High power target design and operation considerations for kaon production Philip Pile Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MTest Facility Low Energy Beam Erik Ramberg AEM 15 October, 2007.
Advertisements

Alexandr Drozhdin March 16, 2005 MI-10 Injection.
MARS15 Simulations of the MERIT Mercury Target Experiment Fermilab March 18, Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration meeting Sergei.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
Slide 1 Diamonds in Flash Steve Schnetzer Rd42 Collaboration Meeting May 14.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
Particle flux simulations Sergei Striganov Fermilab June 11, 2008.
Neutrino Study Group Dec 21, 2001 Brookhaven Neutrino Super-BeamStephen Kahn Page 1 Horn and Solenoid Capture Systems for a BNL Neutrino Superbeam Steve.
Solid Target Options NuFACT’00 S. Childress Solid Target Options The choice of a primary beam target for the neutrino factory, with beam power of
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
MC_ Muon Beam Lines 8/3/06 Want a  beam of ~300MeV/c –This requires a  beam of ~300 MeV/c Possible Sources: SY Proton Beam line components removed.
JHF2K neutrino beam line A. K. Ichikawa KEK 2002/7/2 Overview Primary Proton beamline Target Decay Volume Strategy to change peak energy.
The HERMES Dual-Radiator Ring Imaging Cerenkov Detector N.Akopov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479 (2002) 511 Shibata Lab 11R50047 Jennifer Newsham YSEP.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
Study of a new high power spallation target concept
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
FFAG-ERIT Accelerator (NEDO project) 17/04/07 Kota Okabe (Fukui Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
LAGUNA/LBNO WP4: secondary beam line status report M. Calviani, P. Velten, A. Ferrari, I. Efthymiopoulos, C. Lazaridis (CERN) + M. Zito, V. Galymov (CEA),
ハイパー核ガンマ線分光用 磁気スペクトロメータ -SksMinus- 東北大学 大学院理学研究科 白鳥昂太郎 ATAMI.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Study of Pion Capture Solenoids for PRISM H.Ohnishi AB M. Aoki C, Y. Ajima A, N. Fukasawa AD, K. Ishibashi B, Y. Kuno C, T. Miura A, K. Nakahara C, T.
Proposal for Experiment S291: " Residual radioactivity induced by U ions - experimental investigation and longtime predictions" GSI, Darmstadt: G.Fehrenbacher,
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Considerations for Nufact and Superbeams ISS Meeting RAL April 26, 2006.
Fermilab Test Beam Facility Aria Meyhoefer (soon to be Soha) May 10, 2010.
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
The Meson Test Beam Facility Erik Ramberg LRP Meeting – Oct. 30,2003 Delivering MI beam to MTBF User area layout Operational characteristics Detectors.
PSB dump: proposal of a new design EN – STI technical meeting on Booster dumps Friday 11 May 2012 BE Auditorium Prevessin Alba SARRIÓ MARTÍNEZ.
Mass production (Super-K) Setup of jnubeam – 3 horn 250 kA – 30-GeV proton beam of Gaussian distribution (  x,y = cm) – On center, parallel beam.
Calculation of Beam loss on foil septa C. Pai Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Simulations Report E. García, UIC. Run 1 Geometry Radiator (water) 1cm x 2cm x 2cm with optical properties Sensitive Volume (hit collector) acrylic (with.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
G4Beamline Simulated Electron Distribution within the HPRF Cavity 2/15/20121.
RSVP AGS Upgrade Projects MECO RSVP Preliminary Baseline Review Brookhaven National Lab April 6-8, 2005 D. Phillips.
Collimator and beamline heating External Review of the LHC Collimation Project CERN Wed 30/6/2004.
Instrumentation and Simulations for Target Test MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October Bill Murray 1, Paul Soler 1,2, Kenny Walaron 1,2 1 Rutherford.
A. Leveling - Fermilab Recent Operating Experience at the Antiproton Source Target Hall 3 rd High Power Targetry Workshop September 12, 2007 Fermilab Accelerator.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
RSVP AGS Upgrade Projects MECO RSVP Preliminary Baseline Review Brookhaven National Lab April 6-8, 2005 D. Phillips.
Shock Tests on Tantalum and Tungsten J. R. J. Bennett, S. Brooks, R. Brownsword, C. Densham, R. Edgecock, S. Gray, A. McFarland, G. Skoro and D. Wilkins.
THE DESIGN OF THE AGS-BASED PROTON DRIVER FOR NEUTRINO FACTORY W.T. WENG, BNL FFAG WORKSHOP JULY 7-11, 2003 KEK, JAPAN.
Proton Driver – Target Station Interfaces Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab Wednesday May 28, 2014 MAP 2014 Spring Meeting.
More beam (muons) from the AGS AGS RHIC Users Group Meeting EDM Workshop Brookhaven National Laboratory 7 June 2006 Phil Pile.
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
BNL neutrino beam. Optimization and simulations Milind Diwan June 10.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
Target Proposal Feb. 15, 2000 S. Childress Target Proposal Considerations: –For low z target, much less power is deposited in the target for the same pion.
Longitudinal aspects on injection and acceleration for HP-PS Antoine LACHAIZE On behalf of the HP-PS design team.
RF separated beam and other beam issues Lau Gatignon, COMPASS workshop, 22 March 2016.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design Jim Kellie Glasgow University.
Stopped K beam at J-PARC Designed by J.Doornbos 1)Optics design of a K0.8 branch 2)Performance 3)Pion contamination 4)Comments on K1.1 Nov. 4, 2005 Korea.
Horn and Solenoid options in Neutrino Factory M. Yoshida, Osaka Univ. NuFact08, Valencia June 30th, A brief review of pion capture scheme in NuFact,
NuMI Flux, Leonidas Aliaga William & Mary July 25, 2012 Current Uncertainties And Future Plans International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super Beams.
E-beam scanner experience at FNAL
IF Separator Design of RAON
Large Booster and Collider Ring
of secondary light ion beams
of secondary light ion beams
Conventional Neutrino Beams Day 2
Polarized WACS Experiment (E ) Using Compact Photon Source (CPS)
Beam Tests of Ionization Chambers for the NuMI Neutrino Beam Monitoring System MINOS.
A summary of world-wide test beam facilities
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Details of K1.8BR Beam line
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
RC1 Prototype Conceptual Design Review 15 December, 2005
Presentation transcript:

