REAL TIME. 2. WE SHOW THAT THE PROBABILITY OF FALSE AND MISSED ALERTS ARE NEGLIGIBLE. 3. BY THE METHOD OF COUPLING FUNCTIONS FOR EACH MINUTE OF DATA WE DETERMINE ENERGY SPECTRUM OF SOLAR CR IN THE SPACE AND THE CHANGE OF CUT-OFF RIGIDITY (CHARACTERIZED THE CHANGE OF RING CURRENT IN MAGNETOSPHERE). 4. WE DETERMINE THE TIME OF EJECTION, DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT AND SOURCE FUNCTION BY NM DATA IN HIGH ENERGY REGION.

CONCLUSIONS 5. BY ONE-MINUTE NM AND AVAILABLE FROM NTERNET COSMIC RAY SATELLITE DATA WE DETERMINE ALL ABOVE MENTIONED PARAMETERS FOR BROAD CR SPECTRUM FROM HIGH TO VERY LOW ENERGIES. 6. BY COMBINING OF NM AND SATELLITE DATA FOR MIN OBSERVATIONS IS POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE THE TIME OF EJECTION, SOURCE FUNCTION, AND DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT IN DEPENDENCE FROM ENERGY AND DISTANCE FROM THE SUN. 7. IT IS SHOWN THAT BY THIS METHOD IS POSSIBLE TO FORECAST OF SOLAR CR FLUXES AND FLUENCY IN HIGH AND LOW ENERGY RANGES UP TO ABOUT TWO DAYS. 8. SEPTEMBER 1989 EVENT IS USED AS A TEST CASE.

CONCLUSIONS 9. REALLY OFTEN THE BEGINNINGG OF GLE IS VERY ANISOTROPIC AND FOR THIS STAGE IS NECESSARY TO USE MODE OF PROPAGATION BASED ON ANISOTROPIC DIFFUSION AND KINETIC APPROACH, BUT AFTER MIN DISTRIBUTION BECAME ISOTROPIC (SECOND STAGE) 10. BECOUSE MAIN PART OF RADIATION HAZARD IS FORMATTED MOSTLY DURING DIFFUSION STAGE, IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT WILL GIVE THE FIRST STAGE FOR FORECASTING OF EXPECTED SOLAR CR FLUXES AND ESTIMATION EXPECTED RADIATION HAZARD 11. I THINK THAT THE FIRST STAGE IS NOT SO IMPORTANT FOR DETERMINING DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT, BUT IT IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR DETERMINING ACCELERATION MODE, ENERGY SPECTRUM IN SOURCE, AND THERFORE FOR ESTIMATION OF TOTAL RADIATION HAZARD 12. THE OTHER POSSIBILITY TO INCREASE EFFECTIVITY OF FORECASTING: IT WILL BE IMPORTANT TO SEPARATE STATIONS WHICH MEASURE DIRECT FLUX (ABOUT WITHOUT SCATTERING) AND OTHER STATIONS WHICH MEASURE ONLY DIFFUSION STAGE. THEY WILL GIVE VERY IMPRTANT DIFFERENT INFORMATION ON SOURCS FUNCTION AND PROPAGATION MODE, RESPECTIVELY

CONCLUSIONS 13. AS THE FIRST STEP WE MUST USE IN EACH NMDB STATION THE AUTOMATICAL PROGRAE FOR DETERMINING OF BEGINNING GLE 14. WE WILL TRAINING TO MADE FORECAST BY USING TWO OR THREE NMDB STATIONS WHICH HAVE DIFFERENT MULTIPLICITIES AND/OR DIFFERENT CUTOFF RIGIDITIES