High power target design and operation considerations for kaon production Philip Pile Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York Snowmass Workshop on Intensity Frontier Apr , 2013, Brookhaven National Laboratory 14/19/2013

Outline AGS proton beam, days gone by LESBIII – a state of the art low energy kaon beam line Optics considerations for kaon beam line target LESBIII kaon production target/issues 24/19/2013

PROTON BEAMFY96 FY97 FY98/99FY2000 FY2001 FY2002 SEB SEBFEB (g-2)SEBFEB (g-2)FEB (g-2)FEB (g-2) SEB Beam Energy24 GeV24 GeV24 GeV24 GeV24 GeV24 GeV 24 GeV* 22 GeV* Peak Beam Intensity62 x ppp62 x ppp46 x ppp72 x ppp58 x ppp61 x ppp 63 x ppp 76 x ppp Total protons accelerated0.9 x x x x x x x x Spill Length/Cycle Time1.6 sec/3.6 sec1.6 sec/3.6 sec2.8 sec/5.1 sec2.4 sec/5.4 sec -> Duty Cycle44%44%55% 44% Spill Structure Modulation (peak-average) /average20%20%20%20% Average Availability /Best Week76% / 92%71% / 79%58 % / 67 %71% / 88%55 % / 83 %74 % / 87 %83 % / 88 %85 % / 97 % HEAVY ION BEAMAuAuFe (NASA)AuFe (NASA)Fe (NASA)Fe (NASA)Fe (NASA) Beam Energy /nucleon11 / 4 / 2 GeV11 / 8 / 6 GeV1.0 / 0.6 GeV11 GeV1.0 / 0.6 GeV1.0 GeV1.0 GeV1.0 GeV Peak Beam Intensity4 x 10 8 Au/p 17 x 10 8 Au/p 20 x 10 8 Fe/p 9 x 10 8 Au/bunch36 x 10 8 Fe/p17 x 10 8 Fe/p80 x 10 8 Fe/p49 x 10 8 Fe/p Spill Length/Cycle Time1.4 sec/3.6 sec1.5 sec/4.0 sec1.2 sec/3.0 sec0.9 sec/3.3 sec0.9 sec/3.3 sec0.9 sec/3.3 sec -> Duty Cycle39%38%40 %27%27%27% Spill Structure Modulation (peak-average) /average<20%<20%<20%<20%<20%<20% Average Availability80%82 %96 %81 %90 %90 %97 %84 % * Westinghouse Motor Generator AGS performance T. Roser 34/19/2013

Maximum Momentum: 830 MeV/c Length: 19.6 meters Angular acceptance: 12 msr Momentum acceptance: 4% fwhm Beam Optics: Corrected to third order Movable Collimators: – 4Jaw Theta-Phi Collimator – Horizontal Momentum Collimator – Two Vertical Collimators (Mass Slits) – Second horizontal collimator at achromatic focus Electrostatic Separators: – Two Stage Separation – < 625kV, 12.7 cm gap x 2.0 meter - #1 – < 560kV, 10.2 cm gap x 2.0 meter - #2 Target: – 6 cm long platinum silver soldered to – water cooled copper base – Maximum ~30 x per second during spill Production Angle: 0 degrees Particle Flux (per 10 13, 22 GeV/c protons on target): – 710 MeV/c positive kaons – 2.0 x 10 6 with 3:1  /k LESBIII (E494 beam line) =adjustable collimators EXB Wein Filters 44/19/2013 in air

Longitudal acceptance for LESBIII for 800 MeV/c kaons and pions with EXB separators set to transmit kaons undeflected TURTLE Simulation MS1 = 4 mm, MS2 = 5 mm, 4-Jaw and momentum collimators open, vary HS2 Vacuum window 6 cm target 54/19/2013

Longitudal acceptance for LESBIII for 800 MeV/c kaons and pions with EXB separators set to transmit kaons undeflected TURTLE Simulation MS1 = 4 mm, MS2 = 5 mm, 4-Jaw and momentum collimators open, vary HS2 6 cm target Vacuum window 64/19/2013

MS1 = 4 mm, MS2 = 5 mm, 4-Jaw and momentum collimators open, vary HS2 LESBIII vacuum window 6 cm target 74/19/2013

Turtle simulastion of “cloud pions” in LESBIII, MS1 = 4 mm, MS2 = 5 mm, 4-Jaw and momentum collimators open, HS2=+/- 1.5 cm, separators set to transmit kaons. x,y event distribution at center of production target gated by events that make it to the end Water cooled copper base Platinum target Avoid material here that could become secondary particle source Note orientation changes (y  -y) with separator field polarities 84/19/2013

Target design considerations Kaon beam optics – Short target favored due to longitudal acceptance and kaon beam purity – E949 settled on conservative 6 cm length K + production angle – peaked at 0 deg Target material – To maximize kaons flux consistent with short target need dense material, we picked platinum (21.5 g/cm 3 ) Kaon yield – Relative yields predicted by G4beamline (relative 600 MeV/c K + ’s in forward 45 deg cone with 24 GeV p’s) 6 cm Pt = cm Cu = cm C = cm Pt 95 GeV protons (ORKA) = /19/2013

Some Target Issues Inadvertent short spills from the AGS – In 1997 installed a spill monitor on the AGS extraction beam secondary emission detector (C10 SEC) – tripped beam off in ~100 msec if rate is > 100 TP/sec..it worked… Inadvertent high intensity spill – C-target temperature limit set to trip at 1000 deg C (melting point 1772 deg C). – Trip point chosen so that stress on the platinum and copper is less than half the maximum hard tensile yield strength as predicted by ANSYS Finite Element calculations. – Trip response time ~ 200 msec. – Typical administrative temperature limit for normal spills was 700 deg C. Target station became contaminated with activated debris from targets – Target should be enclosed with controlled environment to contain contamination (ours were not) Unresolved issue: – Had thermocouple or perhaps deteriorating Pt-Cu bond issue with 2002 target resulting in higher temperature (100 deg C or so) readings for hottest segments late in the run – unresolved as to cause. 104/19/2013

C-target (2490 hours of beam) 24 GeV protons, sec spill every sec, up to 72 TP available but shared with others, few x protons on target, admin. limit set at 50 TP for 2 sec spill at flat top (~700 deg C) “Workhorse Target” Pt, 5.1 x 5.1 x 60 mm (w x h x l) Silver soldered to copper 5 slots, 6 Pt segments 114/19/2013

C-Target: cm long 8 segment platinum, 5.1 mm wide x 3.8 mm high Platinum silver soldered to water cooled copper base Maximum ~30 x per 22 GeV beam Latest (Last) C-Target Design changes 124/19/2013

18 April GeV protons 56 x protons per spill 2.2 sec spill every 5.4 sec (41% DF) Maximum rate on this target was ~70 TP/2.2 sec flat top = 32 TP/sec Avg Power ~ 45 kW, peak ~110 kW 5R 4L 3R 6L 3R 4L 6L 5R (as measured with type k thermocouples, drilled and peened into platinum) 2.2 sec 134/19/2013

E949 targets and ORKA E949 target maximum protons per spill achieved (22 GeV beam) – ~70 TP/2.2 sec spill with 5.4 sec repetition ~ deg C temperature – Administrative limit was ~30 TP/sec at flat top – Peak power during spill = 110 kW – Average power = 45m kW So with 1000 deg C limit for the 2002 E949 target – The 2001 target design is good for ~ 90 TP or 40 TP/sec at flat top ORKA initial plans – 95 GeV protons – 48 TP/ 4.4 sec spill with 10 sec repetition – Peak power = 166 kW – Average power = 73 kW So with E target at ORKA – Temperature ~ 166/110 x ( ) = deg C This target design might be considered as a “day one” target for ORKA….but see next slides… 144/19/2013

Some “Dirty” Laundry……. 154/19/2013

“BEFORE” “AFTER” E949, last target design, 2002 ~0.5 x protons ~30-70 x protons per 2.2 sec spill 164/19/2013

A-Target (E865 - Zeller) after ~10-20TP/spill for a ? years 15 cm long copper target and water cooled base 174/19/2013

Path Forward… 184/19/2013

C-target upgrade – possible approach to a 100 TP Pt target (at ~24 GeV) Platinum rod segments Support spiders Water cooling Cu base dimensions in inches (A. Pendzick) This target design was under consideration for next generation C-target before DOE HEP lost interest in AGS experiments 194/19/2013

Thanks to I-H Chiang, Steve Kettell Charlie Pearson and Al Pendzick for helping remember the past! 204/19/2013

Bone yard 214/19/2013

3” thick steel movable shield 6” thick steel fixed shield LESBIII target front end magnet shield target 224/19/2013

~ TP/spill with interruptions for FEB pulse on demand to the g-2 experiment, 23 April /19/2013

1E6, 24 GeV protons on 5mm wide x 3.8 mm high x 60 mm long platinum target 200 mm radius detector 200 mm d/s tgt center G4beamline 244/19/2013

1E6, 24 GeV protons on 5mm wide x 3.8 mm high x 60 mm long platinum target 200 mm radius detector 200 mm d/s tgt center G4beamline 254/19/2013

1E6, 24 GeV protons on 5mm wide x 3.8 mm high x 60 mm long platinum target 200 mm radius detector 200 mm d/s tgt center G4beamline K + with MeV/c +/- 10 deg 264/19/2013

1E6, 24 GeV protons on 5mm wide x 3.8 mm high x 60 mm long copper target 200 mm radius detector 200 mm d/s tgt center G4beamline 274/19/2013

1E6, 24 GeV protons on 5mm wide x 3.8 mm high x 60 mm long carbon target 200 mm radius detector 200 mm d/s tgt center G4beamline 284/19/2013

1E5, 95 GeV protons on 5mm wide x 3.8 mm high x 60 mm long platinum target 200 mm radius detector 200 mm d/s tgt center G4beamline 294/19/2013

1E5, 95 GeV protons on 5mm wide x 3.8 mm high x 60 mm long platinum target 200 mm radius detector 200 mm d/s tgt center G4beamline 304/19/2013

1E5, 95 GeV protons on 5mm wide x 3.8 mm high x 60 mm long platinum target 200 mm radius detector 200 mm d/s tgt center G4beamline 314/19/2013

1E5, 95 GeV protons on 5mm wide x 3.8 mm high x 60 mm long platinum target 200 mm radius detector 200 mm d/s tgt center G4beamline 324/19/2013